Tactical asset allocation

Tactical asset allocation (TAA) is a dynamic investment strategy that actively adjusts a portfolio's asset allocation. The goal of a TAA strategy is to improve the risk-adjusted returns of passive management investing.[1]

Strategy descriptions

TAA strategies can be either discretionary or systematic.

Discretionary

In discretionary tactical asset allocation strategies, an investor modifies his asset allocation according to the valuation of the markets in which they are invested. Thus, someone who invested heavily in stocks might reduce their position when they perceive that other securities, such as bonds, are poised to outperform stocks. Unlike stock picking, in which the investor predicts which individual stocks will perform well, tactical asset allocation involves only judgments of the future return of complete markets or sectors. As such, some practitioners perceive it as a natural supplement to mutual fund investing, including passive management investing.

Systematic

Systematic tactical asset allocation strategies use a quantitative investment model to systematically exploit inefficiencies or temporary imbalances in equilibrium values among different asset classes. They are often based on known financial market anomalies (inefficiencies) that are supported by academic and practitioner research. For example, many systematic TAA strategies use quantitative Trend Following or Relative Strength techniques to produce excess returns. These both aim to capitalize on momentum, a well-known market anomaly.

Considerations

The efficient-market hypothesis would imply that tactical asset allocation cannot increase risk-adjusted returns, since markets are already efficiently priced. If a tactical approach were found that could increase returns without an increase in risk, investors would flock to that inefficiency, and the advantage would go away. Many investors do not accept this hypothesis, however, and believe that inefficiencies in the market persist and can be exploited.

Many factors determine the success of a TAA strategy. The investor needs to have the necessary knowledge, practical investment skills, dedication, and discipline to design and/or execute a successful tactical strategy. The specific market anomalies on which the strategy is based may change or disappear in the future. Other factors such as risk tolerance, market timing, portfolio size, investment expenses, etc. may also affect the portfolio performance.

Criticism

Investors who utilize the tactical asset allocation strategy generally want to hedge risk in a volatile market. However, Larry Swedroe of CBS MoneyWatch described the strategy as an attempt to time the market, and provides an excuse for managers to increase revenue from trading fees due to the frequent activity the strategy requires.[2][3] In a study conducted by Morningstar, Inc., they examined the "net annualized return, standard deviation, Sharpe ratio, and maximum drawdown from July 31, 2010, to December 31, 2011," of 163 tactical funds.[4] They concluded that only a small percentage of firms outperformed the Vanguard Balanced Index, with the exceptions being PIMCO and GMO (Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo) Global Asset Allocation.[4] Updated to June 2013, they found that 20 percent of funds beat the Vanguard Balanced Index Fund, and just four had a better Sharpe ratio.[5]

See also

References

  1. ↑ "Tactical Asset Allocation – TAA". Investopedia. Retrieved 4 May 2012.
  2. ↑ Jim Baird (December 21, 2009). "Tactical Asset Allocation Offers No Free Lunch". Forbes. Retrieved 4 May 2012.
  3. ↑ Larry Swedroe (March 6, 2012). "Tactical asset allocation – Another ripoff". CBS MoneyWatch. Retrieved 4 May 2012.
  4. 1 2 Jeffrey Ptak (February 2, 2012). "In Practice: Tactical Funds Miss Their Chance". Morningstar Advisor. Retrieved 4 May 2012. (subscription required)
  5. ↑ "Do tactical allocation funds add value? - CBS News".

Sources

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, February 28, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.