New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann

New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann

Argued February 19, 1932
Decided March 21, 1932
Full case name '
Citations

285 U.S. 262 (more)

Prior history District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the New State Ice Co.'s complaint for lack of equity, 42 F.(2d) 913; Court of Appeals affirmed, 52 F.(2d) 349; cert. granted.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Charles E. Hughes
Case opinions
Majority Sutherland
Dissent Brandeis, joined by Stone

New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262 (1932) was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that due process prevented a state legislature from arbitrarily creating restrictions on new businesses only on the claim that their markets affected a public use.

Facts

The New State Ice Company had brought suit against Liebmann to prevent him from selling ice without a license.

Judgment

The lower courts had relied on Frost v. Corporation Commission 278 U.S. 515 (1929) in reaching their conclusion that a license is not necessary where existing businesses are "sufficient to meet the public needs therein."[1]

The Supreme Court distinguished Frost as concerned with businesses that grind grain, a public interest key to feeding the population that is not comparable to the ice market.

Justice Brandeis dissented from the court's opinion, saying that federalism allows that "a single courageous State may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country..."

See also

References

Wikisource has original text related to this article:
  1. ↑ 285 U.S. 262, 272, citing Oklahoma law, 147, Session Laws 1925, Sec. 3.


This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, March 31, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.