United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued January 11, 1944 Decided June 5, 1944 | |||||||
Full case name | United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, et al. | ||||||
Citations |
64 S. Ct. 1162; 88 L. Ed. 1440; 1944 U.S. LEXIS 1199; 1944 Trade Cas. (CCH) P57,253 | ||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Black, joined by Douglas, Murphy, Rutledge | ||||||
Dissent | Stone | ||||||
Dissent | Frankfurter | ||||||
Dissent | Jackson | ||||||
Roberts and Reed took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |||||||
Laws applied | |||||||
Sherman Act |
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, 322 U.S. 533 (1944), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Sherman Act, the federal antitrust statute, applied to insurance. To reach this decision, the Court held that insurance could be regulated by the United States Congress under the Commerce Clause, overturning Paul v. Virginia. Congress responded by enacting the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945 which limited antitrust laws' applicability to the business and assured state authority would continue over insurance.
See also
External links
Wikisource has original text related to this article: |
- Text of United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n, 322 U.S. 533 (1944) is available from: Findlaw Justia
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, May 26, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.