M11 link road protest

Route of the M11 link road overlaid over an older map of the area, with key protest sites marked

The M11 link road protest was a major anti-road protest in Leytonstone, London, United Kingdom, in the early to mid-1990s opposing the construction of the "A12 Hackney to M11 link road", also known as the M11 Link Road, which was part of a significant local road scheme to connect traffic from the East Cross Route to the M11, avoiding urban streets.

The road had been proposed since the 1960s, as part of the London Ringways, and was an important link between central London and the Docklands to East Anglia. Over the years, though, road protests elsewhere had become increasingly visible, and urban road building had fallen out of favour with the public. Local Member of Parliament Harry Cohen had been a particular vocal opponent of this scheme.

The protests reached a new level of visibility during 1993 as part of a grassroots campaign where protesters came from outside the area to support the local opposition of the road. The initial focus was on the removal of a tree on George Green, east of Wanstead, that attracted the attention of local, then national media. The activity peaked in 1994 with several high-profile protesters setting up micronations on property scheduled for demolition, most notably on Claremont Road in Leyton. The final stage of the protest was a single building on Fillebrook Road in Leytonstone, which, due to a security blunder, became occupied by squatters.

The road was eventually built as planned, and opened to traffic in 1999, but the increased costs involved in management and policing of protesters raised the profile of such campaigns in the United Kingdom, and contributed to several road schemes being cancelled or reviewed later on in the decade. Those involved in the protest moved on to oppose other schemes in the country, while opinions of the road as built have since been mixed. By 2014, the road had become the ninth most congested in the entire country.[1]

Background

The origin of the link road stems from what were two major arterial roads out of London (the A11 to Newmarket and Norwich, and the A12 to Colchester, Ipswich and Great Yarmouth) and subsequent improvements. The first of these was the Eastern Avenue improvement, that opened on 9 June 1924,[2] which provided a bypass of the old road through Ilford and Romford.

Proposals for the route first arose in the 1960s as part of the London Ringways plan, which would have seen four concentric circular motorways built in the city, together with radial routes, with the M11 motorway ending on Ringway 1, the innermost Ringway, at Hackney Marsh.[3]

The planned London Ringways.

A section of Ringway 1 known as the East Cross Route was built to motorway standards in the late 1960s and early 1970s and designated as the A102(M). A section of the M11 connecting Ringway 2 (now part of the North Circular Road) and Eastern Avenue to Harlow was completed in the late 1970s,[4] opening to traffic in 1977.[5]

The Ringways scheme met considerable opposition; there were protests when the Westway, an urban motorway elevated over the streets of Paddington, was opened in 1970, with local MP John Wheeler later describing the road's presence within 15 metres of properties as "completely unacceptable environmentally,"[6] and the Archway Road public inquiry was repeatedly abandoned during the 1970s as a result of protests.[7][8] The first Link Road Action Group to resist the M11 link road was formed in 1976,[9] and for the next fifteen years activists fought government plans through a series of public inquiries. Their alternative was to build a road tunnel, leaving the houses untouched, but this was rejected on grounds of cost.[10] By 1974, the Greater London Council announced it would not be completing Ringway 1.[11] Drivers travelling in the areas where the new roads would have been built had to continue using long stretches of urban single-carriageway roads. In particular, the suburbs of Leyton, Leytonstone and Wanstead suffered serious traffic congestion.[12][13]

The Roads for Prosperity white paper published in 1989 detailed a major expansion of the road building programme and included plans for the M12 Motorway between London and Chelmsford, as well as many other road schemes.[14] Although Harry Cohen, MP for Leyton and Wanstead suggested in May 1989 that the government should scrap the scheme,[15] a public enquiry was held for the scheme in November.[16]

The protest campaign in East London

The Humble Petition of The Stop the M11 Link Road Action Campaign sheweth: That the A12 Hackney Wick to M11 Link Road will be injurious to the health and well being of the Petitioners insofar as it will cause homelessness through their homes being demolished with in many instances no replacement being offered, it will cause ill health through noise and pollution and will be unfavourable to the community at large.

Petition submitted to the House of Commons, June 1990[17]

By the 1980s, planning blight had affected the area and many of the houses had become home to a community of artists and squatters.[18] Eventually, contractors were appointed to carry out the work and a compulsory purchase of property along the proposed route was undertaken.[10] In March 1993, in preparation for the construction of the road, the Earl of Caithness, then the Minister of State for Transport, estimated that there would be 263 properties scheduled for demolition, displacing 550 people, of which he estimated 172 were seeking rehousing.[19] Several original residents, who had in some cases lived in their homes all their lives, refused to sell or move out of their properties.[20]

Protesters from the local area against the link road scheme were joined by large numbers of anti-road campaigners from around the UK and beyond, attracted by the availability of free housing along the route. These experienced protesters, who had participated in earlier events such as the Anti-Nazi League riots in Welling,[21] gave impetus to the campaign. The new arrivals used the skills they had developed during prior protests to construct "defences", blocking the original entrances to the houses and creating new routes directly between them.[10]

Sophisticated techniques were used to delay the construction of the road. Sit-ins and site invasions were combined with sabotage to stop construction work temporarily. This led to large numbers of police and constant security patrols being employed to protect the construction sites, at great expense. By December 1994, the total cost of construction had been estimated at £6 million and rising by £500,000 every month.[22]

The protesters were successful in publicising the campaign, with most UK newspapers and TV news programmes covering the protests on a regular basis. Desktop publishing, then in its infancy, was used to produce publicity materials for the campaign[23] and send out faxes to the media.[24] When the government began evicting residents along the route and demolishing the empty houses, the protesters set up so-called "autonomous republics" such as "Wanstonia" in some groups of the houses.[25][26] Extreme methods were used to force the engineers to halt demolition, including underground tunnels with protesters secured within by concrete.[27]

The chestnut tree on George Green

The chestnut tree on George Green, Wanstead became a focal point and a symbol for anti-M11 Link Road protesters.[28]

Until late 1993, local opposition to the M11 extension had been relatively limited. While opposition had been going for nearly ten years, institutional avenues of protest had been exhausted, and local residents were largely resigned to the road being built.[29] When outside protesters arrived in September 1993, few residents saw their mission as "their campaign".[30]

One section of the M11 extension was due to tunnel under George Green in Wanstead. Residents had believed that this would save their green, and a 250-year-old sweet chestnut tree that grew upon it,[31] but because this was a cut and cover tunnel, this required the tree to be cut down.[31]

Support for the protests started to extend to the local community when Jean Gosling, a lollipop lady in Wanstead, upon learning of the tree's impending destruction, rallied the support of local children (and was later fired from her job for doing so while wearing her uniform[26][32]), who in turn recruited their parents into the protests.[33] It was then that the non-resident radicals realised that they had significant local support.[31] When local residents gathered for a tree dressing ceremony on 6 November, they found their way barred by security fencing. With support from the protesters, they pulled it down.[31][25]

Protesters continued to delay the destruction of the tree. Solicitors for the campaign had even argued in court that receipt of a letter addressed to the tree itself gave it the status of a legal dwelling, causing a further delay,.[31][34] In the early morning of 7 December 1993, several hundred police arrived to evict the protesters,[lower-alpha 1] which took ten hours to carry out.[lower-alpha 2] Protesters made numerous complaints against the police;[36] police, in turn, denied these allegations, attributing any misbehaviour to the protesters.[lower-alpha 3] Media attention started to increase regarding the protest, with several daily newspapers putting pictures of the tree on their front pages.[31]

Local MP Cohen started to become scathing about the scheme and its progress. In March 1994, he said "the Department of Transport's pig-headed approach to the M11 link road has been a shambles, and a costly one at that," and described the ongoing police presence as "a miniature equivalent of the Iraqi occupation of Kuwait."[26] According to him, squatter Hugh Jones had been threatened by demolition men wielding sledgehammers and pickaxes, adding "the project has cost £500,000 in police time alone, to take over and demolish a 250-year-old chestnut tree and half a dozen houses"[26]

Claremont Road

The view from the tower in Claremont Road, Leyton.

By 1994, properties scheduled for demolition had been compulsory purchased, and most were made uninhabitable by removing kitchens, bathrooms and staircases. The notable exception was in one small street, Claremont Road, which ran immediately next to the Central line and consequently required every property on it to be demolished.[27] The street was almost completely occupied by protesters except for one original resident who had not taken up the Department for Transport's offer to move, 92-year-old Dolly Watson, who was born in number 32 and had lived there nearly all her life.[37][38][39] She became friends with the anti-road protesters, saying "they're not dirty hippy squatters, they're the grandchildren I never had."[39] The protesters named a watchtower, built from scaffold poles, after her.[40]

A vibrant and harmonious community sprung up on the road, which even won the begrudging respect of the authorities.[41] The houses were painted with extravagant designs, both internally and externally, and sculptures erected in the road;[27][42][43] the road became an artistic spectacle that one said "had to be seen to be believed".[44]

In November 1994, the eviction of Claremont Road took place, bringing an end to the M11 link road resistance as a major physical protest. Bailiffs, accompanied by the police in full riot gear, carried out the eviction over several days, and the Central line, running adjacent to the road, was suspended. As soon as eviction was completed, the remaining properties were demolished.[27] In the end, the cost to the taxpayer was over a million pounds in police costs alone.[45] Quoting David Maclean, "I understand from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis that the cost of policing the protest in order to allow bailiffs to take possession of the premises in Claremont road was £1,014,060." Cohen complained in parliament about police brutality, stating "were not many of my constituents bullied—including vulnerable people, and others whose only crime was living on the line of route?"[22] The then Secretary of State for Transport, Brian Mawhinney, pointed out that there had already been three public enquiries at which protesters could have lodged their objections against the line of the route.[22]

Towards the end

"Munstonia" as pictured in an Earth First! leaflet

Following the Claremont Road eviction, non-resident protesters moved on to other sites such as Newbury. Meanwhile, Fillebrook Road near Leytonstone tube station had already had several houses demolished on it due to problems with vandalism. [46] By 1995, the only house left standing was number 135.[47] The house was originally scheduled for demolition at the same time as the others, but had been left standing in order to give the tenant additional time to relocate. After they had done so, on 11 April 1995, the Department for Transport removed the water supply and part of the roof, and left two security guards on duty. When the guards decided to sleep overnight in their cars that evening, leaving the house unoccupied, the protesters moved in.[48] The house was renamed Munstonia (after The Munsters, thanks to its spooky appearance). Like "Wanstonia", they proclaimed themselves a micro-nation and designed their own national anthem and flag, though author Joe Moran mentions their legitimacy was complicated by the protesters continuing to claim unemployment benefits from the "mother country."[49]

The eviction on Fillebrook Road, Leytonstone in June 1995

A tower was built out of the remains of the roof, similar to one that had existed at Claremont Road, and a system of defences and blockades were built. A core of around 30 protesters ensured that there were always people staying there (a legal requirement for a squatted home, as well as a defence against eviction).[48] They were finally evicted on 21 June 1995, whereupon, as at Claremont Road, the building was immediately demolished. The total cost of removing the protesters from Munstonia was given to be £239,349.52, not including additional costs of security guards.[47]

Construction of the road, already under way by this stage, was then free to continue largely unhindered, although systematic sabotage of building sites by local people continued. It was completed in 1999 and given the designation A12; its continuation, the former A102(M), was also given this number as far as the Blackwall Tunnel.

The official opening of the road in October 1999 took place without fanfare, being opened by the Highways Agency Chief Executive rather than a politician, with only journalists with passes being admitted to the ceremony.[50]

Consequences of the protest campaign

The M11 link road protest was ultimately unsuccessful in its aim to stop the building of the link road. The total cost of compensation for the project was estimated to be around £15 million.[51]

Proposals for the M12 motorway were cancelled in 1994 during the first review of the trunk road programme.[52] The most significant response from the government occurred when Labour came into office following the 1997 general election, with the announcement of the New Deal for Trunk Roads in England. This proposal cancelled many previous road schemes, including the construction of the M65 over the Pennines, increased fuel prices, and ensured that road projects would only be undertaken when genuinely necessary,[53] stating "there will be no presumption in favour of new road building as an answer."[54]

Some protesters went on to join the direct action campaign Reclaim the Streets.[55][56][57] A protester arrested and detained on the grounds of breach of the peace unsuccessfully challenged the UK Government's legislation at the European Court of Justice.[58]

In 2002, in response to a major new road building programme and expansion of aviation,[59] a delegation of road protest veterans visited the Department for Transport to warn of renewed direct action in response, delivering a D-lock as a symbol of the past protests.[60] One such protestor, Rebecca Lush Blum went on to found Road Block to support road protesters and challenge the government. In 2007, Road Block became a project within the Campaign for Better Transport[61]

In 2007, the BBC reported that the cost of the M11 link road doubled due to the intervention of protesters.[62]

Residents in Leytonstone have complained that, following the completion of the road, their streets became rat runs for commuters trying to get ahead of queues.[63]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ The BBC give the figure as two hundred;[35] Wall gives the figure as four hundred.[31]
  2. ↑ According to the BBC;[35] Wall gives a figure of nine hours.[31]
  3. ↑ The BBC quotes then-Chief Superintendent Stuart Giblin as saying "My officers acted professionally despite some of the comments and behaviour of the protesters."[35]

References

  1. ↑ ITV News 2014.
  2. ↑ Gosling, in Hansard 23 July 1924.
  3. ↑ Moran 2009, p. 202.
  4. ↑ "The Motorway Archive". Retrieved 7 September 2009.
  5. ↑ Horam, in Hansard 15 December 1976.
  6. ↑ Wheeler, in Hansard 22 May 1981.
  7. ↑ Hansard 28 April 1978.
  8. ↑ Hansard 11 May 1984.
  9. ↑ Moran 2009, p. 214.
  10. 1 2 3 20th Century London 2005.
  11. ↑ Hansard 12 November 1974.
  12. ↑ Fraser, in Hansard 28 July 1965.
  13. ↑ Sorensen, in Hansard 8 May 1963.
  14. ↑ DfT 1989.
  15. ↑ Cohen and Channon, in Hansard 18 May 1989.
  16. ↑ Hansard 29 November 1989.
  17. ↑ Hansard 18 June 1990.
  18. ↑ Cohen, in Hansard 7 June 1985.
  19. ↑ Sinclair, in Hansard 16 March 1993.
  20. ↑ Cohen and Chope, in Hansard 17 May 1991.
  21. ↑ Cohen and Norris, in Hansard 25 February 1994.
  22. 1 2 3 Cohen and Mawhinney, in Hansard 19 December 1994.
  23. ↑ Boyle 1994.
  24. ↑ "kriptick" 2004.
  25. 1 2 Moran 2009, p. 215.
  26. 1 2 3 4 Cohen, in Hansard 11 March 1994.
  27. 1 2 3 4 Measure 2006.
  28. ↑ McKay 1996, p. 149 "A chestnut tree (later capitalized and given a definite article) suddenly became the focus for protesters and increasing numbers of locals ... The protection of the Chestnut Tree came quickly to symbolize what was under threat from the road[.]"
  29. ↑ Doherty 2002, p. 200.
  30. ↑ Doherty 2002, p. 201.
  31. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Wall 1999, p. 76.
  32. ↑ McKay 1996, p. 150.
  33. ↑ Wall 1999, p. 75.
  34. ↑ McKay 1996, p. 149.
  35. 1 2 3 BBC News 1993.
  36. ↑ Rowell 1996 "The police were accused of widespread brutality in evicting the protesters. Forty-nine complaints against police were recorded by protesters[.]" Note that Drury & Reicher 2000 gives a figure of fifty-seven.
  37. ↑ Shepard, Hayduk and Rofes 2002, p. 217. "In place of the usual petitions and marches to save the street, protesters simply moved in—occupying every house on the block (save one house owned and occupied by a feisty 92-year-old woman, who refused the Department of Transport's order to move)."
  38. ↑ Duncombe 2002, p. 349.
  39. 1 2 Geffen 2003.
  40. ↑ Duncombe 2002, p. 351.
  41. ↑ Bordern, Kerr and Rendell 2001, p. 231.
  42. ↑ McKay 1996, p. 151.
  43. ↑ Bordern, Kerr and Rendell 2001, p. 229.
  44. ↑ SchNEWS 1994, p. 1.
  45. ↑ Hansard 9 December 1994.
  46. ↑ Hansard 20 December 1991.
  47. 1 2 Cohen and Norris, in Hansard 5 July 1995.
  48. 1 2 The Independent 1995.
  49. ↑ Moran 2009, p. 217.
  50. ↑ "A12 – M11 Link Road Official Opening 6 October". Retrieved 28 December 2009.
  51. ↑ Cohen and Hill, in Hansard 27 July 2000.
  52. ↑ Hansard 30 March 1994.
  53. ↑ Marshall 2001.
  54. ↑ Department for Transport 1998.
  55. ↑ Duncombe 2002, p. 352.
  56. ↑ Shepard, Hayduk and Rofes 2002, p. 218. "This coalition, armed with the action model pioneered on Claremont Road, fueled the rebirth of Reclaim the Streets."
  57. ↑ Moran 2009, p. 221.
  58. ↑ European Court of Justice 1998.
  59. ↑ New Statesman 2003.
  60. ↑ Indymedia 2004.
  61. ↑ The Guardian 2008.
  62. ↑ BBC 2006. "Figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show that the campaign against the M11 extension contributed to a 100% increase in costs."
  63. ↑ Hackney Council 2004.

Citations

Books

  • Bordern, Iain; Kerr, Joe; Rendell, Jane (2001). The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space. MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-52335-3. 
  • Roads for Prosperity. Department for Transport. 1989. 
  • Doherty, Brian (2002). Ideas and Actions in the Green Movement. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-17401-5. 
  • Duncombe, Stephen (2002). Cultural Resistance Reader. Verso. ISBN 1-85984-379-4. 
  • McKay, George (1996). Senseless Acts of Beauty: Cultures of Resistance. Verso. ISBN 1-85984-908-3. 
  • Moran, Joe (2009). On Roads : A Hidden History. Profile Books. ISBN 978-1-84668-052-6. 
  • Rowell, Andrew (1996). Green Backlash: Global Subversion of the Environment Movement. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-12827-7. 
  • Shepard, Benjamin; Hayduk, Ronald; Rofes, Eric (2002). From ACT UP to the WTO: Urban Protest and Community Building in the Era of Globalization. Verso. p. 218. ISBN 1-85984-356-5. 
  • Wall, Derek (1999). Earth First! and the Anti-Roads Movement: Radical Environmentalism and Comparative Social Movements. Routledge. 

News articles

Websites

Hansard

Further reading

External links

Coordinates: 51°33′12″N 0°00′39″W / 51.55332°N 0.01093°W / 51.55332; -0.01093

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, February 29, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.