Pseudoreplication

Pseudoreplication, as originally defined,[1] is a special case of inadequate specification of random factors where both random and fixed factors are present.[2] The problem of inadequate specification arises when treatments are assigned to units that are subsampled and the treatment F-ratio in an analysis of variance (ANOVA) table is formed with respect to the residual mean square rather than with respect to the among unit mean square. The F-ratio relative to the within unit mean square is vulnerable to the confounding of treatment and unit effects, especially when experimental unit number is small (e.g. four tank units, two tanks treated, two not treated, several subsamples per tank). The problem is eliminated by forming the F-ratio relative to the correct mean square in the ANOVA table (tank by treatment MS in the example above), where this is possible. The problem is addressed by the use of mixed models.[2]

Hurlbert reported "pseudoreplication" in 48% of the studies he examined, that used inferential statistics.[1] When time and resources limit the number of experimental units, and unit effects cannot be eliminated statistically by testing over the unit variance, it is important to use other sources of information to evaluate the degree to which an F-ratio is confounded by unit effects.

Replication

Replication increases the precision of an estimate, while randomization addresses the broader applicability of a sample to a population. Replication must be appropriate: replication at the experimental unit level must be considered, in addition to replication within units.

Hypothesis testing

Statistical tests (e.g. t-test and the related ANOVA family of tests) rely on appropriate replication to estimate statistical significance. Tests based on the t and F distributions assume homogeneous, normal, and independent errors. Correlated errors can lead to false precision and p-values that are too small.[3]

Types

Hurlbert (1984) defined four types of pseudoreplication.

References

  1. 1 2 Hurlbert, Stuart H. (1984). "Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments" (PDF). Ecological Monographs (Ecological Society of America) 54 (2): 187–211. doi:10.2307/1942661. JSTOR 1942661.
  2. 1 2 Millar, R.B.; Anderson, M.R. (2004). "Remedies for pseudoreplication". Fisheries Research 70 (2–3): 397–407. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2004.08.016.
  3. Lazic, SE (2008). "The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis?". BMC Neuroscience 11:5: 5. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-11-5.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, March 24, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.