Northern corn leaf blight

Northern corn leaf blight on corn
Sporulation on corn leaf

Northern corn leaf blight (NCLB) is a foliar disease of corn (maize) caused by Exserohilum turcicum, the anamorph of the ascomycete Setosphaeria turcica. With its characteristic cigar-shaped lesions, this disease can cause significant yield loss in susceptible corn hybrids.[1]

Hosts and symptoms

There are several host-specific forms of E. turcicum. The most economically important host is corn, but other forms may infect sorghum, Johnson grass, or sudangrass.[2] The most common diagnostic symptom of the disease on corn is cigar-shaped or elliptical necrotic gray-green lesions on the leaves that range from one to seven inches long.[3] These lesions may first appear as narrow, tan streaks that run parallel to the leaf veins. Fully developed lesions typically have a sooty appearance during humid weather, as a result of spore (conidia) formation. As the disease progresses, the lesions grow together and create large areas of dead leaf tissue. The lesions found in Northern corn leaf blight are more acute if the leaves above the ear are infected during or soon after flowering of the plant.[4] In susceptible corn hybrids, lesions are also found on the husk of ears or leaf sheaths. In partially resistant hybrids, these lesions tend to be smaller due to reduced spore formation. In highly resistant hybrids, the only visible disease symptoms may be minute yellow spots.[5]

Disease cycle

NCLB disease cycle
Disease cycle of northern corn leaf blight

In nature, E. turcicum lives and reproduces in an asexual phase with a relatively simple life cycle. In temperate regions, the fungus overwinters mycelia, conidia, and chlamydospores in the infected corn debris.[2] When conditions become favorable the following season, conidia are produced from the debris and dispersed by rain or wind to infect new, healthy corn plants.[5] Once on a leaf, conidia will germinate and directly infect the plant. The damage to the plant is relatively localized, although diseased corn plants are more susceptible to stalk rot than are healthy plants.[2] In conditions with high humidity, the fungus will produce new spores at the leaf surface, which are spread by rain or wind through the crop and create cycles of secondary infection.[5] One complete cycle on susceptible plants takes approximately 10 to 14 days, whereas it takes about 20 days on plants with resistance.[2] At the end of the season, E. turcicum goes into a state of dormancy in crop residue.

Environment

The ideal environment for NCLB occurs during relatively cool, wet seasons.[5] Periods of wetness that last more than six hours at temperatures between 18 and 27 °C (64 and 81 °F) are most conducive to disease development.[2] Infection is inhibited by high light intensity and warm temperatures. Leaving large amounts of infected residue exposed in the field and continuing to plant corn in those fields will promote disease progress by providing large amounts of inoculum early in the season.[5] Also, the number of conidia produced in an infected field increases significantly after rain due to the increase in moisture.[6]

Sporulation requires a 14-hour dew period between 20 to 25 °C (77 °F). When there is not a sufficiently long period of continuous humidity, the fungus will stop making spores and resume conidia production only when humidity level rises again. For this reason, sporulation often occurs during nighttime and is halted when humidity falls during the day.[6]

In the United States, NCLB is a problem during the spring in southern and central Florida and during the summer months in the Midwestern states.[7] On a global scale, NCLB is a problem in corn-growing areas in the mid-altitude tropics, which have the wet, cool environment that is favorable for disease development. These susceptible areas include parts of Africa, Latin America, China, and India.[1]

Management

Management of NCLB can be achieved primarily by using hybrids with resistance, but because resistance may not be complete or may fail, it is advantageous to utilize an integrated approach with different cropping practices and fungicides. Scouting fields and monitoring local conditions is vital to control this disease.[5]

Major (vertical) resistance of corn hybrids comes from the race specific Ht1, Ht2, Ht3, and HtN genes, with the Ht1 gene being most prevalent. Plants with Ht1 Ht2, or Ht3 genes have smaller, chlorotic lesions and reduced sporulation.[2] The HtN gene delays symptoms until after the pollen shed. Individually, each Ht gene has limited effectiveness because there are races of E. turcicum that are virulent in the presence of one or the other. For example, widespread use of the Ht1 gene has reduced the prevalence of the Race 0 to which it has resistance against, but has increased Race 1. Breeders are now focusing on incorporating several resistance genes into corn hybrids. Incorporating both the Ht1 and Ht2 provide resistance against both Races 0 and 1. Thus far, this multigenic approach has proven to be effective. However resistant plants still show some symptoms, and the threat of new races showing up lends to the need for other management practices, especially in areas where the disease is present.[8]

Several ways to change cropping practices to control the disease include reducing the amount of infected residue left in a field, managing weeds to improve airflow and reduce humidity, or encouraging residue decomposition with tillage. The tillage will assist in breaking down crop debris and reducing existing inoculum. In a system with normal tillage, a one-year rotation out of corn can be effective, but a two-year rotation may be required for a reduced-tillage system. If possible, planting in low areas that receive heavy dew and fog should be avoided.[5]

The use of foliar fungicides for corn have also been shown to control NCLB.[5] Research suggests that using fungicides to keep the upper 75% of the leaf canopy disease-free for three quarters of the grain-filling period will eliminate yield loss [9] To ensure that newly emerging leaf tissue is protected from infection, before the plants are in tassel, fungicides should be applied on the same day that significant conidial dispersal is expected to occur. After tasseling and silking, timing becomes less important since plant expansion will have slowed down.[10] The disease pressure in the field and weather conditions should be monitored and evaluated beforehand to determine if fungicides are needed or not.[5]

Importance

NCLB can cause significant yield loss in corn. If severe disease is present two to three weeks after silking in field corn, grain yields may be reduced by 40 to 70 percent. In the U.S. Corn Belt and Ontario, NCLB has recently become an significant disease ,[5] causing estimated yield losses of an alarming 74.5 million bushels of grain in 2012 and 132.3 million bushels of grain in 2013.[11]

In susceptible varieties of sweet corn, yields can be reduced by up to 20 percent. In fresh market sweet corn, not only is yield lost, but market value will decrease if the ear husks become infected. The lesions cause the ears to appear old and poor quality even if they are fresh.[6]

Researchers in Hokkaido, Japan have also discovered that NCLB reduces the quality of corn silage as animal feed. Their study showed that the digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, and gross energy was significantly lower in the inoculated silage compared to the control. Total digestible nutrients and digestible energy were reduced by 10.5 and 10.6 percent, respectively[12]

Pathogenesis

E. turcicum causes disease and reduces yield in corn primarily by creating the necrotic lesions and reducing available leaf area for photosynthesis.[5] Following conidia germination, the fungus forms an appressorium, which penetrates the corn leaf cell directly using an infection hypha. Once below the cuticle, the infection hypha produces infection pegs to penetrate the epidermal cell wall. After penetration through the cell wall, the fungus produces intracellular vesicle to obtain nutrients from the cell. After approximately 48 hours after infection, necrotic spots begin to form as the epidermal cells collapse.[13]

Fungal toxins also play an important role in disease development. Researchers have found that a small peptide called the E.t. toxin allows a non-pathogenic isolate of E. turcicum to infect corn when suspensions of conidia and the toxin were in contact with the leaves. This toxin has also been shown to inhibit root elongation in seedlings and in chlorophyll synthesis. Another toxin produced by E. turcicum, called monocerin, is a lipophilic toxin known to cause necrosis of leaf tissue.[14]

References

  1. 1 2 Welz, H. G.; Geiger, H. H. (March 2000). "Genes for resistance to northern corn leaf blight in diverse maize populations". Plant Breeding 119 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00462.x. ISSN 0179-9541.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Smith, C. Wayne; Betrán, Javier; Runge, E. C. A. (2004). Corn: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-41184-0.
  3. ↑ Vieira, Rafael A.; Mesquini, Renata M.; Silva, Cleiltan N.; Hata, Fernando T.; Tessmann, Dauri J.; Scapim, Carlos A. (February 2014). "A new diagrammatic scale for the assessment of northern corn leaf blight". Crop Protection (Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Department of Agronomy) 56: 55–57. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2011.04.018. ISSN 0261-2194.
  4. ↑ Blandino, Massimo; Galeazzi, Michele; Savoia, Walter; Reyneri, Amedeo (November 2012). "Timing of azoxystrobin + propiconazole application on maize to control Northern Corn Leaf Blight and maximize grain yield". Field Crops Research (Elsevier) 139: 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.014. ISSN 0378-4290.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Wise, Kiersten (2011). "Diseases of Corn: Northern Corn Leaf Blight". Purdue University Extension Publication. Purdue University.
  6. 1 2 3 Levy, Yehouda; Pataky, Jerald K. (March 1992). "Epidemiology of northern leaf blight on sweet corn". Phytoparasitica 20 (1): 53–66. doi:10.1007/BF02995636. ISSN 0334-2123.
  7. ↑ Pataky, Jerald K. (January 1992). "Relationships Between Yield of Sweet Corn and Northern Leaf Blight Caused by Exserohilum turcicum" (PDF). Phytopathology 82 (3): 370–375. doi:10.1094/Phyto-82-370. ISSN 0031-949X.
  8. ↑ Svec, Leroy; Dolezal, Bill (2015). "Managing Northern Corn Leaf Blight Race Shifts". Agronomy Sciences Research Summary (DuPont, Pioneer).
  9. ↑ Pataky, J. K.; Raid, R. N.; du Toit, L. J.; Schueneman, T. J. (January 1998). "Disease Severity and Yield of Sweet Corn Hybrids with Resistance to Northern Leaf Blight". Plant Disease 82 (1): 57–63. doi:10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.1.57.
  10. ↑ Berger, Richard D. (1973). "Helminthosporium turcicum Lesion Numbers Related to Numbers of Trapped Spores and Fungicide Sprays" (PDF). Phytopathology 63 (7): 930–933. doi:10.1094/Phyto-63-930. ISSN 0031-949X.
  11. ↑ Mueller, Daren; Wise, Kiersten (2013). "Corn Disease Loss Estimates From the United States and Ontario, Canada - 2013" (PDF). Purdue Extension. BP-96-13-W.
  12. ↑ Wang, Peng; Souma, Kousaku; Kobayashi, Yuki; Iwabuchi, Kei; Sato, Chihiro; Masuko, Takayoshi (August 2010). "Influences of Northern Leaf Blight on corn silage fermentation quality, nutritive value and feed intake by sheep". Animal Science Journal 81 (4): 487–493. doi:10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00757.x. PMID 20662819.
  13. ↑ Levy, Yehouda; Cohen, Yigal (1983). "Biotic and Environmental Factors Affecting Infection of Sweet Corn with Exserohilum turcicum" (PDF). Phytopathology 73 (5): 722–725. doi:10.1094/Phyto-73-722. ISSN 0031-949X.
  14. ↑ Bashan, Bilha; Abadi, Rachel; Levy, Yehouda (November 1996). "Involvement of a phytotoxic peptide in the development of the Northern leaf blight of corn". European Journal of Plant Pathology 102 (9): 891–893. doi:10.1007/BF01877060. ISSN 0929-1873.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, December 03, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.