Ribosomal DNA

The gene segment of eukaryotic rDNA contains 18S, 5.8S, and 28S tracts and forms a tandem repetitive cluster; the 5S rDNA is coded separately. NTS, nontranscribed spacer, ETS, external transcribed spacer, ITS, internal transcribed spacers 1 and 2, numbered from 5' end.

Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is a DNA sequence that codes for ribosomal RNA. Ribosomes are assemblies of proteins and rRNA molecules that translate mRNA molecules to produce proteins. As shown in the figure, rDNA of eukaryotes consists of a tandem repeat of a unit segment, an operon, composed of NTS, ETS, 18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, and 28S tracts. rDNA has another gene, coding for 5S rRNA, located in the genome in most eukaryotes.[1] 5S rDNA is also present in tandem repeats as in Drosophila.[1] In the nucleus, the rDNA region of the chromosome is visualized as a nucleolus which forms expanded chromosomal loops with rDNA. These rDNA regions are also called nucleolus organizer regions, as they give rise to the nucleolus. In the human genome there are 5 chromosomes with nucleolus organizer regions: the acrocentric chromosomes 13,14,15,21 and 22.

Sequence homogeneity of the repeat unit

In the large rDNA array, polymorphisms between rDNA repeat units are very low, indicating that rDNA tandem arrays are evolving through concerted evolution.[1] However, the mechanism of concerted evolution is imperfect, such that polymorphisms between repeats within an individual can occur at significant levels and may confound phylogenetic analyses for closely related organisms.[2][3]

5S tandem repeat sequences in several Drosophila were compared with each other; the result revealed that insertions and deletions occurred frequently between species and often flanked by conserved sequences.[4] They could occur by slippage of the newly synthesized strand during DNA replication or by gene conversion.[4]

Sequence divergence to clarify phylogeny

The rDNA transcription tracts have low rate of polymorphism among species, which allows interspecific comparison to elucidate phylogenetic relationship using only a few specimens. Coding regions of rDNA are highly conserved among species but ITS regions are variable due to insertions, deletions, and point mutations. Between remote species as human and frog comparison of sequences at ITS tracts is not appropriate.[5] Conserved sequences at coding regions of rDNA allow comparisons of remote species, even between yeast and human. Human 5.8S rRNA has 75% identity with yeast 5.8S rRNA.[6] In cases for sibling species, comparison of the rDNA segment including ITS tracts among species and phylogenetic analysis are made satisfactorily.[7][8] The different coding regions of the rDNA repeats usually show distinct evolutionary rates. As a result, this DNA can provide phylogenetic information of species belonging to wide systematic levels.[9]

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 Richard, G. -F.; Kerrest, A.; Dujon, B. (2008). "Comparative Genomics and Molecular Dynamics of DNA Repeats in Eukaryotes". Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 72 (4): 686–727. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00011-08. PMC 2593564. PMID 19052325.
  2. ↑ Álvarez, I.; Wendel, J. F. (2003). "Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29 (3): 417–434. doi:10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00208-2. PMID 14615184.
  3. ↑ Weitemier, K; Straub, S. C. K.; Fishbein, M.; Liston, A. (2015). "Intragenomic polymorphisms among high-copy loci: a genus-wide study of nuclear ribosomal DNA in Asclepias (Apocynaceae)". PeerJ 3: e718. doi:10.7717/peerj.718. PMC 4304868. PMID 25653903.
  4. 1 2 Päques, F.; Samson, M. L.; Jordan, P.; Wegnez, M. (1995). "Structural evolution of the Drosophila 5S ribosomal genes". Journal of Molecular Evolution 41 (5): 615–621. doi:10.1007/bf00175820. PMID 7490776.
  5. ↑ Sumida, M.; Kato, Y.; Kurabayashi, A. (2004). "Sequencing and analysis of the internal transcribed spacers (ITSs) and coding regions in the EcoR I fragment of the ribosomal DNA of the Japanese pond frog Rana nigromaculata". Genes & genetic systems 79 (2): 105–118. doi:10.1266/ggs.79.105. PMID 15215676.
  6. ↑ Nazar, R. N.; Sitz, T. O.; Busch, H. (1976). "Sequence homologies in mammalian 5.8S ribosomal RNA". Biochemistry 15 (3): 505–508. doi:10.1021/bi00648a008. PMID 1252408.
  7. ↑ Ma YJ, Qu FY, Xu JJ. (1998). "Sequence differences of rDNA-ITS2 and species-diagnostic PCR assay of Anopheles sinensis and Anopheles anthropophagus from China. J Med Coll PLA 13: 123-128. PDF.
  8. ↑ Li C, Lee JS, Groebner JL, Kim HC, Klein TA, O'Guinn ML, Wilkerson RC (2005). "A newly recognized species in the Anopheles hyrcanus group and molecular identification of related species from the Republic of South Korea (Diptera: Culicidae)." Zootaxa 939: 1-8. PDF.
  9. ↑ Hillis, D. M.; Dixon, M. T. (1991). "Ribosomal DNA: Molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference". The Quarterly Review of Biology 66 (4): 411–453. doi:10.1086/417338. PMID 1784710.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, February 11, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.