Stewart v. Abend
Stewart v. Abend | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued January 9, 1990 Decided April 24, 1990 | |||||||
Full case name | Stewart et al. v. Abend, DBA Authors Research Co. | ||||||
Citations |
495 U.S. 207; 110 S. Ct. 1750; 109 L. Ed. 2d 184; 1990 U.S. LEXIS 2184; 58 U.S.L.W. 4511; 14 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1614; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P26,557 | ||||||
Prior history | Abend filed suit in District Court, S. Dis. of NY, settled; filed again, District Court, C. Dis. of CA, court granted Stewart's sum. judg. motion based on fair use and Rohauer v. Killiam Shows, Inc., 551 F.2d 484, denied other motions; both parties appealed, Ninth Circuit reversed, Abend v. MCA, Inc., 863 F.2d 1465, 1472 (1988); Supreme Court granted cert., 493 U.S. 807 (1989) | ||||||
Subsequent history | Remanded | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
The Court held that the successor copyright owner's right to permit the creation of a derivative work passes to the heirs of the author of the work, who are not bound by the original author's agreement to permit such use. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | O'Connor, joined by Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Kennedy | ||||||
Concurrence | White | ||||||
Dissent | Stevens, joined by Rehnquist, Scalia | ||||||
Laws applied | |||||||
U.S. Const. |
Stewart v. Abend, 495 U.S. 207 (1990), was an important United States Supreme Court decision which held that a successor copyright owner (one who obtains ownership later on, such as the heirs of a copyright owner who dies) has the exclusive right to permit the creation and exploitation of derivative works, regardless of potentially conflicting agreements by prior copyright holders.
Facts
Cornell Woolrich originally wrote the short story "It Had to Be Murder", and sold the publication rights to Popular Publications, Inc., which published the story in its Dime Detective Magazine (February 1942 issue). Three years later, Woolrich sold the movie rights to a production company, and agreed by contract to renew those rights when the 28-year copyright (then in force) expired. In 1953 the movie rights were bought for $10,000 by Patron Inc., a production company formed by actor James Stewart and director Alfred Hitchcock. The short story was then made into the acclaimed movie Rear Window (1954), directed by Hitchcock and starring Stewart.
Woolrich died in 1968, before the expiration of his 28-year copyright, and control of the literary rights passed to his executor, Chase Manhattan Bank. Chase sold the movie rights for $650 to literary agent Sheldon Abend. Abend refused to honor Woolrich's original agreement to renew the copyright and assign it to the owner of the movie rights, and instead sued Stewart when the movie was shown on television.
Issue
The question presented is whether the owner of a legal derivative work infringes the rights of the successor copyright owner, by continued distribution and publication of the derivative work during the renewal term of the pre-existing work.
Rule
Control of the work reverts to the author—or author’s successors—when renewal comes up. This protects the author (and the heirs) from being deprived of the surprising value of the work.
Result
The assignment was an unfulfilled contingency that died with the author; the successor can prevent continued use of the derivative work.
See also
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 495
- List of United States Supreme Court cases
- Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
- List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court
External links
Wikisource has original text related to this article: |
- ^ 495 U.S. 207 Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.