Nominative determinism

Nominative determinism (ND) is the hypothesis[1] that a person's name may have a significant role in determining key aspects of job, profession, or even character. Writing in 1953, Carl Jung gave the example of a food minister named Herr Feist ("Mr Stout"). He also mentioned his own last name and that of fellow psychiatrist Sigmund Freud, which respectively, mean "young" and "joy" in German. He pointed out that these are potential examples of what he called the compulsion of the name, considering Freud's pleasure principle and Jung's idea of rebirth.[1]

The term nominative determinism was coined in 1994 by New Scientist editor John Hoyland.[2] Synonyms and related concepts include: aptronym, apronym, aptonym, euonym, jobonyms, 'namephreaks', onomastic determinism, 'perfect fit last names' (PFLNs), psychonymics. Tom Stoppard in his play Jumpers labelled the phenomenon cognomen syndrome.[3]

A related term, to refer to a name peculiarly suited to its owner, is the aptronym, said to have been coined by the U.S. newspaper columnist Franklin P. Adams. The distinction between nominative determinacy and a mere aptronym is seen as subtle, but fundamental: i.e. post hoc vs propter hoc. Sometimes ND researchers are referred to as comiconomenclaturists—connoisseurs of humorous names.

Background

In Ancient Rome the predictive power of a person’s name was captured by the Latin proverb ‘’nomen est omen’’, meaning the name is a sign. This saying is still in use today in English and other languages such as Dutch, German, Italian, and Slovenian.[4][5][6][7][8]

In 17th century England it was believed that choosing a name for a child was not a random act but should be done with significance. Children should live according to the message contained in, or the meaning of their names.[9] In 1652 William Jenkyn, an English clergyman, argued that first names should be "as a thread tyed about the finger to make us mindful of the errand we came into the world to do for our Master."[10] English historian William Camden wrote before him, in 1623, when a new type of first name had emerged, viz. Puritan names such as Faith, Fortitude and Grace, that names should be chosen with "good and gracious significations", as they might inspire the bearer to good duties.[11][12]

Origin and definition

The term nominative determinism had its origin in the 'Feedback' column of the British popular science magazine New Scientist in 1994:

"We recently came across a new book, Pole Positions—The Polar Regions and the Future of the Planet, by Daniel Snowman. Then, a couple of weeks later, we received a copy of London Under London—A Subterranean Guide, one of the authors of which is Richard Trench. So it was interesting to see Jen Hunt of the University of Manchester stating in the October issue of The Psychologist: "Authors gravitate to the area of research which fits their surname." Hunt's example is an article on incontinence in the British Journal of Urology by A. J. Splatt and D. Weedon.[13][14][15][16]
We feel it's time to open up this whole issue to rigorous scrutiny. You are invited to send in examples of the phenomenon in the fields of science and technology (with references that check out, please) together with any hypotheses you may have on how it comes about. No prizes, other than seeing your name in print and knowing you have contributed to the advance of human knowledge."[17]

Nominative determinism is defined as the theory that people tend to gravitate towards occupations that are reflected by their names. It differs from the concept of aptronyms in that it focusses on causality. Aptronyms are merely amusingly apt names with no suggested causal effect.[18]

First-hand accounts do exist. Igor Judge, former Lord Chief Justice in England, said he has no recollection of anyone commenting on his destined profession when he was a child, adding “I’m absolutely convinced in my case it is entirely coincidental and I can’t think of any evidence in my life that suggests otherwise.” James Counsell on the other hand, having chosen a career in law just like his father, his sibling, and two distant relatives, reported he cannot remember wanting to do anything else ever. “I remember as a child people saying to me ‘of course you are going to be a barrister because of your name’. How much is down to the subconscious is difficult to say, but the fact that your name is similar may be a reason for showing more interest in a profession than you might otherwise. Any link in adult eyes may seem trivial but to someone in their formative years starting to think about their career it’s possible it may have an effect.” But William James was the first psychologist to challenge the validity of introspection; specifically, the objectivity of introspective reports by owners of fitting names has been questioned as well.[19][20]

Research

Theoretical framework

The first scientists to publish about the concept of nominative determinism were early 20th century German psychologists. In the context of compulsive behaviour and choice of occupation Wilhelm Stekel spoke of the obligation of the name; Karl Abraham wrote that the determining power of names might be partially caused by inheriting a trait from an ancestor who was given a fitting name, for example referring to pride, where the fitting name imposes a duty on the descendents.[21][22] In 1952 Carl Jung referred to Stekel's work in the context of his theory of synchronicity:

"We find ourselves in something of a quandary when it comes to making up our minds about the phenomenon which Stekel calls the 'compulsion of the name'. What he means by this is the sometimes quite gross coincidence between a man's name and his peculiarities or profession. For instance ... Herr Feist (Mr Stout) is the food minister, Herr Rosstäuscher (Mr Horsetrader) is a lawyer, Herr Kalberer (Mr Calver) is an obstetrician ... Are these the whimsicalities of chance, or the suggestive effects of the name, as Stekel seems to suggest, or are they 'meaningful coincidences'?"[23]

Jung listed striking instances among psychologists—including himself:

"Herr Freud (Joy) champions the pleasure principle, Herr Adler (Eagle) the will to power, Herr Jung (Young) the idea of rebirth…"[23][24][25]

In 2002 researchers Pelham, Mirenberg, and Jones argued that people have a basic desire to feel good about themselves and behave, knowingly or unknowingly, according to that desire. People’s positive automatic associations about themselves may influence their feelings about almost anything that people associate with the self. Given that people like objects more when they have been given to them, the ‘’mere ownership effect’’, they theorise that people should develop deep affections for objects and concepts that are chronically associated with the self, such as their name. The unconscious power they call implicit egotism.[26] Simonsohn’s subsequent contribution to the theory of implicit egotism consists of proposing its area of influence is restricted to small marginal stakes, where people are nearly indifferent between options. “The number of Georges who are nearly indifferent or are ambivalent between living in Georgia and another state may be too small for the impact of implicit egotism in their choice to be detectable.” But choosing a charity is a small stakes decision and therefore will show an effect.[27] Smeets later added the prediction that if the implicit egotism theory is indeed based on evaluation of the self, then people with low self-esteem should not gravitate towards choices associated with the self, but possibly away from them.[28]

Empirical evidence

In 2002 Pelham, Mirenberg, and Jones analysed various databases with first names, surnames, occupations, cities and states. In one study they retrieved the number of dentists called Dennis (482) from a database of US dentists. They looked up in the 1990 Census database which male first names were the next most popular name, Walter, and the previous, Jerry. The likelihood of a US male being called Dennis was 0.415% and Walter and Jerry combined 0.416%. They then retrieved the number of dentists called Walter (257) and Jerry (270). Comparing the relative frequencies of Dennis, Walter and Jerry dentists, they concluded that people named Dennis gravitate towards dentistry.[29] However, in 2011, Uri Simonsohn published a paper in which he reported on how the popularity of Dennis, Walter and Jerry as baby names has varied differently over the decades. Therefore it was far more likely for Pelham et al. to find Dennis to have any job, not just a dentist, and Walter to be retired. Simonsohn did indeed find a disproportionally high number of Dennis lawyers compared to Walter lawyers.[30]

Aware of Simonsohn's critical analyses of their earlier methods, Pelham and Mauricio published a new study in 2015, describing how they now controlled for gender, ethnicity, and education confounds. In one study they looked at census data and concluded that men disproportionately worked in 11 traditionally male occupations whose titles matched their surnames, for example, baker, carpenter, and farmer.[31]

In 2009 Michalos reported the results of an analysis of the occurrences of people with surname Counsell or Councell registered as independent barristers in England and Wales versus those in the countries as whole. Where it was expected to find no one registered (0.3 of a person), three barristers were found.[4]

In 2015 researchers Limb, Limb, Limb and Limb published a paper on their study into the effect of surnames in medical specialisation. They looked at 313,445 entries in the medical register from the General Medical Council. They identified surnames that were apt for the speciality, for example, Limb for an orthopaedic surgeon, and for medicine in general, for example Doctor. They found that the frequency of names relevant to medicine and to subspecialties was much greater than expected by chance. Specialties that had the largest proportion of names specifically relevant to that specialty were those in which the English language has provided a wide range of alternative terms for the same anatomical parts (or functions thereof). Specifically, these were genitourinary medicine (for example Hardwick, Kinghorn, Woodcock, Bell) and urology (for example Burns, Cox, Dick, Koch, Cox, Balluch, Ball, Waterfall). Neurologists had names relevant to medicine in general, but far fewer had names directly relevant to the specialty (1 in every 302). They did not report on looking for any confounding variables.[32] In 2010 Abel had come to a similar conclusion. In one study he compared doctors and lawyers whose first or last names began with three-letter combinations representative of their professions, for example, "doc," "law," and likewise found a significant relationship between name and profession. Abel also found that the initial letters of physicians' last names were significantly related to their subspecialty, for example, Raymonds were more likely to be radiologists than dermatologists.[33]

See also

References

Notes

Bibliography

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, May 06, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.