Fixed price of Coca-Cola from 1886 to 1959

The fixed price of Coca-Cola from 1886 to 1959 refers to a period in the United States during which the price of 6.5 oz of Coca-Cola fluctuated very little to consumers. There were many reasons for this lack of movement, including bottling contracts signed by The Coca-Cola Company in 1899, advertising, vending machine technology, and the lower rate of inflation relative to more recent times.[1] The fixed price of Coca-Cola from 1886 to 1959 is especially significant given the potentially influential events that occurred during the same time period, including the founding of Pepsi, World War I, prohibition, changing taxes, a caffeine and caramel shortage, and World War II. Much of the research on this subject comes from "The Real Thing": Nominal Price Rigidity of the Nickel Coke, 1886–1959, a 2004 paper by economists Daniel Levy and Andrew Young.[2]

The beginning

In 1886, Dr. John Stith Pemberton, a pharmacist and former confederate soldier, produced the first Coca-Cola syrup. On May 8, 1886, he brought a jug of his syrup to a local pharmacy on Peachtree road in Atlanta, Georgia. According to the chronicle of Coca-Cola, "It was pronounced 'excellent' and placed on sale for five cents a glass".[3] Although most soda fountain drinks cost seven or eight cents at the time (for a 6.5 oz glass), Coca-Cola chose five cents and specifically marketed itself as an affordable option.[1] Pemberton sold his remaining stake in Coca-Cola to Asa Candler in 1888.

Bottling contracts

In 1899, Benjamin Thomas and Joseph Whitehead, two lawyers from Chattanooga, Tennessee, approached Coca-Cola President Asa Candler about buying Coca-Cola bottling rights. At the time, soda fountains were the predominant way of consuming carbonated beverages in the United States.[2] Candler sold the rights to the two lawyers for one dollar, which he never ended up collecting. It is speculated that Candler sold the bottling rights so cheaply because he (a) truthfully thought bottling would never take off, and (b) was granted the ability in the contract to "pull their franchise if they ever sold an inferior product".[4] Unfortunately for Candler, the contract at the agreed-upon price had no expiration date, so he had essentially agreed to sell Coca-Cola at the same price forever.

Advertising

Advertisement for five-cent Coca-Cola

Although Candler predicted differently, bottling did indeed emerge popular (surpassing fountain sales in 1928), and the non-expiring contract meant that Coca-Cola had to sell their syrup for a fixed price. In order to ensure that the bottlers did not charge disadvantageously high margins, Coca-Cola began an aggressive marketing campaign to associate their product with the five-cent price tag.[1] The campaign proved successful, and bottlers did not increase prices. Coca-Cola was able to renegotiate the bottling contract in 1921. However, in part due to the costs of rebranding (changing all of their advertisements as well as the psychological associations among consumers) the price of Coca-Cola remained at five cents for over three more decades.[1]

Vending machines

Another reason the price of Coca-Cola remained fixed at five cents, even after 1921, was the prevalence of vending machines. In 1950, Coca-Cola owned over 85% of the 460,000 vending machines in the United States. Based on vending machine prices at the time, Levy and Young estimate the value (in 1992 dollars) of these vending machines at between $286 million and $900 million.[2] Because existing Coca-Cola vending machines could not reliably make change, customers needed to have exact change. The Coca-Cola company feared that requiring multiple coins (e.g. six pennies or one nickel and one penny for six-cent Coke) would reduce sales and cost money to implement, among other things.[2] Reluctant to double the price to a dime — the next price achievable with a single coin — they were forced to keep the price of Coca-Cola at five cents, or seek more creative methods. This constraint played a role into the 1950s, when vending machines began to reliably make change.[2]

Attempts to raise prices

The Coca-Cola Company sought ways to increase their prices, even approaching the U.S. Treasury Department in 1953 to ask that they mint a 7.5 cent coin.[1] The Treasury was unsympathetic. In another attempt, The Coca-Cola Company briefly implemented a strategy where one in every nine vending machine bottles was empty.[1] The empty bottle was called an "official blank".[2] This meant that, while most nickels inserted in a vending machine would yield cold drinks, one in nine patrons would have to insert two nickels in order to get a bottle. This effectively raised the price to 5.625 cents.[1] Coca-Cola never implemented this strategy on a national scale.

The end of the fixed price of Coca-Cola

Inflation (CPI) in the United States

Throughout its history, the price of Coca-Cola had been especially sticky, but in the 1940s, inflation in the United States had begun to accelerate, making nickel Coke unsustainable. As early as 1950, Time reported Coca-Cola prices went up to six cents. In 1951, Coca-Cola stopped placing "five cents" on new advertising material, and Forbes Magazine reported on the "groggy" price of Coca-Cola.[2] After Coca-Cola president Robert Woodruff's plan to mint a 7.5 cent coin failed, Business Weekly reported Coke prices as high as 6, 7, and 10 cents, around the country. By 1959, the last of the nickel Cokes had been sold.[2]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NPR. "Episode 416: Why The Price Of Coke Didn't Change For 70 Years". Planet Money. NPR, 13 Nov. 2012. Web.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Levy, Daniel; Young, Andrew (August 2004). ""The Real Thing": Nominal Price Rigidity of the Nickel Coke, 1886–1959". Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 36 (4): 765–799. JSTOR 3839041.
  3. ↑ "The Chronicle of Coca-Cola". The Chronicle of Coca-Cola. N.p., n.d. Web.
  4. ↑ Laprad, David (23 July 2010). "A Brief History of the Chattanooga Coca-Cola Company". Hamilton County Herald.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, March 11, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.