The Sports Gene

The Sports Gene: Inside the Science of Extraordinary Athletic Performance
Author David Epstein
Country United States
Language English
Genre Sports
Published August 2013, Penguin Books
Media type Print (hardback)
Pages 353

The Sports Gene is a book written by David Epstein, a senior writer for Sports Illustrated, on the effects of genetics and sports training on human athleticism. Through investigative journalism, Epstein takes the reader through his experiences regarding what makes the difference between an amateur and a pro-athlete. The book was published in August 2013 by Penguin Books.

Overview

This book explores the question of nature versus nurture as it pertains to training for athletes in sports using anecdotes which favor both sides of the argument. These anecdotes are combined with the results of statistical studies to give the reader an understanding of the magnitude that biology plays in athletics. Topics such as the effects of gender, race, genetics, culture, and physical environment are discussed as contributors to success in specific sports.

The chapters are:

  1. In Search of Sports Genes
  2. Beat by an Underhand Girl: The Gene-Free Model of Expertise
  3. A Tale of Two High Jumpers (Or: 10,000 Hours Plus or Minus 10,000 Hours)
  4. Major League Vision and the Greatest Child Athlete Sample Ever: The Hard and Software Paradigm
  5. Why Men Have Nipples
  6. The Talent of Trainability
  7. Superbaby, Bully Whippets, and the Trainability of Muscle
  8. The Big Bang of Body Types
  9. The Vitruvian NBA Player
  10. We Are All Black (Sort Of): Race and Genetic Diversity
  11. The Warrior-Slave Theory of Jamaican Sprinting
  12. Malaria and Muscle Fibers
  13. Can Every Kalenjin Run?
  14. The World's Greatest Accidental (Altitudinous) Talent Sieve
  15. Sled Dogs, Ultrarunners, and Couch Potato Genes
  16. The Heartbreak Gene: Death, Injury, and Pain on the Field
  17. The Gold Medal Mutation
  18. Epilogue: The Perfect Athlete

Criticism of the 10,000 hours rule

David Epstein criticizes ideas in sports such as the "10,000 hour rule" by providing a series of interviews with experts and results from studies. The 10,000 hour rule is the scientific discovery that world class expertise in most domains of expertise did not come before 10,000 hours for focused, attentive practice at that skill. Epstein challenges the book Outliers, by Malcolm Gladwell which references the 10,000 hour rule, but never references the actual research, discoveries or conclusions. Epstein, ignores the academic work of Swedish psychologist K. Anders Ericsson of which the so called 10,000 hour rule is derived, as well as the fact that K. Anders Ericsson himself makes it exceedingly clear that practice alone is a very poor predictor of skilled performance and the acquisition of skill and expertise. Epstein looks into this "hypothesis" as he calls it, critically, by comparing studies from master chess players to professional volleyball players to violinists to reach the conclusion that the 10,000 hour rule is merely an average and the actual range of hours needed for athletes to master a skill is fairly wide. He explores several cases of persons who were not well-trained in some sport but then performed surprisingly well when put to a test, and when given training quickly went on to win medals in for instance, the Olympics, all while misrepresenting the fact that the "10,000 hour rule" refers to "performance" in the context of "the acquisition of skill and expertise" such as composing a master work in music and not "physical performance", such as running the 40 yard dash.

Race and sport

Epstein explores racial differences in sports performance and argues that on a genetic-level, persons of some African groups (such Jamaicans and Kalenjins) an advantage in some sports such as the 100 meters sprint and marathons respectively. He explores the topic by use of interviews with experts and summarizing scientific studies.

Reception

The book has generally positive reviews on Amazon and Goodreads, with average ratings of 4.6/5 (341 ratings), and 5.15/5 (2827 ratings).[1][2] The official website lists a number of other positive reviews published in venues such as The New York Times, Science, and The Guardian.[3]

References

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, March 18, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.