Quantum heat engines and refrigerators

A quantum heat engine is a device that generates power from the heat flow between hot and cold reservoirs. The operation mechanism of the engine can be described by the laws of quantum mechanics. The first realization of a quantum heat engine was pointed out by Geusic, Schultz-DuBois and Scoville.,^[1] showing the connection of efficiency of the Carnot engine and the 3-level maser. Quantum refrigerators share the structure of quantum heat engines with the purpose of pumping heat from a cold to a hot bath consuming power first suggested by Geusic, Bois and Scoville .^[2] When the power is supplied by a laser the process is termed optical pumping or laser cooling, suggested by Weinland and Hench .^[3] Surprisingly heat engines and refrigerators can operate up to the scale of a single particle thus justifying the need for a quantum theory termed quantum thermodynamics.^[4]

The 3-level amplifier as a quantum heat engine

The three level amplifier. Levels 1 and 3 are coupled to the hot reservoir. Levels 1 and 2 are coupled to the cold reservoir. Power is obtained when there is population inversion between levels 3 and 2.

The three-level-amplifier is the template of a quantum device. It operates by employing a hot and cold bath to maintain population inversion between two energy levels which is used to amplify light by stimulated emission ^[5] The ground state level (1-g) and the excited level (3-h) are coupled to a hot bath of temperature $T_h$. The energy gap is $\hbar \omega_h = E_3-E_1$ . When the population on the levels equilibrate

$\frac{N_h}{N_g}=e^{-\frac{\hbar \omega_h}{k_bT_h}}$

where $\hbar=\frac{h}{2 \pi }$ is Planck's constant and $k_b$ is Boltzmann's constant. The cold bath of temperature $T_c$ couples the ground (1-g) to an intermediate level (2-c) with energy gap $E_2-E_1=\hbar \omega_c$. When levels 2-c and 1-g equilibrate then

$\frac{N_c}{N_g}=e^{-\frac{\hbar \omega_c}{k_bT_c}}$.

The device operates as an amplifier when levels (3-h) and (2-c) are coupled to an external field of frequency $\nu$. For optimal resonance conditions $\nu=\omega_h-\omega_c$. The efficiency of the amplifier in converting heat to power is the ratio of work output to heat input:

$\eta=\frac{\hbar \nu}{\hbar \omega_h} =1-\frac{\omega_c}{\omega_h}$.

Amplification of the field is possible only for positive gain (population inversion) $G =N_h-N_c \ge 0$. This is equivalent to $\frac{\hbar \omega_c}{k_b T_c} \ge \frac{\hbar \omega_c}{k_b T_c}$. Inserting this expression into the efficiency formula leads to:

$\eta =1-\frac{\omega_c}{\omega_h} \le 1- \frac{T_c}{T_h} = \eta_c$

where $\eta_c$is the Carnot cycle efficiency. Equality is obtained under a zero gain condition $G =0$. The relation between the quantum amplifier and the Carnot efficiency was first pointed out by Geusic and Scoville.:^[1]

Reversing the operation driving heat from the cold bath to the hot bath by consuming power constitutes a refrigerator. The efficiency of the refrigerator defined as the coefficient of performance (COP) for the reversed device is:

$\epsilon = \frac{\omega_c}{\nu} \le \frac{T_c}{T_h-T_c}$

Types of quantum heat engines and refrigerators

Quantum devices can operate either continuously or by a reciprocating cycle. Continuous devices include solar cells converting solar radiation to electrical power, thermoelectric where the output is current and lasers where the output power is coherent light. The primary example of a continuous refrigerator is optical pumping and laser cooling^[6] .^[7] Similarly to classical reciprocating engines, quantum heat engines also have a cycle that is divided into different strokes. A stroke is time segment in which a certain operation takes place (e.g. thermalization, or work extraction). Two adjacent strokes do not commute with each other. The most common reciprocating heat machines are the four-stroke machine, and the two-stroke machine. Reciprocating devices have been suggested operating either by the Carnot cycle ^{[8] [9]} or the Otto cycle ^[10] In both types the quantum description allows to obtain equation of motion for the working medium and the heat flow from the reservoirs.

The quantum reciprocating heat engine and refrigerator

Quantum versions of most of the common thermodynamical cycles have been studied, for example the Carnot cycle ^{[8] [9]} ,^[11] Stirling cycle ^[12] and Otto cycle^[10][13]

The Otto cycle can serve as a template for other reciprocating cycles.

quantum Otto cycle shown in the Entropy $\Omega$ plane where the energy entropy and the Von Neumann entropy are displayed. $\Omega$ is the internal frequency of the device and is controlled externally. It mimics the inverse volume in the Otto cycle. The red and blue lines are the hot and cold isochores. The cycle represents a heat pump.

It is composed of the following four segments:

• Segment $A \rightarrow B$ isomagnetic or isochoric process, partial equilibration with the cold bath under constant Hamiltonian. The dynamics of the working medium is characterized by the propagator ${ U}_c$.

• Segment $B \rightarrow C$ magnetization or adiabatic compression, the external field changes expanding the gap between energy levels of the Hamiltonian. The dynamics is characterized by the propagator ${ U}_{ch}$.

• Segment $C \rightarrow D$ isomagnetic, or isochoric process partial equilibration with the hot bath described by the propagator $U_h$.

• Segment $D \rightarrow A$ demagnetization or adiabatic expansion reducing the energy gaps in the Hamiltonian, characterized by the propagator $U_{hc}$.

The propagator of the four stroke cycle becomes $U_{global}$, which is the ordered product of the segment propagators:

${U}_{global}~~=~~ { U}_{hc} { U}_h {U}_{ch} {U}_c$

The propagators are linear operators defined on a vector space which completely determines the state of the working medium. Common to all thermodynamical cycles the consecutive segment propagators do not commute $[{\ U}_i,{ U}_j] \ne 0$. Commuting propagators will lead to zero power.

In a reciprocating quantum heat engine the working medium is a quantum system such as spin systems^[14] or an harmonic oscillator .^[15] For maximum power the cycle time should be optimized. There are two basic timescales in the reciprocating refrigerator the cycle time $\tau_{cyc}$ and the internal timescale $2 \pi /\omega$. In general when $\tau_{cyc} \gg 2\pi/\omega$ the engine operates in quasi-adiabatic conditions. The only quantum effect can be found at low temperatures where the unit of energy of the device becomes $\hbar \omega$ instead of $k_b T$. The efficiency at this limit is $\eta = 1 -\frac{\omega_c}{\omega_h}$, always smaller than the Carnot efficiency $\eta_c$. At high temperature and for the harmonic working medium the efficiency at maximum power becomes $\eta = 1-\sqrt{\frac{T_c}{T_h}}$ which is the Endoreversible thermodynamics result.^[15]

For shorter cycle times the working medium cannot follow adiabatically the change in the external parameter. This leads to friction-like phenomena. Extra power is required to drive the system faster. The signature of such dynamics is the development of coherence causing extra dissipation. Surprisingly the dynamics leading to friction is quantized meaning that frictionless solutions to the adiabatic expansion/compression can be found in finite time.^[16] As a result optimization has to be carried out only with respect to the time allocated to heat transport. In this regime the quantum feature of coherence degrades the performance. Optimal frictionless performance is obtained when the coherence can be cancelled.

The shortest cycle times $\tau_{cyc} \ll 2\pi/\omega$, sometimes termed sudden cycles ,^[17] have universal features. In this case coherence contributes to the cycles power.

A two-stroke engine quantum cycle equivalent to the Otto cycle based on two qubits has been proposed. The first qubit has frequency $\omega_h$ and the second $\omega_c$. The cycle is composed of a first stroke of partial equilibration of the two qubits with the hot and cold bath in parallel. The second power stroke is composed of a partial or full swap between the qubits. The swap operation is generated by a unitary transformation which preserves the entropy as a result it is a pure power stroke.^[18][19]

The quantum Otto cycle refrigerators shares the same cycle with Magnetic refrigeration^[20]

Continuous quantum engines

Continuous quantum engines are the quantum analogues of turbines. The work output mechanism is coupling to an external periodic field, typically the electromagnetic field. Thus the heat engine is a model for a laser.^[7] The models differ by the choice of their working substance and heat source and sink. Externally driven two-level,^[21] three level ^[22] four-level ^[23] and coupled harmonic oscillators ^[24] have been studied.

The periodic driving splits the energy level structure of the working medium. This splitting allows the two level engine to couple selectively to the hot and cold baths and produce power. On the other hand ignoring this splitting in the derivation of the equation of motion will violate the second law of thermodynamics.^[25]

Non thermal fuels have been considered for quantum heat engines. The idea is to increase the energy content of the hot bath without increasing its entropy. This can be achieved by employing coherence^[26] or a squeezed thermal bath.^[27] It should be noted that these devices do not violate the second law of thermodynamics.

Equivalence of reciprocating and continuous heat machines in the quantum regime

Two-stroke, Four-stroke, and continuous machine are very different from each other. However it was shown <ref name=“equiv"> Raam Uzdin, Amikam Levy, and Ronnie Koslofff, Equivalence of Quantum Heat Machines, and Quantum-Thermodynamic Signatures, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031044 (2015).</ref> that there is a quantum regime where all these machines become thermodynamically equivalent to each other. While the intra cycle dynamics in the equivalence regime is very different in different engine types, when the cycle is completed they all turn out to provide the same amount of work and consume the same amount of heat (hence they share the same efficiency as well). This equivalence is a associated with a coherent work extraction mechanism and has no classical analogue.

Heat engines and open quantum systems

The elementary example operates under quasi equilibrium conditions. Its main quantum feature is the discrete energy level structure. More realistic devices operate out of equilibrium possessing friction heat leaks and finite heat flow. Quantum thermodynamics supplies a dynamical theory required for systems out of equilibrium such as heat engines, thus, inserting dynamics into thermodynamics. The theory of open quantum systems constitutes the basic theory. For heat engines a reduced description of the dynamics of the working substance is sought, tracing out the hot and cold baths. The starting point is the general Hamiltonian of the combined systems:

$H = H_s + H_c + H_h + H_{sc}+H_{sh}$

and the system Hamiltonian $H_s(t)$ is time dependent. A reduced description leads to the equation of motion of the system:

$\frac{d}{dt} \rho = -\frac{i}{\hbar}[H_s,\rho] + L_h (\rho)+L_c(\rho)$

where $\rho$ is the density operator describing the state of the working medium and $L_{h/c}$ is the generator of dissipative dynamics which includes the heat transport terms from the baths. Using this construction, the total change in energy of the sub-system becomes:

$\frac{d}{dt} E = \left\langle \frac{\partial H_s}{\partial t} \right\rangle + \langle L_h (H_s) \rangle+\langle L_c (H_s) \rangle$

leading to the dynamical version of the first law of thermodynamics:^[4]

• The power $P =\left\langle \frac{\partial H}{\partial t} \right\rangle$
• Heat currents $J_h = \langle L_h (H_s) \rangle$ and $J_c = \langle L_c (H_s) \rangle$.

The rate of entropy production becomes:

$\frac{d S}{dt} = -\frac{J_h}{T_h}-\frac{J_c}{T_c} \ge 0$

The global structure of quantum mechanics is reflected in the derivation of the reduced description. A derivation which is consistent with the laws of thermodynamics is based on the weak coupling limit. A thermodynamical idealization assumes that the system and the baths are uncorrelated, meaning that the total state of the combined system becomes a tensor product at all times:

$\rho = \rho_s \otimes \rho_{h} \otimes \rho_{c} ~.$

Under these conditions the dynamical equations of motion become: $\frac{d}{dt} \rho_s = {L} \rho_s~,$ where ${ L}$ is the Liouville superoperaor described in terms of the system's Hilbert space, where the reservoirs are described implicitly. Within the formalism of quantum open system, $L$ can take the form of the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad (GKS-L) Markovian generator or also known just as Lindblad equation .^[28] Theories beyond the weak coupling regime have been proposed.^[29][30]

The quantum absorption refrigerator

The absorption refrigerator is of unique importance in setting an autonomous quantum device. Such a device requires no external power and operates without external intervention in scheduling the operations .^[31][32][33] The basic construct includes three baths a power bath, a hot and cold baths. The tricycle model is the template for the absorption refrigerator.

Quantum tricycle absorption refrigerator. The device is composed from three baths where $T_d \ge T_h \ge T_c$. Heat flows from the power reservoir and cold bath to the hot bath.

The tricycle engine has a generic structure. The basic model consists of three thermal baths: A hot bath with temperature $T_h$, a cold bath with temperature $T_c$ and a work bath with temperature $T_d$.

Each bath is connected to the engine via a frequency filter which can be modeled by three oscillators:

$H_0 = \hbar \omega_h a^{\dagger} a +\hbar \omega_c b^{\dagger} b + \hbar \omega_d c^{\dagger} c~~,$

where $\omega_h$, $\omega_c$ and $\omega_d$ are the filter frequencies on resonance $\omega_d=\omega_h-\omega_c$.

The device operates as a refrigerator by removing an excitation from the cold bath as well as from the work bath and generating an excitation in the hot bath. The term $a^{\dagger} b c$ in the Hamiltonian is non linear and crucial for an engine or a refrigerator.

$H_I = \hbar \epsilon \left( a b^{\dagger} c^{\dagger} + a^{\dagger} b c \right)~~,$

where $\epsilon$ is the coupling strength.

The first-law of thermodynamics represents the energy balance of heat currents originating from the three baths and collimating on the system:

$\frac{dE_s}{dt}= { J}_h + { J}_c +{J}_d ~~.$

At steady state no heat is accumulated in the tricycle, thus $\frac{dE_s}{dt}= 0$. In addition, in steady state the entropy is only generated in the baths, leading to the Second law of thermodynamics:

$\frac{d}{dt}\Delta { S}_u~=~-\frac{{J}_h}{T_h} - \frac{{ J}_c}{T_c} -\frac{{ J}_d }{T_d}~\ge~0~~.$

This version of the second-law is a generalisation of the statement of Clausius theorem; heat does not flow spontaneously from cold to hot bodies. When the temperature $T_d \rightarrow \infty$, no entropy is generated in the power bath. An energy current with no accompanying entropy production is equivalent to generating pure power: ${ P}={J}_d$, where ${ P}$ is the power output.

Quantum refrigerators and the third law of thermodynamics

There are seemingly two independent formulations of the third law of thermodynamics both originally were stated by Walther Nernst. The first formulation is known as the Nernst heat theorem, and can be phrased as:

• The entropy of any pure substance in thermodynamic equilibrium approaches zero as the temperature approaches zero.

The second formulation is dynamical, known as the unattainability principle^[34]

• It is impossible by any procedure, no matter how idealized, to reduce any assembly to absolute zero temperature in a finite number of operations.

At steady state the second law of thermodynamics implies that the total entropy production is non-negative. When the cold bath approaches the absolute zero temperature, it is necessary to eliminate the entropy production divergence at the cold side when $T_c \rightarrow 0$, therefore

$\dot S_c \propto - T_c^{\alpha}~~~,~~~~\alpha \geq 0~~.$

For $\alpha=0$ the fulfillment of the second law depends on the entropy production of the other baths, which should compensate for the negative entropy production of the cold bath. The first formulation of the third law modifies this restriction. Instead of $\alpha \geq 0$ the third law imposes $\alpha > 0$, guaranteeing that at absolute zero the entropy production at the cold bath is zero: $\dot S_c = 0$. This requirement leads to the scaling condition of the heat current ${ J}_c \propto T_c^{\alpha+1}$.

The second formulation, known as the unattainability principle can be rephrased as;^[35]

• No refrigerator can cool a system to absolute zero temperature at finite time.

The dynamics of the cooling process is governed by the equation

${ J}_c(T_c(t)) = -c_V(T_c(t))\frac{dT_c(t)}{dt}~~.$

where $c_V(T_c)$ is the heat capacity of the bath. Taking ${ J}_c \propto T_c^{\alpha+1}$ and $c_V \sim T_c^{\eta}$ with ${\eta} \geq 0$ ,we can quantify this formulation by evaluating the characteristic exponent $\zeta$ of the cooling process,

$\frac{dT_c(t)}{dt} \propto -T_c^{\zeta}, ~~~~~ T_c\rightarrow 0, ~~~~~ {\zeta=\alpha-\eta+1}$

This equation introduce the relation between the characteristic exponents $\zeta$ and $\alpha$. When $\zeta < 0$ then the bath is cooled to zero temperature in a finite time, which implies a valuation of the third law. It is apparent from the last equation, that the unattainability principle is more restrictive than the Nernst heat theorem.

References

1. Geusic J, Schulz-DuBios E, Scovil H. 1959. Three-level masers as heat engines. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2:262
2. Geusic J, Bois E, De Grasse R, Scovil H. 1959. Three level spin refrigeration and maser action at 1500 mcsec. J. App. Phys. 30:1113
3. D. J. Wineland and H. Dehmelt, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 20, 637 (1975); T. W. Hänsch and A. L. Schawlow, "Cooling of Gases by Laser Radiation," Opt. Commun. 13, 68 (1975); Letokhov, V. S., V. G. Minogin, and B. D. Pavlik. "Cooling and trapping of atoms and molecules by a resonant laser field." Optics Communications 19, no. 1 (1976): 72-75.
4. Alicki, Robert. "The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine." Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 12, no. 5 (1979): L103.
5. Yariv, Amnon (1989). Quantum Electronics, 3rd ed., Wiley. ISBN 0-471-60997-8
6. Narevicius, Edvardas, S. Travis Bannerman, and Mark G. Raizen. "Single-photon molecular cooling." New Journal of Physics 11, no. 5 (2009): 055046.
7. Kosloff, Ronnie, and Amikam Levy. "Quantum heat engines and refrigerators: Continuous devices." Anual Rev. Phys. Chem. 65, 365 (2014).
8. Eitan Geva and Ronnie Kosloff, A Quantum Mechanical Heat Engine Operating in Finite Time. A Model Consisting of Spin half Systems as The Working Fluid, J. Chem. Phys., 96, 3054-3067 (1992).
9. Bender, Carl M., Dorje C. Brody, and Bernhard K. Meister. "Quantum mechanical Carnot engine." Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 33, no. 24 (2000): 4427.
10. Feldmann, Tova, and Ronnie Kosloff. "Performance of discrete heat engines and heat pumps in finite time." Physical Review E 61, no. 5 (2000): 4774.
11. Quan, H. T., Yu-xi Liu, C. P. Sun, and Franco Nori. "Quantum thermodynamic cycles and quantum heat engines." Physical Review E 76, no. 3 (2007): 031105.
12. Wu, Feng, Lingen Chen, Fengri Sun, Chih Wu, and Yonghong Zhu. "Performance and optimization criteria for forward and reverse quantum Stirling cycles." Energy conversion and management 39, no. 8 (1998): 733-739.
13. Kieu, Tien D. "Quantum heat engines, the second law and Maxwell's daemon." The European Physical Journal D-Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Physics 39, no. 1 (2006): 115-128.
14. Tova Feldmann and Ronnie Kosloff The Quantum Four Stroke Heat Engine: Thermodynamic Observables in a Model with Intrinsic Friction Phys. Rev. E, 68 016101 (2003).
15. Irreversible performance of a quantum harmonic heat engine, Rezek and Kosloff, New J. Phys. 8 (2006) 83
16. del Campo, A., J. Goold, and M. Paternostro. "More bang for your buck: Super-adiabatic quantum engines." Scientific reports 4 (2014).
17. Feldmann, Tova, and Ronnie Kosloff. "Short time cycles of purely quantum refrigerators." Physical Review E 85, no. 5 (2012): 051114.<
18. Allahverdyan, Armen E., Karen Hovhannisyan, and Guenter Mahler. "Optimal refrigerator." Physical Review E 81, no. 5 (2010): 051129
19. Raam Uzdin and Ronnie Kosloff The multilevel four-stroke swap engine and its environment New J. Phys. 16 , 095003 (2014).
20. Shirron, Peter J., and Dan McCammon. "Salt pill design and fabrication for adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators." Cryogenics 62 (2014): 163-171.
21. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky D, Alicki R, Kurizki G. 2013. Minimal universal quantum heat machine. Phys. Rev. E 87:012140
22. Eitan Geva and Ronnie Kosloff, The Quantum Heat Engine and Heat Pump: An Irreversible Thermodynamic Analysis of The Three-Level Amplifier, J. Chem. Phys., 104, 7681-7698 (1996).
23. Scully MO, Chapin KR, Dorfman KE, Kim MB, Svidzinsky A. 2011. Quantum heat engine power can be increased by noise-induced coherence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:15097–100 Harbola U, Rahav S, Mukamel S. 2012. Quantum heat engines: a thermodynamic analysis of power and efficiency. Eur. Phys. Lett. 99:50005
24. R. Kosloff, A Quantum Mechanical Open System as a Model of a Heat Engine.,J. Chem. Phys., 80, 1625-1631 (1984).
25. Szczygielski, Krzysztof, David Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, and Robert Alicki. "Markovian master equation and thermodynamics of a two-level system in a strong laser field." Physical Review E 87, no. 1 (2013): 012120.
26. Scully, Marlan O., M. Suhail Zubairy, Girish S. Agarwal, and Herbert Walther. "Extracting work from a single heat bath via vanishing quantum coherence." Science 299, no. 5608 (2003): 862-864.
27. Roßnagel, J., O. Abah, F. Schmidt-Kaler, K. Singer, and E. Lutz. "Nanoscale heat engine beyond the Carnot limit." Physical review letters 112, no. 3 (2014): 030602.
28. Kosloff, Ronnie. "Quantum thermodynamics: A dynamical viewpoint." Entropy 15, no. 6 (2013): 2100-2128.
29. Gallego, R., A. Riera, and J. Eisert. "Thermal machines beyond the weak coupling regime." New Journal of Physics 16, no. 12 (2014): 125009.
30. Esposito, Massimiliano, Maicol A. Ochoa, and Michael Galperin. "Quantum Thermodynamics: A Nonequilibrium Green’s Function Approach." Physical Review Letters 114, no. 8 (2015): 080602.
31. José P. Palao, Ronnie Kosloff, and Jeffrey M. Gordon Quantum thermodynamic cooling cycle Phys. Rev. E 64, 056130-8 (2001).
32. N. Linden S. Popescu PS. 2010. ”how small can thermal machines be? towards the smallest possible refrigerato”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105:130401
33. Amikam Levy and Ronnie Kosloff Quantum absorption refrigerator Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 070604 (2012).
34. Landsberg, P. T. "Foundations of thermodynamics." Reviews of Modern Physics 28, no. 4 (1956): 363
35. Levy, Amikam, Robert Alicki, and Ronnie Kosloff. "Quantum refrigerators and the third law of thermodynamics." Physical Review E 85, no. 6 (2012): 061126.

Further reading

Gemmer, Jochen, M. Michel, and Günter Mahler. "Quantum thermodynamics. Emergence of thermodynamic behavior within composite quantum systems. 2." (2009).

Petruccione, Francesco, and Heinz-Peter Breuer. The theory of open quantum systems. Oxford university press, 2002.

External links

• Nanoscale heat engine exceeds standard efficiency limit