S v Mtewtwa

S v Mtewtwa
Court Eastern Cape Division
Full case name S v Mtewtwa
Decided 24 March 1977 (1977-03-24)
Citation(s) 1977 (3) SA 628 (E)
Court membership
Judges sitting Smalberger J, Stewart J
Case opinions
Decision by Stewart J
Keywords
Criminal law, Liability, Defence of compulsion, Onus

S v Mtewtwa[1] is an important case in South African criminal law, dealing with the defence of compulsion. The accused, in custody, was threatened by a warder with solitary confinement unless he committed a criminal act. The court considered what State must prove in such circumstances in order to obtain a conviction.

The court held that, where an accused's defence is one of compulsion, the onus lies on the State to show that a reasonable man would have resisted the compulsion. There is no onus on the accused to satisfy the court that he acted under compulsion.

Specifically, where a person is in custody and is threatened by a warder with solitary confinement, then, held the court, at the very least the State must show that the accused could reasonably have complained to the prison authorities of the warder's wrongful conduct and that such complaint would have averted the threatened confinement.

See also

References

Case law

Notes

  1. ↑ 1977 (3) SA 628 (E).
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, August 28, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.