Shapiro v. McManus
| Shapiro v. McManus | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Argued November 4, 2015 Decided December 8, 2015 | |||||||
| Full case name | STEPHEN M. SHAPIRO, et al., petitioners v. DAVID J. MCMANUS, JR., CHAIRMAN, MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al. | ||||||
| Docket nos. | 14–990 | ||||||
| Citations | |||||||
| Prior history | On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit | ||||||
| Holding | |||||||
| Federal district courts are required to refer cases to a three-judge panel when plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the apportionment of congressional districts. | |||||||
| Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
| Case opinions | |||||||
| Majority | Scalia, joined by unanimous | ||||||
| Laws applied | |||||||
| 28 U.S.C. § 2284 | |||||||
Shapiro v. McManus, 577 U.S. ___ (2015) was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States clarified when United States District Court judges must refer cases to three-judge panels. In a unanimous opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court ruled that federal district courts are required to refer cases to a three-judge panel when plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the apportionment of congressional districts.[1]
See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases
- Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
- List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court
References
- ↑ Shapiro v. McManus, No. 14-990, 577 U.S. ___, slip op. at 1, 4 (2015).
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, February 20, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.
