Oreocallis

Oreocallis
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Plantae
(unranked): Angiosperms
(unranked): Eudicots
Order: Proteales
Family: Proteaceae
Genus: Oreocallis
R. Br.

Oreocallis is a plant genus in the family Proteaceae. There is only one species, O. grandiflora. This plant is native to mountainous regions in Peru and Ecuador in South America.

The genus' name is derived from the Ancient Greek words or(e)os "mountain", and kalli- "beauty".[1] Previously, the genus was considered to have several species on both sides of the Pacific Ocean, however the four Australasian species were reclassified in the genus Alloxylon.[2]

The genus was originally defined by Robert Brown in 1810 to contain the Australian species now classified elsewhere, while the two recognised South American species were placed in Embothrium at the time. A reclassification by Dutch botanist Hermann Otto Sleumer in 1954 saw these species transferred into Oreocallis.[1] A second species O. mucronata, has been reclassified as conspecific with O. grandiflora. Some recent sources recognize both species.[3]

Description

The species is a tree or shrub which reaches heights of about 6 metres (20 ft). The leaves, which are arranged in a spiral pattern along the twigs, have a simple, entire blade. As is the case with many species in the Proteaceae, the leaves are highly variable. The shape of the leaves varies from narrow and elongate (lanceolate, or lance shaped) to broad and ellipse-shaped, or anything in between. The base of the leaf can be narrow or broad, and the leaf tip can be pointed or rounded. They usually range from 4.8 to 12.7 centimetres (1.9 to 5.0 in) in length, occasionally reaching lengths of 21.5 cm (8.5 in), and are 1.6 to 3.4 cm (0.63 to 1.34 in) wide. Young leaves are often covered with dense, reddish hairs while older leaves tend to have smooth surfaces with hairs concentrated along the main veins on the lower surface of the leaf.[4] Plants have a terminal or lateral[5] conflorescence (a type of inflorescence).[6] The inflorescences, which are usually 7 to 17.5 cm (2.8 to 6.9 in) long ;but occasionally as much as 38 cm (15 in), bear flowers that can be white, pink, yellow or red in colour.[4] The tepals (petals and sepals) are mostly fused along their length, with only the tips of the tepals unfused. The pollen grains have three pores, a condition that is thought to be primitive in the Proteaceae.[6]

Classification

Together with Telopea, Alloxylon and Embothrium, Oreocallis makes up a small group of terminal often red-flowering showy plants scattered around the southern edges of the Pacific Rim. Known as the Embothriinae, this is an ancient group with roots in the mid Cretaceous, when Australia, Antarctica and South America were linked by land.[7][8] Almost all these species have red terminal flowers, and hence the subtribe's origin and floral appearance must predate the splitting of Gondwana into Australia, Antarctica, and South America over 60 million years ago. The prominent position and striking colour of many species within the subtribe both in Australia and South America strongly suggest they are adapted to pollination by birds, and have been for over 60 million years.[9] Triporopollenites ambiguus is an ancient member of the proteaceae known only from pollen deposits, originally described from Eocene deposits in Victoria. The fossil pollen closely resembles that of T. truncata,[10] Alloxylon pinnatum as well as O. grandiflora.[11]

The type species, Oreocallis grandiflora, is a plant with terminal showy red, pink yellow or whitish inflorescences found in mountainous areas in Peru and southern Ecuador. It was originally described by French naturalist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck in 1786 as Embothrium grandiflora. Robert Brown used it as the type species for the genus Oreocallis when he circumscribed the genus is 1810. As envisioned by Brown, the genus included both South American and Australian species, but in 1991 Peter Weston and Michael Crisp split the Australian species out of Oreocallis and placed them in a new genus, Alloxylon.[4]

In 1954, the Dutch botanist Hermann Sleumer split O. grandiflora into two species, placing individuals with smooth leaves and twigs and pale, white or pink flowers into a new species, O. mucronata, while leaving those with hairy leaves and twigs and darker red flowers in O. grandiflora. Pennington (2007) rejected Sleumer's split, arguing that the hairiness of the leaves and twigs often varied within individuals, and did not vary consistently with flower colour. Weston and Crisp also suggested that differences in flower colour and the angle at which the mature flowers are held may justify this split. While Pennington acknowledged that differences in these characters exist, he argued that the variation was continuous and not the sort of binary variation that would justify a split into two species. He did acknowledge, however, that this difference may be more apparent in live plants and suggested that further study is needed.[4]

Habitat and ecology

Oreocallis grandiflora is a characteristic species in certain semi-deciduous forests in valleys and evergreen upper montane forest in the Andean forests of southern Ecuador[12] and evergreen sclerophyllous forests in northern Peru.[13] It grows at elevations between 1,200 and 3,800 m (3,900 and 12,500 ft) above sea level. It tolerates habitat disturbance, and may be expanding its range in response to increased human activity.[4]

The species flowers throughout the year. The flowers are visited by several hummingbird species including Metallura tyrianthina, Aglaeactis cupripennis and Coeligena iris.[4][14]

Uses

The plant is used for firewood, furniture/carpentry;[3] its "pleasantly mottled cream-white, pinkish and pale brown wood" was used for inlay work and borders on chess boards.[15] It also has medicinal uses.[3] The seeds are eaten in southern Ecuador.[16]

References

  1. 1 2 Wrigley, John; Fagg, Murray (1991). Banksias, Waratahs and Grevilleas. Sydney: Angus & Robertson. pp. 467–68. ISBN 0-207-17277-3.
  2. ↑ Crisp, Michael D.; Weston,Peter H. (1995). "Alloxylon". In McCarthy, Patrick (ed.). Flora of Australia: Volume 16: Eleagnaceae, Proteaceae 1. CSIRO Publishing / Australian Biological Resources Study. pp. 382–386. ISBN 0-643-05693-9.
  3. 1 2 3 2. Oreocallis R. Br., Ulloa Ulloa, C. & P. M. Jørgensen (2004 and onwards), Árboles y arbustos de los Andes del Ecuador
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Pennington, R.T. (2007). "Oreocallis". In Ghilean T. Prance, Vanessa Plana, Katie S. Edwards and R. Toby Pennington. Proteaceae. Flora Neotropica Monograph 100. New York: The New York Botanical Garden Press. pp. 31–35.
  5. ↑ Both Weston (2007) and Pennington (2007) describe the inflorescence as being "terminal or lateral" for the genus, but Pennington's account for the only species in the genus simply describes it as having a terminal inflorescence.
  6. 1 2 Weston, P.H. (2007). "Proteaceae". In K. Kubitzki. The Families and Genera of Flowering Plants: IX Flowering Plants • Eudicots. Berlin: Springer Verlag. pp. 364–404. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-32219-1_42. ISBN 978-3-540-32214-6.
  7. ↑ Johnson, Lawrie. A. S.; Briggs, Barbara G. (1975). "On the Proteaceae: the evolution and classification of a southern family". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 70 (2): 83–182. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1975.tb01644.x.
  8. ↑ Weston, Peter H.; Barker, Nigel P. (2006). (fulltext) "A new suprageneric classification of the Proteaceae, with an annotated checklist of genera" Check |url= value (help) (PDF). Telopea 11 (3): 314–44. Retrieved March 30, 2010.
  9. ↑ Nixon, Paul (1997) [1989]. The Waratah (2nd ed.). East Roseville, NSW: Kangaroo Press. p. 19. ISBN 0-86417-878-6.
  10. ↑ Dettmann, Mary E.; Jarzen, David M. (1991). "Pollen evidence for Late Cretaceous differentiation of Proteaceae in southern polar forests". Canadian Journal of Botany 69 (4): 901–06. doi:10.1139/b91-116.
  11. ↑ Martin, A. R. H. (1995). "Palaeogene proteaceous pollen and phylogeny". Alcheringa: an Australasian Journal of Palaeontology 19: 27–40. doi:10.1080/03115519508619096.
  12. ↑ Homeier, J.; F.A. Werner, S.R. Gradstein, S.-W. Breckle, and M. Richter (2008). "Potential Vegetation and Floristic Composition of Andean Forests in South Ecuador, with a Focus on the RBSF". In Erwin Beck, Jorg Bendix, Ingrid Kottke, Franz Maeschin, Reinhart Mosandl. Gradients in a Tropical Mountain Ecosystem of Ecuador. Ecological Studies 198. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73526-7_10. ISBN 978-3-540-73525-0. Cite uses deprecated parameter |coauthors= (help)
  13. ↑ Aragón, Susan; Deborah W. Woodcock (2010). "Plant Community Structure and Conservation of a Northern Peru Sclerophyllous Forest". Biotropica 42 (2): 262–270. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00578.x.
  14. ↑ Pennington refers to the two former species as Mettalura trianthera and Aylcactis cupripennis. Pennington references collectors notes for these species. Neither of these appear to be actual hummingbird species or genera. The names given represent an attempt to correct typographic or transcriptional errors.
  15. ↑ Joyal, Elaine (1987). "Ethnobotanical Field Notes from Ecuador: Camp, Prieto, Jørgensen, and Giler". Economic Botany 41 (2): 163–189. doi:10.1007/bf02858963. JSTOR 4254956.
  16. ↑ Van den Eynden, Veerle; Eduardo Cueva; Omar Cabrera (2003). "Wild Foods from Southern Ecuador". Economic Botany 57 (4): 576–603. doi:10.1663/0013-0001(2003)057[0576:wffse]2.0.co;2.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, February 13, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.