Penthouse principle
The penthouse principle, a term in syntax coined by John R. Ross in 1973, describes the fact that many syntactic phenomena treat matrix (or main) clauses differently from embedded (or subordinate) clauses:
- The penthouse principle: The rules are different if you live in the penthouse.
The penthouse named in the principle is the top-floor of a highrise apartment building, and is a metaphor for the matrix clause in a multi-clause structure (which, when diagrammed in usual phrase marker notation, contains the highest clause node in the structure). Perhaps the best-known example of a penthouse principle effect is the distribution of subject-auxiliary inversion in constituent questions in English, which in many (but not all) varieties of English is restricted to matrix clauses:
- (1) a. What can Sam do about it?
- b. I'll find out what Sam can do about it.
Compare:
- (2) a. *What Sam can do about it?
- b. *I'll find out what can Sam do about it.
Other phenomena falling under the penthouse principle are V2-effects in the Germanic languages and the distribution of declarative markers, imperative morphology, and of various particles in a variety of languages.[1]
Notes
- ↑ See Merchant 2007 for examples of these.
References
- de Haan, German. 2001. More is going on upstairs than downstairs: Embedded root phenomena in West Frisian. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4.1:3–38.
- Merchant, Jason. 2007. Three kinds of ellipsis. Ms., University of Chicago.
- Ross, John R. 1973. The penthouse principle and the order of constituents. In C.T. Corum, T.C. Smith-Stark and A. Weiser (eds.), You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node, 397–422. Chicago Linguistic Society: Chicago, Ill.