Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr
| Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Argued April 23, 1996 Decided June 26, 1996 | |||||||
| Full case name | Medtronic, Inc., Petitioner 95-754 v. Lora Lohr, et vir; Lora Lohr, et vir, Petitioners 95-886 v. Medtronic, Inc. | ||||||
| Citations |
116 S. Ct. 2240; 135 L. Ed. 2d 700; 1996 U.S. LEXIS 4260; 64 U.S.L.W. 4625; CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P14,634; 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1077; 96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 4685; 96 Daily Journal DAR 7557; 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 83 | ||||||
| Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
| Case opinions | |||||||
| Majority | Stevens, joined by Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (parts I, II, III, V, VII); Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg (parts IV, VI) | ||||||
| Concurrence | Breyer | ||||||
| Concur/dissent | O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas | ||||||
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the scope of federal preemption.
It was later limited by Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008).
See also
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, February 03, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.