Quasi-judicial body

A quasi-judicial body is an entity such as an arbitrator or tribunal board, generally of a public administrative agency, which has powers and procedures resembling those of a court of law or judge, and which is obliged to objectively determine facts and draw conclusions from them so as to provide the basis of an official action. Such actions are able to remedy a situation or impose legal penalties, and may affect the legal rights, duties or privileges of specific parties.[1]

Powers

Such bodies usually have powers of adjudication in such matters as:

Their powers are usually limited to a very specific area of expertise and authority, such as land use and zoning, financial markets, employment law, public standards, and/or a specific set of regulations of an agency.[1]

Differences from judicial

There are some key differences between judicial and quasi-judicial bodies, in that:

Decisions

In general, decisions of a quasi-judicial body require findings of facts to reach conclusions of law that justify the decision. They usually depend on a pre-determined set of guidelines or criteria to assess the nature and gravity of the permission or relief sought, or of the offense committed. Decisions of a quasi-judicial body are often legally enforceable under the laws of a jurisdiction; they can be challenged in a court of law which is the final decisive authority.[1]

List of quasi-judicial bodies

The following is a partial list of quasi-judicial bodies

Further reading

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc.
  2. http://judiciary.house.gov/legacy/stern040303.htm
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, March 11, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.