Salah Asuhan (film)

Salah Asuhan
Directed by Asrul Sani
Produced by Andy Azhar
Screenplay by Asrul Sani
Story by Abdoel Moeis
Based on Salah Asuhan 
by Abdoel Moeis
Starring
Music by Frans Haryadi
Cinematography Sjamsuddin Jusuf
Edited by Janis Badar
Production
company
Taty & Sons Jaya Film
Release dates
  • 1972 (1972) (Indonesia)
Running time
 98 minutes
Country Indonesia
Language Indonesian

Salah Asuhan (literally Wrong Upbringing, released internationally as The Misfit) is a 1972 film directed by Asrul Sani, produced by Andy Azhar, and starring Dicky Zulkarnaen, Ruth Pelupessy, and Rima Melati. Adapted from Abdoel Moeis' 1928 novel of the same name, it tells of a man who betrays his upbringing for the metropolitan life, while at the same time marrying an Indo woman instead of the one chosen by his mother.

Sani attempted to update the story to fit 1970s Indonesia, although the majority of the plot remained the same; critics have doubted his success, noting anachronistic worldviews. Salah Asuhan was runner-up for two awards given by the Indonesian Reporters' Society.

Plot

The Minangkabau Muslim Hanafi (Dicky Zulkarnaen) returns to West Sumatra after spending several years studying in Europe, paid for by his maternal uncle. In return, the uncle expects Hanafi to marry his cousin, Rapiah (Rima Melati). Hanafi, however, has become westernised and explicitly denounces the traditions his mother (Fifi Young) holds dear. He is also in love with his friend Corrie du Bussee (Ruth Pelupessy), who is half-French. Corrie's father (E. Draculic) tells her to go to Jakarta, as he fears that she will be unable to refuse Hanafi's advances. She does so, and Hanafi is married to Rapiah, although he soon shows himself to be an abusive husband.

Hanafi soon falls ill and is sent to Jakarta for treatment, where he meets Corrie. The two marry and move in together, leading to Hanafi becoming further westernised and, ultimately, a poor husband. While he is at work Corrie often meets with Tante Lim, a Chinese woman who, unknown to Corrie, is a procurer of prostitutes. Lim gives Corrie many gifts in effort to have Corrie become a prostitute, but when Corrie becomes aware of this goal she throws Lim out.

Hanafi, however, has seen the two women talking and spreads a rumour that Corrie has stooped to prostitution; he later divorces her. This leads Corrie to become estranged from society and she soon falls ill, forgiving Hanafi on her deathbed. Hanafi returns to his home in Sumatra to apologise to his mother and Rapiah for how he treated them before stepping out the door. His mother stops Rapiah from interfering, saying that he is now beyond all human help.

Production

Salah Asuhan was directed by Asrul Sani and produced by Andy Azhar of Taty & Sons Jaya Film. The crew included Sjamsuddin Jusuf on camera, Nazar Ali as artistic director, Frans Haryadi as music director, and Janis Badar as editor.[1] Sani adapted the film's story from Abdoel Moeis' 1928 novel of the same name, which had been set in the 1920s and emphasised Hanafi's want to become Europeanised. The novel has been considered a major piece of Indonesian literature and Moeis' finest work.[2]

Before primary shooting began but after the film was announced, domestic film critics questioned how it could be faithful to the novel when most of the settings in the novel had changed since it was written. Sani, however, modernised the story and set it in 1970s Indonesia.[2] The American visual anthropologist Karl G. Heider wrote that the result Indonesianised Minang culture, giving the drift from the matrilineal culture evidenced in the novel with the more standard patrilineal culture found in the Indonesian archipelago.[3] The main plot points of both the film and novel, however, remained the same.[2]

The film starred Dicky Zulkarnaen as Hanafi, Rima Melati as Rapiah, and Ruth Pelupessy as Corrie. More minor roles were taken by Fifi Young, E. Draculic, Mohamad Mochtar, Farida Arriany, Jasso Winarto, Fakhri Amrullah, and Dewi Rais.[1]

Techniques and themes

As in many of his earlier productions, Sani exploits the natural beauty of West Sumatra in Salah Asuhan; the film critic Salim Said wrote that the result harkened to the works of contemporary Japanese film directors, who were capable of effectively utilising their settings.[4]

Heider noted that scenes showing Corrie drinking alcohol and wearing a mini skirt suggested to Indonesian audiences that she did not have the inner strength to reject Hanafi's advances. The drinking of alcohol also serves as a symbol of Westernisation; as Hanafi becomes more Europeanised, he takes up the practice — one which forbidden by his Islamic faith.[5] Heider also noted Corrie's deathbed scene as reflecting the dominant Minangkabau mores, as, although Hanafi holds her hands, their palms never touch; he wrote that touching palms was more taboo than kissing in Indonesian cinema at the time.[6]

Heider divides the main characters of Salah Asuhan into four quadrants, representing two binary opposites: Indonesian/Western, and Modern/Traditional. He classifies Hanafi and Corrie as falling into a modern/western type, with Liem best fitting the group (although poorly, owing to the emphasis on her Chineseness in the film). The parents of Hanafi and Corrie are both traditional, with Hanafi's mother matching the Indonesian/traditional and Mr DeBussee matching the Western/traditional type; he places Rapiah and her father into the Indonesian/traditional grouping, although they are not as extreme as Hanafi's mother. He notes only one character in the Indonesian/modern grouping, Corrie's landlady in Jakarta.[3]

Release and reception

Salah Asuhan was released in 1972. It received two nominations from the Indonesian Reporters' Society (Persatuan Wartawan Indonesia), placing as first runner up for Best Actor and third runner up for best actress.[7] A VHS copy remains on archive at Sinematek Indonesia.[8]

Said wrote that Sani had failed to make Salah Asuhan truly modern, instead simply providing updated costumes and settings without updating the psychological aspects. This left the work, in Said's opinion, lacking believable motives and ultimately becoming "a tiresome emptiness".[9] Heider likewise suggests that the novel lost much of its power during adaptation, adding that the characters remain stable in their respective quadrants and thus do not "seriously show the dynamics of modernization".[3]

Footnotes

Works cited

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, January 12, 2014. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.