Ski wax

Ski wax

Vintage ski waxes, once used by U.S. Army ski troops. Left to right are: grip waxes in canisters (blue for "dry snow" and yellow for "wet and corn snow") and a paraffin glide wax.
Industrial sector(s) Winter sports equipment and supplies
Main technologies or sub-processes Tribology
Feedstock Paraffin wax, resins, fluorocarbons
Product(s) Glide wax, grip wax
Leading companies Briko-Maplus, Dakine, Dominator, Hertel Wax, Holmenkol, Oneball, Purl, Rode, Swix, Toko, Visti (Висти)

Ski wax is a material applied to the bottom of snow runners, including skis, snowboards, and toboggans, to improve their coefficient of friction performance under varying snow conditions. The two main types of wax used on skis are glide waxes and grip waxes. They address kinetic friction—to be minimized with a glide wax—and static friction—to be achieved with a grip wax. Both types of wax are designed to be matched with the varying properties of snow, including crystal type and size, and moisture content of the snow surface, which vary with temperature and the temperature history of the snow. Glide wax is selected to minimize sliding friction for both alpine and cross-country skiing. Grip wax (also called "kick wax") provides on-snow traction for cross-country skiers, as they stride forward using classic technique.

Modern plastic materials (e.g. high-modulus polyethylene and Teflon™), used on ski bases, have excellent gliding properties on snow, which in many circumstances diminish the added value of a glide wax. Likewise, uni-directional textures (e.g. fish scale or micro-scale hairs) underfoot on cross-country skis can offer a practical substitute for grip wax for those skiers, using the classic technique.

History

Swedish ski racer, Martin Matsbo, pioneered development of modern cross-country ski waxes.

Johannes Scheffer in Argentoratensis Lapponiæ (History of Lapland) in 1673 gave what is probably the first recorded instruction for ski wax application[1] He advised skiers to use pine tar pitch and rosin. Ski waxing was also documented in 1761.[2]

Beginning around 1854, California gold rush miners held organized downhill ski races.[3] They also discovered that bases smeared with dopes brewed from vegetable and/or animal compound helped increase skiing speeds. This led to some of the first commercial ski wax (even though they contained no wax at all), such as Black Dope and Sierra Lighting; both were mainly composed of sperm oil, vegetable oil and pine pitch. However, some instead used paraffin candle wax that melted onto ski bases, and these worked better under colder conditions.[4]

Pine tar on wooden ski bases proved effective for using skis as transport over the centuries, because it fills the pores of the wood and creates an hydrophobic surface that minimizes suction from water in the snow, yet has sufficient roughness to allow traction for forward motion. In the 1920s and 30s, new varnishes were developed by European companies as season-long ski bases. A significant advance for cross country racing was the introduction of klister, for good traction in granular snow, especially in spring conditions; klister was invented and patented in 1913 by Peter Østbye. In the early 1940s, a Swedish chemical company, advised by Olympic cross-country skier Martin Matsbo, started the development of petroleum-based waxes, using paraffin wax and other admixtures. By 1952, such noted brands as Toko, Swix and Rex were providing an array of color-coded, temperature-tailored waxes.[4]

In the last quarter of the 20th century, researchers addressed the twin problems of water and impurities adhering to skis during spring conditions. Terry Hertel addressed both problems, first with the novel use of a surfactant that interacted with the wax matrix in such a way as to repel water effectively, a product introduced in 1974 by Hertel Wax. Hertel also developed the first fluorocarbon product and the first spring-time wax that repels and makes the running surface slick for spring time alpine ski and snowboard. This technology was introduced to the market in 1986 by Hertel Wax.[4] In 1990, Hertel filed for a U.S. patent on a "ski wax for use with sintered-base snow skis", containing paraffin, a hardener wax, roughly 1% per-fluoroether diol, and 2% SDS surfactant.[5] In the 1990s, Swix chief chemist Leif Torgersen found a glide wax additive to repel pollen and other snow impurities—a problem with soft grip waxes during distance races—in the form of a fluorocarbon that could be ironed into the ski base. The solution was based on the work of Enrico Traverso at Enichem SpA, who had developed a fluorocarbon powder with a melting temperature just a few degrees below that of sintered polyethylene,[4] patented in Italy as a "ski lubricant comprising paraffinic wax and hydrocarbon compounds containing a perfluorocarbon segment".[6]

Science of sliding on snow

Conceptual representation of sliding friction over snow, as a function of water film thickness, created by passage of a ski or other slider over a snow surface.

The ability of a ski or other runner to slide over snow depends on both the properties of the snow and the ski to result in an optimum amount of lubrication from melting the snow by friction with the ski—too little and the ski interacts with solid snow crystals, too much and capillary attraction of meltwater retards the ski. Before a ski can slide, it must overcome the maximum value static friction, F_{max} = \mu_\mathrm{s} F_{n}\,, for the ski/snow contact, where \mu_\mathrm{s} is the coefficient of static friction and  F_{n}\, is the normal force of the ski on snow. Kinetic (or dynamic) friction occurs when the ski is moving over the snow.[7] The coefficient of kinetic friction, \mu_\mathrm{k}, is less than the coefficient of static friction for both ice and snow.[8][9] The force required for sliding on snow is the product of the coefficient of kinetic friction and the normal force: F_{k} = \mu_\mathrm{k} F_{n}\,.[10] Both the static and kinetic coefficients of friction increase with colder snow temperatures (also true for ice).[9]

Snow properties

Snowflakes have a wide range of shapes, even as they fall; among these are: six-sided star-like dendrites, hexagonal needles, platelets and icy pellets. Once snow accumulates on the ground, the flakes immediately begin to undergo transformation (called “metamorphosis”), owing to temperature changes, sublimation, and mechanical action. Temperature changes may be from the ambient temperature, solar radiation, rainwater, wind, or the temperature of the material beneath the snow layer. Mechanical action includes wind and compaction. Over time, bulk snow tends to consolidate[11]—its crystals become truncated from breaking apart or losing mass with sublimation directly from solid to gas and with freeze-thaw, causing them to combine as coarse and granular ice crystals.[12] Colbeck reports that fresh, cold, and man-made snow all interact more directly with the base of a ski and increase friction, indicating the use of harder waxes. Conversely, older, warmer, and denser snows present lower friction, in part due to increased grain size, which better promotes a water film and a smoother surface of the snow crystals for which softer waxes are indicated.[13]

Ski friction properties

Colbeck offers an overview of the five friction processes of skis on snow. They are the: 1) resistance due to plowing of snow out of the way, 2) deformation of the snow over which the ski is traveling, 3) lubrication of the ski with a thin layer of melt water, 4) capillary attraction of water in the snow to the ski bottom, and 5) contamination of the snow with dust and other non-slippery elements. Plowing and deformation pertain to the interaction of the ski, as a whole, with the snow and are negligible on a firm surface. Lubrication, capillary attraction and contamination are issues for the ski bottom and the wax that is applied to reduce sliding friction or achieve adequate grip.[13]

Typically, a sliding ski melts a thin and transitory film of lubricating layer of water, caused by the heat of friction between the ski and the snow in its passing. Colbeck suggests that the optimum water film thickness is in the range between 4 and 12 μm. However, the heat generated by friction can be lost by conduction to a cold ski, thereby diminishing the production of the melt layer. At the other extreme, when the snow is wet and warm, heat generation creates a thicker film that can create increased capillary drag on the ski bottom.[13] Kuzmin and Fuss suggest that the most favorable combination of ski base material properties to minimize ski sliding friction on snow include: increased hardness and lowered thermal conductivity of the base material to promote meltwater generation for lubrication, wear resistance in cold snow, and hydrophobicity to minimize capillary suction. These attributes are readily achievable with a PFTE base, which diminishes the value added by glide waxes.[14] Lintzén reports that factors other than wax are much more important in reducing friction on cross-country skate skis—the curvature of the ski and snow conditions.[15]

Glide wax

Glide wax can be applied to alpine skis, snowboards, skate skis, classic skis, back-country skis, and touring skis. Traditional waxes comprise solid hydrocarbons. High-performance "fluorocarbon" waxes also contain fluorine which substitute some fraction of the hydrogen atoms in the hydrocarbons with fluorine atoms to achieve lower coefficients of friction and high water-repellency than the pure hydrocarbon wax can achieve.[16] Wax is adjusted for hardness to minimize sliding friction as a function of snow properties, which include the effects of:[16]

Properties

A variety of glide waxes are tailored for specific temperature ranges and other snow properties with varying wax hardness and other properties that address repellence of moisture and dirt. The hardness of the glide wax affects the melting of the snow to lubricate its passage over the surface and its ability to avoid suction from meltwater in the snow. Too little melting and sharp edges of snow crystals or too much suction impede the passage of the ski. A tipping point between where crystal type dominates sliding friction and moisture content dominates occurs around 26°F. Harder waxes address colder, drier or more abrasive snow conditions, whereas softer waxes have a lower coefficient of friction, but abrade more readily. Wax formulations combine three types of wax to adjust coefficient of friction and durability. From hard to soft, they include synthetic waxes with 50 or more carbon atoms, microcrystalline waxes with 25 to 50 carbon atoms and paraffin waxes with 20 to 35 carbon atoms.[16] Additives to such waxes include graphite, teflon, silicon, fluorocarbons, and molybdenum to improve glide and/or reduce dirt accumulation.[17]

Application

Glide wax can be applied cold or hot. Cold applications include, rubbing hard wax like a crayon, applying a liquid wax or a spray wax.[18] Hot applications of wax include the use of heat from an iron, infrared lamp, or a "hot box" oven.[19]

Base material

The role of glide wax is to adapt and improve the friction properties of a ski base to the expected snow properties to be encountered on a spectrum from cold crystalline snow to saturated granular snow. Modern ski bases often are made from ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Kuzmin asserts that UHMWPE is non-porous and can hold neither wax nor water, so there is no possibility for filling pores; furthermore, he asserts that UHMWPE is very hydrophobic, which means that wet snow does not appreciably retard the ski and that glide wax offers little additional ability to repel water. He notes that clear bases are more durable and hydrophobic than those with carbon content.[1] The same author asserts that texture is more important than surface chemistry for creating the optimum balance between a running surface that's too dry (not slippery enough) and too wet (ski subject to suction forces). In warm, moist snow, texture can help break the retarding capillary attraction between the ski base and the snow.[19] Giesbrecht agrees that low wetting angle of the ski base is key and also emphasizes the importance of the degree of surface roughness at the micrometre scale as a function of snow temperature—cold snow favoring a smoother surface and wetter, warmer snow favoring a textured surface.[20]

Grip wax

Canister of vintage German grip wax.
Russian Visti (Висти)–brand klisters, graded by color and temperature range.

Cross-country skiers use a grip wax (also called "kick wax") for classic-style waxable skis to provide traction with static friction on the snow that allows them to propel themselves forward on flats and up hills. They are applied in an area beneath the skier's foot and extending, somewhat forward, that is formed by the camber of the classic ski, called the "grip zone" (or "kick zone").[21] The presence of camber allows the skis to grip the snow, when the weight is on one ski and the ski is fully flexed, but minimize drag when the skis are weighted equally and are thus less than fully flexed. Grip waxes are designed for specific temperature ranges and types of snow; a correctly selected grip wax does not appreciably decrease the glide of skis that have proper camber for the skier's weight and for the snow conditions.[4] There are two substances used for grip wax: hard wax and klister.

Some skis are "waxless," having a fish-scale or other texture to prevent the ski from sliding backwards.[25] Ski mountaineers use temporarily adhered climbing skins to provide uphill grip, but typically remove them for descent.[26]

Wax solvents

Wax can be dissolved by a non-polar solvents like mineral spirits.[24] However, some commercial wax solvents are made from citrus oil, which is less toxic, harder to ignite, and gentler on the ski base.[27]

Health and environmental impacts

Health impacts

Ski wax can contain toxic chemicals including perfluorinated chemicals. Levels of perfluorinated carboxylic acids, especially perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), are known to increase dramatically in ski wax technicians during the ski season.[28] PFOA, in particular, is known to be stable in the environment and to cause cancer, birth defects, thyroid dysfunction,[29] increased cardiovascular risk,[30] hormone and immune system disruption, birth and developmental defects and liver toxicity [31]

Environmental impacts

When skiing, the friction between the snow and skis causes wax to abrade and remain in the snow pack until spring thaw.[32] Then the snowmelt drains into watersheds, streams, lakes and rivers, thereby changing the chemistry of the environment and the food chain. Perfluorocarbons in ski wax are heat resistant, chemically and biologically stable, and thus environmentally persistent.[33]

References

  1. 1 2 Kuzmin, Leonid (2006). Investigation of the most essential factors influencing ski glide (PDF) (Licentiate). Luleå University of Technology. Retrieved 2012-10-20.
  2. Oberleutnant Hals. Om Skismøring. Vaage: Skienes Verden. p. 254.
  3. "Longboards at Mammoth". Mic Mac Publishing. Retrieved 25 September 2012.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Masia, Seth. "Grip and Glide: A Short History of Ski Wax". Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  5. US patent 5114482, Terry J. Hertel, "Ski wax for use with sintered base snow skis", issued May 19, 1992
  6. US patent 5202041, Enrico Traverso & Antonio Rinaldi, "Ski lubricant comprising paraffinic wax and a hydrocarbon compound", issued Apr 13, 1993, assigned to Enichem Synthesis S.p.A.
  7. Bhavikatti, S. S.; K. G. Rajashekarappa (1994). Engineering Mechanics. New Age International. p. 112. ISBN 978-81-224-0617-7. Retrieved 2007-10-21.
  8. Sheppard, Sheri; Tongue, Benson H. and Anagnos, Thalia (2005). Statics: Analysis and Design of Systems in Equilibrium. Wiley and Sons. p. 618. ISBN 0-471-37299-4. In general, for given contacting surfaces, μk < μs
  9. 1 2 Bowden, F.P. (January 30, 1964). "Ski and Snow". New Scientist (Reed Business Information) 21 (376): 275. ISSN 0262-4079. Retrieved 2016-01-21.
  10. Persson, B. N. J. (2000). Sliding friction: physical principles and applications. Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-67192-3. Retrieved 2016-01-23.
  11. Colbeck, Samuel C. (December 1997), "A Review of Sintering in Seasonal Snow" (PDF), CRREL Report Series 97 (10), retrieved 2016-01-24
  12. Working Group on Snow Classification, ICSI-UCCS-IACS (2009), "The International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground" (PDF), IHP-VII Technical Documents in Hydrology (Paris: UNESCO) 83 (1): 80, retrieved 2016-01-24
  13. 1 2 3 Colbeck, Samuel C. (April 1992), "A Review of the Processes That Control Snow Friction", CRREL Monograph 92 (2): 49, retrieved 2016-01-19
  14. 1 2 Kuzmin, Leonid; Fuss, Franz Konstantin (2013), "Cross country ski technology", Routledge Handbook of Sports Technology and Engineering (Routledge), ISBN 9781136966590
  15. Ahlbom, Helen (February 29, 1916). "Glidvallan har marginell betydelse i Vasaloppet". Nyteknik (in Swedish) (Stockholm). Retrieved 2016-03-11.
  16. 1 2 3 Talbot, Chris (2008). "The science of ski waxes" (PDF). New England Nordic Ski Association. Retrieved 2016-01-18. Basic ski wax is made from solid hydrocarbons. Some wax companies also sell wax that has fluorine in it. With these waxes, some, most, or all the hydrogen atoms in the hydrocarbons have been replaced with fluorine atoms. This new compound is called a fluorocarbon, and offers very low coefficients of friction and high water- repellency.
  17. "Glide Wax". skiwax.ca. Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  18. Brown, Nat (1999). The Complete Guide to Cross-Country Ski Preparation. Seattle: The Mountaineers Books. p. 140. ISBN 9780898866001.
  19. 1 2 Kuzmin, Leonid (2010). Interfacial kinetic ski friction (Doctoral). Mid Sweden University. Retrieved 2012-10-20.
  20. Giesbrecht, Jan Lukas (2010). Polymers on snow: Towards skiing faster (PDF) (Doctoral). Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Retrieved 2012-10-20.
  21. Rees, David (1981). Cross-country skiing: touring and competition (3d ed.). Toronto: Copp C. Pitman. ISBN 978-0-7730-4045-8. OCLC 300405310.
  22. 1 2 Woodward, Bob (January 1985). "Ski wax made (somewhat) simple—Confused by the wax rainbow? Maybe you've gone too far.". Backpacker Magazine (Active Interest Media, Inc..). p. 14. Retrieved 2016-01-16.
  23. 1 2 McKenney, Kim (August 22, 2014). "All About Classic Skis". Cross Country Ski Technique. Retrieved 2016-01-22.
  24. 1 2 NPCS Board of Consultants & Engineers (2008). Selected Formulary Book on Petroleum, Lubricants, Fats, Polishes, Glass, Ceramics, Nitrogenous Fertilizers, Emulsions, Leather and Insecticides. Niir Project Consultancy Services. p. 784. ISBN 9788190568562.
  25. "Grip Waxing Your Cross-Country Skis". REI. Retrieved 11 October 2014.
  26. Lind, David A.; Sanders, Scott (2013). The Physics of Skiing: Skiing at the Triple Point (2 ed.). Springer Science & Business Media. p. 270. ISBN 1475743459. Retrieved 2016-01-30.
  27. "Nordic Ski Preparation—Waxing Guide for Skating and Classic Skiing" (PDF). Swix. Retrieved 2016-01-20.
  28. Nilsson, Helena; Kärrman, Anna; Håkan, Westberg; Rotander, Anna; van Bavel, Bert; Lindström, Gunilla (March 15, 2010), "A Time Trend Study of Significantly Elevated Perfluorocarboxylate Levels in Humans after Using Fluorinated Ski Wax", Environmental Science and Technology 44 (6): 2150–5, doi:10.1021/es9034733
  29. Melzer, David; Rice, Neil; Depledge, Michael H.; Henley, William E.; Galloway, Tamara S. (May 2010), "Association between Serum Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Thyroid Disease in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey", Environmental Health Perspectives 118 (5): 686–692, doi:10.1289/ehp.0901584
  30. Katz, Cheryl (December 19, 2010). "Ski wax chemicals build up in people's blood, pose risks". Environmental Health News. Retrieved 2016-01-23.
  31. Lau C, Anitole K, Hodes C, Lai D, Pfahles-Hutchens A, Seed J (October 2007). "Perfluoroalkyl acids: a review of monitoring and toxicological findings" (PDF). Toxicol. Sci. 99 (2): 366–94. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfm128. PMID 17519394.
  32. Plassmann, Merle M. (2011), "Environmental occurrence and fate of semifluorinated n-alkanes and perfluorinated alkyl acids present in ski waxes" (PDF), Department of Applied Environmental Science (Stockholm University)
  33. Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (2009). "PFOS and PFOA General Information" (PDF). Public Health England. Retrieved 2016-01-23.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, April 17, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.