USAir Flight 5050
 A USAir Boeing 737-400, similar to the one involved. | |
| Accident summary | |
|---|---|
| Date | September 20, 1989 |
| Summary | Pilot error, aborted takeoff |
| Site | LaGuardia Airport, New York, United States |
| Passengers | 57 |
| Crew | 6 |
| Injuries (non-fatal) | 21 |
| Fatalities | 2 |
| Survivors | 61 |
| Aircraft type | Boeing 737-401 |
| Operator | USAir |
| Registration | N416US |
USAir Flight 5050 was an "extra section" passenger flight to replace the regularly scheduled but cancelled flight 1846, from New York's La Guardia Airport to Charlotte International Airport in Charlotte, North Carolina on September 20, 1989, that crashed on takeoff. Michael Martin was a new Boeing 737 captain, logging only about 140 hours as captain of the 737. In spite of the fact that the weather was very poor (wet with low visibility, causing the cancellation of many flights that day at La Guardia), Captain Martin permitted First Officer Constantine Kleissas to make the takeoff on a short, wet runway, even though he would be conducting his first non-supervised line takeoff in a 737, and had not conducted any takeoffs during the last 39 days.[1][2][3]
Accident sequence
As the first officer began the takeoff on runway 31, the airplane started to drift to the left. The captain attempted to correct that drift with the use of the nosewheel tiller. Moments later, they heard a "bang" and then a rumbling noise. That was the result of the nose tire flying off its rim, after being damaged by the captain's improper use of the nosewheel steering tiller. The captain then took over control from the first officer and aborted the takeoff, but he was unable to stop the plane before it ran off the end of the runway into Bowery Bay. The airplane collided with a wooden approach lighting stanchion or pier, as it went off the end of the overrun. The fuselage separated into three sections with the forward section resting on part of the elevated light stanchion and the aft section partially submerged. All of the fuselage fractures were due to overstress.[1]
Evacuation
All the exits, except the L-1 door and L-2 door were used for evacuation. The lead flight attendant could not open the L-1 door. The evacuation slide at R-1 deployed; the R-2 slide was disarmed before the door was opened because the flight attendant believed that the slide would float upward and block the exit. The L-2 door was opened and then closed when water entered the cabin. All four of the overwing exits were used to evacuate successfully.
"About 20 passengers stood on the left wing, which was out of the water. Someone unstowed the fabric ditching line from above a left overwing exit and tied it to its wing fitting. These 20 passengers, including the woman with the 5 year old child and the 8-month old infant, held onto the line as they awaited rescue. The ditching line was unstowed from its right overwing exit opening but evacuees did not know it needed to be tied to the right wing fitting. The forward portion of the right wing was out of the water and passengers held onto the ditching line so they could stay out of the water."[1]
"Passengers who egressed at the two floor-level exits entered the water and because of the one-knot current some persons drifted away from the airplane and under the runway deck. Crewmembers threw floatation seat cushions and crew life preservers, which were held by passengers and crewmembers, some of whom could not swim. Several persons complained that they could not hold onto the cushions or that the cushions did not keep them afloat. Some clung to pilings under the deck and floating debris. Some passengers also swallowed fuel that was on the water surface. Several complained that waves from boats and downwash from a rescue helicopter hampered staying afloat with their heads out of the water. One passenger said that she sustained a fractured right ankle and a lacerated hand when a rescue boat backed over her."[1]
The last passengers, who were trapped in seats 21F and 22A, were extricated approximately 90 minutes after the accident.
Two of the 57 passengers were killed (Betsy Brogan and her mother-in-law, Ayles Brogan, wife and mother of a USAir employee). The Brogans had the misfortune of selecting seats that were located exactly where the tail section of the fuselage broke away from the rest of the plane. Fifteen other passengers were injured, one critically.[1]
Accident analysis
The NTSB found numerous "crew coordination problems" during its investigation, which had a bearing on the ultimate outcome of Flight 5050:
- The captain's failure to provide an extended briefing, or an emergency briefing, before the takeoffs at BWI and LGA or at any time during the 9 hours the crewmembers spent together before the accident.
- The decision of the captain to execute the takeoff at LGA with autobrakes disengaged, on a wet and short runway, contrary to company and manufacturer recommendations.
- The failure of the crew to detect the improper rudder trim setting in response to the checklists.
- The failure of the crew to detect the improper rudder trim setting by means of rudder pedal displacement, information during taxiing and holding for takeoff.
- The failure of the aircraft to hold at taxiway GOLF GOLF during taxiing as directed by ATC (this error, an obvious violation, had no effect on the accident sequence).
- The failure of the first officer to push the correct button to engage the autothrottles at the beginning of the takeoff roll. He then manually advanced the throttles; the resultant delay and the slightly low thrust set on the left engine lengthened the airplane's ground roll and added to the directional control problem.
- The failure of the captain, during the takeoff roll, to take control of the aircraft and transfer control back to the first officer in a smooth and professional manner, with the result of confusion as to who was in control. Because of poor communication between the pilots, both attempted to 'maintain directional control initially and neither was fully in control later in the takeoff, compounding directional control difficulties.
- The failure of the captain to make speed call outs and to consult airspeed before initiating an abort. Computed V1 speed was 125 knots and action by the captain to reject the takeoff began at 130 knots.
- The failure of the captain to announce the abort decision in standard terminology, with the result of confusion by the first officer as to what action was being taken.
- The failure of the captain to execute the abort procedure in a rapid and aggressive manner. After initiating the RTO, the captain used differential braking to steer the airplane. This delayed the attainment of effective braking until 5½ seconds after the takeoff was rejected. Braking during the RTO was less than the maximum braking achievable on the wet runway; the airplane could have been stopped on the runway.[1]
Rudder trim issue
Analysis of the Digital Flight Data Recorder (DFDR) revealed that the rudder trim had moved to the far left limit, while the plane was parked at the gate. Since power to the DFDR was off, while parked at the gate, the NTSB could not discover what caused that rudder trim to move to that extreme limit. It was speculated that someone was sitting in the jumpseat (which is located directly behind the control pedestal) had rested their feet on it and inadvertently toggled the trim knob. This knob used to have a raised flat and strait portion protruding from it. Subsequent to this event, all 737's were retrofitted with a rounded rudder trim knob– and a higher ridge around the aft section of the pedestal in an effort to prevent a similar occurrence. That mistrim of the rudder should have been discovered when the Before Takeoff checklist was read, but the pilots failed to ensure the rudder was in the zero trim (neutral) position at that time. The captain also failed to detect that the rudder pedals were unequally displaced by 4¼ inches and the nose wheel steering was turned to 4 degrees left, during the taxi out from the gate to the takeoff position on the runway.[1]
When the rudder trim is centered to zero degrees, as required for takeoff, the rudder pedals would be matched so that the captain's legs would be extended the same amount, for each pedal, and the plane's nosewheel steering would not keep trying to turn the plane to the left, during taxi operations (See graphic).
The NTSB could not understand why the captain failed to detect that mistrimmed rudder (as evidenced by the abnormal displacement of the rudder pedals and the tendency for the plane to keep trying to turn left), during the time that the plane was taxied to the takeoff position.
- "The safety issues discussed in the report are the design and location of the rudder trim control on the Boeing 737-400, air crew coordination and communication during takeoffs, crew pairing, and crash survivability. Safety Recommendations addressing these issues were made to the Federal Aviation Administration and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey."[1]
Testing of the pilots for drugs and alcohol
ALPA (the Air Line Pilots Association), which was the labor union representing the two pilots of flight 5050, sequestered the pilots and refused to reveal their whereabouts until such time that any testing for drugs and alcohol would be useless. This made the NTSB investigators so upset that a very unusual and strong statement was included in the official accident report:
The Safety Board is extremely concerned that no federal investigators were allowed to speak to the pilots of flight 5050 until almost 40 hours after the accident. Specific requests to USAir and ALPA to interview the pilots and to have them provide toxicological samples were made about ten hours and again about 20 hours after the accident. USAir representatives stated they did not know where the pilots were sequestered. The Air Line Pilots Association representatives initially stated that they also did not know where the pilots were, then later stated that their location was being withheld so they could not be found by the media. This complicated the investigative process to a great degree. The sequestering of the pilots for such an extended period of time in many respects borders on interference with a federal investigation and is inexcusable.[1]
The FAA was in the process of preparing subpoenas to compel the pilots to present themselves to NTSB accident investigators, when the pilots finally relented and appeared, some 44 hours after the accident. The FAA was processing an emergency suspension of their licenses for failing to present themselves to investigators promptly after the crash. An FAA official said the pilots are entitled to legal counsel, but it is a regulation that they have to talk to the FAA after an accident.
The pilots were requested to provide both blood and urine samples. Upon the advice of their ALPA attorney, they refused to provide any blood samples, but did give urine samples. ALPA officials refused to respond to questions submitted by media reporters. Local law-enforcement officials were attempting to track down rumors that the FO had told Port Authority police after the crash, that the captain had been "mumbling and acting irrationally just before takeoff." However, they were never able to find any witnesses to substantiate that rumor.[3] [4]
The FAA did follow through with a suspension of their licenses, shortly after they finally appeared.[2]
NTSB probable cause
The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the captain's failure to exercise his command authority in a timely manner to reject the takeoff or take sufficient control to continue the takeoff, which was initiated with a mistrimmed rudder. Also causal was the captain's failure to detect the mistrimmed rudder before the takeoff was attempted.[1]
See also
- US Airways Flight 1549, another USAirways flight from LaGuardia to Charlotte that took off from Runway 4 and ended up ditching into the Hudson River
- Water landing
Notes
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 "Aircraft Accident Report: USAir Flight 5050" (PDF).
- 1 2 "TimeMagagazine:Flight 5050". October 2, 1989. Archived from the original on July 13, 2011. Retrieved May 27, 2010.
- 1 2 "Then and Now".
- ↑ McFadden, Robert D. (September 22, 1989). "Pilots Sought". The New York Times. Retrieved May 27, 2010.
External links
Coordinates: 40°46′34″N 73°53′06″W / 40.776°N 73.885°W
| ||||||