Serial (podcast)

Serial
Presentation
Hosted by Sarah Koenig
Genre
  • Investigative journalism
  • Serialized audio narrative
Language English
Updates
  • Thursday morning
  • Season one: weekly
  • Season two:
  • Episode 1-3: weekly
  • Episode 4-11: every other week
Production
Production
  • Sarah Koenig
  • Julie Snyder
  • Dana Chivvis
  • Emily Condon
Audio format Podcast (via streaming or downloadable MP3)
No. of seasons 2
No. of episodes 23
Publication
Debut October 3, 2014
Cited for 2015 Peabody Award
Cited as "an audio game-changer"
Provider WBEZ
Website Serial
Serial host and producer Sarah Koenig

Serial is a podcast hosted by Sarah Koenig, first released in October 2014 as a spin-off of the radio program This American Life. The series was co-created and is co-produced by Koenig and Julie Snyder. Using investigative journalism, Koenig narrates a nonfiction story over multiple episodes. Episodes vary in length. New episodes were originally available weekly, but partway through the second season the schedule was revised to every other week. Serial ranked number one on iTunes even before its debut and remained there for several weeks.[1] Serial won a Peabody Award in April 2015 for its innovative telling of a long-form nonfiction story.

Serial has been confirmed for two additional seasons. The first episode of season two of Serial was released December 10, 2015,[2] and season three is planned to be released in spring of 2016.[3]

Series overview

Season Episodes Originally aired
First aired Last aired
1 12 October 3, 2014 December 18, 2014
2 11 December 10, 2015 March 31, 2016

Koenig has said that Serial is "about the basics: love and death and justice and truth. All these big, big things."[4] She also has noted, "this is not an original idea. Maybe in podcast form it is, and trying to do it as a documentary story is really, really hard. But trying to do it as a serial, this is as old as Dickens."[5] Episodes are released on Thursdays.

Serial was named a 2015 winner of a Peabody Award as radio/podcast, cited as "an audio game-changer."[6] Dr. Jeffrey P. Jones, Director of the Peabody Awards, commented the podcast showed "how new avenues and approaches to storytelling can have a major impact on how we understand truth, reality, and events".[6]

New York Magazine reported that Phil Lord and Chris Miller, producers of The Lego Movie and the film 21 Jump Street, will be producing a television program about the podcast that will take a "behind-the-scenes approach that details how Koenig went from virtual anonymity to creating one of 2014's biggest cultural phenomenons".[7]

Internet radio streaming service, Pandora, will stream the second season of Serial. The first season is available beginning November 24, 2015.[8]

Season 1 (2014)

Season 1 investigated the 1999 murder of Hae Min Lee (Hangul: 이해민), an 18-year-old student at Woodlawn High School in Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A. She was last seen about 3 p.m. on January 13, 1999.[9] Her corpse was discovered on February 9 in Leakin Park and identified two days later. The case was immediately treated as a homicide.[10] Lee's ex-boyfriend, Adnan Masud Syed, was arrested on February 28 at 6 a.m. and charged with first-degree murder, which led to "some closure and some peace" for Lee's family.[11] A memorial service for Lee was held on March 11 at Woodlawn High School.[12] Syed's first trial ended in a mistrial, but after a six-week second trial, Syed was found guilty of Lee's murder on February 25, 2000[13] and given a life sentence, despite pleading his innocence.[14] Syed did not speak in front of the jury.

In February 2015, three weeks after the end of Season 1, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals filed a decision allowing Syed to appeal his conviction on grounds his attorney, Cristina Gutierrez, had provided ineffective counsel for failing to seek a plea bargain during his trial.[15] The Court also announced that another three-judge panel would address the question of whether new evidence from Asia McClain, providing an alibi for Syed, would be admitted.[15]

On February 9, 2015, Scott Pelley of CBS News reported Serial's season one episodes had been downloaded more than 68 million times.[16] By February 2016, the episodes had been downloaded over 80 million times.[17]

Persons involved

Season 2 (2015–16)

See also: Bowe Bergdahl

In September 2015, the New York Times reported the second season would focus on Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, an American soldier who was held for five years by the Taliban, and then arrested for desertion. A spokesperson for Serial only said, "Over the last few months they've been reporting on a variety of stories for both Seasons 2 and 3 of Serial, along with other podcast projects."[21] The first episode of the season was released, without any previous release date announcement, on December 10, 2015.[22]

For Season 2, Koenig teamed up with Mark Boal, the Academy Award winning screenwriter of The Hurt Locker and Zero Dark Thirty, and his production company, Page 1. Boal had conducted a series of interviews with Bergdahl as part of a film production he was working on, and both Boal and Bergdahl gave Koenig permission to use those excerpts of those recorded interviews in episodes of Serial. As Koenig stated in Season 2's first episode: "They'd come to us saying 'hey, we've been doing all this reporting on the story, and we've also got this tape. Do you think you might want to listen?' And yes, we did, and we were kind of blown away, and so we began working with them. They shared their research with us, and also put us in touch with many of their sources... We don't have anything to do with their movie, but Mark and Page 1 are our partners for Season 2."[2]

On December 14, General Robert B. Abrams, head of United States Army Forces Command at Fort Bragg, North Carolina ordered that Bergdahl face a court-martial on charges of desertion.[23]

Sarah Koenig announced on January 12, 2016, that the podcast schedule would be changed to every other week to allow for deeper reporting, and to add more information than initially planned, with Season 2 Episode 5 released on January 21, 2016.[24]

Persons involved

Episodes

Season 1 (2014)

# Title Length (minutes:seconds) Original release date
1"The Alibi"53:28October 3, 2014 (2014-10-03)
This episode explores the story of Adnan Syed, who may or may not have been wrongly convicted in 1999 of killing Hae Min Lee, Syed's ex-girlfriend who was a senior at Baltimore County's Woodlawn High School. She disappeared in January 1999. Serial's investigative team "follows up on long-dormant leads, rechecks alibis, and questions assumptions."[25] Host Sarah Koenig reveals that the story is in process and that she doesn't know how it will end.[26][27]
2"The Breakup"36:28October 3, 2014 (2014-10-03)
Adnan Syed and Hae Min Lee had a storybook romance, kept secret from their disapproving parents. When Lee broke it off, their friends had conflicting interpretations of Syed's behavior: he was either cool with it and sad, or in a rage and hatching a sinister plot to kill her. Syed consistently proclaims his innocence, but there are puzzling inconsistencies in the set of facts he tells.
3"Leakin Park"27:34October 10, 2014 (2014-10-10)
Lee had been missing for three weeks when a man on his lunch break, referred to as "Mr. S", discovered her body. His account of how he found her body seems suspicious to detectives MacGillivary and Ritz, who questioned him, and his background check reveals some bizarre behaviors, including a series of streaking episodes.
4"Inconsistencies"33:44October 16, 2014 (2014-10-16)
An anonymous caller leads detectives to subpoena Adnan Syed's cell phone records. As a result, the detectives discover calls to Jen, who is a friend of one of Adnan's acquaintances, a weed dealer named Jay. Detectives interview Jen and then Jay, who says Syed told him he killed Lee, and then forced him to help bury her body. Details of Jay's story shifted in some significant ways over four interviews, but the detectives said they were able to corroborate his story using cell phone records.
5"Route Talk"43:10October 23, 2014 (2014-10-23)
Producers Koenig and Chivvis test drive the prosecution's route and timeline of Lee's murder between 2:15, when school let out at the high school, and 2:36, when Jay said Syed called him for pick up in the Best Buy parking lot and then showed Jay Lee's body in the trunk of her car. While that timeline seems possible, though just barely, evidence from the call logs and records of cell tower pings do not quite align with Jay's testimony about the rest of the afternoon.
6"The Case Against Adnan Syed"43:37October 30, 2014 (2014-10-30)
In addition to Jay's testimony, evidence against Adnan Syed included a palm print on a map that could not be dated, and cell phone records. Did Syed ask Lee for a ride after school to get into her car? Koenig goes through all the evidence, including the prosecution's timeline and "some stray things" that don't add up, including a neighbor's story, the testimony of Jay's friend Jen, and the sequence of cell phone calls after Lee disappeared.
7"The Opposite of the Prosecution"32:30November 6, 2014 (2014-11-06)
Deirdre Enright, Director of Investigation for the Innocence Project at the University of Virginia School of Law,[28] and a team of law students analyze the case against Adnan Syed. Deirdre thinks the evidence against him was "thin". She advises Koenig to keep revisiting all the evidence, allowing uncertainties to remain until there is a tipping point when her questions are resolved. They start with a presumption of Syed's innocence, and ask whether they can discover who really did kill Lee. They find some undeveloped forensic evidence, but Koenig is still uncertain.
8"The Deal with Jay"43:56November 13, 2014 (2014-11-13)
How credible was Jay's story? Koenig interviews a jury member, who said Jay seemed like a nice young man and believable. A professional detective says the investigation of Lee's murder was better than average, and Jay had handed the police the case on a platter. Koenig and Snyder visit Jay, who declines an interview. Jay's friend Chris recalls what Jay told him about the murder, a story not consistent with Jay's courtroom version. Why did Jay agree to help Syed? Did Syed coerce Jay and threaten to hurt Jay's girlfriend Stephanie? His friends said Jay had a reputation for lying, but not about important things. Jay's friend Jen says she could understand why Jay might lie about some details, but she believed his story. Back to the question: what was the jury thinking?
9"To Be Suspected"47:40November 20, 2014 (2014-11-20)
Koenig reveals she has new information about the call at 2:36. First, Laura claims there were never any pay phones in front of the Best Buy, but Jay's drawing shows a phone booth in front of the Best Buy, and he claimed Syed was standing by that phone booth with red gloves on. Second, Lee's friend Summer says that Lee could not have been dead by 2:36, because she had a conversation with Lee between 2:30 and 2:45. Others also saw Lee after school that day. Third, Asia saw Syed at the library in that same time frame. Sarah Koenig explores Syed's perspective as he was questioned, arrested, tried, and sentenced, as well as his letters to friends about life in prison. She mentions that she has reasonable doubt, not in the legal sense, but in the "normal person" sense.
10"The Best Defense is a Good Defense"53:55December 4, 2014 (2014-12-04)
Did anti-Muslim sentiment affect the prosecution? The prosecution argued that Syed's community would help him flee to Pakistan if bail were granted, using stereotypes to make the case that Syed murdered Lee as an honor killing. Defense attorney Cristina Gutierrez argued that someone else did it, and police did not look beyond Syed. His first trial ended in a mistrial, and in the second trial she cast suspicion on Mr. S and Jay as involved in the crime, but she did not present a clear outline of these arguments or scrutinize discrepancies in the call log timeline. Gutierrez discovered the prosecutor had secured an attorney for Jay – arguably a "benefit" worth money – in connection with his pleading guilty as an accessory and agreeing to testify, but the judge did not agree that this tainted Jay's testimony. Koenig does not believe Cristina Gutierrez intentionally bungled his defense, but within a year after Syed's trial, Gutierrez became very ill, her career collapsed, and she was disbarred. Syed has a petition before a higher court which requires a response by January 14, 2015, on the narrow issue of inadequate defense of counsel based on Gutierrez not seeking a plea bargain, which Syed claims he had asked her to do. Because Syed has maintained his innocence, however, and therefore shows no remorse, he is unlikely to be paroled.
11"Rumors"41:25December 11, 2014 (2014-12-11)
Koenig investigates negative rumors about Syed, though the rumors do not directly connect him to Lee's murder, and the most troubling rumors cannot be substantiated. People from his mosque were scared when he was arrested, some describing his story as a cautionary tale. Some believe Syed was duplicitous, capable of committing the crime. One rumor, that he stole money from the mosque, was partially confirmed by four people. Syed admitted taking some money when he was in eighth grade, but his mother found out, and he felt ashamed. Syed had a reputation as a peacemaker, "a good guy", helpful and caring. People who knew him in high school cannot believe he planned Lee's murder. Did Syed "lose it", and nurse feelings of rejection? Could Syed have committed murder in a dissociative state, not knowing he did it? Koenig explores whether Syed has true empathy or anti-social characteristics, and consults with psychologist Charles Ewing, who has interviewed many young murderers. Why does Syed not sound more angry about Jay or other people connected to his case? In an 18-page letter to Koenig, Syed reveals his concern about being perceived as manipulative, and says it doesn't matter how the podcast portrays him.
12"What We Know"55:37December 18, 2014 (2014-12-18)
After spending over a year researching the case, Koenig still is uncertain what happened the day that Lee disappeared. She reveals new information that happened as a result of people hearing about the podcast: she has spoken with Don, Lee's boyfriend of 13 days at the time of her disappearance, and with Jay's former co-worker, Josh. Koenig reviews the phone records again with her production team and determines that neither Jay's nor Syed's story of that day aligns with the evidence. Unresolved discrepancies also include Jen and Jay's stories about how they disposed of Jay's clothes and boots. Reviewing possible motives for the murder, Koenig and her producers reason that logically, if Syed is innocent, he had extraordinarily bad luck because of circumstantial evidence involving him. Lawyers from the Innocence Project announce they will seek court approval to test the DNA found on Lee's body and a bottle found nearby, possibly pointing to another man, and Syed's petition in the court of appeals is still alive. Koenig expresses her desire to avoid unsubstantiated speculation and to focus on only the facts. She concludes that from a legal perspective, she would have voted to acquit Syed, although she still nurses doubts.

Season 2 (2015–16)

# Title Length (minutes:seconds) Original release date
1"DUSTWUN"44:24December 10, 2015 (2015-12-10)
Private Bowe Bergdahl left his Army post in Afghanistan in 2009, intending to hike about 20 miles to a larger command center and trigger a "DUSTWUN" manhunt. In telephone conversations with Mark Boal, a documentary film maker, Bergdahl said he wanted to report poor leadership at his post and air grievances, but enemy fighters captured him within hours of his disappearance. Sarah Koenig will be using more of the 25 hours of recorded conversations between Bergdahl and Boal to tell his story.[29][30]
2"The Golden Chicken"59:12December 17, 2015 (2015-12-17)
The capture of Bowe Bergdahl is recounted by Taliban members present that day and the weeks following. Other US Army soldiers discuss the initial recovery efforts and their feelings about Bergdahl following his disappearance.
3"Escaping"54:18December 24, 2015 (2015-12-24)
Bergdahl said he tried to escape after he was captured, but his first attempt only resulted in about 15 minutes of freedom. He was chained spread-eagle to a bed and blindfolded for about three months. His next escape lasted only eight days, during which he was injured falling off a cliff in the dark. He remained in captivity until Special Forces picked him up in 2014.
4"The Captors"45:01January 7, 2016 (2016-01-07)
What was going on with the captors? Bergdahl's description of his captors is confusing, largely because his perspective was from inside a cage, inside a locked room. Koenig interviews David Rohde, another American held captive by the Haqqani network for about seven months, who had been abducted with two Afghan colleagues who could interpret what his captors were saying and doing.
5"Meanwhile, in Tampa"53:26January 21, 2016 (2016-01-21)
In 2009, the search for Bergdahl was in hands of two low-level personnel recovery intel analysts for Afghanistan, at CENTCOM in Tampa, not a division in-theater. Hostage recovery was not at the top of list of priorities for the CIA, NSA, or other intelligence agencies, and resources were consequently not available. Because Bergdahl was held in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Pakistan, there were also complicated diplomatic issues. In 2013, General John Campbell made it a top priority to recover Bergdahl, and Colonel Jason Amerine audited everything done in Bergdahl's case and in other hostage cases. Agencies such as CENTCOM, SOCOM, DOD, and the State Department seemed to hand off responsibility for recovering not just Bergdahl, but other American hostages as well, making a dysfunctional hostage recovery policy. Koenig observes that frustration was the central theme expressed by those she interviewed, who were struggling against competing interests and limits on what the U.S. is willing risk to get hostages back.
6"5 O'Clock Shadow"59:57February 4, 2016 (2016-02-04)
Sgt. Bergdahl gave a 380-page statement to Gen. Kenneth Dahl, telling the story of his deployment and what happened when he walked away from his post. Bergdahl had been a good infantry soldier up until that point, who even volunteered for extra duty, a "squared away" soldier. He had become disillusioned at his first post in Alaska after basic training, and found Army leadership to be lacking. The mission in Afghanistan was counterinsurgency and nation-building, but many soldiers expressed confusion over doing "humanitarian things," rather than seeking and destroying the Taliban enemy. Bergdahl wanted adventure and action, and was disappointed in his platoon's work. The platoon was assigned a rescue mission, but they were attacked on their return, in a firefight through a ravine, eventually limping back to the post with no losses, but they were upbraided for not shaving for six days. Bergdahl was angry about the battalion commander's misplaced priorities. Bergdahl wanted to "kill the bad guys", and do better at engaging the regular Afghans, but he felt the Army was not fulfilling its counter-insurgency mission. When the battalion was assigned to dig trenches near Moest in 110-degree heat of summer, the battalion commander aggressively berated them for being out of uniform, as a breakdown in discipline. Bergdahl was offended by the punishment, feeling the commander was incompetent, and out of control. He felt he had to cause a DUSTWUN to correct the situation. So was he selfish, or selfless?
7"Hindsight, Part 1"37:58February 18, 2016 (2016-02-18)
Has Bergdahl been telling the truth about his reasons for walking off base in Afghanistan, or just the version he could live with? Bergdahl says he left because army leaders were dangerously bad. General Dahl concluded Bergdahl's comments were truthful, that his motive was well-meaning, but based on incorrect assumptions. Mark Boal said Bergdahl's conclusions would make sense only to himself. Kayla Harrison described him as an unusual, smart, creative teenager, who forged his own strict, uncompromising moral code, who believed if you know something to be wrong in the world, you must take actions to correct it, and he was "impossibly unrealistic". He had romantic expectations, a rigid code of conduct, and a judgmental perspective. He joined the Coast Guard in January 2006, at age 19. Overwhelmed, he had been hospitalized after a panic attack, and a psychologist had assessed his "mental state significant for situational anxiety", recommending discharge with "diagnosis: adjustment disorder with depression". Bergdahl felt he was being judged by his family as a failure, a black sheep who would not do the right thing. In May 2008, to get a waiver to join the Army, he submitted a medical discharge statement that left out his panic attack, hospitalization, and the doctor's note that before re-enlisting in the military, he needed clearance by a psychiatrist. He didn't tell anyone at home he was joining the Army. He just turned up one day in uniform. Kim Harrison said it was the worst idea ever. Koenig asks,"Should the Army have let Bowe in?”
8"Hindsight, Part 2"36:56February 19, 2016 (2016-02-19)
Did the Army screw up by accepting Bergdahl after his breakdown in Coast Guard basic training two years earlier? Dr. Elspeth Cameron Ritchie thought the Army waiver was not uncommon because information-sharing among different military branches is incomplete. Dr. Michael Valdevenos thought the Army recruiter should have scrutinized Bergdahl's record more thoroughly. Gen. Dahl concluded the recruiter had followed all procedures, but should have included review of his separation action. Mark Boal observed Bergdahl experienced the disillusion of someone who believes in the Army, who just wanted to talk to higher-ranking people in the military about improving command leadership. Bergdahl wanted to be the ideal soldier who fights for a cause he is committed to, who rallies behind trusted military leaders, with a code of honor, loyalty, and self-sacrifice. Bergdahl knew his expectations were unrealistic, but he still defended his vision of the way things should be. Bergdahl's June 27 broadcast e-mail to friends, "Who is John Gault?" referred to the industrialist in Atlas Shrugged, who shut down the world's economy in order to fix it. Dr. Christopher Lang diagnosed Bergdahl as having Schizotypal personality disorder. Dr. Valdevenos concurs that this diagnosis is accurate, describing people who are loners, lack close friends, with perceptual alterations and persistent social anxiety. Bergdahl's paranoia was worse under stress — he believed his commander might send them into a suicide operation. Koenig says this diagnosis makes his story more credible. His judgments about the commander may even be true, that American lives were put at risk to retrieve equipment. For Bergdahl, walking off base was not an absolute boundary, but it was not a rational thing to do. Maj. Margaret Kurtz, the court martial prosecutor, said at the time of his alleged misconduct, Bergdahl was able to appreciate the nature and quality and wrongfulness of his conduct. In other words, mental illness or no, he should be held responsible for his actions. Some soldiers thought Bergdahl's good intentions led to a bad "God-like" decision. Some thought he was lying; some thought he had good intentions, but they still could not forgive his actions. Others didn’t perceive there was danger in the reprimands, like Bergdahl did. His platoon was deeply hurt by his actions. Platoon members would die for each other, and because of that, they had become family together. Bergdahl's actions made them feel their whole deployment lost its meaning. Almost all the soldiers he served with thought he should go to court martial.
9"Trade Secrets"48:46March 3, 2016 (2016-03-03)
The U.S. State Department engaged in secret peace negotiations in Munich in 2010 with the Taliban that included a "confidence building" condition: trade Bergdahl for two prisoners at Guantanamo. But negotiator Richard Holbrooke died before political reconciliation could be achieved. There was a brief hopeful moment with new negotiator Mark Grossman, but then there was stagnation for months, and no progress seemed possible. In May 2011, the Taliban walked away from the talks. Then their demands escalated to include release of five GItmo prisoners, including Mullah Faisal. Setbacks included leaks, bad timing, and "old fashioned screw-ups", including the 2011 assassination of former Afghan president Rabbani. In June 2013 a new Taliban office opened with the flag of the Islamic Emirate, in violation of the agreement with Karzai and U.S. representative James Dobbins. The word "emirate" was also on the wall of the building, which infuriated Karzai. The Taliban withdrew from peace talks, and Bergdahl stayed in captivity for another year. The Pakistani army was gearing up to bomb Pakistani Taliban in Waziristan, and the U.S. had begun withdrawing troops, so prospects for Bergdahl's release were diminishing. Bergdahl's physical condition was deteriorating. U.S. officials, including Chuck Hagel, negotiated through Qatar, finally negotiating a deal for Bergdahl's release in exchange for the five Taliban prisoners at Guantanamo. On Saturday, May 31, 2014, word finally came that Bergdahl was safe and the trade could proceed. It was a transaction, not part of a larger peace negotiation. The Bergdahls had been assured that their son would not face charges, that his time with the Taliban was punishment enough, so they thought it was over, mission accomplished. Not quite.
10"Thorny Politics"51:36March 17, 2016 (2016-03-17)
When Koenig questions people about what bothers them about Bergdahl's case, most say that it has become so political. Was it inevitable that it became so combative? Susan Rice characterized his service with "honor and distinction", which angered the military. Soldiers in his platoon said he walked away, and some from his unit started a "He's not a hero" Facebook page. Fox News interviewed soldiers from Bergdahl's platoon and the story became a juggernaut, with bogus intel from a discredited source even saying Bergdahl had become a Muslim and wanted to be a warrior for Islam. The political right was using the story and the platoon for political purposes, trying to bait President Obama because they had been offended by the Rose Garden ceremony, which they characterized as "a tone-deaf move" on the part of the White House. The President did not recognize the irregularities of Bergdahl's story of or questions about his disappearance, and there was no attempt to get to the bottom of the story. Why did the White House make such a mistake, instead of using an earlier plan to have a quiet event? In retrospect, it was important for the President to own the decision and explain the policy behind it. By law, Congress must be given 30-day notice before Guantanamo detainees are released, but the Department of Defense had taken the lead on the trade, and had not told Congress anything. Leaks could have derailed the fragile deal, jeopardizing Bergdahl's life. Congressional staffers felt they could no longer believe anything from DOD: first, where there had been a collegial relationship before, there was now "unprecedented, profound concern about national security risk…" Second, who signed off on the trade of five Taliban? Third, were they safe to release from Gitmo? The public anger at Bergdahl is personal, wrapped in larger questions about negotiating with terrorists. As a result of this anger, the Republican congress changed the legal wording on Gitmo foreign transfer language, creating a stricter standard as a direct result of the Bergdahl trade, and the administration not telling Congress the truth. Bergdahl also had a lengthy stay in Germany, where "SERE" experts (Survival, evasion, resistance, escape) from the military community planned Bergdahl's reintegration, and debriefs took weeks. Bergdahl was unaware he had become a subject of national interest. One important question has not been addressed: there has been no official report or investigation of whether people died or were injured in the search for Bergdahl.
11"Present for Duty"65:05March 31, 2016 (2016-03-31)
Questions remain about Bergdahl's case. First, people with him during Coast Guard boot camp did not understand how could have enlisted in the Army, given their graphic recollections of his breakdown, which was not a "garden variety panic attack". Gen. Kenneth Dahl wrote that Bergdahl's Coast Guard separation should have been examined more closely. Koenig summarizes: the Army messed up, Bergdahl messed up walking off base, and then there were 5 years with the Taliban. But that leaves out the reckoning desired by the military. They want an accounting. What was Bergdahl's fault, and what was not? Gen. Michael Flynn, formerly head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, says authoritatively people died on missions to find Bergdahl. But the evidence is not so clear, in spite of the six names from the 501st battalion on missions to find DUSTWUN that have been cited in the media. Other soldiers in his unit were convinced that finding Bergdahl was part of all their missions following his disappearance, so the six deaths were connected to Bergdahl. Some cited resources dedicated to finding him that were not then available to other operations. Sgt. Maj. Ken Wolfe, however, advised looking "at a map and a timeframe", meaning after 45+ days, Bergdahl was in Pakistan. No infantry unit would be deployed to look for Bergdahl, as it would have required special forces. But what about second- and third-order consequences of his desertion? Wolfe dispels these arguments as "speculation and hypothetical". Perhaps the mission to find Bergdahl was just top cover to justify other unrelated missions the Army units needed to accomplish, as an excuse to gain assets and permission to "get outside the wire". Flynn points out they did not have bullet-proof intelligence on where Bergdahl was. But resources were diverted and people were injured and suffered because of looking for Bergdahl. Who is to blame for variables causing the deaths and injuries in wars? The country signed up for all the things attending war, including disillusioned youth and failing Army recruiting systems. Mark Boal's remaining question: what is an appropriate punishment for Bergdahl, who did not intend to cause harm? The Army treats most deserters who walk away from base as headcases, because it is so dangerous. Ambivalence about Bergdahl reflects societal confusion about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the war on terror. Bergdahl is still a soldier, now classified as "present for duty". He has an office job at a base in San Antonio, waiting for the Army to decide his fate, just waiting — which he knows how to do.

Development and release

The concept for Serial originated with an experiment in Koenig's basement.[31] Koenig and Snyder had pitched a different idea at a staff meeting for a weekly program on events during the previous seven days, which staff members received without enthusiasm.[32] When Ira Glass asked Koenig if she had any other ideas, she mentioned podcasting a story that unfolded over time, a serialized narrative. In an interview with Mother Jones, she explained that each episode would return to the same story, telling the next chapter of a long, true narrative.[5]

Episode one of the series was released on October 3, 2014, with additional episodes released weekly online. Glass introduced it as a spinoff of his popular radio program, This American Life, and aired episode one on his show.[31] He explained, "We want to give you the same experience you get from a great HBO or Netflix series, where you get caught up with the characters and the thing unfolds week after week, but with a true story, and no pictures. Like House of Cards, but you can enjoy it while you're driving."[31]

Music

Nicholas Thorburn released the soundtrack for Serial on October 17, 2014.[33] It includes fifteen tracks, all short instrumentals, and is available at the Bandcamp site or streamed from several reviewing sites.[33][34][35]

Mark Henry Phillips, who mixes the show, has also provided original scores.[36]

Musical credits for Season 2 include Thorburn and Phillips, as well as Fritz Meyers and staff music editor Kate Bilinski.[37]

Funding

Serial's launch was sponsored by MailChimp, a frequent podcast advertiser, and salaried staff positions were initially funded by WBEZ.[38] Admitting the podcast was funded from This American Life's budget during the launch, producer Koenig noted that Serial would eventually need to generate its own funding. She said, "Everyone's saying 'It's podcasting! It's internet! Of course there'll be money somewhere.' We're not exactly sure yet."[31] Dana Chivvis, another producer, observed that, since the industry is still in its infancy, a business model for podcasting has yet to be established.[39]

Towards the end of the first season, producers asked for public donations to fund a second season.[40] Within a week, the staff of Serial posted an announcement that a second season has been made possible by donations and sponsorship.[41]

Reception

Host and Executive Producer Sarah Koenig accepts the Peabody Award for Serial. She is joined on stage by Julie Snyder, Dana Chivvis, Emily Condon, Cecily Strong and Ira Glass.

Season 1 (2014)

The first season of Serial was both culturally popular and critically well received. Serial was ranked at No. 1 on iTunes even before it débuted, leading iTunes rankings for over three months, well after the first season ended.[1][42] It also broke records as the fastest podcast ever to reach 5 million downloads at Apple's iTunes store.[43] David Carr in The New York Times called Serial "Podcasting's first breakout hit."[44] The Guardian characterized it as a "new genre of audio storytelling".[5]

Introducing a PBS NewsHour segment about Serial, Judy Woodruff noted that it is "an unexpected phenomenon", and Hari Sreenivasan mentioned it has "five million downloads on iTunes, far more than any other podcast in history".[45] In the interview that followed, David Haglund of Slate observed the solitary experience of listening with earphones adds to the intimacy of the podcast form.[45]

Calling the characters "rich and intriguing", The Daily Californian noted similarities to the film The Thin Blue Line (1988), and described the podcast as "gripping" and the story as "thrilling", while applauding the series for giving "listeners a unique opportunity to humanize the players".[46]

Slate's reviewer pointed out that Serial is not escapist and went on to note: "Someone in the show is not telling the truth about something very sinister. That's the narrative tension that makes Serial not only compelling but also unlike anything I can remember watching or reading before."[26]

The Baltimore Sun commented on the inherently riveting subject matter: "We seemingly never tire of the everything was perfect until... narrative" of a crime-drama, and noted that the top-notch reporting and podcast format yield "a novel twist on the investigative long-form piece".[25]

A critique from the journalism community was more qualified. First noting that some people believe there is a "podcast renaissance", the reviewer from Harvard's Nieman Journalism Lab observed that even though podcasts are not new, they are not yet mainstream.[38]

Not all critiques of the podcasting format have been as equivocal. PopMatters observed that podcasting is a new distribution model, very different from television as a distribution model because it gives users access to media and the freedom to listen to episodes of a long-form story while doing other things. The reviewer applauded the focus on long-form journalism and added, "Suddenly you feel like the full promise of podcasting has just been unleashed. That long-form narrative nonfiction is really the way to best leverage the potential of podcasting as a distribution model."[47]

A Wall Street Journal critic observed: "podcasts have slipped marketers' minds. ZenithOptimedia, for example, put out a forecast predicting 0% growth for the medium after years of positive momentum," and went on to note that podcast advertising company Podtrac reports one million unique listeners for each Serial podcast.[48] Discussing the economics of podcast advertising, New York Magazine noted that the personal nature of the podcast format allows higher advertising rates: "CPM (the cost to an advertiser per thousand impressions, a standard ad-industry unit) was between $20 and $45. Compare that to a typical radio CPM (roughly $1 to $18) or network TV ($5 to $20) or even a regular old web ad ($1 to $20), and the podcast wins."[49]

Multiple reviews have commented on the addictive nature of Serial.[50][51][52][53] Reddit hosts a Serial subreddit site, including discussions, transcripts, a link library, and podcasts about each Serial episode.[54][55] Slate is also reported to be "following the story closely" and presents a podcast discussion of Serial every week following the latest release.[56] A review in New York Magazine linked fans' feelings about the possibility of an ambiguous ending with their psychological need for closure.[57]

In an interview with Jon Ronson for The Guardian, Syed's mother Shamim and younger brother Yusuf both said they listened to the podcast and that people sent transcripts to Syed in prison. Yusuf said the podcast had indirectly reconnected the family to his estranged brother Tanveer for the first time in the 15 years since the murder.[58]

Several reviews have criticised the ethics of Serial, notably the decision to start broadcasting without the reporting having been finished.[59][60] Critics said the "live investigation" format invited listeners to do their own sleuthing, which quickly led to the full names and even addresses of people who were questioned by the police at the time of the murder being exposed online. Another point of debate was whether it was legitimate to use the murder of Hae Min Lee as a subject for entertainment.[61][62]

Sarah Koenig's reporting has also been criticized as being biased in favor of Adnan's innocence, and Katy Waldman's Slate blog noted that some felt Serial undercut Adnan's detractors.[63][64] An Atlantic roundtable discussion noted that because Koenig was "a bit gushing and attached to Adnan" throughout the show and tended to annotate evidence against Adnan, the podcast forces the listener to consider Koenig's "verification bias", the tendency to seek answers that support her own biased assumptions, and that "even a well-meaning narrator isn't always credible".[65]

One critic asserted that Koenig and her obsession were actually the subject of the show, and that she presented the story of a murder involving two minority teenagers and their cultures through a lens of white privilege, "a white interpreter 'stomping through communities that she does not understand' ".[66] Another critic added that Koenig had employed the "model minority" trope in her descriptions of Syed and Hae Min Lee, and that Jay was then portrayed as a "stereotypical urban black youth".[67] A rejoinder in The Atlantic pointed out, "Serial is a reflection on a murder case and the criminal-justice system reported over 'just' a year, which is to say, it is researched with more effort and depth than 99 percent of journalism produced on any beat in America... Most of all, the response to mistakes should never be to discourage white reporters from telling important stories."[68]

Serial was honored with a Peabody award in April 2015, noting "Serial rocketed podcasting into the cultural mainstream", and that it was an "experiment in long-form, non-fiction audio storytelling". It was cited for "its innovations of form and its compelling, drilling account of how guilt, truth, and reality are decided".[69]

Related podcasts

The popularity of Serial and the intrigue of the case it covered has spawned several companion podcasts, such as Crime Writers on Serial, The Serial Serial, and Undisclosed: The State vs. Adnan Syed, the latter produced by Rabia Chaudry.[70][71][72]

Parodies

Parodies of Serial have targeted the show's style, its fans' obsessive tendencies, Koenig's curiosity and uncertainties, the charts and graphics posted on the show's website, and the podcast's sponsor MailChimp (especially the meme "MailKimp").[73][74][75][76]

References

  1. 1 2 Larson, Sarah (October 9, 2014). "Serial: The Podcast We've Been Waiting For". The New Yorker. Retrieved October 12, 2014.
  2. 1 2 Koenig, Sarah (September 10, 2015). "DUSTWUN". Serial. Retrieved September 24, 2015.
  3. ↑ Yeung, Peter (29 May 2015). "Serial podcast: second and third seasons confirmed". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 1 June 2015. Retrieved 14 June 2015.
  4. ↑ Olson, Marina (October 10, 2014). "NPR's Absorbing New Podcast,Serial". Acculturated. Retrieved October 14, 2014.
  5. 1 2 3 Raptopoulos, Lilah (October 10, 2014). "This American Life's first spinoff podcast: 'I don't know where it will end'". The Guardian (Guardian News and Media Limited). Retrieved October 12, 2014.
  6. 1 2 Holston, Noel (April 16, 2015). "74th Annual Peabody Award Winners". Peabody Awards - Awarding Stories that Matter. Retrieved April 16, 2015.
  7. ↑ "'Serial' the Podcast Will Now Become Serial the TV Show". Vulture, NYMag.com. Retrieved October 1, 2015.
  8. ↑ "Pandora's "Serial" Deal Is Great News For Podcast Nerds And Internet Radio". Fast Company. Retrieved 2015-11-11.
  9. ↑ "Information sought on woman missing". The Baltimore Sun. February 4, 1999. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
  10. ↑ Chang, Young; Hermann, Peter (February 12, 1999). "Body found in park is missing woman, 18". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
  11. ↑ Oakes, Amy (March 1, 1999). "Ex-boyfriend is charged in teen's killing". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
  12. ↑ Apperson, Jay (March 12, 1999). "Slain teen remembered as joyful, 'full of love'". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
  13. ↑ Francke, Caitlin (February 26, 2000). "Jury finds teen guilty of killing ex-girlfriend". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
  14. ↑ Francke, Caitlin (June 7, 2000). "19-year-old gets life sentence for killing former girlfriend". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
  15. 1 2 Phillip, Abby (7 February 2015). "Md. court allows Adnan Syed to appeal his conviction in Serial case". The Washington Post. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  16. ↑ "New hope for inmate from Serial podcast". CBS News. February 9, 2015. Retrieved February 9, 2015.
  17. ↑ 'Serial' takes the stand: How a podcast became a character in its own narrative Washington Post. February 8, 2016
  18. ↑ Vargas-Cooper, Natasha (December 29, 2014). "Exclusive: Jay, key witness from Serial, tells his story for the first time". The // Intercept. Retrieved January 4, 2015.
  19. ↑ Fagge, Nick (November 13, 2014). "Will hit podcast lead to the release of high school killer? Family's new hopes for homecoming king convicted of murdering 'brilliant' secret girlfriend". Mail Online. Daily Mail. Retrieved December 7, 2014.
  20. ↑ "537: The Alibi - Transcript". This American Life. Chicago Public Media & Ira Glass. October 3, 2014. Retrieved December 5, 2014.
  21. ↑ Buckley, Cara (September 23, 2015). "'Serial' Podcast to Take Up Bowe Bergdahl Case". The New York Times. Retrieved September 24, 2015.
  22. ↑ Oppel Jr, Richard A.; Koblin, John (December 10, 2015). "'Serial' Season 2 Lets Bowe Bergdahl Tell His Side of Afghan Story". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 10, 2015.
  23. ↑ Oppel, Jr., Richard (December 14, 2015). "Bowe Bergdahl to Face Court-Martial on Desertion Charges". The New York Times. Retrieved December 14, 2015.
  24. ↑ "Season 2 Announcement". Serial. January 12, 2015. Retrieved January 12, 2016.
  25. 1 2 Mulvihill, Amy (October 6, 2014). "Baltimore Teen's Murder Re-Examined in New Podcast - Makers of This American Life delve into questions surrounding the 1999 murder of a Woodlawn High School senior". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved October 12, 2014.
  26. 1 2 Mathis-Lilley, Ben (October 3, 2014). "Serial Is Like Nothing I've Heard or Watched Before". Slate. Retrieved October 12, 2014.
  27. ↑ Chattopadhyay, Piya (October 10, 2014). "Serial: This American Life's first spin-off explores murder case". CBC. Retrieved October 12, 2014.
  28. ↑ "Innocence Project at the UVA School of Law". University of Virginia School of Law. October 9, 2014. Retrieved 2014.
  29. ↑ Ortiz, Erik; Miklaszewski, Jim (December 10, 2015). "'Serial' Season 2 Debuts With Bowe Bergdahl Telling 'Desertion' Story". NBC News. Retrieved December 10, 2015.
  30. ↑ Lamothe, Dan (December 10, 2015). "In new Serial podcast, Bowe Bergdahl says he likened himself to Jason Bourne before capture". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 10, 2015.
  31. 1 2 3 4 Lurie, Julia (September 19, 2014). "This American Life Channels True Detective in a New Podcast". Mother Jones. Retrieved October 12, 2014.
  32. ↑ Raptopoulos, Lilah (October 9, 2014). "Interview: Sarah Koenig on how Serial came to be". Soundcloud.com. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  33. 1 2 Hudson, Alex (October 17, 2014). "Nick Thorburn Releases Soundtrack to Podcast Serial". exclaim.ca. Retrieved October 23, 2014.
  34. ↑ Thorburn, Nick (October 16, 2014). "Nick Diamonds - Music from Serial". Bandcamp. Retrieved October 23, 2014.
  35. ↑ Young, Alex (October 17, 2014). "Islands' Nick Thorburn writes soundtrack for Serial podcast — listen". Consequence of Sound. Retrieved October 23, 2014.
  36. ↑ Phillips, Mark Henry (2014). "Original score from Serial". soundcloud.com. Retrieved November 21, 2014.
  37. ↑ "Music". Serial. Retrieved January 12, 2016.
  38. 1 2 O'Donovan, Caroline (October 3, 2014). "This American Life tries to turn its radio audience onto podcasting with its new show Serial". Nieman Lab. Retrieved October 13, 2014.
  39. ↑ Schroeder, Audra (October 4, 2014). "This American Life debuts its new investigative podcast, Serial". The Daily Dot. Daily Dot, LLC. Retrieved October 14, 2014.
  40. ↑ Griffin, Andrew (November 21, 2014). "Serial podcast needs cash for second season, despite being one of most popular shows ever". The Independent. Retrieved November 21, 2014.
  41. ↑ Condon, Emily (November 26, 2014). "There will be a Season Two of Serial! Thanks to everyone who donated.". Serialpodcast. Chicago Public Media & Ira Glass. Retrieved December 4, 2014.
  42. ↑ "iTunes podcast charts". itunescharts.net. February 2, 2015.
  43. ↑ Dredge, Stuart (18 November 2014). "Serial podcast breaks iTunes records as it passes 5m downloads and streams". The Guardian. Retrieved 3 April 2015.
  44. ↑ Carr, David. "'Serial,' Podcasting's First Breakout Hit, Sets Stage for More". The New York Times. Retrieved 3 April 2015.
  45. 1 2 "What 'Serial'-mania says about the growing popularity of podcasts". PBS NEWSHOUR. NewsHour Productions LLC. December 11, 2014. Retrieved December 12, 2014.
  46. ↑ Schultz, Anya (October 10, 2014). "Review: Serial, a captivating new podcast". The Daily Californian. The Independent Berkeley Student Publishing Co., Inc. Retrieved October 13, 2014.
  47. ↑ Q, shathley (October 13, 2014). "The Iconographies - John Woo Said "For a Better Tomorrow:" CW's The Flash and This American Life's Serial". PopMatters. PopMatters.com. Retrieved October 15, 2014.
  48. ↑ Perlberg, Steven (November 5, 2014). "Serial Is The Hottest Show Of The Fall — Do Marketers Need a Podcast Strategy?". The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  49. ↑ Roose, Kevin (October 30, 2014). "What's Behind the Great Podcast Renaissance?". New York - Daily Intelligencer. New York Media LLC. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  50. ↑ Kiernan, Louise (October 30, 2014). "Serial podcast producers talk storytelling, structure and if they know whodunnit". NiemanStoryboard. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, The President and Fellows of Harvard. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  51. ↑ Labrecque, Jeff (October 30, 2014). "Serial podcast makes Thursdays a Must-Listen event". Entertainment Weekly. Entertainment Weekly and Time Inc. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  52. ↑ Yurcaba, Josephine (October 24, 2014). "This American Crime: Sarah Koenig on Her Hit Podcast Serial". Rolling Stone. Rolling Stone. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  53. ↑ Rupp, Shannon (October 18, 2014). "Serial Podcast: True Crime Storytelling at Its Finest". The Tyee. The Tyee. News. Culture. Solutions. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  54. ↑ "Subreddit Serialpodcast". Reddit SerialPodcast. REDDIT. 2014. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  55. ↑ Engel, Pamela (November 12, 2014). "Redditors Are Trying to Solve a Murder That's at the Center of the Wildly Popular Serial Podcast". Business Insider. Business Insider Inc. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  56. ↑ Haglund, David; Waldman, Katy; Hess, Amanda (November 6, 2014). "Serial Takes a Step Back, and Gets Some Experts Involved. We Discuss the Latest Episode.". Slate Browbeat. The Slate Group, a Graham Holdings Company. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  57. ↑ Singal, Jesse (December 5, 2014). "A Psychological Explanation for Why 'Serial' Drives Some People Crazy". New York Magazine, Science of Us. Retrieved December 5, 2014.
  58. ↑ Ronson, Jon (7 December 2014). "Serial: The Syed family on their pain and the 'five million detectives trying to work out if Syed is a psychopath'". The Guardian. Retrieved 7 December 2014.
  59. ↑ Satullo, Chris (December 14, 2014). "With one episode left, will 'Serial' land well, or crash and burn?". newsworks. WHYY newsworks 2014. Retrieved December 21, 2014.
  60. ↑ Goldstein, Jessica (November 20, 2014). "The Complicated Ethics of 'Serial,' the Most Popular Podcast of All Time". ThinkProgress. Center for American Progress Action Fund. Retrieved December 21, 2014.
  61. ↑ Orr, Deborah (December 19, 2014). "Was Serial just feeding our appetite for stories about murdered women?". The Guardian. Retrieved January 4, 2015.
  62. ↑ Sanghani, Radhika (December 21, 2014). "Serial: How a schoolgirl's brutal murder became casual entertainment". The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group Limited. Retrieved January 4, 2014.
  63. ↑ Smerconish, Michael (January 18, 2015). "The Pulse: Under the spell of 'Serial'". Philadelphia Inquirer. Retrieved January 18, 2015.
  64. ↑ Waldman, Katy (20 January 2015). "A Serial Witness Reverses Her Story in the Latest Bizarre Twist". Browbeat - Slate's Culture Blog. Retrieved 28 January 2015.
  65. ↑ "Serial Episode 8: A Study in Bias?". The Atlantic. 13 November 2014. Retrieved 28 January 2015.
  66. ↑ Kang, Jay Caspian (November 13, 2014). "'Serial' and White Reporter Privilege - On cringing through the mystery.". The Awl. Retrieved December 21, 2014.
  67. ↑ Wong, Julia Carrie (November 16, 2014). "The Problem With 'Serial' And The Model Minority Myth It needs a 'bad' minority to balance the scales. Hello, Jay.". Buzz Feed - Ideas. Retrieved December 21, 2014.
  68. ↑ Friedersdorf, Conor (December 3, 2014). "The Backlash Against Serial—and Why It's Wrong". The Atlantic. The Atlantic Monthly Group. Retrieved December 21, 2014.
  69. ↑ "Serial". www.peabodyawards.com. 2014. Retrieved January 20, 2016.
  70. ↑ "Crime Writers On Serial". Crime Writers On...
  71. ↑ "The A.V. Club - The Serial Serial". www.avclub.com. Retrieved 2016-02-25.
  72. ↑ "Adnan Syed’s story continues post-'Serial' in new podcast - PBS NewsHour". PBS NewsHour.
  73. ↑ Roe, Mike (November 8, 2014). "Serial: The hottest podcast with the most spot-on parodies". 89.3KPCC. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  74. ↑ Scollins, Mike (November 3, 2014). "Mike at Funny Or Die Solves the Serial Podcast". Funny or Die. Funny or Die, Inc. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  75. ↑ Fitzpatrick, Molly (November 6, 2014). "Why are Serial podcast fans so obsessed with MailChimp?". V[ ]cative. Vocativ. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  76. ↑ Rial, Michelle (November 19, 2014). "Charts for people obsessed with Serial". The Bold Italic. Retrieved November 21, 2014.
  77. ↑ Sipress, David (December 5, 2014). "Daily cartoon: Friday, December 5th". The New Yorker. Retrieved December 5, 2014.
  78. ↑ "The Colbert Report". Colbert Nation. Comedy Partners. December 10, 2010. Retrieved December 11, 2013.
  79. ↑ "Christmas Serial - Saturday Night Live". YouTube. SNL40. December 21, 2014. Retrieved December 21, 2014.
  80. ↑ "Hunt the Truth". Halopedia. Retrieved April 7, 2015.
  81. ↑ "The Final Episode of Serial". Funny or Die. Funny or Die. 16 December 2014. Retrieved 2 October 2015.
  82. ↑ Metz, Nina (October 10, 2015). "Review: True-crime parody in 'One Story Told Week by Week'". Chicago Tribune. Tribune Publishing. Retrieved October 14, 2015.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Serial (podcast).
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, May 04, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.