Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction
The Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction is a continued fraction discovered by Rogers (1894) and independently by Srinivasa Ramanujan, and closely related to the Rogers–Ramanujan identities. It can be evaluated explicitly for a broad class of values of its argument.

 of  the function
 of  the function  , where
, where  is the Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction.
 is the Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction.Definition

 of the Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction.
 of the Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction.Given the functions G(q) and H(q) appearing in the Rogers–Ramanujan identities,
and,
 A003114 and
 A003114 and  A003106, respectively, where
 A003106, respectively, where  denotes the infinite q-Pochhammer symbol, j is the j-function, and 2F1 is the hypergeometric function, then the Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction is,
 denotes the infinite q-Pochhammer symbol, j is the j-function, and 2F1 is the hypergeometric function, then the Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction is,
Modular functions
If  , then
, then  and
 and  , as well as their quotient
, as well as their quotient  , are modular functions of
, are modular functions of  . Since they have integral coefficients, the theory of complex multiplication implies that their values for
. Since they have integral coefficients, the theory of complex multiplication implies that their values for  an imaginary quadratic irrational are algebraic numbers that can be evaluated explicitly.
 an imaginary quadratic irrational are algebraic numbers that can be evaluated explicitly.
Examples
where  is the golden ratio.
 is the golden ratio.
Relation to modular forms
It can be related to the Dedekind eta function, a modular form of weight 1/2, as,[1]
Relation to j-function
Among the many formulas of the j-function, one is,
where,
Eliminating the eta quotient, one can then express j(τ) in terms of  as,
 as,
where the numerator and denominator are polynomial invariants of the icosahedron.  Using the modular equation between  and
 and  , one finds that,
, one finds that,
let ,then
,then
where,
which in fact is the j-invariant of the elliptic curve,
parameterized by the non-cusp points of the modular curve  .
.
Functional equation
For convenience, one can also use the notation  when q = e2πiτ. While other modular functions like the j-invariant satisfies,
 when q = e2πiτ. While other modular functions like the j-invariant satisfies,
and the Dedekind eta function has,
the functional equation of the Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction involves[2] the golden ratio  ,
,
Incidentally,
Modular equations
There are modular equations between  and
 and  . Elegant ones for small prime n are as follows.[3]
. Elegant ones for small prime n are as follows.[3]
For  , let
, let  and
 and  , then
, then 
For  , let
, let  and
 and  , then
, then 
For  , let
, let  and
 and  , then
, then 
For  , let
, let  and
 and  , then
, then 
Regarding  , note that
, note that 
Other results
Ramanujan found many other interesting results regarding R(q).[4] Let  ,
,  , and
, and  as the golden ratio.
 as the golden ratio.
If  , then
, then 
If  , then
, then 
The powers of R(q) also can be expressed in unusual ways. For its cube,
For its fifth power, let  , then,
, then,
References
- ↑ Duke, W. "Continued Fractions and Modular Functions", http://www.math.ucla.edu/~wdduke/preprints/bams4.pdf
- ↑ Duke, W. "Continued Fractions and Modular Functions" (p.9)
- ↑ Berndt, B. et al. "The Rogers–Ramanujan Continued Fraction", http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~berndt/articles/rrcf.pdf
- ↑ Berndt, B. et al. "The Rogers–Ramanujan Continued Fraction"
- Rogers, L. J. (1894), "Second Memoir on the Expansion of certain Infinite Products", Proc. London Math. Soc., s1-25 (1): 318–343, doi:10.1112/plms/s1-25.1.318
- Berndt, B. C.; Chan, H. H.; Huang, S. S.; Kang, S. Y.; Sohn, J.; Son, S. H. (1999), "The Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction" (PDF), Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 105: 9, doi:10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00033-3
External links
- Weisstein, Eric W., "Rogers-Ramanujan Identities", MathWorld.
- Weisstein, Eric W., "Rogers-Ramanujan Continued Fraction", MathWorld.
![\begin{align}G(q) 
&= \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac {q^{n^2}} {(1-q)(1-q^2)\dots(1-q^k)} =\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac {q^{n^2}} {(q;q)_n} = \frac {1}{(q;q^5)_\infty (q^4; q^5)_\infty}\\
&= \prod_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{(1-q^{5n-1})(1-q^{5n-4})}\\
&=\sqrt[60]{qj}\,_2F_1\left(-\tfrac{1}{60},\tfrac{19}{60};\tfrac{4}{5};\tfrac{1728}{j}\right)\\
&=\sqrt[60]{q\left(j-1728\right)}\,_2F_1\left(-\tfrac{1}{60},\tfrac{29}{60};\tfrac{4}{5};-\tfrac{1728}{j-1728}\right)\\
&= 1+ q +q^2 +q^3 +2q^4+2q^5 +3q^6+\cdots
\end{align}](../I/m/f6973e945d7cb88030deab028a59d7bd.png)
![\begin{align}H(q) 
&= \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac {q^{n^2+n}} {(1-q)(1-q^2)\dots(1-q^k)}  =\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac {q^{n^2+n}} {(q;q)_n} = \frac {1}{(q^2;q^5)_\infty (q^3; q^5)_\infty}\\
&= \prod_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{(1-q^{5n-2})(1-q^{5n-3})}\\
&=\frac{1}{\sqrt[60]{q^{11}j^{11}}}\,_2F_1\left(\tfrac{11}{60},\tfrac{31}{60};\tfrac{6}{5};\tfrac{1728}{j}\right)\\
&=\frac{1}{\sqrt[60]{q^{11}\left(j-1728\right)^{11}}}\,_2F_1\left(\tfrac{11}{60},\tfrac{41}{60};\tfrac{6}{5};-\tfrac{1728}{j-1728}\right)\\
&= 1+q^2 +q^3 +q^4+q^5 +2q^6+2q^7+\cdots
\end{align}](../I/m/7319b6181555de86ca407396bb9df6c2.png)




![\frac{1}{R^5(q)}-R^5(q) = \left[\frac{\eta(\tau)}{\eta(5\tau)}\right]^6+11](../I/m/99b496525db7e04de0752095f35bfd9a.png)

![x = \left[\frac{\sqrt{5}\,\eta(5\tau)}{\eta(\tau)}\right]^6](../I/m/28391276099195314377c98e7056add2.png)



![z_{\infty}= -\left[\frac{\sqrt{5}\,\eta(25\tau)}{\eta(5\tau)}\right]^6-11,z_0=-\left[\frac{\eta(\tau)}{\eta(5\tau)}\right]^6-11,z_1=\left[\frac{\eta(\frac{5\tau+2}{5})}{\eta(5\tau)}\right]^6-11,z_2=-\left[\frac{\eta(\frac{5\tau+4}{5})}{\eta(5\tau)}\right]^6-11,z_3=\left[\frac{\eta(\frac{5\tau+6}{5})}{\eta(5\tau)}\right]^6-11,z_4=-\left[\frac{\eta(\frac{5\tau+8}{5})}{\eta(5\tau)}\right]^6-11](../I/m/cb126db2bdd03afa47d4a6848b79bc23.png)






