Amanda Knox: Murder on Trial in Italy

Amanda Knox: Murder on Trial in Italy
Genre True crime
Written by Wendy Battles
Directed by Robert Dornhelm
Starring Hayden Panettiere
Marcia Gay Harden
Vincent Riotta
Djibril Kébé
Timothy Martin
Paolo Romio
Amanda Stevens
Theme music composer Djibril Kébé
Zack Ryan
Country of origin United States
Original language(s) English
Production
Producer(s) Roberto Manni
Randy Sutter
Running time 87 minutes
Production company(s) Pilgrim Films & Television
Craig Anderson Productions
Project X Productions
Distributor Lifetime
Release
Original network Lifetime
Original release
  • February 21, 2011 (2011-02-21)

Amanda Knox: Murder on Trial in Italy (also known as The Amanda Knox Story)[1] is a 2011 American true crime television film. It stars Hayden Panettiere as Amanda Knox, Paolo Romio as Raffaele Sollecito, Djibril Kébé as Rudy Guede and Amanda Fernando Stevens as Meredith Kercher, and first aired on the Lifetime network on February 21, 2011.[2]

Set between 2007 and 2009, Amanda Knox: Murder on Trial in Italy is based on the murder of Meredith Kercher in Perugia, Italy, and the subsequent trials of the suspects, Guede, Knox and Sollecito. It was written by Wendy Battles, who has worked on scripts for the American television series CSI: NY and Law & Order,[3] and filmed in Rome, after officials refused to grant the production team permission to shoot in Perugia.[2] The film contains a re-enactment of the murder.[2] In Italy, the television film has been trasmitted on Canale 5, on December 3, 2012, after Amanda Knox sent a team of lawyers to Mediaset, to prevent the airing.

After its first broadcast, the film was followed by a one-hour documentary, Beyond the Headlines: Amanda Knox, which examines the Italian judicial system and includes interviews with the parents and friends of Knox, investigators, prosecutors and legal scholars.[4]

Plot

The film depicts events that occurred after Amanda Knox moved to Perugia, Italy, in September 2007, as a foreign exchange student attending language classes at the University for Foreigners.

Knox shares an upstairs flat in a cottage with Meredith Kercher, a British student, and two Italian women, Filomena and Laura. In October, Knox meets Raffaele Sollecito, an Italian student of computer engineering, at a classical music concert, and she begins to stay at his house each night.

On November 1, Kercher is found stabbed to death in her bedroom. While searching for evidence in the days following the murder, the police question both Knox and Sollecito about recent events. Knox admits that she and Sollecito had "smoked weed" on the night of November 1, and states that they had gone to his house, watched a film on his computer, and gone to bed. Meanwhile, the chief prosecutor of Perugia, Giuliano Mignini, discusses the case with the coroner and forensic investigators from Rome. The coroner mentions that multiple bruises were found on Kercher's body, which could indicate a struggle between Kercher and her murderer. The prosecutor inquires whether more than one person could have been involved in the fatal attack.

During Sollecito's interrogation, he is informed by police that telephone records indicate he has called the emergency number after the Polizia Postale arrived at the cottage on the day Kercher's body was discovered. A policeman warns Sollecito that his rich, influential family will not be able to protect him. Sollecito asserts that Knox told him to make certain claims, that she was not with him at the time of the murder, and that he had not "thought about the contradictions" in his alibi.

Police subsequently approach Knox, who has been performing cartwheels while waiting alone in the hall, and ask her to explain a text message that has been found on her cell phone. The officers claim that Knox had left the message for her employer, pub owner Patrick Lumumba, on the night of the murder to tell him she would meet him later. Knox replies that, in English, the words amounted more to "I'll see you around" than "meet me later". The police order Knox to tell them about meeting Lumumba that night, or suffer the consequences. Several hours later, Knox states that she had met Lumumba in a local square, that they had gone to the cottage with Kercher, and that Lumumba had entered Kercher's room before her death.

Knox, Sollecito and Lumumba are arrested. Under police interrogation, his face swollen with bruises, Lumumba insists that he hardly knew Kercher and that he has never visited the cottage. Some days later, he is released when a university professor reveals that he had been with him at the pub Le Chic, and could not have been at the cottage at the time of the murder. The parents of Knox travel to Italy to help their daughter, and hire lawyers for her defense in court.

The forensics team finds a bloody fingerprint in the murder room that does not match the prints of either Knox or Sollecito. The resulting manhunt leads to the arrest of Rudy Guede, originally from the Côte d'Ivoire, whom Knox and Kercher had met weeks earlier when he was playing the guitar in the downstairs flat at the cottage with the Italian men who lived there. Guede later goes to trial and is found guilty of murder and sexual assault. Knox and Sollecito are indicted in the same court judgment.

Knox and Sollecito are tried jointly in 2009 on the charges of murder, sexual assault, staging a crime scene, and transporting a lethal knife. Luminol tests in the cottage hallway revealed small footprints, which were too small for the men to have made, but approximated the size of Knox's feet. DNA experts testify that Knox's blood was found on a bathroom tap, mixed with Kercher's. In Sollecito's apartment, police found a large kitchen knife, with Knox's DNA on the handle and four cells of Kercher's on the blade. A defense expert testifies that 10 cells would be required for the purpose of evidence, since four DNA cells indicated "contamination" rather than evidence that the knife had been used as a murder weapon. The prosecution insists that Knox had argued with Kercher and stabbed her, as presented in an hypothetical flashback set in Kercher's room.

The chief forensics investigator testifies that Sollecito's DNA was found on a metal clasp severed from the back strap of Kercher's bra (presented as being cut off with a knife in the flashback). Sollecito's attorney asks when the bra clasp was discovered. The investigator replies that it was photographed on the first day after the murder, but only collected 47 days later, during which time it had been moved from its original position and passed between the various members of the forensics team. Although the attorney claims that this small amount of DNA is possibly the result of contamination, the investigator replies that, with the exception of the clasp, only a cigarette butt in the kitchen held Sollecito's DNA, stating, "DNA does not fly around".

Eventually, in December 2009, the jury delivers a verdict of guilty: Knox is sentenced to 26 years in prison, Sollecito to 25 years. Knox's father reassures his daughter that he and her mother will appeal the verdict in a new trial. The film closes with a caption stating that the parents of the real-life Knox have both been charged with criminal slander for claiming that police had abused their daughter, and that they face three years' imprisonment if found guilty.

Note: The film is now shown with an amendment noting the subsequent acquittal of Knox and Sollecito on appeal.

Cast

Actresses Lindsay Lohan, Megan Fox, Emily Blunt and Kristen Stewart were all considered for the part of Knox prior to the casting of Panettiere.[5][6]

Reception

Before broadcast

On February 3, 2011, Kercher's parents, John and Arline Kercher, described certain scenes in the film as "very distressing". John stated "They are absolutely horrific and I have asked and would hope the pictures are withdrawn" in reference to the scenes in which Kercher is attacked and murdered by her friends.[5][7] Arline said, "It's awful what these film people have done. Your imagination runs riot as it is about what happened, but to actually see it like this is very different and very distressing. I'm surprised they have gone so far. I was told the original brief and synopsis of the film was to take it up to the point of the killing but not actually show the killing itself. It's obvious from these pictures they are showing the killing. So not only have they upset me and my family but they are also now in extreme danger of being sued by the convicted people's lawyers. In Italy you are regarded as still not being completely convicted until you have had two appeals. If these people win their appeals – which I hope they won't – then they could sue the filmmakers."[2][7] Kercher's lawyer, Francesco Maresca, expressed his displeasure at the making of the film: "It is inopportune as the trial is still ongoing with two further appeals."[8] Lawyers for Knox and Sollecito formally demanded that Lifetime abandon the production.[9] Panettiere stated, "I hope, I don't think the family will be upset about the way it was put together."[7]

After broadcast

On its first airing, the film achieved decent ratings of approximately 2.8 million viewers in the United States.[10] According to The Daily Telegraph, the production of the film would always have been complicated since the case itself contained much doubt and many inconsistencies.[11] Nick Squires of The Daily Telegraph wrote that the film did "a credible job of navigating a complex case without coming down one way or the other on whether Knox and ... Sollecito ... are innocent or guilty."[11]

Differences from reported events

Kercher's family and lawyers, Knox and her family, and Sollecito and his lawyers have all been vocal opponents of the film.[12] Nikki Battiste of ABC News listed 15 points in the film when scenes or lines are fabricated.[12]

Knox's relationships

The film portrays Knox and Sollecito having a picnic in an attempt to establish a relationship. There is no evidence that such a picnic took place, and the weather typical for Italy for the month of October makes the event improbable.[12][13] The film also shows Knox, Kercher and Guede in attendance at a party featuring drug use. However, both Knox and Guede have stated they were not friends, and the Italian police have stated that there was no communication between them.[12][13][14] In addition, the film depicts Kercher confronting Knox about not doing her fair share of house cleaning. In reality, Kercher's friends testified that she was too reserved to confront Knox about this issue.[15]

Knox's statements

In the film, Knox informs her mother that she has been questioned for 13 hours. Knox was interrogated for almost 50 hours in the days prior to her arrest.[12] The film depicts Knox, through the account of a roommate, telling the roommate that Kercher had suffered because her "throat was slit".[12] This leads the prosecution to suspect Knox. Knox did not mention Kercher's throat being cut: in response to a question concerning whether Kercher had suffered, Knox stated, according to the witness, "Of course she suffered. She fucking bled to death."[12][13][14]

Trial evidence

View of hillside steps in Perugia

The film indicates that police had found Kercher's DNA on the tip of the blade of a knife. Kercher's DNA was found on the dull side of the blade.[16] In the film, the prosecutor accuses Knox and Sollecito of returning to the murder scene hours later and cutting Kercher's bra from her body and moving the body to stage the crime scene. Neither at the trial nor in the investigation was anything found to indicate that Kercher's body had been moved or that the bra clasp had been removed hours after she died.[12][13] The film presents the victim as being stabbed horizontally across the throat. Autopsy reports describe the wounds as stabs to the side or back of the neck, with smaller punctures to the front.[16]

To prove the prosecutor's argument that the crime scene was staged, the film indicates that there was broken glass on top of clothes in crime scene photographs. No such photographs exist.[15] In the film, a shop owner contacts the police immediately to tell them that Knox bought some cleaning supplies from him on the morning of the murder. When the witness was originally questioned by police, he did not mention that Knox was in the store and the other worker at the shop testified that Knox was not present at that time.[13][14] Furthermore, the shop owner did not contact the prosecutor until he was encouraged to do so by reporters months after the murder.[16]

Trial events

In the film, Knox enters the court on a red carpet, dressed in a what Battiste describes as a "sexually suggestive" manner, and waving to the reporters. Knox was generally brought in through the rear entrance of the courthouse to avoid the press, and the courthouse does not have a red carpet.[13][16] Additionally, Knox did not, in Battiste's view, dress in a provocative manner and did not wave to the media.[15][16] The film portrays Knox and Sollecito sitting near each other and sharing shifty looks during the trial, when in reality they sat farther apart.[15]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Hayden Panettiere on the Controversy Surrounding The Amanda Knox Story Archived February 13, 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  2. 1 2 3 4 Pisa, Nick (February 4, 2011). "Meredith's Mum: Knox Film is 'Shocking'". news.sky.com. Retrieved February 3, 2011.
  3. ↑ "Hayden Panettiere to Play Amanda Knox in New Movie". metro.co.uk. September 20, 2010. Retrieved February 5, 2011.
  4. ↑ "About Beyond the Headlines: Amanda Knox". mylifetime.com. February 3, 2011. Retrieved February 5, 2011.
  5. 1 2 "Meredith Kercher Family Slams 'Horrible' Amanda Knox Story". metro.co.uk. September 21, 2010. Retrieved February 3, 2011.
  6. ↑ Andreeva, Nellie (September 20, 2010). "Amanda Knox Story to Become Lifetime Original Movie Starring Hayden Panettiere". deadline.com. Retrieved February 3, 2011.
  7. 1 2 3 Sales, Dan (November 2, 2010). "Meredith Dad's Fury at Sick Murder Film". thesun.co.uk (London). Retrieved February 3, 2011.
  8. ↑ "Amanda Knox: Murder on Trial in Italy Film Trailer Re-creates Meredith Kercher's Bloody Murder". metro.co.uk. January 27, 2011. Retrieved February 3, 2011.
  9. ↑ Winfield, Nicole (February 5, 2011). "Amanda Knox Lawyers Seek to Stop Lifetime Film". apnews.myway.com. Retrieved February 5, 2011.
  10. ↑ Ng, Philiana (February 22, 2011). "Lifetime's Amanda Knox Telepic Draws Decent Ratings". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved February 24, 2011.
  11. 1 2 Squires, Nick (February 22, 2011). "Amanda Knox: Murder on Trial in Italy: Review". The Daily Telegraph (Rome). Retrieved February 22, 2011.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Fact and Fiction in Amanda Knox Movie". ABC News (Rome). February 22, 2011. Retrieved February 22, 2011.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Amanda Knox Movie Flunks Truthiness Test". Seattle Pi (Seattle). February 22, 2011. Archived from the original on March 17, 2011. Retrieved March 1, 2011.
  14. 1 2 3 "A Lifetime Movie Full of Mistakes, Says CBS News Producer". CBS News (Seattle). February 23, 2011. Retrieved March 1, 2011.
  15. 1 2 3 4 "Amanda Knox Movie Flunks Truthiness Test". Seattle Pi (Seattle). February 22, 2011. Archived from the original on March 17, 2011. Retrieved March 1, 2011.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 "Fact and Fiction in Amanda Knox Movie". ABC News (Rome). February 22, 2011. Retrieved February 22, 2011.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, February 25, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.