Shade tolerance

Eastern Hemlock is a shade tolerant tree.

In ecology, shade tolerance refers to a plant's ability to tolerate low light levels. The term is also used in horticulture and landscaping, although in this context its use is sometimes sloppy, especially with respect to labeling of plants for sale in nurseries.

Shade tolerance is a relative term, a complex, multi-faceted property of plants, not a single variable or simple continuum. Different plant species exhibit different adaptations to shade. In fact, a particular plant can exhibit varying degrees of shade tolerance, or even of requirement for light, depending on its history or stage of development.

Basic concepts

Except for some parasitic plants, all plants need sunlight to survive.^[1] However, in general, more sunlight does not always make it easier for plants to survive. In direct sunlight, plants face desiccation and exposure to UV rays, and must expend energy producing pigments to block UV light, and waxy coatings to prevent water loss.

Plants adapted to shade have the ability to utilise far-red light (about 730 nm) more effectively than plants adapted to full sunlight. Most red light gets absorbed by the shade-intolerant canopy plants, but more of the far-red light penetrates the canopy, reaching the understory. The shade-tolerant plants found here are capable of photosynthesis using light at such wavelengths.

On the other hand, when less light is available, less energy is available to the plant. Whereas in sunny and dry environments water can be a limiting factor in growth and survival, in shade, energy (in the form of sunlight) is usually the limiting factor.

The situation with respect to nutrients is often different in shade and sun. Most shade is due to the presence of a canopy of other plants, and this is usually associated with a completely different environment—richer in soil nutrients—than sunny areas.

Shade-tolerant plants are thus adapted to be efficient energy-users. In simple terms, shade-tolerant plants grow broader, thinner leaves to catch more sunlight relative to the cost of producing the leaf. Shade-tolerant plants are also usually adapted to make more use of soil nutrients than shade-intolerant plants.

A distinction may be made between "shade-tolerant" plants and "shade-loving" or sciophilous plants. Sciophilous plants are dependent on a degree of shading that would eventually kill most other plants, or significantly stunt their growth.

Plants adaptation to the changing light

Plants applied multilevel adaptations to the changing light environment from the systemic level to the molecular level.

Leaf movement

Various types of leaf movement for adaptation to changing light environment have been identified: developmental, passive and active.^[2]

• Active movements are reversible. Some plants utilize blue-light absorbing pigments as a sensor and pulvinar motor tissue to drive leaf movement.^[3] These adaptions are usually slow but relatively efficient. They are advantageous to some shade plant that have low photosynthetic capacity but are occasionally exposed to small light bursts.
• Passive movements are related to drought, where plants employ passive adaptation like increasing leaf reflectance during high light (by for example producing salt crystals on the leaf surface) or developing air-filled hairs.
• Developmental movements are slow and irreversible.

Chloroplast movement

Chloroplast movement is one of the plant adaptations to the changing light at the molecular level.^[4] A study suggested that chloroplast movement shared the same photoreceptor with leaf movement as they showed similar action spectra.^[5] It is fast adaptation, occurring within minutes but limited as it can only reduced 10-20% of the light absorption during high light.^[6] Limitations of chloroplast movement could be the presence of other large organelles like vacuole that the restrict the chloroplast passage to the desired side of a cell. On top of that, chloroplast movement might not efficient as in natural environment light tends to scattered in all directions.

Photosystem modulation

Photosystem modulation is an example of long term light adaptations or acclimation that usually occurring on the genetic level; transcriptional, translational and post-translational.^[7] Plants grown under high light intensity usually have smaller antenna compared to plants grown under low light.^[8] Study found that the acclimative modulation of PSII antenna size only involves the outer light harvesting complexes of PSII (LHC-PSII) caused by the proteolysis of its apoprotein.^[9]

The response towards high light took up to two days upon enzymes expression and activation. Reduction of outer LHC-II by half through proteolysis took less than a day once activated. By changing the PS numbers, plant are able to adapt to the changing light on the environment. To compensate the reduction of the red light that usually encountered by the plant grown under canopy, they possessed higher PS-II to PS-I ratio compare to the plant that grown under the high light.^[10] However the factors involving in the mechanism is not well understood. Study suggested the protein phosphorylation including LHC-II is an important pathway for signal transduction in light acclimatization.

Herbaceous plants

In temperate zones, many wildflowers and non-woody plants persist in the closed canopy of a forest by leafing out early in the spring, before the trees leaf out. This is partly possible because the ground tends to be more sheltered and thus the plants are less susceptible to frost, during the period of time when it would still be hazardous for trees to leaf out. As an extreme example of this, winter annuals sprout in the fall, grow through the winter, and flower and die in the spring.

Just like with trees, shade tolerance in herbaceous plants is diverse. Some early-leafing out plants will persist after the canopy leafs out, whereas others rapidly die back. In many species, whether or not this happens depends on the environment, such as water supply and sunlight levels.

Although most plants grow towards light, many tropical vines, such as Monstera deliciosa and a number of other members of the family Araceae, such as members of the genus Philodendron, initially grow away from light; this is a dramatic example of sciophilous growth, which helps them locate a tree trunk, which they then climb to regions of brighter light. The upper shoots and leaves of such a Philodendron grow as typical light-loving, photophilic plants once they break out into full sunshine.

Trees

In forests where rainfall is plentiful and water is not the limiting factor to growth, shade tolerance is one of the most important factors characterizing tree species. However, different species of trees exhibit different adaptations to shade.

The Eastern Hemlock, considered the most shade-tolerant of all North American tree species, is able to germinate, persist, and even grow under a completely closed canopy. Hemlocks also exhibit the ability to transfer energy to nearby trees through their root system. In contrast, the Sugar Maple, also considered to be highly shade-tolerant, will germinate under a closed canopy and persist as an understory species, but only grows to full size when a gap is generated.

Shade-intolerant species such as willow and aspen cannot sprout under a closed canopy. Shade-intolerant species often grow in wetlands, along waterways, or in disturbed areas, where there is adequate access to direct sunlight.

In addition to being able to compete in conditions of low light intensity, shade-bearing species, especially trees, are able to withstand relatively low daytime temperatures compared with the open, and above all high root competition especially with subordinate vegetation. It is very difficult to separate the relative importance of light and below ground competition, and in practical terms they are inextricably linked.

See also

• List of shade-tolerant species

References

2. Commun Integr Biol. 2009 Jan-Feb; 2(1): 50–55
3. Koller D. Light-driven leaf movements. Plant Cell Environm. 1990;13:615–632.
4. Chow WS, Anderson JM, Hope AB. Variable stoichiometries of photosystem-II to photosystem-I reaction centers. Photosynth Res. 1988;17:277–281.
5. Brugnoli E, Bjorkman O. Growth of cotton under continuous salinity stress—influence on allocation pattern, stomatal and nonstomatal components of photosynthesis and dissipation of excess light energy. Planta. 1992;187:335–347.
6. Brugnoli E, Bjorkman O. Growth of cotton under continuous salinity stress—influence on allocation pattern, stomatal and nonstomatal components of photosynthesis and dissipation of excess light energy. Planta. 1992;187:335–347.
7. Kloppstech K. Light regulation of photosynthetic genes.Physiol Plant. 1997;100:739–747.
8. Anderson JM, Chow WS, Park YI. The grand design of photosynthesis: Acclimation of the photosynthetic apparatus to environmental cues. Photosynth Res.1995;46:129–139.
9. Andersson B, Aro EM. Proteolytic activities and proteases of plant chloroplasts. Physiol Plant. 1997;100:780–793.
10. Anderson JM, Osmond B. Sun-shade responses: Compromises between acclimation and photoinhibition. In: Kyle DJ, Osmond B, Arntzen CJ, editors. Photoinhibition. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2001. pp. 1–38.

• C.D. Canham. "Different Responses to Gaps Among Shade-Tolerant Tree Species". Ecology, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 548–550. (Jun 1989)