Nevile Gwynne
Nevile Martin Gwynne is a British writer who has gained recognition and some criticism for his book, Gwynne's Grammar. He has also written Gwynne's Latin. In April 2013 a grammar test devised by Gwynne was published by the Daily Telegraph.[1] He spent his early days in Gloucestershire before attending Eton College and Oxford University, graduating with a Master of Arts degree in Modern Languages. He later qualified as a Chartered Accountant at the British Institute of Chartered Accountants.[2]
Gwynne's Grammar
Gwynne's Grammar is an "introduction to Grammar and the writing of good English".[3]
Part One
In "Part One" of Gwynne's Grammar, Gwynne explains that "all thinking and communicating depend on grammar".[4] In Chapter 5, "Parts of Speech", he criticises both H F Fowler and Eric Partridge for their treatment of the word "firstly"– Fowler for his support of the word and Partridge for his rejection of it. His objection is that both Fowler and Partridge fail to produce any authoritative support for their opinions.[5] Gwynne then goes on to support the use of the construction "First, secondly" (in preference to "Firstly, secondly"), using Michael Drummett's Grammar & Style For Examination Candidates and Others as a supporting source.[6] Continuing in the same vein he outlines his opposition to modern usage of the words "hopefully", "regretfully" and "thankfully".[7] The remainder of "Part One" is a discourse on parts of speech, syntax and punctuation.
Part Two
"Part Two" is a reproduction of an earlier work; The Elements of Style, by Professor William Strunk.
Part Three
"Part Three" comprises a number of appendices including a brief coverage of grammatical definitions, irregular verbs, "Special Prepositions" and "The Formation of Plurals".
Reception
Gwynne's Grammar has received mixed reviews:
- Mark Dooley, of the Daily Mail wrote "Gwynne’s Grammar is much more than an excellent introduction to the writing of good English. It is nothing less than a guide to the good life".[8]
- The book gained approval from Education Secretary Michael Gove who "told his department to stop writing pompous, illiterate letters".[9]
- According to Michael Rosen "Martin Gwynne may have fun telling people the rules of grammar, but language is owned and controlled by everybody".[10]
- Linguist Geoffrey Pullum called Gwynne a "preposterous old fraud" with a "lack of any grasp of the subject"[11] and was quoted in the New Zealand Herald saying, "I've never seen a book so bad on my subject".[12]
Gwynne's Latin
Gwynne's Latin is an "introduction to Latin including the Latin in everyday English".[13] According to Britt Peterson of the Boston Globe, Gwynne believes "students should start memorising Latin verbs at age 3".[14]
Part One
In Chapter 1, "About Latin", Gwynne explains his love of the subject in some detail[15] and in Chapter 3, "The Importance of Learning Latin, Examined in Detail", describes how Jean Paul Getty employed classicists because "They sell more oil".[16] In Chapter 4, "Is This How to Learn Latin?", he criticises both the Cambridge Latin Course and the Oxford Latin Course for being "impossible to learn Latin from".[17]
Part Two Chapter 6 defines accidence (morphology), parts of speech, syntax and grammatical cases and in Chapter 8, pronunciation is covered.
Part Three
"Part Three" contains the main subject matter including declensions. Everything that is covered in "Part Two" is discussed in more detail.
Reception
Gwynne's Latin has received less recognition than has Gwynne's Grammar.
- Harry Mount, in The Spectator writes; "It would be a precocious child who had the determination to teach himself Latin, but he certainly could from this book. As Molesworth says, he’d have to work hard, and, as Gwynne says, he’d have to do a lot of learning by heart."[18]
- Daniel Hahn wrote; "This little book makes a great case for learning Latin, not least because of the countless Latin words and phrases in our daily English."[19]
- Ross McGuinness in the Metro took a neutral line, supporting the teaching of Latin without expressing an opinion of the merits of Gwynne's book.[20]
Other works
- The Truth about Rodrigo Borgia, Pope Alexander VI Lulu.com ISBN 9782917813034
- Banks and Money Lulu.com ISBN 9782917813348
References
- ↑ Andrew Marszal (15 April 2013). Good grammar test: can you pass?. The Telegraph. Retrieved 08 January 2015.
- ↑ Nevile Martin Gwynne. Retrieved 08 January 2015.
- ↑ Gwynne's Grammar, front cover.
- ↑ Gwynne's Grammar, p. 11
- ↑ Gwynne's Grammar, pp 44-46
- ↑ Gwynne's Grammar, p. 46
- ↑ Gwynne's Grammar, p. 48
- ↑ Mark Dooley (15 November 2012). "This marvellous moralist is the corrective to claptrap". MailOnline. Retrieved 08 January 2015.
- ↑ "Gove grovels to Gwynne' Grammar". London Evening Standard (01 July 2013). Retrieved 08 January 2015.
- ↑ Michael Rosen (02 March 2012). "Sorry, there's no such thing as 'correct grammar' ". The Guardian. Retrieved 08 January 2015.
- ↑ "Hopefully no need to comment, Language Log, 26 May 2013
- ↑ Tom Chivers (20 March 2014). "Are the 'grammar police' ruining the English language?". New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 08 January 2015.
- ↑ Gwynne's Latin, front cover.
- ↑ Britt Peterson (31 August 2014). "Why we love the language police". Boston Globe. Retrieved 08 January 2015.
- ↑ Gwynne's Latin, p. 2
- ↑ Gwynne's Latin, p. 8
- ↑ Gwynne's Latin, p. 19
- ↑ Harry Mount (03 May 2014). "To be topp at lat., throw your Cambridge Latin Course away". The Spectator. Retrieved 08 January 2015.
- ↑ Daniel Hahn (20 April 2014). Book review: Gwynne’s Latin By N M Gwynne. The Independent. Retrieved 08 January 2015.
- ↑ Ross McGuinness (11 April 2014). "Carpe diem, innit: Can Latin seize the day for a new generation of students?". Metro. Retrieved 08 January 2015.
Sources
- Gwynne's Grammar (2013), Ebury Press, ISBN 9780091951450
- Gwynne's Latin (2014), Ebury Press, ISBN 9780091957438