Tibble v. Edison International
| Tibble v. Edison International | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Argued February 24, 2015 Decided May 18, 2015 | |||||||
| Full case name | Glenn Tibble, et al, Petitioners v. Edison International, et al. | ||||||
| Docket nos. | 13–550 | ||||||
| Citations | |||||||
| Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
| Case opinions | |||||||
| Majority | Breyer, joined by unanimous | ||||||
| Laws applied | |||||||
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act | |||||||
Tibble v. Edison International, 575 U.S. ___ (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "because a fiduciary normally has a continuing duty to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, a plaintiff may allege that a fiduciary breached a duty of prudence by failing to properly monitor investments and remove imprudent ones. Such a claim is timely as long it is filed within six years of the alleged breach of continuing duty."[1]
Opinion of the Court
Associate Justice Stephen Breyer authored the unanimous opinion of the Court.[2]
References
External links
- Slip opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court
- SCOTUSblog coverage
- Oyez.org coverage
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, February 21, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.
