Misnagdim

This article is about the historical Rabbinic opposition to Hasidism from the 18th century, centred in Lithuania. For the non-Hasidic stream of Eastern European Judaism, see Lithuanian Jews.
Synagogue in Jurbarkas. Lithuania was the Misnagdic heartland, with Vilna a "Jerusalem" for other Talmudic strongholds. Hasidim and Misnagdim diverged as two interpretations within Rabbinic Judaism: Misnagdim believed in Kabbalah, as Lurianic Kabbalah replaced "Rationalist" Medieval philosophical method as complete structure of theology in traditional development until today.[1] However, Misnagdic Kabbalistic study and practice remained traditionally restricted to elite, with popular devotion in intellectual Talmudic rigour and later Ethics. Hasidism popularised mysticism in new psychology for the masses. Conversely, mastery of Rabbinic literature and Talmud could be found in both camps,[2] as scholars were also attracted to Hasidic philosophy. Lithuanian-"Yeshiva" and Hasidic paths continue today as the two reconciled alternative streams in Eastern European Judaism

Misnagdim or Mitnagdim is a Hebrew word (מתנגדים) meaning "opponents".[3] It is the plural of misnaged or mitnaged. The term "Misnagdim" commonly refers to opponents of Hasidism.[3] The term "Misnagdim" gained a common usage among Jews living in Europe as the term that referred to Ashkenazi Jews who opposed the rise and spread of early Hasidic Judaism.[3]

Origins

The rapid spread of Hasidism in the second half of the 18th century greatly troubled many traditional rabbis; many saw it as a potentially dangerous enemy. They thought that it was another manifestation of the recent messianic movement of Sabbatai Zevi (1626–1676) that had led many Jews away from mainstream Judaism.

Hasidism's founder was Rabbi Israel ben Eliezer, known as the Baal Shem Tov ("master of a good name" usually applied to a saintly Jew who was also a wonder-worker), or simply by the Hebrew acronym "Besht" (bet-shin-tav); he taught that man's relationship with God depended on immediate religious experience, in addition to knowledge and observance of the details of the Torah and Talmud.

Much of Judaism was still fearful of the messianic movements of the Sabbateans and the Frankists (followers of the messianic claimant Jacob Frank (1726–1791)). Many rabbis suspected Hasidism of an intimate connection with these movements.

The characteristically "Lithuanian" approach to Judaism was marked by a concentration on highly intellectual Talmud study. Lithuania became the heartland of the traditionalist opposition to Hasidism, to the extent that in popular perception "Lithuanian" and "misnaged" became virtually interchangeable terms. In fact, however, a sizable minority of Lithuanian Jews belong(ed) to Hasidic groups, including Chabad, Slonim, Karlin (Pinsk) and Koidanov.

The first documented opposition to the Hasidic Movement was from the Jewish community in Belorussia, Shklov, in the year 1772.[3] Rabbis and community leaders voiced concerns about the Hasidim because they were making their way to Belorussia.[3] The rabbis sent letters forbidding Hasidic prayer houses, burning of Hasidic texts, and humiliating and torturing prominent Hasidic leaders.[3] The rabbis imprisoned the Hasidic leaders in an attempt to isolate them from coming into contact with their followers.[3]

Opposition of the Vilna Gaon

The Vilna Gaon

The first attacks on Hasidic Judaism came during the times of the founder of Hasidic thought. Two bans of excommunication against Hasidic Jews first appeared in 1772, accompanied by the public ripping up of several early Hasidic pamphlets. The Vilna Gaon, Elijah ben Solomon Zalman, a prominent rabbi, galvanized opposition to Hasidic Judaism. He believed that the claims of miracles and visions made by Hasidic Jews were lies and delusions. A key point of opposition was that the Vilna Gaon maintained that greatness in Torah and observance must come through natural human efforts at Torah study without relying on any external "miracles" and "wonders", whereas the Ba'al Shem Tov was more focused on bringing encouragement and raising the morale of the Jewish people, especially following the Chmelnitzki pogroms (1648–1654) and the aftermath of disillusionment in the Jewish masses following the millennial excitement heightened by the failed messianic claims of Sabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank. Opponents of Hasidim held that Hasidim viewed their rebbes in an idolatrous fashion.

Hasidism's changes and challenges

Most of the changes made by the Hasidim were the product of the Hasidic approach to Kabbalah, particularly as expressed by Rabbi Isaac Luria (1534–1572), known as "the ARI" and his disciples, particularly Rabbi Chaim Vital (1543–1620). Both Misnagdim and hassidim were greatly influenced by the ARI, but the legalistic Misnagdim feared in hasidism what they perceived as disturbing parallels to the Sabatean movement. An example of such an idea was the concept that the entire universe is completely nullified to God. Depending on how this idea was preached and interpreted, it could give rise to pantheism, universally acknowledged as a heresy, or lead to immoral behavior, since elements of Kabbalah can be misconstrued to de-emphasize ritual by rote and glorifies sexual metaphors as a deeper means of grasping some inner hidden notions in the Torah based on the Jews' intimate relationship with God.

The stress of Jewish prayer over Torah study and the Hasidic reinterpretation of Torah l'shma (Torah study for its own sake), was seen as a rejection of traditional Judaism.

Hasidim did not follow the traditional Ashkenazi prayer rite, and instead used a rite which is a combination of Ashkenazi and Sephardi rites (Nusach Sefard), based upon Kabbalistic concepts from Rabbi Isaac Luria of Safed. This was seen as a rejection of the traditional Ashkenazi liturgy and, due to the resulting need for separate synagogues, a breach of communal unity.

Hasidic Jews also added some halakhic stringencies on Kashrus, the laws of keeping kosher. They made certain changes in how livestock were slaughtered and in who was considered a reliable mashgiach (supervisor of kashrut). The end result was that they essentially considered some kosher food as less kosher. This was seen as a change of traditional Judaism, and an over stringency of halakha (Jewish law), and, again, a breach of communal unity.

Struggles and persecutions

A bitter struggle soon arose between traditional observant Jews and the newer Hasidim. At the head of the Orthodox party stood the Vilna Gaon. In 1772, when the first secret circles of Hasidim appeared in Lithuania, the rabbinic qahal ("council") of Vilna, with the approval of Rabbi Elijah ben Solomon, arrested the local leaders of the sect, and excommunicated its adherents. Letters were sent from Vilna to the rabbis of other communities calling upon them to make war upon the "godless sect."

In many places persecutions were instituted against the Hasidim. The appearance in 1780 of the first works of Hasidic literature created alarm among the Orthodox. At the council of rabbis held in the village of Zelva, Trakai Voivodeship, in 1781, it was resolved to uproot Hasidism. In the official letters issued by the council, the faithful were ordered to expel the Hasidim from every Jewish community, to regard them as members of another faith, to hold no social intercourse with them, not to intermarry with them, and not to bury their dead.

Shneur Zalman of Liadi

Hasidism in the south of eastern Europe had established itself so firmly in the various communities that it had no fear of persecution. The main sufferers were the northern Hasidim. Their leader, Hasidic Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi (1745–1812), the founder of Chabad Hasidism, attempted to allay the anger of the Misnagdim and of Elijah Gaon.

On the death of the latter in 1797 the exasperation of the Misnagdim became so great that they resolved to libel and denounce the leaders of the Hasidim to the Russian government as dangerous agitators and teachers of heresy. In consequence twenty-two Hasidic Jews were arrested in Vilna and other places. Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi was arrested at his court in Liozna and brought to St. Petersburg (1798). Chabad Hasidim still celebrate the day of his liberation from prison.

The struggle of Misnagdim with Hasidism in Lithuania and White Russia led to the formation of the latter sect in those regions into separate religious organizations; these existing in many towns alongside of those of the Misnagdim. In the south-western region the Hasidim almost completely crowded out the Misnagdim. Lithuania remained strongly Misnagdic. Another group of non-Hasidic Jews were the Oberlander Jews of Hungary and Slovakia, who were not Misnagdim.

Winding down the battles

By the mid-19th century most of non-Hasidic Judaism had discontinued its struggle with Hasidism and had reconciled itself to the establishment of the latter as a fact. The reason for the reconciliation between the Hasidim and the Misnagdim was the rise of the Haskalah movement, which both of them perceived as a greater threat to religion as a whole than they represented to each other.[4] In the modern era, Misnagdim continue to thrive, but they prefer to be called "Litvish" or "Yeshivish."

See also

References

  1. ↑ Kabbalah: A Very Short Introduction, Joseph Dan, Oxford University Press 2007, chapter on Hasidism. The Vilna Gaon and Chaim Volozhin were intimately involved in Kabbalistic interpretation. In Torah Lishmah: Study of Torah for Torah's Sake in the Work of Rabbi Hayyim Volozhin and his Contemporaries, Ktav Pub, Norman Lamm describes Chaim Volozhin as the main theoretician of the Misnagdim, with Schneur Zalman of Liadi as his main Hasidic counterpart. He traces the Hasidic-Misnagdic schism to alternative immanent and transcendent interpretations of the Lurianic Tzimtzum. Lurianic Kabbalah remains the accepted traditional Jewish esoteric belief, even when restricted to elite study alone, in most contemporary Orthodox Judaism, with minority groups accepting only previous forms of Kabbalah, or only non-esoteric Medieval Rationalist Philosophy. Most Orthodoxy would see the diverse historical interpretations of Judaism as integral parts of the Rabbinic canon, and open to scholarly synthesis
  2. ↑ The Mystical Origins of Hasidism, Rachel Elior, Littman Library of Jewish Civilization 2008
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Nadler, Allan. 2010. Misnagdim. YIVO Encyclopedia of Jews in Eastern Europe. http://www.yivoencyclopedia.org/article.aspx/Misnagdim (accessed November 18, 2013).
  4. ↑ The Haskalah Movement, Jacob Raisin, 1913

External links

Maps:

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, March 25, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.