Peace Ship

The Peace Ship was the common name for the ocean liner Oscar II, on which American industrialist Henry Ford organized and launched his 1915 amateur peace mission to Europe;[1] Ford chartered the Oscar II and invited prominent peace activists to join him.[2] He hoped to create enough publicity to prompt the belligerent nations to convene a peace conference and mediate an end to World War I,[1] but the mission was widely mocked by the press, which referred to the Oscar II as the “Ship of Fools” as well as the “Peace Ship”.[3] Infighting between the activists, mockery by the press contingent aboard, and an outbreak of influenza marred the voyage.[4] Four days after Oscar II arrived in Norway, a beleaguered and physically ill Ford abandoned the mission and returned to the United States.[5] The peace mission was unsuccessful, which reinforced Ford’s reputation as a supporter of unusual causes.[6]

Henry Ford and the Peace Ship

Oscar II Peace Ship leaving New York Dec. 4, 1915

In early 1915, Henry Ford began to publicly express pacifist sentiment and denounce the ongoing war in Europe.[7] Later in the year, American peace activist Louis Lochner and Hungarian journalist Rosika Schwimmer approached Ford, now commonly recognized a pacifist, with a proposal to launch an amateur diplomatic mission to Europe to broker an end to World War I.[7] Schwimmer claimed to possess diplomatic correspondence that proved that the European powers were willing to negotiate, an outright fabrication.[7] Nevertheless, Ford agreed to finance a peace campaign.[7]

Rosika Schwimmer

Henry Ford initially sought President Woodrow Wilson's endorsement of his diplomatic undertaking.[2] Ford and Lochner secured a meeting with Wilson at the White House and proposed that Wilson officially commission Ford’s mission to Europe.[2] Although Wilson was sympathetic to Ford’s aims, he declined the offer on the ground that the venture was most unlikely to succeed.[2] Disappointed by the President’s response, Ford told Lochner that Wilson was a “small man”.[8]

Ford was undeterred by Wilson’s refusal to endorse the expedition, and planned it as a private delegation to Europe.[2] On 24 November 1915 he announced to a New York City press conference that he had chartered the ocean liner Oscar II for a diplomatic mission to Europe, and invited the most prominent pacifists of the age to join him.[2] Among those invited were Jane Addams, William Jennings Bryan, Thomas Edison, and John Wanamaker.[3] Addams, Bryan, Edison and Wanamaker all declined.[3] However, a number of noted peace activists did join the voyage, among them suffragette Inez Milholland Boissevain and publisher S. S. McClure. Also aboard the ship were more than forty reporters and Ford’s friend the Reverend Samuel Marquis.[9]

Oscar II Peace Ship with Capt. G. W. Hempel and Henry Ford

The Oscar II set sail from Hoboken, New Jersey, on 5 December 1915, amid an atmosphere that the press later derided as circus-like.[10] A crowd of about fifteen thousand watched the Oscar II depart from the harbor while a band played “I Didn’t Raise My Boy to Be a Soldier”.[10] Just before the ship’s departure, a prankster placed a cage containing two squirrels and a sign reading “To the Good Ship Nutty” on the ship’s gangplank.[10] When the ship departed a fully dressed man jumped off the pier and attempted to swim after it.[10] The harbor police rescued the man, who identified himself as Mr. Zero, explaining that he was "swimming to reach public opinion".[9]

Infighting among the delegates plagued Oscar II for much of its journey across the Atlantic.[6] In particular, they quarrelled over the proper response to send to the media after they received news of President Wilson’s 7 December address to Congress, which called for considerable increases to the United States’ army and navy.[9] The majority of delegates signed a resolution that denounced Wilson’s policy of military preparedness, although a substantial minority refused to sign the resolution, on the ground that it was unpatriotic.[11] After the pro-Wilson minority threatened to abandon the mission upon landing in Europe, the two factions mutually denounced each other.[11]

An outbreak of influenza spread through the ship about halfway across the Atlantic, resulting in one person dying of pneumonia and many others being afflicted.[4] Ford himself fell ill and withdrew to his cabin,[9] avoiding reporters.[4] Nevertheless, a group of them barged into his cabin to check on a rumor that he had died.[9]

The Peace Ship arrived at its first destination, Oslo, Norway, on 18 December,[4] receiving a cool reception from the Norwegians, many of whom supported military preparedness and were skeptical towards the ship and its delegates.[4] Ford, still sick with flu, retreated to his room at the Grand Hotel for four days.[5] He eventually met the press on 22 December, but he spoke little about the Peace Ship and its mission.[5] (The date cannot be correct. Mr Ford´s statement to the press was reported in Dagens Nyheter, a Stockholm morning newspaper on 22 December. The newspaper is on record on microfilm at the Swedish National Library in Stockholm. He probably met the press on 21 December.)

About this time Sanuel Marquis convinced Ford to abandon the Peace Ship, on account of Ford’s illness and Schwimmer’s failure to produce the documents which supposedly proved that the belligerent nations were ready to mediate.[12] On 23 December Ford and Marquis slipped out of their hotel and boarded a ship back to the United States.[4] Despite Ford’s abandonment of the endeavor, the Peace Ship continued its journey around Europe.[6] Ford continued to pay for the ship’s expenses until early 1917.[5] In total, the Peace Ship expedition ultimately cost Ford approximately half a million dollars (US$ 9,240,000 in 2016).[6]

Response

The Tug of Peace by Raven Hill, Punch 15 Dec. 1915

Initially, the press response to the Peace Ship was respectful.[8] The New York Times warned that an immediate peace would entail German possession of Belgium and part of France, but concluded that Ford’s plan would do “as little harm as good”.[8] Some newspapers applauded Ford’s efforts. The New York Herald asserted that, “We need more Fords, more peace talks, and less indifference to the greatest crime in the world’s history”.[13]

After all Ford’s most prominent invitees declined his offer of sailing to Europe, the press reaction turned negative.[13] The Baltimore Sun noted that “All the amateur efforts of altruistic and notoriety-seeking millionaires only make matters worse” while the New York World stated that “Henry Ford says he would give all his fortune to end the war. So would many another man. But this is something that money will not do”.[14] Other papers openly mocked Ford’s amateur peace campaign. The Philadelphia Record claimed that "Henry Ford’s millions have gone to his head". The Louisville Courier was even more severe, suggesting that Henry Ford carried "cold cream in his head".[14]

Also critical of Ford’s endeavor were former United States Senator Chauncey M. Depew and one- time presidential candidate Alton B. Parker. Depew famously commented of the Peace Ship, “In uselessness and absurdity it will stand without an equal”.[14] Parker also publicly criticized the peace ship, stating “chances are that his antics will be taken seriously and they will tend to bring us into contempt if not hatred”.[14]

Although the press mocked Ford’s peace mission, it viewed Ford as a victim of manipulation by the other pacifists aboard the ship.[9] The reporters on the Oscar II took a liking to Ford and decided that he should be afforded more respect than rest of his entourage.[4] The correspondent for The New York Times stated that the reporters on the ship earned "an immense respect and liking for the character and abilities of Henry Ford".[4]

However, the press portrayed the majority of Ford’s entourage aboard the ship as buffoons, and ridiculed the delegates for the infighting.[4] The press was exceptionally critical of Rosika Schwimmer, who insisted she had diplomatic correspondence that proved the European powers were open to negotiation, but refused to show these documents to the press.[11] Schwimmer responded to her negative treatment by the press by locking them out of the wireless room.[11]

Legacy

The Peace Ship’s mission was ultimately a failure, producing only inconsequential meetings with “quasi-official representatives” from several European governments.[6] Nevertheless, Ford asserted that the Peace Ship’s expedition was successful on the grounds that it stimulated discussions about peace.[5] Ford told the press that the Peace Ship "got people thinking, and when you get them to think they will think right".[5] Despite roundly criticizing the Peace Ship, the press generally treated Ford favorably upon his return from Europe.[15] Even papers that derided the Peace Ship, such as the New York American, often voiced support for Ford’s calls for peace.[15] In the following years, Ford continued his antiwar activism and paid for anti-preparedness advertisements to appear in newspapers across the United States.[5]

References

  1. 1 2 Watts, Steven (2005). The People's Tycoon: Henry Ford and the American Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. p. 228.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Watts, Steven (2005). The People's Tycoon: Henry Ford and the American Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. p. 229.
  3. 1 2 3 Traxel, David (2006). Crusader Nation: The United States in Peace and the Great War 1898-1920. New York. p. 206.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Watts, Steven (2005). The People's Tycoon: Henry Ford and the American Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. p. 234.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Watts, Steven (2005). The People's Tycoon: Henry Ford and the American Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. p. 235.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Henry, Jim (June 15, 2003). "Noble cause becomes a farce ; Peace Ship cements Henry Ford's image as a well-meaning but naive do-gooder". Automotive News. Retrieved 7 December 2012.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Traxel, David (2006). Crusader Nation: The United States in Peace and the Great War 1898-1920. New York. p. 204.
  8. 1 2 3 Traxel, David (2006). Crusader Nation: The United States in Peace and the Great War 1898-1920. New York. p. 205.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Traxel, David (2006). Crusader Nation: The United States in Peace and the Great War 1898-1920. New York. p. 209.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Watts, Steven (2005). The People's Tycoon: Henry Ford and the American Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. p. 232.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Watts, Steven (2005). The People's Tycoon: Henry Ford and the American Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. p. 233.
  12. ↑ Traxel, David (2006). Crusader Nation: The United States in Peace and the Great War 1898-1920. New York. pp. 209–210.
  13. 1 2 Watts, Steven (2005). The People's Tycoon: Henry Ford and the American Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. p. 230.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Watts, Steven (2005). The People's Tycoon: Henry Ford and the American Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. p. 231.
  15. 1 2 Watts, Steven (2005). The People's Tycoon: Henry Ford and the American Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. p. 240.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, December 28, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.