Picture superiority effect

^[1] Visual Storytelling by Sohini Gowan

The picture superiority effect refers to the phenomenon whereby pictures and images are more likely to be remembered than words.^{[2][3][4][5][6][7]} This effect has been demonstrated in numerous experiments using different methods. It is based on the notion that "human memory is extremely sensitive to the symoblic modality of presentation of event information" ^[8] While explanations for the picture superiority effect are still not concrete, they are still being debated.

History of Picture Superiority Effect

Allen Pavio’s Dual-Coding Theory is a basis of picture superiority effect. Pavio claims that pictures have advantages over words with regards to coding and retrieval of stored memory because pictures are coded more easily and can be retrieved from symbolic mode, while the dual coding process using words is more difficult for both coding and retrieval. Another explanation of the higher free call in picture superiority is due to the higher familiarity or frequency of pictured objects (Asch & Ebenholtz, 1962).^[1] According to dual-coding theory by Allan Paivio (1971, 1986), memory exists either (or both) verbally or "imaginally". Concrete concepts presented as pictures are encoded into both systems; however, abstract concepts are recorded only verbally. In psychology the effect has implications for salience in attribution theory as well as the availability heuristic. It is also relevant to advertising and user interface design.

Related Theories

Paivio – Dual Coding Theory

Picture stimuli have an advantage over word stimuli because they are dually encoded; they generate a verbal and image code, whereas word stimuli only generate a verbal code. Pictures are likely to generate a verbal label, whereas words are not likely to generate image labels.^[4]

Nelson – Sensory Semantic Theory

Pictures hold two encoding advantages over words. Pictures are perceptually more distinct from one another than are words, thus increasing their chance for retrieval. In experiments when similarity among pictures was high, no picture superiority effect was present. Pictures are also believed to assess meaning more directly than words. Levels of processing theory apply when words and pictures are compared under semantic study instructions (rate the pleasantness of each item), recall is very similar for pictures and words, as both were encoded at deeper levels.^[4]

Picture superiority results from superior encoding for pictures as opposed to words, which facilitate greater recollection for pictures.^[2]

Weldon and Roediger-Transfer Appropriate Processing Theories

^[4] Greater overlap of processing at study and test result in increased performance. TAP accounts for picture superiority by an interaction of encoding and retrieval. If items are encoded during a semantic task, performance should be higher for a memory test that relies on concepts related to the items for retrieval than a test that relies on perceptual features.

Evidence of Picture Superiority Effect

This effect has been shown to occur in recognition memory tasks, where items studied as pictures are better remembered than items studied as words, even when targets are presented as words during the test phase.^[5] Whether the picture superiority effect influences the familiarity and/or recollection processes, according to the dual-process models, thought to underlie recognition memory is not clear.^[2]

In experiments of associative recognition memory, participants studied random concrete word pairs, and line drawing pairs. They had to discriminate between intact and rearranged pairs at test. The picture superiority effect continued to express a strong effect with a greater hit rate for intact picture pairs. This further supports encoding theories ^[9] More recent research in associative recognition shows support that semantic meaning of nameable pictures is activated faster than that of words, allowing for more meaningful associations between items depicted as pictures to be generated.^[10]

Pictures have distinctive features that enable to distinguish pictures from words and such discriminability increase memory ability in comparison with verbal cues (Jenkins, Neale & Deno, 19^[11] 67). Picture Superiority effect was also evident for memory recall during semantic procession (Childers & Houston, 1984^[12]). Moreover, pictures in pairs or group were better organized in our memory than words thus resulting in superiority in recall (Pavio & Csapo, 1973^[13]). The picture superiority effect is also present in spatial memory, where locations of items and photographs were remembered better than locations of words.^[14]

Critique of Picture Superiority Effect

The advantage of picture over word is only feasible when visual similarity is not a reliable cue because it takes longer to understand pictures than words (Snodgrass & McCullough, 1986^[15]). Pictures are only superior to words for list learning because differentiation is easier for pictures (Dominowski & Gadlin, 1968^[16]). Reverse picture superiority was observed that learning was much slower when the responses were pictures (Postman, 1978^[17]). Words were produced faster response than pictures and pictures did not have advantages of having easier access to sematic memory or superior effect over words for dual-coding theory (Amrhein, McDaniel & Waddill 2002^[18]). Similarly, there were studies when response time deadlines have been implemented reserve superiroity effect was reported. This is related to the dual-process model of familiarity and recollection. When deadlines to respond were short, the process of familiarity was present, along with an increased tendency to recall words over pictures. When response deadlines were longer, the process of recollection was being utilized, and a strong picture superiority effect was present.^[19] In addition, equivalent response time was reported for picture and words for intelligence comparison (Paivio & Marschark, 1980^[20]). Contrary to the assumption that pictures access faster to the same semantic code than words do, all semantic information is stored in a single system. The only difference is that pictures and words access different features of the semantic code (te Linde, 1982^[21]).

Picture Superiority Effect with age

Across the lifespan, the picture superiority effect is evident. The picture superiority effect in recognition memory shows a developmental trend, becoming more pronounced with age.^[5][6] Picture superiority effect increased with ages disputing the hypothesis that greater picture superiority is observed among younger children (Whitehouse, Mayber, Durkin, 2006^[22]). However, the major contribution in picture superiority in recognition memory among children was familiarity (Defeyter, Russo & McPartlin, 2009^[23]). During childhood, specifically among seven-year-olds, the picture superiority effect is lesser in magnitude than in other age groups.^[6] This could be due to the lack of inner speech among younger children supporting the dual coding theory of Paivio. In healthy older adults, the picture superiority effect was found to be greater than it was for younger adults, in comparison to recognition for words, which was disadvantaged for older adults.^[24] In that regards, oldest-old people can benefit from the pictorial information in order to retain textual information, implying greater possibilities of using pictorial images or memory treatment in their daily lives (Cherry et al., 2008^[25]). While memory for words is impaired for older adults, pictures help restore their impaired memory and function properly (Ally et al., 2008^[26]). In addition, older adults have shown the same level of capability for identifying correct items in comparison with young adults when items were accompanied with pictures (Smith, Hunt & Dunlap, 2015). In populations with Alzheimer’s disease, and other mild cognitive impairments, the picture superiority effect remains apparent.^[27] ERP activity indicates that patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment utilized frontally based memorial processes to support successful recognition for pictures, which was similar to healthy controls, but not for words.^[27]

Application

By Anthony Jackson

• Education (language learning): Learners can structure a mental model when processing a picture initially so that no further model construction may be required for subsequent processing of a text. Presenting picture before text is beneficial to students with low prior knowledge (Eitel & Scheiter, 2015^[28]). In a similar vein, reading a picture prior to processing textual information improves comprehension levels for students with low prior knowledge (Salmerón, Baccino, Cañas, Madrid, & Fajardo, 2009^[29]). Pictures can be more effective than word translation for language learning when individuals are not overconfident in the mnemonic power of pictures (Carpenter & Olson, 2011^[30]). If they are overconfident, pictures lose superiority over words.

Antismoking PSA-Truth Campaign

• Heath Communication: A study by Ally, Gold and Budson (2009)^[31] confirm that picture superiority effect was observed among mild Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and amnestic-type mild cognitive impairment (MC). Pictures have a significantly positive effect on four areas of communication: attention, comprehension, recall, and intention/adherence. Health education materials can benefit greatly by adding pictures as pictures can be especially beneficial for people who lack literacy skill (Houts, C.Doak, L.Doak &Loscalzo, 2006^[32]). Picture superiority effect can be implemented in creating materials for health communication that inclusion of fearful or disgusting images led to improved recognition memory in comparison with the condition without a presence of image (Leshner, Vultee, Bolls & Moore, 2010^[33]).
• Advertising: Percy and Rossiter^[34] (1997, p. 295) stated, “ The picture is the most important structural element in magazine advertising, for both consumer and business audiences.” Visually framed messages were more effective under the condition where the audience was less motivated and had less ability to process information semantically. Visual ads require less exposure than verbal ads for long-term memory effect (Childers & Houston, 1984^[12]). The pictorial component in the ad is more likely to be viewed before words, and it generates an expectation for the verbal component of the ad (Houston, Childers & Heckler, 1987^[35]). Maximizing the size of pictures regardless of advertising contents will improve attention to the entire advertisement as pictures draw significant attention to baseline in the ads (Pieters & Wedel, 2004^[36]).

Proposed Model of Picture Superiority Effect

Dual coding process by Clark and Paivio (1991)

Proposed Model of Picture Superiority Effect by Sung Eun Park

See also

• Memory bias
• List of cognitive biases
• Visual rhetoric
• Dual process model
• Infographic
• Pictogram

Direction for future studies

• Clinical setting to evaluate pictures for health communication (Houts, C.Doak, L.Doak &Loscalzo, 2006^[32])
• Empirical studies on simplicity of picture for encoding and decoding the pictorial information

References

1. Asch, Solomon E; Ebenholtz, Sheldon M (1982). "The principle of associative symmetry". Proceeding of the American Philosophical Society.
2. Curran, T., & Doyle, J. (2011). Picture superiority doubly dissociates the ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(5), 1247-1262. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21464
3. Shepard, R.N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 156-163.
4. McBride, D. M., Dosher, B.A. (2002). A comparison of conscious and automatic memory processes for picture and word stimuli: a process dissociation analysis. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 423-460.
5. Defetyer, M. A., Russo, R., McPartlin, P. L. (2009). The picture superiority effect in recognition memory: a developmental study using the response signal procedure.Cognitive Development, 24, 265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.05.002
6. Whitehouse, A. J., Maybery, M.T., Durkin, K. (2006). The development of the picture-superiority effect. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 767-773. doi:10.1348/026151005X74153
7. Ally, B. A., Gold, C. A., Budson, A. E. (2009). The picture superiority effect in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia 47, 595-598. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.010
8. Yuille, John C. (2014-05-09). Imagery, Memory and Cognition (PLE: Memory): Essays in Honor of Allan Paivio. Psychology Press. ISBN 9781317685470.
9. Hockley, W. E. (2008). The picture superiority effect in associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 36(7), 1351-1359. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1351.
10. Hockley, W.E., & Bancroft, T. (2011). Extensions of the picture superiority effect in associative recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(4), 236-244. doi: 10.1037/a0023796
11. Jenkins, Joseph R; Neale, Daniel C; Reno, Stanley L (1967). "Differential memory for picture and word stimuli". Journal of Educational Psychology.
12. Childers, Terry L; Houston, Michael J (1984). "Conditions for a picture-superiority effect on consumer memory". Journal of consumer research.
13. Paivio, Allan; Csapo, Kalman (1973). "Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding?". Cognitive psychology.
14. Cattaneo, Z., Rosen, M., Vecchi, T., Pelz, J. B. (2008). Monitoring eye movements to investigate the picture superiority effect in spatial memory. Perception, 37, 34-49. doi: 10.1068/p5623
15. Snodgrass, Joan G; McCullough, Brian (1987). "The role of visual similarity in picture categorisation". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
16. Dominowski, Roger L; Gadlin, Howard (1968). "Imagery and paired-associate learning". Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie.
17. Postman, Leo (1978). "Picture-word differences in the acquisition and retention of paired associates". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory.
18. Amrhein, Paul C; McDaniel, Mark; Waddill, Paula (2002). "Revisiting the picture superiority effect in symbolic comparison: Do pictures provide privileged access?". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
19. Boldini, A., Russo, R., Punia, S., Avons, S. E. (2007). Reversing picture superiority effect: a speed-accuracy trade-off study of recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 113- 123. doi: 10.3758/BF03195948
20. Paivio, Allan; Marschark, Marc (1980). "Comparative judgements of animal intelligence and pleasantness". Memory & Cognition.
21. te Linde, John (1982). "Picture-word difference in decision latency: A test of common-coding assumptions". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
22. Whitehouse, Andrew JO; Maybery, Murray T; Durkin, Kevin (2006). "The development of the picture-superiority effect". British Journal of Developmental Psychology.
23. Defeater, Margaret A; Russo, Riccardo; McPartlin, Pamela (2009). "The Picture Superiority Effect in Recognition Memory: a developmental study".
24. Ally, B. A., Waring, J. D., Beth, E. H., McKeever, J. D., Milberg, W. P., Budson, A. E. (2008). Aging memory for pictures: using high-density event-related potentials to understand the effect of aging on the picture superiority effect. Neuropsychologia, 46, 679-689. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.011
25. Cherry, Katie E; Hawley, Karri S; Jackson, Erin M; Julia, Volaufova; Su, Joseph; Jazwinski, Michal (2008). "Pictorial superiority effects in oldest-old people". Memory.
26. Ally, Brandon; Warning, Jill D; Beth, Ellen H; McKeever, Joshua; Milberg, William P; Budson, Andrew E (2008). "Acing memory for pictures: Using high-density potentials to understand the effect of aging on the picture superiority effect". Neuropsychologia.
27. Ally, B. A., McKeever, J. D., Waring, J. D., Budson, A. E. (2009). Preserved frontal memorial processing for pictures in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2044-2055. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.015
28. Eitel, Alexander; Scheiter, Katharina (2015). "Picture or text first? Explaining sequence effects when learning with pictures and text". Educational psychology review.
29. Salmerón, Ladislao; Baccino, Thierry; Cañas, Jose J; Madrid, Rafael I; Fajardo, Inmaculada (2009). "Do graphical overviews facilitate or hinder comprehension in hyptertext?". Computers & Education.
30. Carpenter, Shana K; Olson, Kellie M (2012). "Are pictures good for learning new vocabulary in a foreign language? Only if you think they are not.". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
31. Ally, Brandon; Gold, Carl A; Budson, Andrew E (2009). "The picture superiority effect in patients with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment". Neuropsychologia.
32. Houts, Peter S; Doak, Cecilia C; Doak, Leonard G; Loscalzo, Matthew J (2006). "The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall,and adherence". Patient education and counseling.
33. Leshner, Glenn; Volte, Fred; Bolls, Paul D; Moore, Jensen (2010). "When a fear appeal isn't just a fear appeal: The effects of graphic anti-tobacco messages". Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.
34. Percy, Larry; Rossiter, John R (1997). A theory-based approach to pretesting advertising. WD Wells. p. 295.
35. Houston, Michael J; Childers, Terry L; Heckler, Susan E (1987). "Picture-word consistency and the elaborative processing of advertisements". Journal of Marketing Research.
36. Pieters, Rik; Wedel, Michel (2004). "Attention capture and transfer in advertising: Brand, pictorial, and text-seize effects". Journal of Marketing.

Sources

• Nelson, D.L., Reed, U.S., & Walling, J.R. (1976). Pictorial superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 523-528.
• Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.