Rule of mixtures

The upper and lower bounds on the elastic modulus of a composite material, as predicted by the rule of mixtures. The actual elastic modulus lies between the curves.

In materials science, a general rule of mixtures is a weighted mean used to predict various properties of a composite material made up of continuous and unidirectional fibers.[1][2][3] It provides a theoretical upper- and lower-bound on properties such as the elastic modulus, mass density, ultimate tensile strength, thermal conductivity, and electrical conductivity.[3] In general there are two models, one for axial loading (Voigt model),[2][4] and one for transverse loading (Reuss model).[2][5]

In general, for some material property E (often the elastic modulus[1]), the rule of mixtures states that the overall property in the direction parallel to the fibers may be as high as

 E_c = fE_f + \left(1-f\right)E_m

where

In the case of the elastic modulus, this is known as the upper-bound modulus, and corresponds to loading parallel to the fibers. The inverse rule of mixtures states that in the direction perpendicular to the fibers, the elastic modulus of a composite can be as low as

E_c = \left(\frac{f}{E_f} + \frac{1-f}{E_m}\right)^{-1}.

If the property under study is the elastic modulus, this quantity is called the lower-bound modulus, and corresponds to a transverse loading.[2]

Derivation for elastic modulus

Upper-bound modulus

Consider a composite material under uniaxial tension \sigma_\infty. If the material is to stay intact, the strain of the fibers, \epsilon_f must equal the strain of the matrix, \epsilon_m. Hooke's law for uniaxial tension hence gives

\frac{\sigma_f}{E_f} = \epsilon_f = \epsilon_m = \frac{\sigma_m}{E_m}

 

 

 

 

(1)

where \sigma_f, E_f, \sigma_m, E_m are the stress and elastic modulus of the fibers and the matrix, respectively. Noting stress to be a force per unit area, a force balance gives that

\sigma_\infty = f\sigma_f + \left(1-f\right)\sigma_m

 

 

 

 

(2)

where f is the volume fraction of the fibers in the composite (and 1-f is the volume fraction of the matrix).

If it is assumed that the composite material behaves as a linear-elastic material, i.e., abiding Hooke's law \sigma_\infty = E_c\epsilon_c for some elastic modulus of the composite E_c and some strain of the composite \epsilon_c, then equations 1 and 2 can be combined to give

E_c\epsilon_c = fE_f\epsilon_f + \left(1-f\right)E_m\epsilon_m.

Finally, since \epsilon_c = \epsilon_f = \epsilon_m, the overall elastic modulus of the composite can be expressed as[6]

 E_c = fE_f + \left(1-f\right)E_m.

Lower-bound modulus

Now let the composite material be loaded perpendicular to the fibers, assuming that \sigma_\infty = \sigma_f = \sigma_m. The overall strain in the composite is distributed between the materials such that

\epsilon_c = f\epsilon_f + \left(1-f\right)\epsilon_m.

The overall modulus in the material is then given by

E_c = \frac{\sigma_\infty}{\epsilon_c} = \frac{\sigma_f}{f\epsilon_f + \left(1-f\right)\epsilon_m} = \left(\frac{f}{E_f} + \frac{1-f}{E_m}\right)^{-1}

since \sigma_f=E\epsilon_f, \sigma_m=E\epsilon_m.[6]

Other properties

Similar derivations give the rules of mixtures for

\left(\frac{f}{\rho_f} + \frac{1-f}{\rho_m}\right)^{-1} \leq \rho_c \leq f\rho_f + \left(1-f\right)\rho_m
\left(\frac{f}{\sigma_{UTS,f}} + \frac{1-f}{\sigma_{UTS,m}}\right)^{-1} \leq \sigma_{UTS,c} \leq f\sigma_{UTS,f} + \left(1-f\right)\sigma_{UTS,m}
\left(\frac{f}{k_f} + \frac{1-f}{k_m}\right)^{-1} \leq k_c \leq fk_f + \left(1-f\right)k_m
\left(\frac{f}{\sigma_f} + \frac{1-f}{\sigma_m}\right)^{-1} \leq \sigma_c \leq f\sigma_f + \left(1-f\right)\sigma_m

References

  1. 1 2 Alger, Mark. S. M. (1997). Polymer Science Dictionary (2nd ed.). Springer Publishing. ISBN 0412608707.
  2. 1 2 3 4 "Stiffness of long fibre composites". University of Cambridge. Retrieved 1 January 2013.
  3. 1 2 Askeland, Donald R.; Fulay, Pradeep P.; Wright, Wendelin J. (2010-06-21). The Science and Engineering of Materials (6th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN 9780495296027.
  4. Voigt, W. (1889). "Ueber die Beziehung zwischen den beiden Elasticitätsconstanten isotroper Körper". Annalen der Physik 274: 573–587. Bibcode:1889AnP...274..573V. doi:10.1002/andp.18892741206.
  5. Reuss, A. (1929). "Berechnung der Fließgrenze von Mischkristallen auf Grund der Plastizitätsbedingung für Einkristalle". Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 9: 49–58. doi:10.1002/zamm.19290090104.
  6. 1 2 "Derivation of the rule of mixtures and inverse rule of mixtures". University of Cambridge. Retrieved 1 January 2013.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, September 05, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.