Thin plate spline
Thin plate splines (TPS) are a spline-based technique for data interpolation and smoothing. They were introduced to geometric design by Duchon. [1] They are an important special case of a polyharmonic spline.
Physical analogy
The name thin plate spline refers to a physical analogy involving the bending of a thin sheet of metal. Just as the metal has rigidity, the TPS fit resists bending also, implying a penalty involving the smoothness of the fitted surface. In the physical setting, the deflection is in the 
 direction, orthogonal to the plane. In order to apply this idea to the problem of coordinate transformation, one interprets the lifting of the plate as a displacement of the 
 or 
 coordinates within the plane. In 2D cases, given a set of 
 corresponding points, the TPS warp is described by 
 parameters which include 6 global affine motion parameters and 
 coefficients for correspondences of the control points. These parameters are computed by solving a linear system, in other words, TPS has closed-form solution.
Smoothness measure
The TPS arises from consideration of the integral of the square of the second derivative -- this forms its smoothness measure. In the case where 
 is two dimensional, for interpolation, the TPS fits a mapping function 
 between corresponding point-sets 
 and 
 that minimises the following energy function: 
The smoothing variant, correspondingly, uses a tuning parameter 
 to control how non-rigid is allowed for the deformation, balancing the aforementioned criterion with the measure of goodness of fit, thus minimising:
For this variational problem, it can be shown that there exists a unique minimizer 
 (Wahba,1990).The  finite element  discretization of this variational problem, the method of elastic maps, is used for data mining and nonlinear dimensionality reduction.
Radial basis function
The Thin Plate Spline has a natural representation in terms of radial basis functions. Given a set of control points 
, a radial basis function basically defines a spatial mapping which maps any location 
 in space to a new location 
, represented by,
where 
 denotes the usual Euclidean norm and 
 is a set of mapping coefficients. The TPS corresponds to the radial basis kernel 
.
Spline
Suppose the points are in 2 dimensions (
). One can use homogeneous coordinates for the point-set where a point 
 is represented as a vector 
. The unique minimizer 
 is parameterized by 
 which comprises two matrices 
 and 
 (
).
where d is a 
 matrix representing the affine transformation (hence 
 is a 
 vector) and c is a 
 warping coefficient matrix representing the non-affine deformation. The kernel function 
 is a 
 vector for each point 
, where each entry 
 for each (
) dimensions.  Note that for TPS, the control points 
 are chosen to be the same as the set of points to be warped 
, so we already use 
 in the place of the control points.
If one substitutes the solution for 
, 
 becomes:
where 
 and 
 are just concatenated versions of the point coordinates 
 and 
, and 
 is a 
 matrix formed from the 
. Each row of each newly formed matrix comes from one of the original vectors. The matrix 
 represents the TPS kernel. Loosely speaking, the TPS kernel contains the information about the point-set's internal structural relationships. When it is combined with the warping coefficients 
, a non-rigid warping is generated.
A nice property of the TPS is that it can always be decomposed into a global affine and a local non-affine component. Consequently, the TPS smoothness term is solely dependent on the non-affine components. This is a desirable property, especially when compared to other splines, since the global pose parameters included in the affine transformation are not penalized.
Application
TPS has been widely used as the non-rigid transformation model in image alignment and shape matching.[2]
The Thin-plate-spline has a number of properties which have contributed to its popularity:
- It produces smooth surfaces, which are infinitely differentiable.
 - There are no free parameters that need manual tuning.
 - It has closed-form solutions for both warping and parameter estimation.
 - There is a physical explanation for its energy function.
 
See also
- Inverse distance weighting
 - Radial basis function
 - Subdivision surface (emerging alternative to spline-based surfaces)
 - Elastic map (a discrete version of the thin plate approximation for manifold learning)
 - Spline
 - Polyharmonic spline (the thin-plate-spline is a special case of a polyharmonic spline)
 - Smoothing spline
 
References
- ↑ J. Duchon, 1976, Splines minimizing rotation invariant semi-norms in Sobolev spaces. pp 85–100, In: Constructive Theory of Functions of Several Variables, Oberwolfach 1976, W. Schempp and K. Zeller, eds., Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 571, Springer, Berlin, 1977
 - ↑ Bookstein, F. L. (June 1989). "Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations". IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11 (6): 567–585. doi:10.1109/34.24792.
 
- Haili Chui: Non-Rigid Point Matching: Algorithms, Extensions and Applications. PhD Thesis, Yale University, May 2001.
 - G. Wahba, 1990, Spline models for observational data. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
 
External links
- Explanation for a simplified variation problem
 - TPS at MathWorld
 - TPS in C++
 - TPS in templated C++
 - TPS interactive morphing demo
 - TPS in R
 

![E_{tps,smooth}(f) = \sum_{i=1}^K \|y_i - f(x_i) \|^2 + \lambda \iint\left[\left(\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x_1^2}\right)^2 + 2\left(\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x_1 \partial x_2}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x_2^2}\right)^2 \right] \textrm{d} x_1 \, \textrm{d}x_2](../I/m/dd915d70852892c01faef37ee781bb5e.png)


