Rhode Island v. Massachusetts
| Rhode Island v. Massachusetts | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Decided February 21, 1838 | |||||||
| Full case name | The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Complainants v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendant | ||||||
| Citations |
9 L. Ed. 1233; 1838 U.S. LEXIS 372 | ||||||
| Holding | |||||||
| Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over a suit by one state against another over their shared border | |||||||
| Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
| Case opinions | |||||||
| Dissent | Taney | ||||||
| Story took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |||||||
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 37 U.S. 657 (1838), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court asserted its original jurisdiction over a suit in equity by one state against another over their shared border. The case involved a boundary dispute between Massachusetts and Rhode Island dating back to colonial times. Daniel Webster was involved in the case representing Massachusetts.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, January 29, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.
