Moshe ha-Darshan

Rabbinical Eras

Moshe haDarshan (11th century) (Hebrew: משה הדרשן) was chief of the yeshiva of Narbonne, and perhaps the founder of Jewish exegetical studies in France. Along with Rashi, his writings are often cited as the first extant writings in Zarphatic, the Judæo-French language.

According to a manuscript in the possession of the Alliance Israélite Universelle containing those parts of Abraham Zacuto's Sefer Yuḥasin that are omitted in Samuel Shullam's edition,[1] Moses was descended from a Narbonne family distinguished for its erudition, his great-grandfather, Abun, his grandfather, Moses ben Abun, and his father, Jacob ben Moses ben Abun (called "ha-Navi"), all having been presidents of the Narbonne yeshivah. Moses himself held this position, and after his death it was occupied by his brother Levi.[2]

As Haggadist

Though Moshe ha-Darshan was considered a rabbinical authority,[3] he owes his reputation principally to the fact that together with Tobiah ben Eliezer he was the most prominent representative of midrashic-symbolic Bible exegesis (derash) in the 11th century. His work on the Bible, probably sometimes called Yesod, and known only by quotations found mostly in Rashi's commentaries (Rashi quotes him 19 times in his pirush Al HaTorah, and only twice in his pirush on Shas - once in Kesuvos 75b, and the other in Niddah 19a), contained extracts from earlier haggadic works as well as midrashic explanations of his own. Often the latter were not in harmony with the spirit of the rabbinical Midrash and even contained Christian theological conceptions.

Probably the non-preservation of the work was due to an excess of the foreign element in its composition, causing it to be regarded with disfavor. Moreover, as has recently been ascertained by A. Epstein, it was not a systematically arranged work, but merely a collection of notes made by Moses. For this reason, apparently, it did not have a fixed title, and therefore it is quoted under various names by different authors.[4]

The Midrash Bereshit Rabbah Major or Bereshit Rabbah Rabbati, known through quotations by Raymund Martin in his Pugio Fidei, has many haggadot and haggadic ideas which recall very strongly Moses ha-Darshan's teachings; it is claimed by Zunz[5] that the midrash was actually the work of Moses. A. Epstein, however, is of the opinion that the final compiler of the midrash, certainly not Moses ha-Darshan, took from the Yesod whatever he considered appropriate for his purpose, especially from Moses' midrashic interpretation of the Genesis creation myth.[6]

In a similar way the Yesod influenced the Midrash Bamidbar Rabbah and the Midrash Tadshe, which latter, in a haggadic-symbolic manner, endeavors to show the parallelism between the world, mankind, and the Tabernacle.[7] Concerning the Midrash Tadshe, Epstein goes so far as to assume that Moses ha-Darshan was its author.[8] Moses ha-Darshan explained some obscure expressions in certain piyyuṭim[9]). He is credited also with a midrash on the Ten Commandments and with a "widdui."

His pupils

Moses' son was Judah ha-Darshan ben Moses, probably the Joseph he-Ḥasid mentioned in Samuel ben Jacob ibn Jama's additions to the Aruk of Nathan ben Jehiel[10] was a son of Judah ha-Darshan. It is certain that Nathan ben Jehiel was a pupil of Moses, whose explanations of Talmudical words and passages he cites. Both Abraham Zacuto (Sefer Yuḥasin) and the above-mentioned manuscript of the Alliance Israélite Universelle ascribe to Moses three more pupils: Moses Anaw, Moses ben Joseph ben Merwan Levi, and Abraham ben Isaac (author of the Sefer ha-Eshkol). A. Epstein credits Moses with another pupil, a certain R. Shemaiah, who is quoted sometimes in Bereshit Rabbah Rabbati and in Numbers Rabbah as explaining sayings of Moses ha-Darshan's.[11] He also suggests (l.c.) the identity of this Shemaiah with Shemaiah of Soissons, author of a midrash on Parashat Terumah,[12] whose cosmological conceptions seem to have been influenced by Moses ha-Darshan.

See also

Jewish Encyclopedia bibliography

Notes

  1. ↑ See Isidore Loeb, Joseph Haccohen et les Chroniqueurs Juifs, in R. E. J. xvi. 227.
  2. ↑ See R. Tam, Sefer ha-Yashar, ed. Vienna, No. 620, p. 74.
  3. ↑ R. Tam, l.c.; Abraham ben Isaac, Sefer ha-Eshkol, ed. Benjamin Hirsch Auerbach, i. 143, Halberstadt, 1865.
  4. ↑ See A. Berliner, Eine Wiederaufgefundene Handschrift, in Monatsschrift, 1884, p. 221; Zunz, G. V. 2d ed., p. 302, note E.
  5. ↑ l.c. p. 302.
  6. ↑ See A. Epstein, Bereshit Rabbati, in Berliner's Magazin, xv. 70.
  7. ↑ Zunz, G. V. p. 292; Adolf Jellinek, B. H. vol. iii., pp. xxxiii. et seq.
  8. ↑ Beiträge zur Jüdischen Alterthumskunde, p. xi.
  9. ↑ Zunz, Ritus, p. 199; Ziemlich, Das Machsor von Nürnberg, in Berliner's Magazin, xiii. 18.
  10. ↑ See S. Buber in Grätz Jubelschrift, p. 34, s.v. ארס .
  11. ↑ l.c. pp. 74 et seq.; comp. p. ii.
  12. ↑ Published by Berliner in Monatsschrift, xiii. 224 et seq.

External links

 This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Jewish Encyclopedia. 1901–1906. 

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, February 13, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.