Social Multiplier Effect

The social multiplier effect is a term used in economics, economic geography, sociology, public health and other academic disciplines to describe certain social externalities. It is based on the principle that high levels of one attribute amongst one’s peers can have spillover effects on an individual. “This social multiplier can also be thought of as a ratio ∆P/∆I where ∆I is the average response of an individual action to an exogenous parameter (that affects only that person) and ∆P is the (per capita) response of the peer group to a change in the same parameter that affects the entire peer group.”[1] In other words, it is the ratio of an individual action to an exogenous parameter to the aggregate effect of the same parameter on the individual’s peers.

Overview

For example, we know that health outcomes strongly correlate with education level. Given the social multiplier effect, we know that in the aggregate, if a poorly educated individual moves into a highly educated area they will experience some of the positive health effects associated with being more educated.[2] It is important however to distinguish between 1) a local-average model or social norms, whereby certain attributes are adopted based on them being the socially normal behavior, and 2) a local-aggregate model or social multiplier effect whereby “peer effects are captured by the sum of friends’ efforts in some activity.”[3] In the former an individual pays a price for deviating from a norm. In the latter, as an individual gains more peers who have a certain attribute, they will experience greater utility for adopting this attribute as well. The following are some examples of research on the social multiplier effect.

Examples

Researchers Scott E. Carrell et. al. have shown that your friends’ fitness affects your own. They find that “each out-of-shape individual creates two additional out-of-shape individuals through their social interactions.”[4] Another researcher Jeffery Fletcher has found that a 10 percent increase in the number of students who smoke at a high school increases the chances another student will smoke by about 3 percent.[5] Xiaodong Liu et. al. have found that there is a multiplier effect for juvenile delinquency in schools.[6] Additionally, in another article Carell et. al. find that peer cheating increases the likelihood that an individual will cheat.[7]

The social multiplier effect is of particular concern to researchers in economic geography. It is well documented that factors like income and education have strong positive correlations with many aspects of health. This is important because the geographic distribution of income and education is becoming increasingly stratified.[8] For example, since 1980, on average, cities that had high levels of college educated workers are becoming increasingly college educated whereas those who had low levels are becoming increasingly less educated. The same trend applies to income.[9] Consequently, as the distribution of income and education level becomes more disparate, many low income regions lose out on the social multiplier benefits they once enjoyed.

See also

References

  1. ↑ Sheinkman, José. Social Interactions. Princeton. Retrieved on 25 February 2016. https://www.princeton.edu/~joses/wp/socialinteractions.pdf
  2. ↑ Moretti, Enrico. The New Geography of Jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: 2012. p. 101.
  3. ↑ Xiandong Liu et. al. "Social Multiplier versus Social Norms: What Matters Most for Outcomes?" Center For Economic Policy Research: 2013. Retrieved on 25 February 2016. http://www.voxeu.org/article/social-multiplier-versus-social-norms-what-matters-most-outcomes.
  4. ↑ Scott E. Carrell et. al. "Is Poor Fitness Contagious?: Evidence From Randomly Assigned Friends." Penn State University: 2010. Retrieved on 25 February 2016. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.296.5005&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  5. ↑ Fletcher, Jeffery. "Social interactions and smoking: evidence using multiple student cohorts, instrumental variables, and school fixed effects." Health Economics: 2010. Retrieved on 25 February 2016. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19382102
  6. ↑ Xiandong Liu et. al. "Social Multiplier versus Social Norms: What Matters Most for Outcomes?" Center For Economic Policy Research: 2013. Retrieved on 25 February 2016. http://www.voxeu.org/article/social-multiplier-versus-social-norms-what-matters-most-outcomes.
  7. ↑ Scott E. Carrell et. al. "Peer Effects in Academic Cheating." Social Science Research Network: 2005. Retrieved on 25 February 2016. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=842224
  8. ↑ Moretti, Enrico. The New Geography of Jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: 2012. p. 101-2.
  9. ↑ Moretti, Enrico. The New Geography of Jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: 2012. p. 102.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, May 07, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.