Richard Pennefather (judge)

Richard Pennefather (1773–1859) was an Irish judge, who enjoyed a high reputation for legal ability and integrity, and was praised in particular for his scrupulously impartial conduct of the politically sensitive Doneraile Conspiracy Trials of 1829. He was the elder brother of Edward Pennefather, Lord Chief Justice of Ireland.

Family

He was the eldest son of William Pennefather of Knockeevan, or Darling Hill, County Tipperary, who was member of the Irish House of Commons for Cashel, and his wife Ellen Moore, daughter of Edward Moore, Archdeacon of Emly.[1] They were a junior branch of the long-established Pennefather family of Newpark, County Tipperary.

Wife and children

He married in 1798 Jane Bennett of Cork, daughter of John Bennett, judge of the Court of King's Bench (Ireland) and his wife Jane Lovett. Richard and Jane had eight children, of whom six reached adulthood and five, two sons and three daughters, survived their father. Their sons who reached adulthood were:

Their daughters were:

Pennefather employed the architect William Tinsley, later famous for his work in the United States, to rebuild Darling Hill.

Early career

He went to school in Portarlington, County Laois, and then in Clonmel, graduated from the University of Dublin in 1794 and entered Middle Temple in 1792.[1] He was called to the Irish Bar in 1795, became King's Counsel in 1816 and was appointed a Baron of the Court of Exchequer (Ireland) in 1821. He served on the Court for 38 years.[1]

Doneraile Trials

Background

While the Crown's motives in bringing on the Doneraile conspiracy trials have been questioned, most historians accept that there was a conspiracy of some sort, and that it formed part of a wider pattern of agrarian disturbance which had begun with the Whiteboys movement of the previous century.[2] There is evidence of a plot to murder several unpopular landlords in the Doneraile area, notably Michael Creagh, the former High Sheriff of County Cork. In January 1829 a local doctor called John Norcott was shot at, almost certainly in mistake for Michael Creagh. Several local landlords expressed their fears to the authorities that an uprising was imminent; and in April two informers, Patrick Daly and his cousin Owen, came forward with evidence that at Rathclare fair a few days earlier a number of men had entered a sworn agreement to kill several local landlords, including Michael Creagh.[2] On foot of their evidence 21 men were arrested and sent for trial : a Special Commission was set up to try them consisting of Pennefather and Mr. Justice Torrens, with John Doherty, the Solicitor General for Ireland, prosecuting. It sat in Cork city in October 1829.

How much truth there was in the Dalys' testimony is difficult to determine. As Geoghegan remarks it is likely that a few of the accused were guilty at least of the attack on Dr. Norcott, but that most of the 21 were innocent; the great danger was that no distinction would be made between innocent and guilty.[2] That a major miscarriage of justice was averted owes a good deal to the eloquence of Daniel O'Connell, but just as much to the integrity of the judges, especially Pennefather.

The course of the Trials

On 23 October 1829 four of the accused – John Leary, James Roche, James McGrath and William Shine – were tried. No criticism has been made of the judges' conduct of the trial, but partly because they were lacking defence counsel of the skill of O'Connell, all were found guilty and sentenced to death (their sentences were later commuted to transportation).[3]

In desperation, William Burke, a brother of one of the accused, raised 100 guineas and rushed to O'Connell's home, Derrynane, to plead with him to take the case. O'Connell who had previously refused to take the brief, now accepted it and started out for Cork immediately.[3] He arrived in Court just as the second trial – of Edmund Connors, Michael Wallace, Patrick Lynch and Timothy Barrett- was beginning. Pennefather- an old friend and colleague from the Munster Circuit- allowed O'Connell to plead and, to the annoyance of the prosecution, even allowed him to eat his breakfast in Court. O'Connell subjected the Crown's witnesses, in particular Patrick Daly, to merciless cross-examination and pointed to numerous inconsistencies in their evidence.

The jury deliberated for so long that it became known as the "40-hour jury". Eventually it acquitted Timothy Barrett but could not agree a verdict in the other 3 cases.[4]

The judges' ruling

On 29 October John Burke and William Shine stood trial. At the start of the trial Pennefather called O'Connell to the Bench and handed him a document. This turned out to be Patrick Daly's original sworn deposition about the alleged conspiracy, which was utterly inconsistent with the testimony he had given throughout the trials. Pennefather, who had sent to Doneraile for the original deposition, realised that it was evidence the defence must see, and further charged the jury in such a manner that a verdict of Not Guilty was inevitable.[5] The Solicitor General stated that no further trials would take place and the Special Commission came to an end.

Later life

Pennefather remained on the Bench until he was 86; he was held in such esteem that the Bar for a very long time resisted any suggestion that he should be asked to retire, even after he went blind.[6] An inquiry by the House of Commons in 1856 into the alleged incapacity of the Irish High Court judges pointed to Pennefather's age and physical disabilities; but the Bar responded with so eloquent a tribute to his ability that the matter was dropped. He eventually retired a few months before his death. He died rather suddenly at his home at Knockeevan, County Tiperrary, and was buried in Cahir.[1]

Character

Elrington Ball called him a model of "what is distinguished in professional, and admirable in private life".[7] Geoghegan calls him "one of the finest judges of the period and a model of integrity".[5] The Dictionary of National Biography desrcibes him as a "sound, able, and upright judge, skilled in the digestion and elucidation of evidence, courteous in his bearing and in criminal cases lenient". [8]He was well versed in every branch of jurisprudence; and yet curiously, he was a judge who left behind very few judgments of any importance.[9]

His conduct of the Doneraile Trials, and in particular his ruling that the prosecution have an absolute duty to disclose all relevant evidence to the accused, was cited with approval by the Supreme Court of Ireland in 2007.[10]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Ball 1926, p. 341.
  2. 1 2 3 Geoghegan 2008, p. 2.
  3. 1 2 Geoghegan 2008, pp. 2–3.
  4. ↑ Geoghegan 2008, pp. 6–7.
  5. 1 2 Geoghegan 2008, p. 10.
  6. ↑ Ball 1926, p. 294.
  7. ↑ Ball 1926, p. 260.
  8. ↑ Norgate p.326
  9. ↑ Norgate p.326
  10. ↑ O'Callaghan v. Judge Mahon [2008] 2 I.R. 514

Sources

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, April 30, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.