Scipio Aemilianus

Publius Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus Africanus Numantinus (185–129 BC), also known as Scipio Aemilianus or Scipio Africanus Minor (Scipio Africanus the Younger), was a politician of the Roman Republic. He was elected consul twice. On both occasions he was under the age required to be a consul, but an exception was made, so that he could take the command in wars in which the Romans struggled to make headway. In 147 BC, he took over the command of the Third Punic War (149-146 BC) and besieged and destroyed Carthage. In 134 BC he took over the Numantine War (143-133 BC), restored the discipline of the Roman army, besieged Numantia and destroyed it. He was a prominent patron of writers and philosophers.

Family

Scipio Aemilianus was the second of two sons of Lucius Aemilius Paulus Macedonicus, (the commander who led the victorious campaign of the Romans in the Third Macedonian War) and his first wife, Papiria Masonis, Aemilius divorced. The two sons were adopted by two prominent patrician families. The older one was adopted by a son or grandson of Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus (a prominent commander in the Second Punic War) and his name became Quintus Fabius Maximus Aemilianus (assuming the name of his adoptive father and the agnomen Aemilianus after his original family name). The younger one was adopted by Publius Cornelius Scipio, the eldest son of Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus (the commander who won the decisive battles of the Second Punic War), whose mother was Aemilia Tertia (better known as Aemilia Paulla), the sister of Aemilianus. His name became Publius Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus. Through Aemilia his adoptive father was also his cousin. Aemilius had two sons from a second wife whose name is unknown. He also had two daughters. We are not told who their mother was.[1] The two other sons died just before and just after the father celebrated his triumph for his victory in Greece.[2]

First involvement in a war (Third Macedonian War, 171–168 BC)

Lucius Aemilius Paullus took his two older sons with him in his campaign in Greece. Plutarch wrote that Scipio was his favourite son because he "saw that he was by nature more prone to excellence than any of his brothers." He related that during mopping-up operations after the Battle of Pydna, Aemilius was worried because his younger son was missing. Plutarch also wrote that "The whole army learned of the distress and anguish of their general, and springing up from their suppers, ran about with torches, many to the tent of Aemilius, and many in front of the ramparts, searching among the numerous dead bodies. Dejection reigned in the camp, and the plain was filled with the cries of men calling out the name of Scipio. For from the very outset he had been admired by everybody, since, beyond any other one of his family, he had a nature adapted for leadership in war and public service. Well, then, when it was already late and he was almost despaired of, he came in from the pursuit with two or three comrades, covered with the blood of the enemies he had slain ..." [3] Scipio Aemilanus was seventeen at the time.

First involvement in the Numantine War (143-133 BC)

In 152 BC, the consul Marcus Claudius Marcellus urged the senate to conclude a peace with the Celtiberians. The senate rejected this and one of the consuls for 151 BC, Lucius Licinius Lucullus, was sent to Hispania to continue the war. However, there was a crisis of recruitment. Due to rumours about of the incessant battles and heavy Roman losses, and with Marcellus appearing to be afraid of continuing the war, there was panic. Young men avoided enrollment as soldiers through unverifiable excuses. Men eligible to be legates (legion commanders) or Military tribunes (senior officers) did not volunteer.[4] Scipio Aemilianus, who was thought to have advised the prosecution of the war, asked the senate to be sent to Hispania either as a military tribune or a legatus, even though it was safer for him to go to Macedon where he had been invited to go to settle domestic disputes, because the crisis in Hispania was more urgent. The senate was at first surprised, but Scipio became popular and those who had been avoiding their duty, ashamed by Scipio’s example begun to volunteer as legates or to enroll as soldiers.[5] He served under Lucullus. Velleius Paterculus wrote and was awarded a mural crown (a military decoration awarded to a soldier who first climbed the wall of a besieged city or fortress to successfully place the military standard on it).[6] Florus wrote that "having been challenged by their king to a single combat, carried off the spolia opima (the armour and arms stripped from the body of an opposing commander slain in single combat. They were regarded as the most honourable of all war trophies).[7]

Third Punic War (149-146 BC)

Although the power of Carthage been broken with her defeat in the Second Punic War, there was still lingering resentment in Rome. Cato the Elder ended every speech with, "Carthage must be destroyed." In 150 BC an appeal was made to Scipio Aemilianus by the Carthaginians to act as mediator between them and the Numidian prince Massinissa who, supported by the anti-Carthaginian faction in Rome, was incessantly encroaching on Carthaginian territory. In 149 BC Rome declared war, and a force sent to Africa (Tunisia), Carthage's homeland.[8]

In the early stages of the war, the Romans suffered repeated defeats. Scipio Aemilianus, was a military tribune (senior officer), and distinguished himself repeatedly. In 147 BC he was elected consul, while still under the minimal age required by law to hold this office.[8] Without the customary procedure of drawing lots, he was assigned to the African theatre of war. After a year of desperate fighting and stubborn heroism on the part of the defenders, he took the city of Carthage, taking prisoner about 50,000 survivors (about one tenth of the city's population.) Complying with the mandate of the Senate, he ordered the city evacuated, burnt it, razed it to the ground and ploughed it over, ending the Third Punic War. On his return to Rome he received a Triumph, having also established a personal claim to his adoptive agnomen of Africanus.[8]

Numantine War (143-133 BC)

In 134 BC Scipio was elected consul again because the citizens thought that he was the only man capable of defeating the Numantines in the Numantine War. The Celtiberians of the City of Numantia, which had strong defensive geographical features, held off the Romans for nine years. The army in Hispania was demoralised and ill-disciplined. Scipio concentrated on restoring discipline by forbidding luxuries the troops had become accustomed to, through regular tough exercises (all-day marches, building camps and fortifications and then demolishing them, digging ditches and then filling them up, and the like) and by enforcing regulations strictly. When he thought that the army was ready he encamped near Numantia. He did not proceed along the shorter route to avoid the guerrilla tactics the Numantines were good at. Instead, he made a detour though the land of the Vaccaei, who were selling food to the Numantines. He was ambushed several times but defeated the enemy. In one of these ambushes by a river which was difficult to cross, he was forced to make a detour along a longer route where there was no water. He marched at night when it was cooler and dug wells which had bitter water. He saved his men, but some horses and pack animals died of thirst. Then he passed through the territory of the Caucaei who had broken the treaty with Rome and declared that they could return safely to their homes. He returned to the Numanitine territory and was joined by Jugurtha, the son of the king of Numidia, with twelve elephants, archers and slingers.[9]

Eventually, Scipio prepared to besiege Numantia. He asked the allied tribes in Hispania for specified numbers of troops. He built a circuit of fortifications which was nine kilometres long. The wall was three metres high and two and a half metres wide. He built an embankment of the same dimensions as the wall around the adjoining marsh. He built two towers by the River Durius (Douro) to which he moored large timbers with ropes which were full of knives and spear heads and were constantly kept in motion by the current. This prevented the enemy from slipping through covertly. He managed to force Numantia into starvation. The Numantines surrendered. Some killed themselves. Scipio sold the rest into slavery, destroyed the city and kept fifty men for his triumph.[10] For his success Scipio Aemilianus received the additional agnomen of "Numantinus." [8]

Political career

In 142 BC Scipio Africanus was a censor. During his censorship, he endeavoured to check the growing luxury and immorality of the period. In 139 BC, he was unsuccessfully accused of high treason by Tiberius Claudius Asellus, whom he had degraded when censor. The speeches he gave on that occasion (now lost) were considered brilliant.

Scipio helped his relative Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus who in 134 BC had served in the Numantine War as a quaestor (treasurer) under the consul Gaius Hostilius Mancinus. The consul was pinned down by the enemy and, unable to escape, made a peace treaty. Tiberius negotiated the peace terms. The treaty was rejected by the senate as a disgrace. Plutarch wrote that "the relatives and friends of the soldiers, who formed a large part of the people" blamed this on Mancinus and insisted "that it was due to Tiberius that the lives of so many citizens had been saved." Those who disagreed with the violation of the treaty "cast forth those who had taken hand and share in the treaty, as for instance the quaestors and military tribunes, turning upon their heads the guilt of perjury and violation of the pact. In the present affair, indeed, more than at any other time, the people showed their good will and affection towards Tiberius. For they voted to deliver up the consul unarmed and in bonds to the Numantines, but spared all the other officers for the sake of Tiberius." Scipio used his influence to help to save the men "but none the less he was blamed for not saving Mancinus, and for not insisting that the treaty with the Numantines, which had been made through the agency of his kinsman and friend Tiberius, should be kept inviolate." [11]

The Encyclopædia Britannica suggests that Scipio Aemilianus was not in sympathy with the optimates, the political faction which supported the aristocracy.[12] Whatever the case, he was in disagreement with the militant actions of the movement led by Gracchus when he was a plebeian tribune, which pressed for a law to redistribute land to the poor. Plutarch wrote that "this disagreement certainly resulted in no mischief past remedy" and thought that if Scipio had been in Rome during the political activity of Gracchus, the latter would not have been murdered [13] - he was fighting the war in Hispania. Still, he disliked the actions of Gracchus. Plutarch wrote "[while] at Numantia, when he learned of the death of Tiberius, he recited in a loud voice the verse of Homer: [from the Odyssey I.47] "So may all who engage in such lawless conspiracies perish." Plutarch also wrote that (after his return to Rome) "when Caius and Fulvius asked him in an assembly of the people what he thought about the death of Tiberius, he made a reply which showed his dislike of the measures advocated by him," this made him unpopular, "the people began to interrupt him as he was speaking, a thing which they had never done before, and Scipio himself was thereby led on to abuse the people." [14] Gaius Papirius Carbo was a plebeian tribune and Marcus Fulvius Flaccus was a senator sympathetic to the Gracchian cause.

Scipio made himself unpopular again. Appian related that Fulvius Flaccus, Papirius Carbo and Tiberius’ younger brother, Caius Sempronius Gracchus, chaired a commission to implement the Gracchian law. There never had been a land survey and land owners often did not have land deeds. The land was resurveyed. Some owners had to give up their orchards and farm buildings and go to empty land or move from cultivated to uncultivated land or swamps. As anyone was allowed to work undistributed land, many tilled land next to their own, blurring the demarcation between public and private land. Rome’s Italian allies complained about lawsuits brought against them and chose Scipio Aemilianus to defend them. As the allies had fought in his wars, he accepted. In the senate Scipio did not criticise the Law, but argued that the cases should be herd by a court rather than the commission which did not have the confidence of the litigants. This was accepted and the consul Gaius Sempronius Tuditanus was appointed to give judgement. However, seeing that the job was difficult he found a pretext to fight a war in Illyria. The people were angry "because they saw a man, in whose favour they had often opposed the aristocracy and incurred their enmity, electing him consul twice contrary to law, now taking the side of the Italian allies against themselves" His enemies claimed that he was determined to abolish the Gracchian law and was about to start "armed strife and bloodshed." When the people heard these allegations they were in a state of alarm until Scipio died at home in his bed.[15] Then According to Appian, he died without a wound.

Appian wrote that it could not be known whether Scipio was murdered by Cornelia (the mother of the Gracchi brothers) and her daughter Sempronia (who was married to Scipio) who were worried that the Gracchian law might be repealed or whether he committed suicide because he saw that he could not deliver on his promises. He added that "[s]ome say that slaves under torture testified that unknown persons were introduced through the rear of the house by night who suffocated him, and that those who knew about it hesitated to tell because the people were angry with him still and rejoiced at his death." [16] Plutarch wrote that "although Scipio Africanus died at home after dinner, there is no convincing proof of the manner of his end, but some say that he passed away naturally, being of a sickly habit, some that he died of poison administered by his own hand, and some that his enemies broke into his house at night and smothered him. And yet Scipio's dead body lay exposed for all to see, and all who beheld it formed therefrom some suspicion and conjecture of what had happened to it." [17] In another book Plutarch wrote "no cause of such an unexpected death could be assigned, only some marks of blows upon his body seemed to intimate that he had suffered violence" The heaviest suspicions fell on on Fulvius Flaccus who "that very day had reflected upon Scipio in a public address to the people." Caius Gracchus also came under suspicion. However, "this great outrage, committed too upon the person of the greatest and most considerable man in Rome, was never either punished or inquired into thoroughly, for the populace opposed and hindered any judicial investigation, for fear that Caius should be implicated in the charge if proceedings were carried on.[18] Gaius Papirius Carbo also came under accusation. During a trial Lucius Licinius Crassus accused Carbo of being a party in the murder of Scipio.[19] Ian Worthington rejects all these speculations and argues that Scipio Aemilianus died of natural causes.[20]

The man

Velleius Paterculus wrote that Scipio was "a cultivated patron and admirer of liberal studies and of every form of learning, and kept constantly with him, at home and in the field, two men of eminent genius, Polybius and Panaetius. No one ever relieved the duties of an active life by a more refined use of his intervals of leisure than Scipio, or was more constant in his devotion to the arts either of war or peace. Ever engaged in the pursuit of arms or his studies, he was either training his body by exposing it to dangers or his mind by learning." [21] Polybius mentioned going to Africa with Scipio to explore the continent [22] Gellius wrote that Scipio "used the purest diction of any man of his time." [23] Cicero cited him among the orators who were "a little more emphatic than the ordinary, [but] never strained their lungsof shouted …" [24] It seems that he had a good sense of humour and Cicero cited a number of anecdotes about his puns.[25] Cicero also wrote a short story dedicated to him called "The Dream of Scipio."

Culturally, Scipio Aemilianus was both progressive and conservative. He was the patron of the so-called Scipionic circle, a group of 15 to 27 philosophers, poets, and politicians, Besides Roman satirists and comedy writers such as Lucilius and Terence, there were Greek intellectuals, such as the scholar and historian Polybius and the Stoic philosopher Panaetius. Hence, Scipio had a philhellenic disposition (love and admiration for Greek culture). Such disposition was criticised by Roman traditionalists who disliked the growing Hellenisation of Rome which, they thought was corrupting Roman culture and life though alien influences and advocated adherence to old Roman traditions and ancestral virtues and mores. Yet, Scipio was also a supporter of such traditions and mores. Gellius wrote that when he was censor, Scipio made a speech "urging the people to follow the customs of their forefathers." [26] He criticised several things which "were done contrary to the usage of our forefathers," and found fault with adoptive sons being of profit to their adoptive father in gaining the rewards of paternity, and said: "A father votes in one tribe, the son in another, an adopted son is of as much advantage as if one had a son of his own; orders are given to take the census of absentees, and hence it is not necessary for anyone to appear in person at the census." [27]

Gellius wrote that after he was censor, Scipio was accused before the people by Claudius Asellius, a plebeian tribune, whom he had stripped of his knighthood during his censorship. He does not mention what the accusation was. Although under accusation, Scipio did not stop to shave and to wear white clothing and did not appear in the garb of those under accusation. He added that in those days noblemen started shaving in middle age.[28] The satirist Lucilius wrote a verse about the episode: "Thus base Asellus did great Scipio taunt: Unlucky was his censorship and bad." [29]

Scipio Aemilianus will be forever be associated with the destruction of Carthage.

“

Scipio, when he looked upon the city as it was utterly perishing and in the last throes of its complete destruction, is said to have shed tears and wept openly for his enemies. After being wrapped in thought for long, and realizing that all cities, nations, and authorities must, like men, meet their doom; that this happened to Ilium, once a prosperous city, to the empires of Assyria, Media, and Persia, the greatest of their time, and to Macedonia itself, the brilliance of which was so recent, either deliberately or the verses escaping him, he said:

A day will come when sacred Troy shall perish,
And Priam and his people shall be slain.

And when Polybius speaking with freedom to him, for he was his teacher, asked him what he meant by the words, they say that without any attempt at concealment he named his own country, for which he feared when he reflected on the fate of all things human. Polybius actually heard him and recalls it in his history.[30]

 ”

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Plutarch Parallel Lives, the Life of Aemilianus, 5.16
  2. ↑ Plutarch, Parallel lives, The Life of Aemilius, 35
  3. ↑ Plutarch, Parallel Lives, The Live of Aemilius, 22.2-7
  4. ↑ Polybius, The Histories, 35.4.1-7
  5. ↑ Polybius, The Histories, 35, 4.8-14
  6. ↑ Velleius Paterculus, Roman History, I.12.3
  7. ↑ Florus, Epitome of Roman History 1.17
  8. 1 2 3 4 Public Domain One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Scipio". Encyclopædia Britannica 24 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 406–407. This Scipio is listed as the third of four with the name.
  9. ↑ Appian, Roman History, Book 6, The Wars in Spain, 84-89
  10. ↑ Appian, Roman History, Book 6, The Wars in Spain, 90-98
  11. ↑ Plutarch, Parallel lives, The live of Tiberius Gracchus, 7.1-3
  12. ↑ "Scipio Africanus the Younger". Encyclopaedia Britannica Online. Retrieved 4 May 2013.
  13. ↑ Plutarch, Parallel lives, The live of Tiberius Gracchus, 7.4
  14. ↑ Plutarch, Parallel Lives, The life of Tiberius Gracchus, 21-4-5
  15. ↑ Appian, Roman History, Book 13 The Civil Wars, 1.18-20
  16. ↑ Appian, Roman History, Book 13, The Civil Wars, 1.20
  17. ↑ Plutarch, Parallel Lives, The live of Romulus, 27.4-5
  18. ↑ Plutarch, Parallel lives, The live of Caius Gracchus, 10.4-5.
  19. ↑ Cicero, De Oratore, II.40
  20. ↑ Worthington, I, The Death of Scipio Africanus, Hermes, Vol. 117, No. 2 (1989), pp. 253–256 ( JSTOR reference)
  21. ↑ Velleius Paterculus, Roman History, 1.13.3
  22. ↑ Polybius,The Histories, 34, 15.7, 16.2
  23. ↑ Gellius, Attic Nights, 2.20.4
  24. ↑ Cicero De Oratore, 2.60
  25. ↑ Cicero, De Oratore, 2.61, 64, 65, 66, 69
  26. ↑ Gellius, Attic Nights, 4.20.10
  27. ↑ Gellius, Attic Nights, 19.15
  28. ↑ Gellius, Attic Nights, 3.4
  29. ↑ Gellius Attic Nights, 4.17.1
  30. ↑ Polybius 38.22 The Fall of Carthage

References

Ancient sources

Secondary sources

Preceded by
Spurius Postumius Albinus Magnus and Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus		 Consul of the Roman Republic
with Gaius Livius Drusus
147 BC 		Succeeded by
Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus and Lucius Mummius Achaicus
Preceded by
Quintus Calpurnius Piso and Servius Fulvius Flaccus		 Consul of the Roman Republic
with Gaius Fulvius Flaccus
134 BC 		Succeeded by
Lucius Calpurnius Piso Frugi and Publius Mucius Scaevola
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, May 02, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.