Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass'n

Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association

Argued December 1, 2014
Decided March 9, 2015
Full case name Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor, et al., Petitioners v. Mortgage Bankers Association, et al.; Jerome Nickols, et al., Petitioners v. Mortgage Bankers Association
Docket nos. 13–1041
13–1052
Citations

575 U.S. ___ (more)

Court membership
Chief Justice
John G. Roberts
Case opinions
Majority Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan; Alito (expect part III-B)
Concurrence Alito
Concurrence Scalia
Concurrence Thomas
Laws applied
Administrative Procedure Act

Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association, 575 U.S. ___ (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the D.C. Circuit's Paralyzed Veterans doctrine is contrary to a clear reading of the Administrative Procedure Act and "improperly imposes on agencies an obligation beyond the Act's maximum procedural requirements."[1]

Opinion of the Court

Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored the opinion of the Court.[2]

Associate Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas authored concurring opinions.

See also

References

  1. ↑ http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/perez-v-mortgage-bankers-association/
  2. ↑ http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-1041_0861.pdf

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, March 02, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.