Lumbar puncture

Lumbar puncture
Intervention
Lumbar puncture in a sitting position. The reddish-brown swirls on the patient's back are tincture of iodine (an antiseptic).
ICD-9-CM	03.31
MeSH	D013129
eMedicine	80773

A lumbar puncture (LP), also known as a spinal tap, is a medical procedure in which a needle is inserted into the spinal canal, most commonly to collect cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for diagnostic testing. The main reason for a lumbar puncture is to help diagnose diseases of the central nervous system, including the brain and spine. Examples of these conditions include meningitis and subarachnoid hemorrhage. It may also be used therapeutically in some conditions. Increased intracranial pressure (pressure in the skull) is a contraindication, due to risk of brain matter being compressed and pushed toward the spine. Sometimes, lumbar puncture cannot be performed safely (for example a severe bleeding tendency). It is regarded as a safe procedure, but post-dural-puncture headache is a common side effect.

The procedure is typically performed under local anesthesia using a sterile technique. A needle is used to access the subarachnoid space and fluid collected. Fluid may be sent for biochemical, microbiological, and cytological analysis.

Lumbar puncture was first introduced in 1891 by the German physician Heinrich Quincke.

Medical uses

The reason for a lumbar puncture may be to make a diagnosis^[1][2] or to treat a disease.^[1]

Diagnostic

The chief diagnostic indications of lumbar puncture are for collection of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Analysis of CSF may exclude infectious,^[1][3] inflammatory,^[1] and neoplastic diseases^[1] affecting the central nervous system. The most common purpose is in suspected meningitis,^[4] since there is no other reliable tool with which meningitis, a life-threatening but highly treatable condition, can be excluded. A lumbar puncture can also be used to detect whether someone has 'Stage 1' or 'Stage 2' Trypanosoma brucei. Young infants commonly require lumbar puncture as a part of the routine workup for fever without a source. This is due to higher rates of meningitis than in older persons. Infants also do not reliably show classic symptoms of meningeal irritation (meningismus) like neck stiffness and headache the way adults do.^[4] In any age group, subarachnoid hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, benign intracranial hypertension, and many other diagnoses may be supported or excluded with this test. It may also be used to detect the presence of malignant cells in the CSF, as in carcinomatous meningitis or medulloblastoma. CSF containing less than 10 red blood cells (RBCs)/mm³ constitutes a "negative" tap in the context of a workup for subarachnoid hemorrhage, for example. Taps that are "positive" have an RBC count of 100/mm³ or more.^[5]

Therapeutic

Lumbar punctures may also be done to inject medications into the cerebrospinal fluid ("intrathecally"), particularly for spinal anesthesia^[6] or chemotherapy.

Serial lumbar punctures may be useful in temporary treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). This disease is characterized by increased pressure of CSF which may cause headache and permanent loss of vision. While mainstays of treatment are medication, in some cases lumbar puncture performed multiple times may improve symptoms. It is not recommended as a staple of treatment due to discomfort and risk of the procedure, and the short duration of its efficacy.^[7][8]

Additionally, some people with normal pressure hydrocephalus (characterized by urinary incontinence, a changed ability to walk properly, and dementia) receive some relief of symptoms after removal of CSF.^[9]

Contraindications

Lumbar puncture should not be performed in the following situations:

• Idiopathic (unidentified cause) increased intracranial pressure (ICP)
  • Rationale: lumbar puncture in the presence of increased ICP may cause uncal herniation
  • Exception: therapeutic use of lumbar puncture to reduce ICP, but only if obstruction (for example in the third ventricle of the brain) has been ruled out
  • Precaution
    • CT brain, especially in the following situations
      • Age >65
      • Reduced GCS
      • Recent history of seizure
      • Focal neurological signs
      • Abnormal respiratory pattern
      • Hypertension with bradycardia and deteriorating consciousness
    • Ophthalmoscopy for papilledema
• Bleeding diathesis (relative)
  • Coagulopathy
  • Decreased platelet count (<50 x 10⁹/L)
• Infections
  • Skin infection at puncture site
• Vertebral deformities (scoliosis or kyphosis), in hands of an inexperienced physician.^[10][11]

Adverse effects

Post spinal headache with nausea is the most common complication; it often responds to analgesics and infusion of fluids. It was long taught that this complication can often be prevented by strict maintenance of a supine posture for two hours after the successful puncture; this has not been borne out in modern studies involving large numbers of patients. Merritt's Neurology (10th edition), in the section on lumbar puncture, notes that intravenous caffeine injection is often quite effective in aborting these so-called "spinal headaches." Contact between the side of the lumbar puncture needle and a spinal nerve root can result in anomalous sensations (paresthesia) in a leg during the procedure; this is harmless and patients can be warned about it in advance to minimize their anxiety if it should occur. A headache that is persistent despite a long period of bedrest and occurs only when sitting up may be indicative of a CSF leak from the lumbar puncture site. It can be treated by more bedrest, or by an epidural blood patch, where the patient's own blood is injected back into the site of leakage to cause a clot to form and seal off the leak.

Serious complications of a properly performed lumbar puncture are extremely rare.^[1] They include spinal or epidural bleeding, adhesive arachnoiditis and trauma to the spinal cord^[6] or spinal nerve roots resulting in weakness or loss of sensation, or even paraplegia. The latter is exceedingly rare, since the level at which the spinal cord ends (normally the inferior border of L1, although it is slightly lower in infants) is several vertebral spaces above the proper location for a lumbar puncture (L3/L4). There are case reports of lumbar puncture resulting in perforation of abnormal dural arterio-venous malformations, resulting in catastrophic epidural hemorrhage; this is exceedingly rare.^[6]

The procedure is not recommended when epidural infection is present or suspected, when topical infections or dermatological conditions pose a risk of infection at the puncture site or in patients with severe psychosis or neurosis with back pain. Some authorities believe that withdrawal of fluid when initial pressures are abnormal could result in spinal cord compression or cerebral herniation; others believe that such events are merely coincidental in time, occurring independently as a result of the same pathology that the lumbar puncture was performed to diagnose. In any case, computed tomography of the brain is often performed prior to lumbar puncture if an intracranial mass is suspected.^[12]

Technique

Mechanism

The brain and spinal cord are enveloped by a layer of fluid, 125-150 ml in total (in adults) which acts as a shock absorber and provides a medium for the transfer of nutrients and waste products. The majority is produced by the choroid plexus in the brain and circulates from there to other areas, before being reabsorbed into the circulation (predominantly by the arachnoid granulations).^[13]

The cerebrospinal fluid can be accessed most safely in the lumbar cistern. Below the first or second lumbar vertebrae (L1 or L2) the spinal cord terminates (conus medularis). Nerves continue down the spine below this, but in a loose bundle of nerve fibers called the cauda equina. There is lower risk with inserting a needle into the spine at the level of the cauda equina because these loose fibers move out of the way of the needle without being damaged.^[13] The lumbar cistern extends into the sacrum.^[13]

Procedure

Illustration depicting lumbar puncture (spinal tap)

Spinal needles used in lumbar puncture.

Illustration depicting common positions for lumbar puncture procedure.

The patient is usually placed on their side (left more commonly than right). The patient bends the neck so the chin is close to the chest, hunches the back, and brings knees toward the chest. This approximates a fetal position as much as possible. Patients may also sit on a stool and bend their head and shoulders forward. The area around the lower back is prepared using aseptic technique. Once the appropriate location is palpated, local anaesthetic is infiltrated under the skin and then injected along the intended path of the spinal needle. A spinal needle is inserted between the lumbar vertebrae L3/L4, L4/L5^[6] or L5/S1^[6] and pushed in until there is a "give." This indicates the needle has passed the ligamentum flavum. The needle is again pushed until there is a second 'give' that indicates the needle is now past the dura mater. The arachnoid membrane and the dura mater exist in flush contact with one another in the living person's spine due to fluid pressure from CSF in the subarachnoid space pushing the arachnoid membrane out towards the dura. Therefore, once the needle has pierced the dura mater it has also traversed the thinner arachnoid membrane. The needle is then in the subarachnoid space. The stylet from the spinal needle is then withdrawn and drops of cerebrospinal fluid are collected. The opening pressure of the cerebrospinal fluid may be taken during this collection by using a simple column manometer. The procedure is ended by withdrawing the needle while placing pressure on the puncture site. The spinal level is so selected to avoid spinal injuries.^[6] In the past, the patient would lie on their back for at least six hours and be monitored for signs of neurological problems. There is no scientific evidence that this provides any benefit. The technique described is almost identical to that used in spinal anesthesia, except that spinal anesthesia is more often done with the patient in a seated position.

The upright seated position is advantageous in that there is less distortion of spinal anatomy which allows for easier withdrawal of fluid. Some practitioners prefer it for lumbar puncture in obese patients, where lying on their side would cause a scoliosis and unreliable anatomical landmarks. However, opening pressures are notoriously unreliable when measured in the seated position. Therefore, patients will ideally lay on their side if practitioners need to measure opening pressure.

Reinsertion of the stylet may decrease the rate of post lumbar puncture headaches.^[11]

Although not available in all clinical settings, use of ultrasound is helpful for visualizing the interspinous space and assessing the depth of the spine from the skin. Use of ultrasound reduces the number of needle insertions and redirections, and results in higher rates of successful lumbar puncture.^[14]

Special consideration for pediatric patients

In children, a sitting flexed position was as successful as lying on the side with respect to obtaining non-traumatic CSF, CSF for culture, and cell count. There was a higher success rate in obtaining CSF in the first attempt in infants younger than 12 months in the sitting flexed position.^[15]

The spine of an infant at the time of birth differs from the adult spine. The conus medularis (bottom of the spinal cord) terminates at the level of L1 in adults, but may range in term neonates (newly born babies) from L1-L3 levels.^[16] It is important to insert the spinal needle below the conus medularis at the L3/L4 or L4/L5 interspinous levels.^[17] With growth of the spine, the conus typically reaches the adult level (L1) by 2 years of age.^[16]

The ligamentum flavum and dura mater are not as thick in infants and children as they are in adults. Therefore, it is difficult to assess when the needle passes through them into the subarachnoid space because the characteristic "pop" or "give" may be subtle or nonexistent in the pediatric lumbar puncture. To decrease the chances of inserting the spinal needle too far, some clinicians use the "Cincinnati" method. This method involves removing the stylet of the spinal needle once the needle has advanced through the dermis. After removal of the stylet, the needle is inserted until CSF starts to come out of the needle. Once all of the CSF is collected, the stylet is then reinserted before removal of the needle.^[17]

Interpretation

Analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid generally includes a cell count and determination of the glucose and protein concentrations. The other analytical studies of cerebrospinal fluid are conducted according to the diagnostic suspicion.^[1]

Pressure determination

Lumbar puncture in a child suspected of having meningitis.

Increased CSF pressure can indicate congestive heart failure, cerebral edema, subarachnoid hemorrhage, hypo-osmolality resulting from hemodialysis, meningeal inflammation, purulent meningitis or tuberculous meningitis, hydrocephalus, or pseudotumor cerebri.^[18] In the setting of raised pressure (or normal pressure hydrocephalus, where the pressure is normal but there is excessive CSF), lumbar puncture may be therapeutic.^[18]

Decreased CSF pressure can indicate complete subarachnoid blockage, leakage of spinal fluid, severe dehydration, hyperosmolality, or circulatory collapse. Significant changes in pressure during the procedure can indicate tumors or spinal blockage resulting in a large pool of CSF, or hydrocephalus associated with large volumes of CSF.^[13]

Cell count

The presence of white blood cells in cerebrospinal fluid is called pleocytosis. A small number of monocytes can be normal; the presence of granulocytes is always an abnormal finding. A large number of granulocytes often heralds bacterial meningitis. White cells can also indicate reaction to repeated lumbar punctures, reactions to prior injections of medicines or dyes, central nervous system hemorrhage, leukemia, recent epileptic seizure, or a metastatic tumor. When peripheral blood contaminates the withdrawn CSF, a common procedural complication, white blood cells will be present along with erythrocytes, and their ratio will be the same as that in the peripheral blood.

The finding of erythrophagocytosis,^[19] where phagocytosed erythrocytes are observed, signifies haemorrhage into the CSF that preceded the lumbar puncture. Therefore, when erythrocytes are detected in the CSF sample, erythrophagocytosis suggests causes other than a traumatic tap, such as intracranial haemorrhage and haemorrhagic herpetic encephalitis. In which case, further investigations are warranted, including imaging and viral culture.

Microbiology

CSF can be sent to the microbiology lab for various types of smears and cultures to diagnose infections.

• Gram staining may demonstrate bacteria in bacterial meningitis.^[20]
• Microbiological culture is the gold standard for detecting bacterial meningitis. Bacteria, fungi, and viruses can all be cultured by using different techniques.
• Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been a great advance in the diagnosis of some types of meningitis, such as meningitis from herpesvirus and enterovirus. It has high sensitivity and specificity for many infections of the CNS, is fast, and can be done with small volumes of CSF. Even though testing is expensive, cost analyses of PCR testing in neonatal patients demonstrated savings via reduced cost of hospitalization.^[21][22]
• Numerous antibody-mediated tests for CSF are available in some countries: these include rapid tests for antigens of common bacterial pathogens, treponemal titers for the diagnosis of neurosyphilis and Lyme disease, Coccidioides antibody, and others.
• The India ink test is still used for detection of meningitis caused by Cryptococcus neoformans,^[23][24] but the cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) test has a higher sensitivity.^[25]

Chemistry

Several substances found in cerebrospinal fluid are available for diagnostic measurement.

• Glucose is present in the CSF; the level is usually about 60% that in the peripheral circulation.^[26] A fingerstick or venipuncture at the time of lumbar puncture may therefore be performed to assess peripheral glucose levels and determine a predicted CSF glucose value. Decreased glucose levels^[27] can indicate fungal, tuberculous^[28] or pyogenic infections; lymphomas; leukemia spreading to the meninges; meningoencephalitic mumps; or hypoglycemia. A glucose level of less than one third of blood glucose levels in association with low CSF lactate levels is typical in hereditary CSF glucose transporter deficiency also known as De Vivo disease.^[29]
• Increased glucose levels in the fluid can indicate diabetes, although the 60% rule still applies.^[30][31]
• Increased levels of glutamine^[32] are often involved with hepatic encephalopathies,^[33][34] Reye's syndrome,^[35][36] hepatic coma, cirrhosis,^[34] hypercapnia and depression.^[37]
• Increased levels of lactate can occur the presence of cancer of the CNS, multiple sclerosis, heritable mitochondrial disease, low blood pressure, low serum phosphorus, respiratory alkalosis, idiopathic seizures, traumatic brain injury, cerebral ischemia, brain abscess, hydrocephalus, hypocapnia or bacterial meningitis.^[30]
• The enzyme lactate dehydrogenase can be measured to help distinguish meningitides of bacterial origin, which are often associated with high levels of the enzyme, from those of viral origin in which the enzyme is low or absent.^[38]
• Changes in total protein content of cerebrospinal fluid can result from pathologically increased permeability of the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier,^[39] obstructions of CSF circulation, meningitis, neurosyphilis, brain abscesses, subarachnoid hemorrhage, polio, collagen disease or Guillain-Barré syndrome, leakage of CSF, increases in intracranial pressure or hyperthyroidism. Very high levels of protein may indicate tuberculous meningitis or spinal block.
• IgG synthetic rate is calculated from measured IgG and total protein levels; it is elevated in immune disorders such as multiple sclerosis, transverse myelitis, and neuromyelitis optica of Devic. Oligoclonal bands may be detected in CSF but not in serum, suggesting intrathecal antibody production.

Cause	Appearance[40]	Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes[20]	Lymphocytes[20]	Protein[20]	Glucose[20]
Pyogenic bacterial meningitis	Yellowish, turbid	Markedly increased	Slightly increased or Normal	Markedly increased	Very Decreased
Viral meningitis	Clear fluid	Slightly increased or Normal	Markedly increased	Slightly increased or Normal	Normal or Mildly Decreased
Tuberculous meningitis	Yellowish and viscous	Slightly increased or Normal	Increased	Markedly Increased	Decreased
Fungal meningitis	Yellowish and viscous	Slightly increased or Normal	Markedly increased	Slightly increased or Normal (increase may be delayed)	Normal or Mildly Decreased

History

Lumbar puncture, early 20th century.

The first technique for accessing the dural space was described by the London physician Walter Essex Wynter. In 1889 he developed a crude cut down with cannulation in four patients with tuberculous meningitis. The main purpose was the treatment of raised intracranial pressure rather than for diagnosis.^[41] The technique for needle lumbar puncture was then introduced by the German physician Heinrich Quincke, who credits Wynter with the earlier discovery; he first reported his experiences at an internal medicine conference in Wiesbaden, Germany, in 1891.^[42] He subsequently published a book on the subject.^[43][44]

The lumbar puncture procedure was taken to the United States by Arthur H. Wentworth an assistant professor at the Harvard Medical School, based at Children's Hospital. In 1893 he published a long paper on diagnosing cerebrospinal meningitis by examining spinal fluid.^[45] However, he was criticized by antivivisectionists for having obtained spinal fluid from children. He was acquitted, but, nevertheless, he was uninvited from the then forming Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, where he would have been the first professor of pediatrics.

Historically lumbar punctures were also employed in the process of performing a pneumoencephalography, a nowadays obsolete X-ray imaging study of the brain that was performed extensively from the 1920s until the advent of modern non-invasive neuroimaging techniques such as MRI and CT in the 1970s. During this quite painful procedure, CSF was replaced with air or some other gas via the lumbar puncture in order to enhance the appearance of certain areas of the brain on plain radiographs.

References

1. Sempere, AP; Berenguer-Ruiz, L; Lezcano-Rodas, M; Mira-Berenguer, F; Waez, M (1–15 October 2007). "Lumbar puncture: its indications, contraindications, complications and technique". Revista de neurologia 45 (7): 433–6. PMID 17918111.
2. Gröschel, K; Schnaudigel, S; Pilgram, SM; Wasser, K; Kastrup, A (January 2008). "The diagnostic lumbar puncture". Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 133 (1–2): 39–41. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1017470. PMID 18095209.
3. Matata, C; Michael, B; Garner, V; Solomon, T (24–30 October 2012). "Lumbar puncture: diagnosing acute central nervous system infections". Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987) 27 (8): 49–56; quiz 58. doi:10.7748/ns2012.10.27.8.49.c9364. PMID 23189602.
4. Visintin, C.; Mugglestone, M. A.; Fields, E. J.; Jacklin, P.; Murphy, M. S.; Pollard, A. J.; Guideline Development Group; National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (28 June 2010). "Management of bacterial meningitis and meningococcal septicaemia in children and young people: summary of NICE guidance". BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 340: c3209. doi:10.1136/bmj.c3209. PMID 20584794.
5. Mann, David (2002). "The role of lumbar puncture in the diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage when computed tomography is unavailable.". Journal of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 4 (2): 102–105.
6. López, T; Sánchez, FJ; Garzón, JC; Muriel, C (January 2012). "Spinal anesthesia in pediatric patients". Minerva anestesiologica 78 (1): 78–87. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03769.x. PMID 22211775Epub 2011 Dec 28
7. Biousse, V. "Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Diagnosis, monitoring and treatment". Revue Neurologique 168 (10): 673–683. doi:10.1016/j.neurol.2012.07.018.
8. KESLER, ANAT; KUPFERMINC, MICHAEL. "Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension and Pregnancy". Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 56 (2): 389–396. doi:10.1097/grf.0b013e31828f2701.
9. Gallia, Gary L.; Rigamonti, Daniele; Williams, Michael A. (2005-01-01). "The diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus". Nature Clinical Practice Neurology 2 (7): 375–381. doi:10.1038/ncpneuro0237.
10. Roos KL (March 2003). "Lumbar puncture". Semin Neurol 23 (1): 105–14. doi:10.1055/s-2003-40758. PMID 12870112.
11. Straus SE, Thorpe KE, Holroyd-Leduc J (October 2006). "How do I perform a lumbar puncture and analyze the results to diagnose bacterial meningitis?". JAMA 296 (16): 2012–22. doi:10.1001/jama.296.16.2012. PMID 17062865.
12. Joffe, Ari R. (2007-07-01). "Lumbar Puncture and Brain Herniation in Acute Bacterial Meningitis: A Review". Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 22 (4): 194–207. doi:10.1177/0885066607299516. ISSN 0885-0666. PMID 17712055.
13. Wright, B.L.; Lai, J.T.; Sinclair, A.J. (2012). "Cerebrospinal fluid and lumbar puncture: a practical review". Journal of Neurology 259 (8): 1530–1545. doi:10.1007/s00415-012-6413-x. PMID 22278331.
14. Shaikh, Furqan; Brzezinski, Jack; Alexander, Sarah; Arzola, Cristian; Carvalho, Jose C. A.; Beyene, Joseph; Sung, Lillian (2013-01-01). "Ultrasound imaging for lumbar punctures and epidural catheterisations: systematic review and meta-analysis". BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 346: f1720. doi:10.1136/bmj.f1720. ISSN 1756-1833. PMID 23532866.
15. Hanson, Amy L.; Ros, Simon; Soprano, Joyce. "Analysis of Infant Lumbar Puncture Success Rates". Pediatric Emergency Care 30 (5): 311–314. doi:10.1097/PEC.0000000000000119.
16. Cramer, Gregory D.; Yu, Shi-Wei (2014-01-01). Darby, Gregory D. CramerSusan A., ed. Chapter 13 - Unique Anatomic Features of the Pediatric Spine. Saint Louis: Mosby. pp. 566–585. doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-07954-9.00013-x. ISBN 978-0-323-07954-9.
17. Bonadio, William. "Pediatric Lumbar Puncture and Cerebrospinal Fluid Analysis". The Journal of Emergency Medicine 46 (1): 141–150. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.056.
18. Wright, Ben L. C.; Lai, James T. F.; Sinclair, Alexandra J. (2012-01-26). "Cerebrospinal fluid and lumbar puncture: a practical review". Journal of Neurology 259 (8): 1530–1545. doi:10.1007/s00415-012-6413-x. ISSN 0340-5354. PMID 22278331.
19. Harald Kluge (2007). Atlas of CSF cytology. Thieme. pp. 45–46. ISBN 978-3-13-143161-5. Retrieved 28 October 2010.
20. Pearson, Justin; Fuller, Geraint. "Lumbar punctures and cerebrospinal fluid analysis". Medicine 40 (8): 459–462. doi:10.1016/j.mpmed.2012.05.005.
21. Nigrovic, L. E.; Chiang, V. W. (2000-08-01). "Cost analysis of enteroviral polymerase chain reaction in infants with fever and cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis". Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 154 (8): 817–821. doi:10.1001/archpedi.154.8.817. ISSN 1072-4710. PMID 10922279.
22. Rand, Kenneth; Houck, Herbert; Lawrence, Robert (2005-10-01). "Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Herpes Simplex Virus in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Cost Savings from Earlier Hospital Discharge". The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD 7 (4): 511–516. doi:10.1016/s1525-1578(10)60582-x. ISSN 1525-1578. PMC 1888494. PMID 16237221.
23. Zerpa, R; Huicho, L; Guillén, A (September 1996). "Modified India ink preparation for Cryptococcus neoformans in cerebrospinal fluid specimens." (PDF). Journal of clinical microbiology 34 (9): 2290–1. PMID 8862601.
24. Shashikala; Kanungo, R; Srinivasan, S; Mathew, R; Kannan, M (Jul–Sep 2004). "Unusual morphological forms of Cryptococcus neoformans in cerebrospinal fluid.". Indian journal of medical microbiology 22 (3): 188–90. PMID 17642731.
25. Antinori, Spinello; Radice, Anna; Galimberti, Laura; Magni, Carlo; Fasan, Marco; Parravicini, Carlo (November 2005). "The role of cryptococcal antigen assay in diagnosis and monitoring of cryptococcal meningitis.". Journal of clinical microbiology 43 (11): 5828–9. doi:10.1128/JCM.43.11.5828-5829.2005. PMC 1287839. PMID 16272534.
26. Nigrovic, Lise E.; Kimia, Amir A.; Shah, Samir S.; Neuman, Mark I. (9 February 2012). "Relationship between Cerebrospinal Fluid Glucose and Serum Glucose". New England Journal of Medicine 366 (6): 576–578. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1111080. PMID 22316468.
27. Hendry, E (June 1939). "The blood and spinal fluid sugar and chloride content in meningitis". Archives of Disease in Childhood 14 (78): 159–72. doi:10.1136/adc.14.78.159. PMC 1975626. PMID 21032142.
28. Gierson, HW; Marx, JI (April 1955). "Tuberculous meningitis: the diagnostic and prognostic significance of spinal fluid sugar and chloride". Annals of Internal Medicine 42 (4): 902–8. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-42-4-902. PMID 14362261.
29. De Vivo, Darryl C.; Trifiletti, Rosario R.; Jacobson, Ronald I.; Ronen, Gabriel M.; Behmand, Ramin A.; Harik, Sami I. (5 September 1991). "Defective Glucose Transport across the Blood-Brain Barrier as a Cause of Persistent Hypoglycorrhachia, Seizures, and Developmental Delay". New England Journal of Medicine 325 (10): 703–709. doi:10.1056/NEJM199109053251006. PMID 1714544.
30. Leen, Wilhelmina G.; Willemsen, Michèl A.; Wevers, Ron A.; Verbeek, Marcel M.; Mendelson, John E. (5 August 2012). Mendelson, John E, ed. "Cerebrospinal Fluid Glucose and Lactate: Age-Specific Reference Values and Implications for Clinical Practice". PLoS ONE 7 (8): e42745. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042745. PMC 3412827. PMID 22880096.
31. Servo, C; Pitkänen, E (December 1975). "Variation in polyol levels in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in diabetic patients". Diabetologia 11 (6): 575–80. doi:10.1007/BF01222109. PMID 1205026.
32. "Cerebrospinal Fluid Glutamine". clinicallabtesting.com. Retrieved 11 August 2013.
33. Hourani, Benjamin T.; Hamlin, EM; Reynolds, TB (1 June 1971). "Cerebrospinal Fluid Glutamine as a Measure of Hepatic Encephalopathy". Archives of Internal Medicine 127 (6): 1033–6. doi:10.1001/archinte.1971.00310180049005. PMID 5578559.
34. Cascino, A.; Cangiano, C.; Fiaccadori, F.; Ghinelli, F.; Merli, M.; Pelosi, G.; Riggio, O.; Rossi Fanelli, F.; Sacchini, D.; Stortoni, M.; Capocaccia, L. (September 1982). "Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid amino acid patterns in hepatic encephalopathy". Digestive diseases and sciences 27 (9): 828–32. doi:10.1007/BF01391377. PMID 7105954.
35. Glasgow, Allen M.; Dhiensiri, Kamnual (June 1974). "Improved Assay for Spinal Fluid Glutamine, and Values for Children with Reye's Syndrome" (PDF). Clinical Chemistry 20 (6): 642–644. PMID 4830166.
36. Watanabe, A; Takei, N; Higashi, T; Shiota, T; Nakatsukasa, H; Fujiwara, M; Sakata, T; Nagashima, H (October 1984). "Glutamic acid and glutamine levels in serum and cerebrospinal fluid in hepatic encephalopathy". Biochemical medicine 32 (2): 225–31. doi:10.1016/0006-2944(84)90076-0. PMID 6150706.
37. Levine, J; Panchalingam, K; Rapoport, A; Gershon, S; McClure, RJ; Pettegrew, JW (1 April 2000). "Increased cerebrospinal fluid glutamine levels in depressed patients". Biological Psychiatry 47 (7): 586–93. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00284-X. PMID 10745050.
38. Jay H. Stein (1998). Internal Medicine. Elsevier Health Sciences. pp. 1408–. ISBN 978-0-8151-8698-4. Retrieved 12 August 2013.
39. Reiber, Hansotto (2003). "Proteins in cerebrospinal fluid and blood: Barriers, CSF flow rate and source-related dynamics" (PDF). Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 21 (3–4): 79–96. PMID 14530572.
40. Conly, John M.; Ronald, Allan R. "Cerebrospinal fluid as a diagnostic body fluid". The American Journal of Medicine 75 (1): 102–108. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(83)90080-3.
41. Wynter W. E. (1891). "Four Cases of Tubercular Meningitis in Which Paracentesis of the Theca Vertebralis Was Performed for the Relief of Fluid Pressure". Lancet 1 (3531): 981–2. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)16784-5.
42. Quincke HI (1891). Verhandlungen des Congresses für Innere Medizin, Zehnter Congress, Wiesbaden 10. pp. 321–331.
43. Quincke HI (1902). Die Technik der Lumbalpunktion. Berlin & Vienna.
44. Heinrich Irenaeus Quincke at Who Named It?
45. Susan E. Lederer (1997). Subjected to Science: Human Experimentation in America Before the Second World War. JHU Press. p. 216. ISBN 9780801857096.. Page 62 has a reference to an 1896 publication in Boston Med. Surg. J

External links

• Ellenby, MS; Tegtmeyer, K; Lai, S; Braner, DA (28 September 2006). "Videos in clinical medicine. Lumbar puncture". The New England Journal of Medicine 355 (13): e12. doi:10.1056/NEJMvcm054952. PMID 17005943.