Nassi–Shneiderman diagram

Example of a NassiShneiderman diagram

A NassiShneiderman diagram (NSD) in computer programming is a graphical design representation for structured programming.[1] This type of diagram was developed in 1972 by Isaac Nassi and Ben Shneiderman who were both graduate students at SUNY-Stony Brook.[2] These diagrams are also called structograms,[3] as they show a program's structures.

Overview

Following a top-down design, the problem at hand is reduced into smaller and smaller subproblems, until only simple statements and control flow constructs remain. NassiShneiderman diagrams reflect this top-down decomposition in a straightforward way, using nested boxes to represent subproblems. Consistent with the philosophy of structured programming, NassiShneiderman diagrams have no representation for a GOTO statement.

NassiShneiderman diagrams are only rarely used for formal programming. Their abstraction level is close to structured program code and modifications require the whole diagram to be redrawn. Nonetheless, they can be useful for sketching processes and high-level designs.

NassiShneiderman diagrams are (almost) isomorphic with flowcharts. Everything you can represent with a NassiShneiderman diagram you can also represent with a flowchart. For flowcharts of programs, almost everything you can represent with a flowchart you can also represent with a NassiShneiderman diagram. The exceptions are constructs like goto and the C programming language break and continue statements for loops.

In Germany, NassiShneiderman diagrams were standardised in 1985 as DIN 66261.[4] They are still used in German introductions to programming, for example Böttcher and Kneißl's introduction to C,[5] Baeumle-Courth and Schmidt's introduction to C[6] and Kirch's introduction to C#.[7]

NassiShneiderman diagrams can also be used in technical writing.[8]

Diagrams

Process blocks: the process block represents the simplest of steps and requires no analyses. When a process block is encountered the action inside the block is performed and we move onto the next block.

Process blocks

Branching blocks: there are two types of branching blocks. First is the simple True/False or Yes/No branching block which offers the program two paths to take depending on whether or not a condition has been fulfilled. These blocks can be used as a looping procedure stopping the program from continuing until a condition has been fulfilled.

True/False branching blocks

The second type of branching block is a multiple branching block. This block is used when a select case is needed in a program. The block usually contains a question or select case. The block provides the program with an array of choices and is often used in conjunction with sub process blocks to save space.

Multiple branching blocks

Testing loops: this block allows the program to loop one or a set of processes until a particular condition is fulfilled. The process blocks covered by each loop are subset with a side-bar extending out from the condition.

There are two main types of testing loops, test first and test last blocks. The only difference between the two is the order in which the steps involved are completed. In the test first situation, when the program encounters the block it tests to see if the condition is fulfilled, then, if it is not completes the process blocks and then loops back. The test is performed again and, if the condition is still unfulfilled, it processes again. If at any stage the condition is fulfilled the program skips the process blocks and continues onto the next block.

Test first loop block

The test last block is simply reversed, the process blocks are completed before the test is performed. The test last loop allows for the process blocks to be performed at least once before the first test.

Test last loop block

See also

Publications

References

  1. Hans-Georg Fill (2009). Visualisation for Semantic Information Systems. p.32
  2. A short history of structured flowcharts (Nassi-Shneiderman Diagrams). Webdoc draft: May 27, 2003. (Source)
  3. Rolf Isermann (1988). Automatic Control: Selected papers from the triennial world congress of the International Federation of Automatic Control : Munich, Federal Republic of Germany, 27–31 July 1987, Volume 10;Volume 14. p.89
  4. Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. (DIN): DIN 66261: Informationsverarbeitung; Sinnbilder für Struktogramme nach Nassi-Shneiderman.
  5. Böttcher, Axel; Kneißl, Franz: Informatik für Ingenieure: Grundlagen und Programmierung in C. 3rd edition. München: Oldenbourg, 2012. ISBN 978-3-486-70527-0. See especially Chapter 10: "Kontrollstrukturen" (control flow).
  6. Baeumle-Courth, Peter; Schmidt, Torsten: Praktische Einführung in C. München: Oldenbourg, 2012. ISBN 978-3-486-70799-1. See especially Chapter 6: "Kontrollstrukturen" (control flow).
  7. Kirch, Ulla: C# lernen und professionell anwenden. Heidelberg: mitp, 2009. ISBN 978-3-8266-5915-7. See especially Chapter 5: "Schleifen und Verzweigungen" (loops and branches).
  8. Weiss, Edmond H.: "Visualizing a Procedure with Nassi-Schneiderman Charts", Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, Vol. 20, Nr. 3 (1990): 237-54.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Nassi-Shneiderman diagrams.

Software

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, April 13, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.