Mossman v. Higginson
Mossman v. Higginson | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Decided August 11, 1800 | |||||||
Full case name | Mossman v. Higginson | ||||||
Citations |
1 L. Ed. 720; 1800 U.S. LEXIS 298; 4 Dall. 12 | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
"The parties to an equity suit must be so described on the record as to show that the court has jurisdiction. It is not enough that an alien is a party ; the other party must be a citizen. A writ of error may be amended by filling the blank left for the return day, there being enough on the writ to amend by." | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
|
Mossman v. Higginson, 4 U.S. 12 (1800), was an 1800 decision of the United States Supreme Court asserting that "The parties to an equity suit must be so described on the record as to show that the court has jurisdiction. It is not enough that an alien is a party ; the other pafty must be a citizen. A writ of error may be amended by filling the blank left for the return day, there being enough on the writ to amend by."[1]
References
- ↑ Reports of decisions in the Supreme Court of the United States: with notes and a digest, Volume 1 (Little, Brown, 1887), pg. 313
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, January 29, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.