Ribbon category

In mathematics, a ribbon category, also called a tortile category, is a particular type of braided monoidal category.

Definition

A monoidal category \mathcal C is, loosely speaking, a category equipped with a notion resembling the tensor product (of vector spaces, say). That is, for any two objects C_1, C_2 \in \mathcal C, there is an object C_1 \otimes C_2 \in \mathcal C. The assignment C_1, C_2 \mapsto C_1 \otimes C_2 is supposed to be functorial and needs to require a number of further properties such as a unit object 1 and an associativity isomorphism. Such a category is called braided if there are isomorphisms

c_{C_1, C_2}: C_1 \otimes C_2 \stackrel \cong \rightarrow C_2 \otimes C_1.

A braided monoidal category is called a ribbon category if the category is left rigid and has a family of twists. The former means that for each object C there is another object (called the left dual), C^*, with maps

1 \rightarrow C \otimes C^*, C^* \otimes C \rightarrow 1

such that the compositions

C^* \cong C^* \otimes 1 \rightarrow C^* \otimes (C \otimes C^*) \cong (C^* \otimes C) \otimes C^* \rightarrow 1 \otimes C^* \cong C^*

equals the identity of C^*, and similarly with C. The twists are maps

C \in \mathcal C, \theta_C : C \rightarrow C

such that

\theta_{C_1 \otimes C_2} = c_{C_2, C_1} c_{C_1, C_2} (\theta_{C_1}  \otimes \theta_{C_2}).

To be a ribbon category, the duals have to be compatible with the braiding and the twists in a certain way.

An example is the category of projective modules over a commutative ring. In this category, the monoidal structure is the tensor product, the dual object is the dual in the sense of (linear) algebra, which is again projective. The twists in this case are the identity maps. A more sophisticated example of a ribbon category are finite-dimensional representations of a quantum group.[1]

The name ribbon category is motivated by a graphical depiction of morphisms.[2]

Variant

A strongly ribbon category is a ribbon category C equipped with a dagger structure such that the functor †: CopC coherently preserves the ribbon structure.

References

  1. Turaev, see Chapter XI.
  2. Turaev, see p. 25.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, March 08, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.