Pati–Salam model

In physics, the Pati–Salam model is a Partial Unification Theory proposed in 1974 by nobel laureate Abdus Salam and Jogesh Pati. The unification is based on there being four quark color charges, dubbed red, green, blue and violet (or lilac), instead of the conventional three, with the new "violet" quark being identified with the leptons. The model also has Left–right symmetry and predicts the existence of a high energy right handed weak interaction with heavy W' and Z' bosons.

Originally the fourth color was labelled "lilac" to alliterate with "lepton". Pati–Salam is a mainstream theory and a viable alternative to the Georgi–Glashow $SU(5)$ unification. It can be embedded within an $SO(10)$ unification model (as can $SU(5)$ ).

Core theory

The Pati–Salam model states that the gauge group is either $SU(4) \times SU(2) L \times SU(2) R$ or $(SU(4) \times SU(2) L \times SU(2) R)/ Z 2$ and the fermions form three families, each consisting of the representations $(4, 2, 1)$ and $(4, 1, 2)$ . This needs some explanation. The center of $SU(4) \times SU(2) L \times SU(2) R$ is $Z 4 \times Z 2L \times Z 2R$ . The $Z 2$ in the quotient refers to the two element subgroup generated by the element of the center corresponding to the two element of $Z 4$ and the 1 elements of $Z 2L$ and $Z 2R$ . This includes the right-handed neutrino, which is now likely believed to exist. See neutrino oscillations. There is also a $(4, 1, 2)$ and/or a $(4, 1, 2)$ scalar field called the Higgs field which acquires a VEV. This results in a spontaneous symmetry breaking from $SU(4) \times SU(2) L \times SU(2) R$ to $SU(3) \times SU(2) \times U(1) Y)/ Z 3$ or from $(SU(4) \times SU(2) L \times SU(2) R)/ Z 2$ to $(SU(3) \times SU(2) \times U(1) Y)/ Z 6$ and also,

(4, 2, 1) \to (3, 2) 1 / 6 \oplus (1, 2) - 1 / 2 (q & l)

(4, 1, 2) \to (3, 1) 1 / 3 \oplus (3, 1) - 2 / 3 \oplus (1, 1) 1 \oplus (1, 1) 0 (d c, u c, e c & ν c)

(6, 1, 1) \to (3, 1) - 1 / 3 \oplus (3, 1) 1 / 3

(1, 3, 1) \to (1, 3) 0

(1, 1, 3) \to (1, 1) 1 \oplus (1, 1) 0 \oplus (1, 1) -1

See restricted representation. Of course, calling the representations things like $(4, 1, 2)$ and $(6, 1, 1)$ is purely a physicist's convention, not a mathematician's convention, where representations are either labelled by Young tableaux or Dynkin diagrams with numbers on their vertices, but still, it is standard among GUT theorists.

The weak hypercharge, Y, is the sum of the two matrices:

\begin{pmatrix}\frac{1}{3}&0&0&0\\0&\frac{1}{3}&0&0\\0&0&\frac{1}{3}&0\\0&0&0&-1\end{pmatrix} \in \text{SU}(4), \qquad \begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix} \in \text{SU}(2)_{\text{R}}

Actually, it is possible to extend the Pati–Salam group so that it has two connected components. The relevant group is now the semidirect product $\left ([SU(4)\times SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R]/\mathbf{Z}_2\right )\rtimes\mathbf{Z}_2$ . The last $Z 2$ also needs explaining. It corresponds to an automorphism of the (unextended) Pati–Salam group which is the composition of an involutive outer automorphism of $SU(4)$ which isn't an inner automorphism with interchanging the left and right copies of $SU(2)$ . This explains the name left and right and is one of the main motivations for originally studying this model. This extra "left-right symmetry" restores the concept of parity which had been shown not to hold at low energy scales for the weak interaction. In this extended model, $(4, 2, 1) \oplus (4, 1, 2)$ is an irrep and so is $(4, 1, 2) \oplus (4, 2, 1)$ . This is the simplest extension of the minimal left-right model unifying QCD with B−L.

Since the homotopy group

\pi_2\left(\frac{SU(4)\times SU(2)}{[SU(3)\times U(1)]/\mathbf{Z}_3}\right)=\mathbf{Z},

this model predicts monopoles. See 't Hooft–Polyakov monopole.

This model was invented by Jogesh Pati and Abdus Salam.

This model doesn't predict gauge mediated proton decay (unless it is embedded within an even larger GUT group).

Differences from the SU(5) unification

As mentioned above, both the Pati–Salam and Georgi–Glashow $SU(5)$ unification models can be embedded in a $SO(10)$ unification. The difference between the two models then lies in the way that the $SO(10)$ symmetry is broken, generating different particles that may or may not be important at low scales and accessible by current experiments. If we look at the individual models, the most important difference is in the origin of the weak hypercharge. In the $SU(5)$ model by itself there is no left-right symmetry (although there could be one in a larger unification in which the model is embedded), and the weak hypercharge is treated separately from the color charge. In the Pati–Salam model, part of the weak hypercharge (often called $U(1) B-L$ ) starts being unified with the color charge in the $SU(4) C$ group, while the other part of the weak hypercharge is in the $SU(2) R$ . When those two groups break then the two parts together eventually unify into the usual weak hypercharge $U(1) Y$ .

Minimal supersymmetric Pati–Salam

Spacetime

The $N = 1$ superspace extension of $3 + 1$ Minkowski spacetime

Spatial symmetry

N=1 SUSY over $3 + 1$ Minkowski spacetime with R-symmetry

Gauge symmetry group

$(SU(4) \times SU(2) L \times SU(2) R)/ Z 2$

Global internal symmetry

$U(1) A$

Vector superfields

Those associated with the $SU(4) \times SU(2) L \times SU(2) R$ gauge symmetry

Chiral superfields

As complex representations:

label	description	multiplicity	$SU(4) \times SU(2) L \times SU(2) R$ rep	R	A
$(4, 1, 2) H$	GUT Higgs field	$1$	$(4, 1, 2)$	$0$	$0$
$(4, 1, 2) H$	GUT Higgs field	$1$	$(4, 1, 2)$	$0$	$0$
$S$	singlet	$1$	$(1, 1, 1)$	$2$	$0$
$(1, 2, 2) H$	electroweak Higgs field	$1$	$(1, 2, 2)$	$0$	$0$
$(6, 1, 1) H$	no name	$1$	$(6, 1, 1)$	$2$	$0$
$(4, 2, 1)$	left handed matter field	$3$	$(4, 2, 1)$	$1$	$1$
$(4, 1, 2)$	right handed matter field including right handed (sterile or heavy) neutrinos	$3$	$(4, 1, 2)$	$1$	$-1$

Superpotential

A generic invariant renormalizable superpotential is a (complex) $SU(4) \times SU(2) L \times SU(2) R$ and $U(1) R$ invariant cubic polynomial in the superfields. It is a linear combination of the following terms:

\begin{matrix} S \\ S(4,1,2)_H (\bar{4},1,2)_H\\ S(1,2,2)_H (1,2,2)_H \\ (6,1,1)_H (4,1,2)_H (4,1,2)_H\\ (6,1,1)_H (\bar{4},1,2)_H (\bar{4},1,2)_H\\ (1,2,2)_H (4,2,1)_i (\bar{4},1,2)_j\\ (4,1,2)_H (\bar{4},1,2)_i \phi_j\\ \end{matrix}

$i$ and $j$ are the generation indices.

Left-right extension

We can extend this model to include left-right symmetry. For that, we need the additional chiral multiplets $(4, 2, 1) H$ and $(4, 2, 1) H$ .

Sources

Graham G. Ross, Grand Unified Theories, Benjamin/Cummings, 1985, ISBN 0-8053-6968-6
Anthony Zee, Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell, Princeton U. Press, Princeton, 2003, ISBN 0-691-01019-6

References

J. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974), 275. Lepton number as the fourth "color"
J.C. Baez, J. Huerta (2009). "The Algebra of Grand Unified Theories". arXiv:0904.1556 [hep-th].

External links

Pati-Salam model on Scholarpedia
Proton decay, annihilation or fusion? by Wu, Dan-Di; Li, Tie-Zhong, Zeitschrift für Physik C, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp. 321–323 preview Fusion of all three quarks is the only decay mechanism mediated by the Higgs particle, not the gauge bosons, in the Pati–Salam model
The Algebra of Grand Unified Theories John Huerta. Slide show: contains an overview of Pati–Salam
the Pati-Salam model Motivation for the Pati–Salam model

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, December 29, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.