Target date fund

stylized glide path

A target date fund (TDF) – also known as a lifecycle, dynamic-risk or age-based fund – is a collective investment scheme, often a mutual fund or a collective trust fund, designed to provide a simple investment solution through a portfolio whose asset allocation mix becomes more conservative as the target date (usually retirement) approaches.[1]

History

Target-date funds were first introduced in the early 1990s with BGI being the first institution to offer such products.[2] Their popularity in the US increased significantly in recent years due in part to the auto-enrollment legislation Pension Protection Act of 2006 that created the need for safe-harbor type Qualifying Default Investment Alternatives, such as target-date funds, for 401(k) savings plans. With the UK enacting auto-enrollment legislation in 2012, target-date funds are used by NEST National Employment Savings Trust, and are expected to become increasingly popular as their design should satisfy the DWP's eligible default fund criteria.[3]

Design

Target-date funds are aimed at people planning for retirement and have appeal because they offer a lifelong managed investment strategy so should remain appropriate to an investor's risk profile even if left accidentally unreviewed. Research suggests that age is by far the most important determinant in setting an investment strategy, thus Target Date, or age-based funds are particularly attractive as default investment funds.[4] They do not offer a guaranteed return but offer a convenient multi-asset retirement savings strategy through a single outcome-oriented fund.[5]

Target-date funds' asset allocation mix typically provides exposure to return-seeking assets, such as equities, in early years when risk capacity is higher, and becomes increasingly conservative as time progresses with exposure switched progressively towards capital-preservation assets, such as government- and index-linked bonds.[6]

The speed with which a target date fund de-risks its asset allocation is known in the industry as the "glide-path", using the analogy of an airplane (the fund, presumably) coming in for a landing (the landing being, presumably, arriving at the Target Date with the appropriately low-risk mix of underlying assets).

By taking a managed, or stochastic, approach to de-risking the fund, target-date funds offer a higher level of both technical and fiduciary care than earlier lifestyling techniques that rely on an automated, or deterministic, approach.[7][8]

The theoretical underpinnings to glidepath design are based on combining modern portfolio theory, with the theory of "Human Capital", the present value of expected future earnings.[9]

The Glidepath

The strategic asset allocation model over time is known as the 'glidepath' illustrating how an investment strategy becomes increasingly conservative over time towards the target date. An example of a glidepath for a selection of savings strategies for the UK market is shown here. Intelligent Money provides different glidepaths depending upon the end requirement of each client (a lump sum for withdrawal or an income producing portfolio for income drawdown).

Nudge and behavioral economics

Target Date Funds are commonly used as default funds as they make it easier for savers to select a savings strategy. This reduces the risk of inferior outcomes that behavioral tendencies might create.

US TDF Assets Under Management

In the USA, the use of Target Date Funds accelerated from 2006 onwards with the introduction of automatic-enrolment pensions legislation, where the convenience of a single 'fund for life' made them the most popular type of default strategy. Since that, time TDF assets under management have grown more than 10x reaching $763bn at end 2015.[10]

TDF growth in the US from 2000

Largest TDF Managers in the USA

Fidelity, Vanguard, T. Rowe Price, BlackRock, Principal Funds, Wells Fargo Advantage, and Northern Trust. Note that the actual sizes of the books of different managers are difficult to estimate, as many hold assets in vehicles other than mutual funds. Northern Trust, for example, uses Collective Trust Funds (CTFs), which typically do not figure in Morningstar or Bloomberg estimates of AUM.

UK TDF Assets Under Management

In the UK, the use of Target Date Funds is gaining traction, with the first launch in 2003, and current AUM estimated to be approximately £4.0bn.[11] This is expected to increase with the advent of automatic enrolment pensions legislation.

List of TDF Providers in the UK

Retail: Architas BirthStar (managed by AllianceBernstein), Fidelity

Institutional: AllianceBernstein, BirthStar, BlackRock, Fidelity, JPMorgan, NEST, State Street Global Advisers

Use of TDFs by pension schemes in the UK

According to independent research, TDFs are expected to grow from a low base to 17% of all UK Defined Contribution (DC) default assets by 2023.[12] Multi-employer pensions schemes (also known as 'master trusts') are amongst the early adopters of Target Date Funds in the UK market.

BlackRock Master Trust: BlackRock Lifepath Target Date Funds[13]

Carey Workplace Pension Trust: BirthStar Target Date Funds[14]

Intelligent Money: IM Optimum Portfolios[15] Intelligent Money provides Target Date Portfolios (rather than Funds).

Lighthouse Pensions Trust: BirthStar Target Date Funds[16]

TDF Benchmarks in the US

The main Target Date Benchmarks in the US are:

S&P Target Date Indices[17] Dow Jones Target Date Indices[18] Morningstar Lifetime Allocation Indexes[19]

TDF Benchmarks in the UK

Target Date Benchmarks in the UK are:

FTSE UK DC Benchmarks[20]

US Controversy

The funds are not without their critics, who point to the unexpected volatility of some near-dated target-date funds in the financial crisis of 2007–2008, suggesting they were not as conservatively positioned as their name would imply.[21] In response to this, the SEC and DoL hosted a joint hearing on Examining Target Date Funds in June 2009,[22] which found that while target-date funds were generally a welcome innovation, disclosure had to be improved to ensure investors were fully aware of a target-date fund glidepath, which may differ from manager to manager. The rules on disclosures for target-date funds were published by the SEC in 2010.[23]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Lemke, Thomas P. (2013). "§2:125". ERISA for Money Managers. Thomson West. ISBN 9780314612618.
  2. ↑ "Industry's First Target-Date Fund Celebrates 15 Years Since Groundbreaking Launch" (Press release). Barclays Global Investors. 7 Nov 2008 – via Marketwired.
  3. ↑ Staff (May 2011). "Guidance for offering a default option for defined contribution automatic enrolment pension schemes" (PDF). United Kingdom: Department for Work and Pensions. ISBN 978-1-84947-604-1.
  4. ↑ Alliance Bernstein: Target date funds explained
  5. ↑ SEC Investor Bulletin on TDFs
  6. ↑ Target Date Funds: will the UK follow the American revolution
  7. ↑ Dynamic Lifecycle Strategies for Target Date Retirement Funds - Basu, Byrne & Drew (2009)
  8. ↑ From Deterministic to Stochastic Life-Cycle Investing: Implications for the Design of Improved Forms of Target Date Funds - Martellini & Milhau (2010)
  9. ↑ Ibbotson Associates Research Paper: Lifetime Asset Allocations: Methodologies for Target Maturity Funds
  10. ↑ [Morningstar (US)]
  11. ↑ Defaqto: Introductory Guide to Target Date Funds/
  12. ↑ [Spence Johnson, Morningstar Investment Conference, May 2014]
  13. ↑ Investment Europe: BlackRock extends access for pension schemes to Target Date Funds
  14. ↑ Carey Workplace Pension Scheme
  15. ↑
  16. ↑ Corporate Adviser: Lighthouse launches master trust with BirthStar TDFs
  17. ↑ S&P Target Date Index Home Page
  18. ↑ Dow Jones Target Date Indices Home Page
  19. ↑ Morningstar Lifetime Allocation Indices Home Page
  20. ↑ FTSE Global Markets report
  21. ↑ Target-Date Funds Go Under the Microscope
  22. ↑ Ibbotson's reaction to the Joint SEC DOL Target-Date Fund Hearing
  23. ↑ SEC Proposes New Measures to Help Investors in Target Date Funds
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, February 18, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.