Reference monitor
In operating systems architecture a reference monitor concept defines a set of design requirements on a reference validation mechanism, which enforces an access control policy over subjects' (e.g., processes and users) ability to perform operations (e.g., read and write) on objects (e.g., files and sockets) on a system. The properties of a reference monitor are captured by the acronym NEAT, which means:
- The reference validation mechanism must be Non-bypassable, so that an attacker cannot bypass the mechanism and violate the security policy.
- The reference validation mechanism must be Evaluable, i.e., amenable to analysis and tests, the completeness of which can be assured (verifiable). Without this property, the mechanism might be flawed in such a way that the security policy is not enforced.
- The reference validation mechanism must be Always invoked. Without this property, it is possible for the mechanism to not perform when intended, allowing an attacker to violate the security policy.
- The reference validation mechanism must be Tamper-proof. Without this property, an attacker can undermine the mechanism itself and thence violate the security policy.
For example, Windows 3.x and 9x operating systems were not built with a reference monitor, whereas the Windows NT line, which also includes Windows 2000 and Windows XP, was designed to contain a reference monitor,[1] although it is not clear that its properties (tamperproof, etc.) have ever been independently verified, or what level of computer security it was intended to provide.
The claim is that a reference validation mechanism that satisfies the reference monitor concept will correctly enforce a system's access control policy, as it must be invoked to mediate all security-sensitive operations, must not be tampered, and has undergone complete analysis and testing to verify correctness. The abstract model of a reference monitor has been widely applied to any type of system that needs to enforce access control, and is considered to express the necessary and sufficient properties for any system making this security claim.[2]
According to Ross Anderson,[3] the reference monitor concept was introduced by James Anderson in an influential 1972 paper.[4] Peter Denning in a 2013 oral history stated that James Anderson credited the concept to a paper he and Scott Graham presented at a 1972 conference.[5]
Systems evaluated at B3 and above by the Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria (TCSEC) must enforce the reference monitor concept.
References
- ↑ http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windowsnt/4/workstation/reskit/en-us/archi.mspx?mfr=true
- ↑ Irvine, C. E. (1999). The Reference Monitor Concept as a Unifying Principle in Computer Security Education. IN PROCEEDINGS OF THE IFIP TC11 WG 11.8 FIRST WORLD CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SECURITY EDUCATION, 27--37
- ↑ Anderson, R. (2008). Security engineering - A guide to building dependable distributed systems (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Publishing, Inc. Chapter 8, "Multilevel Security"
- ↑ Anderson, J. 'Computer Security Technology Planning Study', ESD-TR-73-51, US Air Force Electronic Systems Division (1973). Section 4.1.1 http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/history/ande72.pdf
- ↑ Peter J. Denning, Oral history interview, Charles Babbage Institute, University of Minnesota. On pp. 37-38 Denning stated: "James Anderson . . . promoted it in his community, saying that the biggest contribution of that paper was the reference monitor. That became the standard notion in everything he talked about when he was talking about how to make a system more secure."