Volkswagen emissions scandal

Volkswagen emissions scandal

2010 VW Golf TDI with defeat device displaying "Clean Diesel" at a US auto show.
Date 2008–2015
Location Worldwide
Type Emissions violations
Cause Engaging full emissions control only during testing
Participants International Council on Clean Transportation, West Virginia University, Volkswagen Group, US EPA, other regulators
Footage http://www.vwdieselinfo.com
Timeline
1999 New US Tier 2 rules established to replace Tier 1. NOx limit decreasing from 1.0 g/mi to .07 g/mi
2004–2009 Phase in period of diesel emissions rules
2007 VW suspends sales of current diesel lines awaiting technology to meet new standards. Bosch allegedly warns VW not to use its software illegally[1][2]
2008 VW announces new Clean Diesel cars. Some cars are described in Europe as "EU4 emissions standard (EU5 compliant)".[3] Cars with the test-rigging software are sold in the UK.[4]
2009

US Tier 2 fully in effect,

VW TDI cars go on sale in US. In Europe, some models are now being described as Euro emission class 5, a change from class 4 in 2008.[3][5]
2009–2015 VW diesel sales in the US rebound, Clean Diesels win several environmental awards, receive tax breaks
2014 International Council on Clean Transportation asks WVU CAFEE to help demonstrate the benefits of US diesel technology, hoping to have Europe follow suit
May 2014 Instead, CAFEE finds discrepancies showing poor on-road emissions. Results presented at public forum and published, getting attention of EPA
2014–2015 EPA repeats tests, and contacts VW for explanation of poor real world NOx emissions
Dec 2014 VW orders voluntary recall of TDI cars but CARB and EPA not satisfied
3 Sep 2015 EPA threatens to not certify 2016 diesels, VW responds by admitting software was programmed to cheat testing
18 Sep 2015 Public announcement by EPA of order to recall 2009–2015 cars
20 Sep 2015 VW admits deception, issues public apology
21 Sep 2015 First business day after news, VW stock down 20%
22 Sep 2015 VW to spend $7.3B to cover costs of scandal; stock declines another 17%
23 Sep 2015 CEO Winterkorn resigns
29 Sep 2015 Volkswagen announces plans to refit up to 11 million vehicles affected by the emissions violations scandal
2 Oct 2015 Volkswagen sets up an online based service on which customers can check if their car is affected based on the vehicle identification number
8 Oct 2015 VW US CEO Michael Horn testifies before US Congress
3 Nov 2015 VW's investigation finds that CO2 emissions and fuel consumption figures are also affected by "irregularities".[6]
25 Nov 2015 The German Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) approves VW fixes for 1.2, 1.6 and 2.0 diesel engines in Europe.[7][8]
9 Dec 2015 VW revises previous estimates on CO2 emissions irregularities, saying that only around 36,000 vehicles are affected.[9]
9 Mar 2016 VW US CEO Michael Horn resigns, citing a "mutual agreement" with the company.[10]

On 18 September 2015, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a notice of violation of the Clean Air Act to German automaker Volkswagen Group after it was found that Volkswagen had intentionally programmed turbocharged direct injection (TDI) diesel engines to activate certain emissions controls only during laboratory emissions testing. The programming caused the vehicles' nitrogen oxide (NOx) output to meet US standards during regulatory testing but emit up to 40 times more NOx in real-world driving.[11] Volkswagen put this programming in about eleven million cars worldwide, and in 500,000 in the United States, during model years 2009 through 2015.[12][13][14][15][16]

The findings stemmed from a study on emissions discrepancies between European and US models of vehicles commissioned in 2014 by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), summing up the data from three different sources on 15 vehicles. Among the research groups was a group of five scientists at West Virginia University, who detected additional emissions during live road tests on two out of three diesel cars. ICCT also purchased data from two other sources. The new road testing data and the purchased data were generated using Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) invented by an EPA engineer in 1995. The findings were provided to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in May 2014.[17][18][19]

Volkswagen became the target of regulatory investigations in multiple countries,[20] and Volkswagen's stock price fell in value by a third in the days immediately after the news. Volkswagen Group CEO Martin Winterkorn resigned, and the head of brand development Heinz-Jakob Neusser, Audi research and development head Ulrich Hackenberg, and Porsche research and development head Wolfgang Hatz were suspended. Volkswagen announced plans to spend US$7.3 billion on rectifying the emissions issues, and planned to refit the affected vehicles as part of a recall campaign. The scandal raised awareness over the higher levels of pollution being emitted by all vehicles built by a wide range of car makers, which under real world driving conditions are prone to exceed legal emission limits. A study conducted by ICCT and ADAC showed the biggest deviations from Volvo, Renault, Jeep, Hyundai, Citroën and Fiat.[21][22][23] A discussion was sparked that software-controlled machinery will generally be prone to cheating, and a way out would be to make the software source code accessible to the public.[24][25][26]

Background

VW anti-pollution system

The underlying issue that VW was attempting to resolve is that while three-way catalytic converter technology has been very effective since the early 1980s at reducing nitrogen oxide in petrol engine exhaust, it does not work well for diesel exhaust because of its relatively high proportion of oxygen.

In 2005, parts of VW intended to purchase Mercedes' BlueTec system for reducing pollution, but other parts of VW rejected that and preferred to develop their own system.[27][28][29]

Starting in the 2009 model year cars with "electronically controlled common rail direct injection system with Bosch high pressure pump", Volkswagen Group began migrating its light-duty passenger vehicle turbocharged direct injection (TDI) diesel engines to a common-rail fuel injection system. This system allows for higher-precision fuel delivery using electronically controlled fuel injectors and higher injection pressure, theoretically leading to better fuel atomization, better air/fuel ratio control, and by extension, better control of emissions.[30][31] Model year 2009 Volkswagens began sales to the public in 2008.[3][4][32]

With the addition of a diesel particulate filter to capture soot, and on some vehicle models, a urea-based exhaust aftertreatment system, the engines were described by Volkswagen as being as clean as or cleaner than US and Californian requirements, while providing good performance.[33][34] In reality, the system failed to combine good fuel economy with compliant NOx emissions, and VW chose some time before 2010 to program the engine control to switch from good fuel economy and high NOx emissions to low-emission compliant mode when it detected an emissions test, particularly for the EA 189 engine. This caused the engine to emit NOx levels above limits in daily operation, but comply with US NOx standards only when being tested.[28][35] The newspaper Der Spiegel reported that at least 30 people at management level in VW knew about the deceit for years; VW denies this.[36]

As of 2014, VW is registered with a Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) of 34 mpg-US (6.9 L/100 km; 41 mpg-imp).[37] The low emissions levels of Volkswagen vehicles tested with the defeat device in operation enabled the company to receive green car subsidies and tax exemptions in the US.[38]

  1. ^ "VW's Clean Diesel Ads Now Make Us Feel Dirty". New York Mag. 23 September 2015. 
  2. ^ "VW Plays 'Truth & Dare' Online". AdWeek. 5 May 2009. 
  3. ^ "Volkswagen launches 'truth & dare' site to dispel diesel myths". Motor Authority. 4 May 2009. 
  4. ^ "VW launches TDI Truth & Dare with coffee filter test". AutoBlog Magazine. 3 May 2009. 

Early warnings

In 2011, the European Commission's Joint Research Centre published a report which found that all tested diesel vehicles emit 0.93 ± 0.39 g/km and that the tested Euro 5 diesel vehicles emit 0.62 ± 0.19 g/km. This substantially exceeds the respective Euro 3-5 emission limit.[39] In 2013, the research center then warned:

Sensors and electronic components in modern light-duty vehicles are capable of 'detecting' the start of an emissions test in the laboratory (e.g., based on acceleration sensors or not-driven/not-rotating wheels). Some vehicle functions may only be operational in the laboratory, if a predefined test mode is activated. Detecting emissions tests is problematic from the perspective of emissions legislation, because it may enable the use of defeat devices that activate, modulate, delay, or deactivate emissions control systems with the purpose of either enhancing the effectiveness of these systems during emissions testing or reducing the effectiveness of these systems under normal vehicle operation and use. While the use of defeat devices is generally prohibited, exceptions exist in cases where it is necessary to protect the engine against damage and to ensure safe vehicle operation (EC, 2007). These exceptions leave room for interpretation and provide scope, together with the currently applied test procedure, for tailoring the emissions performance [...].[40]

The European commission and European governments could not agree upon who was responsible for taking action.[41] In the United Kingdom, the Department for Transport received a report from the ICCT in October 2014 which stated there was a "real world nitrogen oxides compliance issue" with diesel passenger cars.[42] The UK's DEFRA research indicates a significant reduction in NOx and particulate matter from 1983 to 2014. Respirable suspended particles with a diameter of 10 micrometres also known as PM10 (including diesel particulates) have halved since 1996 despite the increased number and size diesel cars in the UK.[43]

European discrepancies

The independent body International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) commissioned a study in 2014 and obtained data on 15 vehicles from three sources. John German, co-lead of the US branch of ICCT, said the idea for the "very ordinary" test came from Peter Mock, managing director ICCT in Europe. Mr. German said they chose to put US vehicles through on-the-road tests because their emissions regulations are more stringent than those in the European Union. The ICCT expected the cars to pass, and thought they would be able to use the results to demonstrate to Europeans that it was possible to run diesel cars with cleaner emissions. The study found emissions discrepancies in the diesel VW Passat and VW Jetta, and no discrepancies in a BMW X5. They wanted to test a Mercedes as well, but could not get one.[19][44][45]

US testing conducted

A group of scientists at West Virginia University submitted a proposal to ICCT, and John German awarded them a US$50,000 grant for a study[17][46] to conduct tests on three diesel cars:[47] a VW Passat, a VW Jetta, and a BMW X5.[44] ICCT also purchased data from Emissions Analytics, a UK-based emissions consultancy, and from stakeholders in the Real Driving Emissions-Light Duty Vehicle working group in charge of amending Euro 6 regulations.[17]

Two professors and two students began testing emissions from the three vehicles under road conditions in early 2014, using a portable emissions measurement system, making it possible to collect real world driving emissions data, for comparison with laboratory dynamometer testing.[19]

The three vehicles were all certified at a California Air Resources Board facility before the tests[19] as falling below the emissions limits when using the standard laboratory testing protocols.[18][48] They put 2,400 kilometres (1,500 mi) on the Jetta and BMW. For their final test, they wanted to put even more mileage on the Passat and drove it from Los Angeles to Seattle and back again, virtually the entire West Coast of the United States,[44] over 3,200 kilometres (2,000 mi).[19] The BMW was "at or below the standard … with exception of rural-up/downhill driving conditions."[18] But the researchers found that under real-world driving conditions the Jetta exceeded US emissions limits "by a factor of 15 to 35" while the Passat exceeded the limit "by a factor of 5 to 20."[18][47]

The emissions far exceeded legal limits set by both European and US standards. One of the testers, Research Assistant Professor Arvind Thiruvengadam said, "... we did so much testing that we couldn't repeatedly be doing the same mistake again and again."[49][50] German said the deceit required more effort than merely adding some code to the engine software, as the code would also have to be validated.[49]

The US test results confirmed the ICCT's findings in Europe.[18] The West Virginia scientists did not identify the defeat device, but they reported their findings in a study they presented directly to the EPA and CARB in May 2014.[51][52] Colorado's RapidScreen real-world emissions test data reinforced the suspected abnormally high emissions levels.[53]

Emission standards

The VW and Audi cars identified as violators had been certified to meet either the US EPA Tier 2 / Bin 5 emissions standard or the California LEV-II ULEV standard.[54] Either standard requires that nitrogen oxide emissions not exceed 0.043 grams per kilometre (0.07 g/mi) for engines at full useful life which is defined as either 190,000 kilometres (120,000 mi) or 240,000 kilometres (150,000 mi) depending on the vehicle and optional certification choices.[55][56]

This standard for nitrogen oxide emissions is among the most stringent in the world. For comparison, the contemporary European standards known as Euro 5 (2008 "EU5 compliant",[3] 2009[5]–2014 models) and Euro 6 (2015 models) only limit nitrogen oxide emissions to 0.18 grams per kilometre (0.29 g/mi) and 0.08 grams per kilometre (0.13 g/mi) respectively.[56][57] Defeat devices are forbidden in the EU.[58] The use of a defeat device is subject to a penalty.[57]

NOx numbers for VW Passat and Jetta[18] See note
Car EPA (USA) Euro5 Euro6 Comment
Limit Dyno WVU
measurement
Limit Register Measurement
2011
Limit Register Measurement
201x
Vehicle A

[Volkswagen Jetta[59]]

0.043 g/km 0.022 g/km 0.61-1.5 g/km 0.18 g/km[57] 0.62 ± 0.19 g/km[39] 0.08 g/km[57] lean-NOx trap (LNT) (Vehicle A)
Vehicle B

[Volkswagen Passat[59]]

0.043 g/km 0.016 g/km 0.34-0.67 g/km 0.62 ± 0.19 g/km urea-based selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system (Vehicle B)

20% of European city dwellers are exposed to unhealthy levels of nitrogen dioxide. In London, where diesel road traffic is responsible for 40% of NOx emissions, air pollution causes more than 3,000 deaths a year.[60] A Channel 4 documentary in January 2015 referred to the UK government moving to a CO2 emission band system for road tax, which favoured diesel power, as the "great car con", with Barry Gardiner MP, former member of the Blair government, stating that the policy, which lowered CO2 emissions yet increased NOx pollution, was a mistake.[61]

EPA Notice of Violation

On 18 September 2015 the US EPA served a Notice of Violation (NOV) on Volkswagen Group alleging that approximately 480,000 VW and Audi automobiles equipped with 2-litre TDI engines, and sold in the US between 2009 and 2015, had an emissions-compliance "defeat device" installed.[12][62] A Notice of Violation is a notification to the recipient that the EPA believes it has committed violations and is not a final determination of liability.[63][64]

Volkswagen's "defeat device" is specially written engine management unit firmware that detects "the position of the steering wheel, vehicle speed, the duration of the engine's operation, and barometric pressure"[65] when positioned on a dynamometer using the FTP-75 test schedule.[66] These criteria very closely match the EPA's required emissions testing protocol[65] which allowed the vehicle to comply with emissions regulations by properly activating all emissions control during testing. The EPA's NOV alleged that under normal driving conditions, the software suppressed the emissions controls, allowing better fuel economy, at the expense of emitting up to 40 times more nitrogen oxides than allowed by law.[12][67]

Volkswagen's response

Initial response

Former Volkswagen AG CEO Martin Winterkorn in March 2015

According to the EPA, Volkswagen had insisted for a year before the outbreak of the scandal that discrepancies were mere technical glitches.[68] Volkswagen only fully acknowledged that they had manipulated the vehicle emission tests after being confronted with evidence regarding the "defeat device".[69][70]

The first sign that Volkswagen was ready to come clean reportedly occurred on 21 August 2015 at a conference on green transportation in Pacific Grove, California, where an unnamed company representative approached Christopher Grundler, director of the EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, and surprised him by informally admitting that the company had been deceiving regulators.[71] A CARB official was standing next to Grundler at the time.[71]

Formal acknowledgement of the deception was made by Volkswagen executives in Germany and the United States to EPA and California officials during a 3 September conference call, during which Volkswagen executives discussed written materials provided to the participants demonstrating how Volkswagen's diesel engine software circumvented US emissions tests. That admission came after the EPA threatened to withhold approval for the company's 2016 Volkswagen and Audi diesel models.[13]

I am shocked by the events of the past few days. I am stunned that misconduct on such a scale was possible in the Volkswagen Group. As CEO I accept responsibility for the irregularities. I am doing this in the interests of the company even though I am not aware of any wrongdoing on my part.

Martin Winterkorn, resignation statement, September 23, 2015.[72]

Volkswagen's CEO Martin Winterkorn said: "I personally am deeply sorry that we have broken the trust of our customers and the public." Winterkorn was in charge at Volkswagen from the start of 2008 to September 2015.[73] He attributed the admitted wrongdoing to "the terrible mistakes of a few people". Winterkorn initially resisted calls to step down from his leadership role at VW,[74][75] but then resigned as CEO on 23 September 2015.[76][77][78]

Volkswagen Group of America CEO Michael Horn was more direct, saying, "We've totally screwed up."[74] Horn added, "Our company was dishonest with the EPA, and the California Air Resources Board and with all of you."[75] Olaf Lies, a Volkswagen board member and economy minister of Lower Saxony, later told the BBC that the people "who allowed this to happen, or who made the decision to install this software" acted criminally, and must be held personally accountable. He also said the board only found out about the problems "shortly before the media did", and expressed concerns over "why the board wasn't informed earlier about the problems when they were known about over a year ago in the United States".[79]

Volkswagen announced that 11 million cars were involved in the falsified emission reports, and that over seven billion dollars would be earmarked to deal with the costs of rectifying the software at the heart of the pollution statements.[16] The newly appointed CEO of VW Mathias Müller stated that the software was only activated in a part of those 11 million cars, which has yet to be determined.[15] The German tabloid Bild claimed that top management had been aware of the software's use to manipulate exhaust settings as early as 2007. Bosch provided the software for testing purposes and warned VW that it would be illegal to use the software to avoid emissions compliance during normal driving.[80] Der Spiegel followed Bild with an article dated 30 September 2015 to state that some groups of people were aware of this in 2005 or 2006.[81] Süddeutsche Zeitung had similarly reported, that Heinz-Jakob Neusser, one of VW's top executives, had ignored at least one engineer's warnings over "possibly illegal" practices in 2011.[82]

On 28 September 2015, it was reported that VW had suspended Heinz-Jakob Neusser, head of brand development at its core VW brand; Ulrich Hackenberg, the head of research and development at its brand Audi who oversees technical development across the VW group; and Wolfgang Hatz, research and development chief at its sports-car brand Porsche who also heads engine and transmissions development of the VW group.[83]

On the same day it was reported that in addition to the internal revision process to investigate the incidents, the supervisory board of VW hired American law firm Jones Day to carry out an independent external investigation.[84] A software audit trail is one possible way of investigating what took place when; test logs are another way.[85] Later Volkswagen also contracted three public relations firms (Kekst in the United States, Hering Schuppener in Germany, Finsbury in Britain), in addition to its usual US-retained firm Edelman.[86] To further help deal with the scandal, VW hired ex-FBI director Louis Freeh, alongside former German constitutional judge Christine Hohmann-Dennhardt; the latter was previously employed by rival company Daimler, and now serves on VW's board as its new director of integrity and legal affairs.[87]

For the European market, VW has stated unequivocally that EA288-engined cars (which conform to Euro 6 standards) are not affected, even though MY2015 TDIs in the US (which all use the EA288) are part of the EPA allegation and VW's admission. VW announcements to the German press make no mention of any EA288-equipped cars being part of the scandal in any country.

Other irregularities

CO2 emissions irregularities

On 3 November 2015, VW revealed that its internal investigation found that CO2 emissions and fuel consumption figures were also affected by "irregularities". These new issues, first estimated to cost up to €2 billion to repair, involved mainly diesel, but also some petrol models, with initial estimates suggesting that approximately 800,000 vehicles equipped with 1.4, 1.6 and 2.0 litre motors from VW, Skoda, Audi and Seat might be affected.[6] On 9 December 2015, VW revised these estimates, saying that only around 36,000 vehicles are affected by the irregularities, while also affirming that it had found no evidence of unlawful changing of CO2 emissions data.[9] The news prompted a 7.3 percent increase in VW preference shares on the same day.[9][88]

3.0 liter TDI emissions irregularities

On 20 November 2015, the EPA said that VW officials told the agency that all 3.0-liter TDI diesel engines sold in the US from 2009 through 2015 were also fitted with emissions-cheating software, in the form of "alternate exhaust control devices". These are prohibited in the United States, however the software is legal in Europe.[89] VW acknowledges these devices' existence, but maintains that they were not installed with a "forbidden purpose".[88] On 4 January 2016, the US department of justice filed a complaint in a federal court against VW, alleging that the respective 3.0-liter diesel engines only meet the legal emission requirements in a “temperature conditioning” mode that is automatically switched on during testing conditions, while at "all other times, including during normal vehicle operation, the vehicles operate in a 'normal mode' that permits NOx emissions of up to nine times the federal standard".[90] The complaint covers around 85,000 3.0 liter diesel vehicles sold in the United States since 2009, including the Volkswagen Touareg, Porsche Cayenne, Audi A6 Quattro, Audi A7 Quattro, Audi A8, Audi A8L, Audi Q5, and Audi Q7 models.[90]

Vehicle recall and consequences

On 29 September 2015, Volkswagen announced plans to refit up to 11 million vehicles affected by the emissions violations scandal. The recall will affect models fitted with Volkswagen's EA 189 diesel engines, including 5 million at VW brand, 2.1 million at Audi, 1.2 million at Škoda and 1.8 million light commercial vehicles. SEAT said that 700,000 of its diesel models were affected. In Europe, a total of 8 million vehicles are affected.[91]

In Germany, 2.8 million vehicles will have to be recalled, followed by the UK, with 1.2 million. In France, 984,064 vehicles were affected, in Austria around 360,000, while in the Czech Republic 148,000 vehicles were involved (of which 101,000 were Škodas). In Portugal, VW said it had sold 94,400 vehicles with the software.[92][93] The repair may not require a formal recall; in the UK, for example, the company will simply offer to repair the cars free of charge; a recall is only required, "when a defect is identified that... could result in serious injury". As the rules violation involved enabling emission controls during testing, but turning it off under normal conditions to improve performance or fuel mileage, it has been speculated that the software update might make cars perform less efficiently and impair fuel economy; according to VW, however, its proposed solutions will be designed to achieve legal EU emissions compliance without impairing engine performance or consumption.[94]

It was unclear as of September 2015 whether the repair would also include hardware modifications, such as selective catalytic reduction upgrades.[95][96] The recall was scheduled to start in January 2016, with all affected cars projected to be fixed by the end of the year. The company also announced a review of all of its brands and models, including its supercar marque Bugatti.[97]

On 8 October 2015, Volkswagen US CEO Michael Horn said in testimony before the US Congress that it could nevertheless take years to repair all the cars, especially the older models, due to the complex hardware and software changes that will be required. He also said that the fixes will likely preserve fuel economy ratings but, "there might be a slight impact on performance".[98][99]

On 10 October 2015, Consumer Reports tested a 2015 Jetta TDI and a 2011 Jetta Sportwagen TDI in what they presumed was the special emissions testing, or cheat, mode. The 0 to 60 mph (0 to 97 km/h) acceleration time of the 2011 Jetta increased from 9.9 to 10.5 seconds, and the 2015 car's time went from 9.1 to 9.2 seconds. The fuel economy of the 2011 car decreased from 50 to 46 mpg-US (4.7 to 5.1 L/100 km; 60 to 55 mpg-imp) and the 2015 car's fuel economy decreased from 53 to 50 mpg-US (4.4 to 4.7 L/100 km; 64 to 60 mpg-imp). Consumer Reports's Director of Auto Testing said that while the added fuel costs, "may not be dramatic, these cars may no longer stand out among many very efficient competitors."[100] The method the magazine used to engage cheat mode while driving required making assumptions about the ECU's operations. Because disabling electronic stability control is a necessary step for running a car on a dynamometer, the magazine assumed that this would put the car in cheat mode.[100] In order to keep the electronic stability control from reactivating while driving, they disconnected the cars' rear wheel speed sensors, simulating the inputs the ECU receives while the car is on a stationary test rig, even though it was being driven on the road.[100] Besides front and rear wheel speeds, the EPA had said that steering wheel movement, barometric pressure and duration of engine operation were factors in triggering cheat mode.[12]

On 12 October 2015, Paul Willis, VW UK managing director, told the Commons Transport Select Committee that about 400,000 Volkswagen cars in the UK will need fuel injectors altered as well as a software fix.[32] The vehicles requiring the hardware fix are the 1.6 litre diesel models. The 1.2 litre[101] and 2.0 litre diesel models will only require a software fix.[32]

On the same day, Volkswagen announced it would overhaul its entire diesel strategy, saying that in Europe and North America it will switch "as soon as possible" to the use of selective catalytic reduction technology to improve diesel emissions. It also announced plans to accelerate the development of electric cars and plug-in hybrids, as well as petrol, instead of diesel engines for smaller cars.[102]

On 12–13 October 2015, Volkswagen Group vehicle drivers in the UK started receiving notification letters, to "rectify the issue".[103][104] Volkswagen later announced a timeline for UK diesel recalls, citing March 2016 for 2.0 liter engines, June 2016 for 1.2. liter engines, and October 2016 for 1.6. litre engines.[105]

VW suggested in the beginning of October 2015 to let car owners decide whether their cars would be recalled for handling.[106][107] However, the German Federal Motor Transport Authority (Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt, or KBA)[108] views the software as illegal,[109][110] and has ordered a full recall of all affected cars in Germany. VW then decided to recall around 8.5 million cars in Europe,[107] about a third of all its car deliveries since 2009.[111] KBA requires VW to send a recall plan to KBA before the end of October for 2.0 liter cars, and end of November for 1.2 and 1.6 liter cars.[110] If KBA approves a plan, VW can then start handling the cars. The German authorities require that VW removes the software and that VW ensures that emission rules are fulfilled.[106] Media estimates that the KBA procedure sets a precedence for how authorities in other countries handle the case.[111][112]

On 18 November 2015, Autoblog reported that a VW fix for the affected 1.6 diesel engine is under review by the KBA.[113] On 25 November 2015, VW said the fix involves a minor hardware modification to the car's air intake system, alongside a software update.[114] This low-cost solution contradicted earlier speculation regarding the possible fitting of new injection nozzles and catalytic converters.[113] VW also said that its affected 1.2 liter and 2.0 liter diesel engines only need a software update.[115][116] The fixes have been approved by the KBA, with the first recalls likely to begin in January 2016.[8] According to VW, the measures aim to achieve legal EU emissions compliance without impairing engine output, fuel consumption, or performance.[94] The simple fixes with inexpensive parts and software are now possible but were not available when the engines were developed, because engine technology understanding and intake flow simulation capabilities have matured in the interim time, allowing for a better understanding and options for addressing the burning of Diesel and air mixtures via intake flow shaping.[117]

Although there are three sizes of affected diesel engines, there exist more than a dozen variations to the repairs, prompting VW to roll out the recalls in waves for each cluster of vehicle; the first model to be repaired was the low-volume Volkswagen Amarok.[118] Classified as a light commercial vehicle, the Amarok pickup has a higher Euro 5 NOx emissions limit than the passenger cars that are yet to have an available approved fix. German motoring journal Auto Motor und Sport tested two Amarok TDI pickups pre and post software update and found that whilst engine power had remained the same, fuel consumption had increased by 0.5 litres/100 km.[119] This is believed in turn to have delayed the next wave of updates to the larger volume Passat model which had been expected to start on 29 February 2016 due to the further testing of the update by the KBA.[120] Volkswagen confirmed on 11 April 2016 that the Passat recall would be delayed as testing had revealed higher fuel consumption.[121]

Due to stricter environmental legislation, fixes for US vehicles are expected to take longer to produce and be more technically complex.[94]

Communication actions

In France, the MediaCom media agency, which buys advertising for Volkswagen, warned the French newspapers on 22 September that it would cancel planned Volkswagen and Audi campaigns in case they would cover the emission violations.[122] Given the scale that the scandal had already taken by that time, the threat had little effect on its coverage.

On the occasion of German Unity Day, Volkswagen launched an ad campaign in German Sunday-newspapers. In the ad Volkswagen stated that actually at this point it wanted to express its joy about the 25th anniversary of German reunification, its pride about having shaped the country together with all people for the last 25 years, to give thanks for the confidence of the customers it had experienced during all this time and that it wanted to thank all its employees and trade partners in Germany, but concluded that it wants to express in one sentence, that it will do everything to win back the confidence of its customers.[123]

New orders

Volkswagen's Belgian importer, D'Ieteren, announced that it would offer free engine upgrades to 800 customers who had ordered a vehicle with a diesel engine that was likely to have been fitted with illegal software.[124][125]

Sales of vehicles with EA 189 engines were halted in some European countries, including Spain, Switzerland, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium and the UK.[124][126]

In the United States, VW has withdrawn its application for emissions certification for its 2016 diesel models, leaving thousands of vehicles stranded at ports. The company said the vehicles contain software that should have been disclosed to and certified by the EPA.[127] EPA has quarantined some 2016-models until it becomes clear that their catalysts perform the same on the road as they do in tests.[128]

Compensation

On 9 November 2015, Volkswagen announced that 482,000 diesel Audi and VW owners in the United States would be eligible to receive US$1,000 in vouchers, in addition to the US$2,000 it is offering current VW owners for trade-ins.[129] On 18 November 2015, VW said that approximately one quarter of the affected vehicle owners had applied to the program, which was estimated to cost at least $120 million in benefits.[130] VW confirmed that it is offering vouchers including to customers in Canada.[131] VW America said that accepting the gift cards does not prevent owners from filing lawsuits.[132] VW also created a claims fund, managed by the well-known mediation attorney Kenneth Feinberg, which will offer full compensation packages (in the form of cash, buy-backs, repairs or replacement cars) to the approximately 600,000 U.S. owners affected by the scandal.[133] Despite earlier hints to the contrary, in December 2015 VW CEO Matthias Müller said that customers outside the US and Canada should also expect some type of compensation package: "we are working on an attractive package, let’s call it compensation, for reduction in residual values in our cars”.[134][135] However, on 11 January 2016, a VW spokesman said “there won’t be compensation. All the indications are that residual values are unaffected”;[136] the company, which continued to face pressure from E.U. officials to compensate European drivers as well,[137] blamed the confusion on "a slight mistranslation”.[136] Accused by E.U. commissioner Elżbieta Bieńkowska that it is openly treating European consumers unfairly, VW asserted that the situation in US and Canadian markets, where confidence in diesel technology is "severely shaken" and clients need to wait longer for an engine fix due to tougher emissions standards, is not "automatically comparable" with other markets.[137]

On 21 April 2016, the federal district court for the Northern District of California, which was appointed in December 2015 (see below) to oversee almost all of the litigation in the United States, including claims filed by vehicle owners and state governments, announced that Volkswagen will offer its US customers "substantial compensation" and car buyback offers for nearly 500,000 2.0-litre vehicles, as part of a settlement aiming to resolve the emissions scandal in North America.[138] Former FBI Director Robert Mueller was appointed by the court as a mediator to oversee the ongoing settlement negotiations between claimants, regulators, and Volkswagen, who are required to produce a final "consent decree" by late June 2016.[139][140]

Consequences

Health consequences

Main article: Diesel exhaust

Deaths

A peer-reviewed study published in Environmental Research Letters estimated that approximately 59 premature deaths will be caused by the excess pollution produced between 2008 and 2015 by vehicles equipped with the defeat device in the U.S., the majority due to particulate pollution (87%) with the remainder due to ozone (13%). The study also found that that making these vehicles emissions compliant by the end of 2016 would avert an additional 130 early deaths.[141][142]

Earlier studies published in media sources, that had not been subjected to peer review, provided point estimates ranging from approximately 10 to 350 excess deaths in the U.S. related to the defeat devices based on varying assumptions.[143]

Non-fatal health impacts

NO
2
is a precursor to ground-level ozone and may cause respiratory problems "including asthma, bronchitis and emphysema".[144][145][146] Nitrogen oxides also amplify the effect of fine particulate soot that causes heart problems, a form of air pollution estimated to kill 50,000 in the United States annually.[147]

A peer-reviewed study published in Environmental Pollution estimated that the fraudulent emissions are associated with 45 thousand disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and a value of life lost of at least 39 billion US dollars.[148]

Environmental consequences

NOx are also regulated as a pollutant for their contribution to acid rain, and to formation of a visible brown cloud or smog due to both the visible nature of NO
2
, and the tropospheric ozone created by NO. NO and NO
2
are not greenhouse gases, whereas N
2
O
is.[149] NO
2
is a precursor to ground-level ozone.

Legal and financial repercussions

Government actions

Australia

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is investigating VW for possible violations of consumer and safety standards.[150]

Belgium

A special Dieselgate committee was set up in the Chamber of Representatives in October 2015.[151] The committee held hearings and finalized a report by consensus in March 2016, with recommendations for the government to implement, which was presented in plenary session on 21 April 2016 and near-unanimously approved on 28 April 2016.[152]

In January 2016, public broadcaster VRT reported on Opel Zafira cars having lower emissions after receiving an update since the Dieselgate scandal compared to before receiving the update. Opel denies deploying software updates influencing emissions, and the Economic Inspection of the Federal Government started an investigation on the request of Minister of Consumer Protection Kris Peeters.[153]

Brazil

Volkswagen Brazil has confirmed that 17,057 units of its Amarok mid-size pickup produced between 2011 and 2012 and sold in Brazil are equipped with the emissions cheating software. The Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (Ibama) launched an investigation, warning that VW could face fines up to R$50,000,000.[154]

Canada

Environment Canada announced that it had initiated proceedings to evaluate if "defeat devices" were installed in Volkswagen vehicles to bypass emission control tests in Canada.[155]

China

China's General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine announced the recall of 1,946 imported Tiguan SUVs and four imported Passat B6 sedans, in order to fix the emissions software problems.[156][157]

European Union

Government regulatory agencies and investigators have initiated proceedings in France, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Spain, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic and Romania. Several countries have called for a Europe-wide investigation.[158][159][160] The European Investment Bank (EIB) said it is considering recalling VW loans, and announced its own investigation into the matter.[161] On 27 October 2015, the European Parliament voted a resolution urging the bloc to establish a federal authority to oversee car-emissions, following reports in the press that top EU environmental officials had warned, since early 2013, that manufacturers are tweaking vehicles to perform better in the lab than on the road. The resolution urged for tougher emissions tests to be fully implemented in 2017, instead of being phased in between 2017–2019, as had been originally planned.[162] However, the European Commission proceeded with passing legislation that allowed the car industry an extra year before having to comply with the newer regulation. Also, it was revealed that the new "realistic" EU driving emissions test will continue to allow cars to emit more than twice the legal limit of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from 2019 and up to 50% more from 2021.[163] The legislation, opposed only by the Netherlands, is considered a great victory for the car industry, and has drawn stern critique from other MEPs. Dutch MEP Bas Eickhout referred to the new test as "a sham”,[163] while liberal democrat MEP Catherine Bearder described the legislation as "a disgraceful stitch-up by national governments, who are once again putting the interests of carmakers ahead of public health".[163] The EU Parliament has voted to establish a special committee to investigate whether regulators and executive officials, including the European Commission, have failed in their efforts to oversee the car industry and its pollution testing regimes.[164]

France

French authorities have opened an inquiry into Volkswagen over the rigging of emission tests, with prosecutors investigating suspicions of "aggravated deception".[126] Other cars from several makers were tested, including Renault and Peugeot, whose headquarters were raided by fraud investigators in January and April 2016, respectively. Renault has subsequently recalled 15,000 cars for emission testing and fixing.[165][166][167]

Germany

German prosecutors have launched an investigation against former Volkswagen chief executive Martin Winterkorn. Winterkorn had resigned over the scandal, saying he had no knowledge of the manipulation of emissions results.[168] A German prosecutor later clarified the status of these inquiries, saying it was looking into allegations of fraud from unidentified individuals, but that Winterkorn was not under formal investigation.[169] Police raided VW headquarters on 8 October 2015.[170] On 16 October 2015 there were 20 investigators working on the case, targeting "more than two, but a lot fewer than 10" VW staff.[171] The KBA is testing 50 cars from different manufacturers in November 2015, both in laboratory and on-road with PEMS.[172]

India

Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) has been instructed by the Indian government to investigate if vehicles from Volkswagen had circumvented Indian laws and regulations on vehicle emission testing. Ambuj Sharma, additional secretary at the Ministry of Heavy Industry, said: "ARAI has been asked to submit its report within a week."[173][174] The Indian Foundation of Transport, Research and Training (IFTRT) has demanded a probe into Volkswagen's Confirmation of Production process for vehicles sold in India.[175] Government of India has extended the deadline for the submission of the test results to the end of October 2015.[176]

Italy

Italy's competition regulator announced plans to investigate whether VW engaged in "improper commercial practices" when promoting its affected diesel vehicles.[177] On 15 October 2015, Italian police raided VW offices in Verona, and the company's Lamborghini offices in Bologna, placing six executives under investigation.[178]

Netherlands

Netherlands has spent billions of euros on subsidies in energy-efficient cars in the recent years. Jesse Klaver from the political party GroenLinks responded that the Netherlands must claim back money from the car manufacturers if it emerges that they have committed fraud in the Netherlands.[179]

Norway

Norway's prosecutors have opened a criminal investigation into possible economic crimes committed by VW.[180]

Romania

The Romanian Automotive Register (RAR) stopped issuing registration documents for VW vehicles equipped with Euro 5 diesel engines.[181]

South Africa

The departments of Environmental Affairs and Transport as well as the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications say they need to determine whether local cars have been affected by the rigging of US vehicle emissions tests.

South Korea

South Korea is the world’s eighth-largest diesel-car market.[182] Authorities there announced pollution control investigations into cars manufactured by Volkswagen and other European car-manufacturers. Park Pan-kyu, a deputy director at South Korea's environment ministry said: "If South Korean authorities find problems in the VW diesel cars, the probe could be expanded to all German diesel cars".[183] In November 2015, defeat devices were found in some Volkswagen models, which were then ordered to be recalled by the Environment Minister, who also issued a fine of 14,100,000,000.[184] The country's environmental agency also filed criminal charges against VW, seeking up to $48 billion in penalties. Johannes Thammer, managing director of Audi Volkswagen Korea, was placed under investigation and faces up to five years in prison and a fine of up to 30,000,000.[185] VW’s recall plan for South Korea, submitted on 6 January 2016, was rejected by the authorities, as it failed to meet a number of key legal requirements.[182] Authorities are also reported to have rejected a revised plan on 23 March 2016 for the same reasons.[186]

Spain

A Spanish court has opened a criminal probe against Volkswagen AG, aiming to establish whether the company's actions broke any local laws.[187]

Sweden

Sweden's chief prosecutor is considering starting a preliminary investigation into Volkswagen's emissions violations.[188]

Switzerland

Switzerland has banned sales of Volkswagen diesel cars, marking the most severe step taken so far by a government in reaction to the emissions crisis.[189]

United Kingdom

The Department for Transport announced on 24 September that it would begin re-testing cars from a variety of manufacturers to ensure the use of "defeat devices" is not industry wide.[190] The UK Parliamentary Transport Select Committee opened an enquiry into Volkswagen Emissions Violations with evidence sessions on 12 October 2015 and 25 January 2016. The Select Committee published a letter from Paul Willis, Managing Director of Volkswagen Group UK Ltd of 21 December 2015 stating: "In very simple terms, the software did amend the NOx characteristics in testing. The vehicles did meet EU5 standards, so it clearly contributed to meeting the EU5 standards in testing"[191]

A report on “real world” tests commissioned by the Government published in April 2016 showed toxic emissions from 37 diesel engines up to 14 times higher than had been claimed, with every vehicle exceeding the legal level of nitrogen oxide emissions.[192] Only Volkswagen group vehicles were found to have test cycle detection software. The lack of compensation for vehicle owners is being questioned.

United States

The EPA announced that should the allegations be proven, Volkswagen Group could face fines of up to US$37,500 per vehicle (approximately US$18 billion in total). VW suspended sales of TDI-equipped cars in the US on 20 September 2015.[193] In addition to possible civil fines, media reports state that the United States Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division is conducting a criminal probe of Volkswagen AG's conduct.[194][195] The United States House Energy Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations has announced that it would hold a hearing into the Volkswagen scandal. New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said that his investigation was already underway and warned: "No company should be allowed to evade our environmental laws or promise consumers a fake bill of goods".[196] Over 25 other states' attorneys general, as well as the FBI in Detroit, were reported to be involved in similar investigations.[180]

Following the scandal, the EPA decided to broaden its investigations, focusing on 28 diesel-powered models made by BMW, Chrysler, General Motors, Land Rover and Mercedes-Benz. The agency will initially focus on one used vehicle of each model, and will widen the probe should it encounter suspicious data.[197] On 12 November 2015, the Federal Bureau of Investigation confirmed to engineering magazine Ingeniøren that FBI in Detroit has an ongoing investigation,[198] after previous unconfirmed reports.[199] The EPA has described the hidden VW pollution as "knowing endangerment".[200]

On 4 January 2016, the Justice Department, on behalf of the EPA, filed a lawsuit against VW in a federal court in Detroit, Michigan. The complaint, seeking up to $46 billion in penalties for Clean Air Act violations,[201] alleges that VW equipped certain 2.0 and 3.0 liter diesel-engine vehicles with emissions cheating software, causing NOx pollution to exceed EPA's standards during normal driving conditions. The suit further claimed that "efforts to learn the truth about the (excess) emissions … were impeded and obstructed by material omissions and misleading information provided by VW entities",[201] while "so far recall discussions with the company have not produced an acceptable way forward";[90][202] On 9 January 2016, US officials criticized VW for citing German law in order to withhold documents from a group of states investigating the company's actions. New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman also complained over VW's slowness in producing documents from its US files, claiming the company "has sought to delay responses until it completes its ‘independent investigation’ several months from now".[201]

On 12 January 2016, US regulators rejected VW's recall plans for its affected 2.0 liter diesel engines, submitted to CARB in December 2015, claiming that these "do not adequately address overall impacts on vehicle performance, emissions and safety".[203][204] Volkswagen confirmed that its discussions with CARB will continue, and said that the company is working on bringing "a package together which satisfies our customers first and foremost and then also the regulators".[203] The states of West Virginia, New Mexico, Texas and Harris County, Texas, all filed separate lawsuits seeking restitution from VW. The company also faces investigations by 48 U.S. state attorneys (as of February 2016).[205][206]

On 29 March 2016, Volkswagen was additionally sued by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission for false advertising due to fraudulent claims made by the company in its promotion of the affected models, which touted the "environmental and economic advantages" of diesel engines and contained claims of low emissions output. The suit was consolidated into existing litigation over the matter in San Francisco, which would allow the FTC to participate in global settlements over the matter.[207]

Private actions

By 27 September 2015 at least 34 class-action lawsuits had been filed in the U.S.[208][209][210] and Canada[211][212] on behalf of Volkswagen and Audi owners, accusing VW of breach of contract, fraudulent concealment, false advertising, and violations of federal and state laws, and positing the "diminished value" of diesels that will be fixed to conform with pollution regulations, due to possible reductions in horsepower and fuel efficiency.[213] According to Reuters, one reason class action lawyers were able to mobilize so fast is that the company's marketing to upscale professionals, including jurists, had backfired.[214]

As of 30 September 2015 at least one investor lawsuit seeking class action status for holders of Volkswagen American Depositary Receipts had been filed in the United States seeking compensation for the drop in stock value due to the emissions scandal.[215]

On 7 October, the Los Angeles Times reported that the number of class-action lawsuits filed had grown to more than 230.[216]

On 19 November 2015, ABC News Australia reported that more than 90,000 VW, Audi and Skoda diesel vehicle owners had filed a class action lawsuit against VW in the country's Federal Court.[132]

On 8 December 2015, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order consolidating over 500 class actions against Volkswagen into a single multidistrict litigation, captioned In re: Volkswagen 'Clean Diesel' Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2672, and transferred the entire MDL to judge Charles R. Breyer of the federal district court for the Northern District of California.[217]

On 21 January 2016, Judge Breyer held a hearing on the requests by over 150 plaintiff's attorneys for some kind of leadership role in the gigantic Volkswagen MDL, of which over 50 sought to serve as lead counsel or to chair the plaintiffs' steering committee.[218] More than 100 of those attorneys tried to squeeze into his San Francisco courtroom to argue their requests in person, and some of them had to stand in the aisles or in the outside hallway.[218] That afternoon, Judge Breyer issued an order naming 22 attorneys to a plaintiffs' steering committee, and of those, selected Elizabeth Cabraser of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein as chair of the committee.[218] On the other side, Volkswagen hired Robert Giuffra of Sullivan & Cromwell as its lead defense counsel in the MDL.[219]

On 14 March 2016, Volkswagen AG was sued in Germany for allegedly failing to inform financial markets in a timely manner about defeat devices used in diesel engines. The suit on behalf of 278 institutional investors seeks €3.3 billion (US$3.7 billion at March 2016 exchange rate) in compensation.[220]

In November 2015, Moody's Investors Service downgraded VW's bond credit rating from A2 to A3.[221] Fitch Ratings downgraded Volkswagen's Long-term Issuer Default Rating by two notches to BBB+, with a negative outlook.[129][222]

In May 2016, The Children's Investment Fund Management, run by Chris Hohn and retaining a 2% stake in VW preference stock, launched a campaign aiming to overhaul the company's executive pay system, arguing that “for years management has been richly rewarded with massive compensation despite presiding over a productivity and profit collapse", thereby leading to an "aggressive management behavior" and contributing to the diesel emission scandal. [223]

Models affected

Vehicle line-up at 2012 Volkswagen Great Canadian Clean Diesel Tour.

By 22 September 2015, Volkswagen had admitted that 11 million vehicles sold worldwide are affected in addition to the 480,000 vehicles with 2.0 L TDI engines sold in the US.[224] According to Volkswagen, vehicles sold in other countries with the 1.6 L and 2.0 L 4-cylinder TDI engine known as Type EA189 are also affected. This software is also said to affect EA188 and the 2015 EA288 generation of the four-cylinder.[225] Worldwide, around 1.2 million Skodas[226] and 2.1 million Audis may contain the software, including TTs and Qs.[227] VW states that Euro6 model in Germany are not affected, while 2015 US models with the same EA288 engines are affected. This suggests that normal-operation measurements that place the EA288 NOx emissions between the two standards' limits were readily available at VW headquarters in Germany. According to Müller, the 1.2 and 2.0 liter models may be updated by software, whereas the around 3 million 1.6 liter require various hardware solutions, and some cars may even be replaced. The cars are so diverse that many different solutions are required.[228]

Over one quarter of VW's sales in the US are diesel-powered vehicles. The corporation has chosen a market strategy that emphasizes clean diesel over electric cars or hybrid electric vehicles.[229]

The vehicles affected by the recall in the US include the following model years:[230][231][232][233][234]

  • 2009–2015 Audi A3 2.0 L TDI
  • 2009–2015 VW Beetle 2.0 L TDI
  • 2009–2015 Beetle Convertible 2.0 L TDI
  • 2009–2015 VW Golf 2.0 L TDI
  • 2015 VW Golf Sportwagen 2.0 L TDI
  • 2009–2015 VW Jetta 2.0 L TDI
  • 2009–2014 Jetta Sportwagen 2.0 L TDI
  • 2012–2015 VW Passat 2.0 L TDI.

The EPA revealed on 2 November 2015 that VW had shipped additional diesel models with defeat devices, including the 2014 VW Touareg and the 2015 Porsche Cayenne. Model year 2016 Audi Quattro diesels were also found affected, including several 2016 Audi Quattro models (the 2016 Audi Quattro A6, A7, A8, A8L, and Q5).[235] Cynthis Giles, the EPA Assistant Administrator for Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, called out the company for further refusing to take responsibility for its failure to comply with the law. Under US federal Clean Air Act, VW could be liable for up to $375 million in fines.[236]

Resale value

As of 26 October 2015, the resale value of affected model cars in the US was down from 5 to nearly 16 percent depending on model as compiled by Black Book and Kelley Blue Book based on used car auction prices, the volume of which was also down.[237]

On 15 March 2016, Volkswagen Financial Services took a writedown of 353,000,000 to cover a potential decline in the residual value of the fleet of its leased cars.[238]

Stock value

Price of Volkswagen AG (VOW.DE) stock, Adjusted Close. Width of line shows Volume. Text in green is the percent difference from previous day's close. In red is the percent difference from the close on 17 September 2015[239]
Price of Volkswagen AG (VOW.DE) stock 17 September–5 October 2015[239]
Date Adj Close Volume % diff from 17 Sep % diff from previous day
17 September16760,6000.00%
18 September161112,700-3.61%-3.61%
21 September1341,496,700-20.13%-17.14%
22 September1113,058,700-33.57%-16.83%
23 September1192,381,300-28.97%6.92%
24 September1191,542,800-28.97%0.00%
25 September116880,700-30.97%-2.82%
28 September107865,400-36.02%-7.31%
29 September103513,700-38.29%-3.55%
30 September105416,500-37.31%1.60%
1 October105477,700-38.59%0.10%
2 October101588,700-39.58%-3.71%
5 October103754,400-38.59%1.63%

On 21 September 2015 the first day of trading after the EPA's Notice of Violation to Volkswagen became public, share prices of Volkswagen AG fell 20% on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.[240] On 22 September, the stock fell another 12%. On 23 September, the stock quickly fell 10.5%, dropping below €100 to a record 4-year low before regaining some lost ground.[241][242] Share prices of other German automakers were also affected, with BMW down 4.9% and Daimler down 5.8%.[243]

Qatar, one of the biggest VW shareholders with a 17% stake in the company, lost nearly $5 billion as the company stock value fell.[244]

Sales

The US sale of Volkswagens was 23,882 vehicles in November 2015, a 24.7% decline from November 2014.[245][246] While in South Korea, sales in November rose 66% to 4,517 units from a year ago due to the Volkswagen's aggressive marketing efforts such as discount of up to 18,000,000 (US$15,600 at December 2015 exchange rates) for some models.[247]

In Great Britain, the scandal did not affect sales, which increased in 2016 to an all-point high, placing VW second in the league of best-selling cars. [248]

Media reaction

The Volkswagen TDI emissions scandal has received widespread negative media exposure,[249] with headlines fronting the websites of multiple news gathering and reporting organizations.[33][67][250] Reuters said that the crisis at Volkswagen could be a bigger threat to the German economy than the consequences of the 2015 Greek sovereign debt default.[251] Deutsche Welle, one of Germany's state broadcasters, said that a "lawsuit tsunami" was headed for Volkswagen and that the scandal had dealt a blow to the country's psyche and "Made in Germany" brand.[252] Popular Mechanics said that the scandal "is much worse than a recall", highlighting that Volkswagen had engaged in a pattern of "cynical deceit".[253]

Public polling

Despite the scandal, one poll conducted for Bild suggested that the majority of Germans (55%) still have "great faith" in Volkswagen, with over three-quarters believing that other carmakers are equally guilty of manipulation.[254] Similarly, a poll conducted by the management consultancy Prophet in October 2015 indicated that two-thirds of Germans believe the scandal to be exaggerated and continue to regard VW as a builder of "excellent cars".[255] A survey by Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management, Brand Imperatives and Survata said that nearly 50% of US consumers had either a positive or very positive impression of Volkswagen, while 7.5% had a "very negative" impression.[256] Another US survey by market researcher AutoPacific found that 64% of vehicle owners do not trust Volkswagen and only 25% of them have a positive view of Volkwagen following the scandal.[257][258]

Reactions

Political figures

German Chancellor Angela Merkel stated she hoped that all facts in the matter would be made known promptly, urging "complete transparency". She additionally noted that Germany's Transport Minister, Alexander Dobrindt, was in ongoing communication with Volkswagen.[259]

The German Green Party accused Merkel of knowing about the defeat devices with a "wink".[260]

Michel Sapin, the French Finance Minister, called for an investigation of diesel-powered cars that would encompass the entire continent of Europe.[261]

Catherine Bearder, MEP for South East England, commented on 27 October 2015 in the European Parliament that "we now have the political momentum for a radical overhaul that will ensure carmakers cannot dodge the rules", defending an EU resolution meant to specifically "cut deadly pollution from diesel vehicles".[162] However, when the European Commission proceeded with passing legislation that allowed the car industry more time to comply with the newer regulation, while also permitting cars, even under the more "realistic" tests, to emit more than twice the legal limit of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from 2019 and up to 50% more from 2021, Bearder denounced the legislation as "a disgraceful stitch-up by national governments, who are once again putting the interests of carmakers ahead of public health".[163]

London Assembly member Stephen Knight suggested on 1 November 2015 that diesel vehicles should either be banned in the future, or face stringent tests before being allowed to enter London's low-emissions zone. The city's deputy mayor for the environment, Matthew Pencharz, responded that such measures could lead to serious economic problems.[262]

Automotive industry and other commentators

Major car manufacturers, including Toyota, GM, PSA Peugeot Citroen, Renault, Mazda, Daimler (Mercedes Benz), and Honda, issued press statements reaffirming their vehicles' compliance with all regulations and legislation for the markets in which they operate; The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders described the issue as affecting "just one company", with no evidence to suggest that the whole industry might be affected.[263]

Renault-Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn said it would be difficult for an automaker to conceal internally an effort to falsify vehicle emissions data, such as has happened at Volkswagen AG: "I don't think you can do something like this hiding in the bushes."[264]

Jim Holder, the editorial director of Haymarket Automotive, which publishes WhatCar and AutoCar, opined that there had never been a scandal in the automotive industry of this size.[265]

A commentary in Spiegel Online argued that the VW scandal will affect the entire German industry, and that German companies operating abroad will face a decrease in competitiveness.[266]

Alan Brown, chairman of the Volkswagen National Dealer Advisory Council, commented on the scandal's negative impact on US dealers, who were already struggling with overpriced products and a deteriorating relationship between the company and the dealer body.[267] Car and Driver similarly emphasized VW's inability to efficiently operate in the US market, while also suggesting that the company had grossly underestimated the EPA's power, and inexplicably failed to go public before the story broke, despite receiving ample warning.[268]

Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk was asked about his opinion whether the scandal will weaken the consumer's view on green technologies; he responded saying he expects the opposite to happen: "What Volkswagen is really showing is that we've reached the limit of what's possible with diesel and gasoline. The time has come to move to a new generation of technology."[269]

Similarly, analysts at Fitch suggested the VW diesel emissions crisis was likely to affect the entire automotive industry, with petrol cars potentially enjoying a revival in Europe and greater investment being poured into electric vehicles.[61] Other commentators argued that the diesel engine will nevertheless regain its footing in the market, due to its international indispensability, low CO2 emissions and strong presence in the US pickup– and commercial–truck segments.[268]

On 29 September 2015, S&P Dow Jones Indices and RobecoSAM stated that Volkswagen AG's stock will be de-listed from the Dow Jones Sustainability indexes after close of trading on 5 October 2015. Among the reasons for the de-listing, the statement issued by RobecoSAM cited social and ethical reasons, and confirmed that VW will no longer be identified as an Industry Group Leader in the "Automobiles & Components" industry group.[270]

In early October, Green Car Journal rescinded its Green Car of the Year awards, for models that "best raise the bar in environmental performance", that were given to the 2009 VW Jetta TDI and 2010 Audi A3 TDI models.[271]

The VW scandal more generally raised awareness over the high levels of pollution being emitted by diesel vehicles built by a wide range of carmakers, including Volvo, Renault, Mercedes, Jeep, Hyundai, Citroen, BMW, Mazda, Fiat, Ford and Peugeot.[22][23] Independent tests carried out by ADAC proved that, under normal driving conditions, diesel vehicles including the Volvo S60, Renault's Espace Energy and the Jeep Renegade, exceeded legal European emission limits for nitrogen oxide (NOx) by more than 10 times.[23] Researchers have criticized the inadequacy of current regulations and called for the use of a UN-sanctioned test that better reflects real-life driving conditions. The test is not due to come into force until 2017, with critics saying that car firms have lobbied fiercely to delay its implementation due to the high cost of meeting stricter environmental controls.[22] The Washington Post also reported that in the late 1990s, EPA engineers at Virginia Testing Laboratory had built a system called ROVER, designed to test a car's emissions on the road. The project was shut down in 2001, despite preliminary tests indicating gaps between emissions from lab tests and real world tests of about 10 to 20 percent.[272]

In December 2015, a group of business and environmental leaders, including Tesla CEO Elon Musk, addressed an open letter to CARB, urging the agency to absolve VW of recalling the 85,000 diesel vehicles affected by the scandal in the US, and argued that VW should instead be asked to allocate resources to an accelerated rollout of zero-emissions vehicles ("cure the air, not the cars"). The letter, which includes a 5-step legally enforcable plan, argues that this course of action could result in a "10 for 1 or greater reduction in pollutant emissions as compared to the pollution associated with the diesel fleet cheating", while suggesting that the affected vehicles on the road in California "represent an insignificant portion of total vehicles emissions in the State" and "do not, individually, present any emissions-related risk to their owners or occupants".[273][274] Similar requests were put forward by the American Lung Association, who petitioned the EPA to determine Volkswagen to promote zero-emissions vehicles, build sustainable transport infrastructure and retrofit older diesel models with superior emissions controls.[275]

Previous defeat device cases

Main article: Defeat device

The Volkswagen TDI diesel emissions case is not the first use of defeat devices, nor the first time automakers have taken advantage of their foreknowledge of the specific lab test conditions in order to engage emissions controls only during testing, but not during normal driving.[276]

In 1973 Chrysler, Ford Motor Company, General Motors, Toyota, and Volkswagen had to remove ambient temperature switches which affected emissions, though the companies denied intentional cheating and said that strategies like enriching fuel mixture during cold engine warm-up periods could reduce overall pollution.[277][278][279] The switches were ordered removed from production but cars already on the road did not have to be recalled, and fines were relatively modest.[278][279]

In 1996 General Motors had to pay a near-record fine of $11 million, and recall 470,000 vehicles, because of ECU software programmed to disengage emissions controls during conditions known to exist when the cars were not being lab tested by the EPA.[280] The model year 1991–1995 Cadillacs were programmed to simply enrich the engine's fuel mixture, increasing carbon monoxide (CO) and unburned hydrocarbon (HC) pollution, any time the car's air conditioning or heater was turned on, since the testing protocol specified they would be off.[280]

In 1998, Honda Motor Company had to spend $267 million to correct the disabling of the misfire monitoring device on 1.6 million 1996 and 1997 model year vehicles, and Ford Motor Company paid $7.8 million for programming 60,000 1997 Ford Econoline vans to keep emissions low during the 20-minute EPA test routine, and then disabling the emissions controls during normal highway cruising.[281]

Another timer-based strategy was used by seven heavy truck manufacturers, Caterpillar Inc., Cummins Engine Company, Detroit Diesel Corporation, Mack Trucks, Navistar International, Renault Vehicules Industriels, and Volvo Trucks, who in 1998 paid the largest ever fine to date, $83.4 million, for, in the same manner as Volkswagen, programming trucks to keep NOx emissions low during the test cycle, and then disabling the controls and emitting up to three times the maximum during normal highway driving.[282]

The goal of both the Ford and the heavy truck defeat devices was better fuel economy than could be achieved under pollution limits.[282] The major truck manufacturers also had to spend up to $1 billion to correct the problem, which affected 1.3 million heavy duty diesel trucks.[276][282]

While Volkswagen's actions have significant precedents, the Center for Auto Safety's Clarence Ditlow said that Volkswagen "took it to another level of sophisticated deception we've never seen before."[276]

See also

Notes

  1. "Abgas-Skandal bei VW – Techniker warnte schon 2011 vor Manipulationen". Bild.
  2. "VW scandal: Carmaker was warned by Bosch about test-rigging software in 2007". International Business Times UK.
  3. 1 2 3 4 http://www.volkswagen.co.uk/assets/common/pdf/brochures/old-brochure/Passat-Saloon/Passat-Saloon-August-2008.pdf
  4. 1 2 "VW says sold first UK vehicle with emission test rigging software in 2008". Reuters UK. Retrieved 27 October 2015.
  5. 1 2 http://www.volkswagen.co.uk/assets/common/pdf/brochures/old-brochure/Passat-Estate/Passat-Estate-July-2009.pdf
  6. 1 2 "Volkswagen says 800,000 cars may have false CO2 levels - BBC News", Bbc.com, 4 November 2015, retrieved 4 November 2015
  7. "Volkswagen European TDI repair for diesel cars", Autoweek.com, retrieved 27 December 2015
  8. 1 2 Bruce, Chris (25 November 2015). "VW explains fixes for 1.6, 2.0 diesels in Europe". Autoblog. Retrieved 29 November 2015.
  9. 1 2 3 Andreas Cremer (9 December 2015), "VW says CO2 emissions scandal not as bad as feared", Reuters.com, retrieved 9 December 2015
  10. "Volkswagen's US chief leaves troubled German carmaker". BBC News. Retrieved 10 March 2016.
  11. "'It Was Installed For This Purpose,' VW's U.S. CEO Tells Congress About Defeat Device". NPR. 8 October 2015. Retrieved 19 October 2015.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Brooks, Phillip A. (18 September 2015). "VW Notice of Violation, Clean Air Act (September 18, 2015)" (PDF). US Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  13. 1 2 Gardner, Timothy; Lienert, Paul; Morgan, David (24 September 2015), After year of stonewalling, VW stunned US regulators with confession, Reuters, retrieved 25 September 2015
  14. Jordans, Frank (21 September 2015). "EPA: Volkswagon Thwarted Pollution Regulations For 7 Years". CBS Detroit. Associated Press. Retrieved 24 September 2015.
  15. 1 2 "Abgasaffäre: VW-Chef Müller spricht von historischer Krise". Spiegel. Reuters. 28 September 2015. Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  16. 1 2 Ewing, Jack (22 September 2015). "Volkswagen Says 11 Million Cars Worldwide Are Affected in Diesel Deception". The New York Times. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  17. 1 2 3 Franco, Vicente; Sánchez, Francisco Posada; German, John; Mock, Peter. "Real-World Exhaust Emissions From Modern Diesel Cars" (PDF). Retrieved 26 September 2015.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Thompson, Gregory J.; Carder, Daniel K.; et al. (15 May 2014). "In-Use Emissions Testing of Light-Duty Diesel Vehicles in the United States" (PDF). WVU Center for Alternative Fuels, Engines, and Emissions. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  19. 1 2 3 4 5 Bigelow, Pete (23 September 2015). "West Virginia researcher describes how Volkswagen got caught". Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  20. "VW could face 'long legal nightmare'". BBC News. 24 September 2015.
  21. NOX control technologies for Euro 6 Diesel passenger cars, Market penetration and experimental performance assessment, Liuhanzi Yang, Vicente Franco, Alex Campestrini, John German, and Peter Mock. ICCT in collaboration with ADAC, 3 September 2015.
  22. 1 2 3 "Volkswagen emissions scandal: More carmakers implicated as tests reveal pollution levels of popular diesels", Independent.co.uk, retrieved 1 October 2015
  23. 1 2 3 "Wide range of cars emit more pollution in realistic driving tests, data shows", Theguardian.com, retrieved 1 October 2015
  24. Volkswagen and Cheating Software, Schneier on Security, 30 September 2015
  25. VW's Cheating Proves We Must Open Up the Internet of Things, Klint Finley, Wired, 24 September 2015.
  26. Volkswagen's Diesel Fraud Makes Critic of Secret Code a Prophet, NY Times on Eben Moglen, 22 September 2015.
  27. "Ingenieure gestehen Installation von Manipulations-Software". bild.de.
  28. 1 2 Jack Ewing (4 October 2015). "Volkswagen Engine-Rigging Scheme Said to Have Begun in 2008". New York Times.
  29. William Boston (5 October 2015). "Volkswagen Emissions Investigation Zeroes In on Two Engineers". The Wall Street Journal.
  30. Jääskeläinen, Hannu; Khair, Magdi K. (May 2015). "Common Rail Fuel Injection". DieselNet Technology Guide. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  31. Robert Bosch GmbH (7 June 2004). "The Common Rail Diesel Injection System Explained". Swedespeed.com. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  32. 1 2 3 "400,000 VW cars in UK need engine modification". BBC News. Retrieved 27 October 2015.
  33. 1 2 Yerak, Becky; Karp, Gregory (21 September 2015). "Volkswagen owners should be nervous about emissions scandal, experts say". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  34. Hall, Steve (5 March 2015). "VW Touts TDI Clean Diesel With 'Golden Sisters' Video Series on Tumblr". Marketing Land. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  35. Lucas Mearian (24 September 2015). "EPA details how VW software thwarted emission tests". Computerworld.
  36. SPIEGEL ONLINE, Hamburg, Germany (14 October 2015). "Volkswagen: Dutzende Manager in VW-Skandal verwickelt". SPIEGEL ONLINE.
  37. Hicks, Maurice (December 2014). "Summary of Fuel Economy Performance (Public Version)" (PDF). NHTSA/CAFE. p. 9. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
  38. "Taxpayers Paid $51M in Green Car Subsidies Linked to VW Diesels". Motor Trend. 23 September 2015.
  39. 1 2 Analyzing on-road emissions of light-duty vehicles with Portable Emission Measurement Systems (PEMS), Weiss, M., Bonnel, P., Hummel, R., Manfredi, U., Colombo, R., Lanappe, G., Le Lijour, P., and Sculati, M., JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, EUR 24697 EN, (2011).
  40. A complimentary emissions test for light-duty vehicles: Assessing the technical feasibility of candidate procedures (2013) Joint Research Center Institute for Energy and Transport
  41. Jim Brunsden and Christian Oliver. "EU failed to heed emissions warnings in 2013" Financial Times, October 2015
  42. Oliver, Christian; Brunsden, Jim; Vasagar, Jeevan; Pickard, Jim. "EU warned on devices at centre of VW scandal two years ago". Financial Times. Retrieved 27 September 2015.
  43. "Air Pollution in the UK report". defra.gov.uk. United Kingdom: Defra.
  44. 1 2 3 "Meet John German: the man who helped expose Volkswagen's emissions scandal". The Guardian. 26 September 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2015.
  45. Abgasexperte Peter Mock: Der Mann, der aus Versehen VW ins Wanken brachte, der Spiegel, 23 September 2015.
  46. JAFFE, ERIC (24 September 2015). "The Study That Brought Down Volkswagen". Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  47. 1 2 "WVU study found elevated levels of emissions from Volkswagen vehicles". West Virginia University. 24 September 2015.
  48. Vlasic, Bill; Kessler, Aaron M. (21 September 2015). "It Took E.P.A. Pressure to Get VW to Admit Fault". New York Times. Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  49. 1 2 "How A Little Lab In West Virginia Caught Volkswagen's Big Cheat". NPR. 24 September 2015. Retrieved 16 September 2015.
  50. Franco, Vicente; Posada Sánchez, Francisco; et al. (11 October 2014). "Real-world exhaust emissions from modern diesel cars". International Council on Clean Transportation. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  51. Ramsey, Mike (23 September 2015). "Volkswagen Emissions Problem Exposed by Routine University Research". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 23 September 2015.
  52. Thompson, Gregory J. (15 May 2014). "In-Use Emissions Testing of Light-Duty Diesel Vehicles in the United States" (PDF). Center for Alternative Fuels, Engines & Emissions, West Virginia University. Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  53. "Colorado pollution data helped expose VW emissions cheat". The Denver Post.
  54. "Background on the 2.0L diesel engines at the core of the Volkswagen emissions testing debacle". Green Car Congress. 21 September 2015.
  55. "California: Light-duty: Emissions". Transport Policy.
  56. 1 2 "US: Light-duty: Emissions". Transport Policy.
  57. 1 2 3 4 REGULATION (EC) No 715/2007 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 20 June 2007. Articles 3, 5, 13 on pages 5-9
  58. FAQ - Air pollutant emissions standards European Commission, 25 September 2015. Quote: Article 5 (2) of Euro 6 Regulation 715/2007/EC prohibits the use of defeat devices. Article 3(10) defines defeat device as any element of design which senses temperature, vehicle speed, engine speed (RPM), transmission gear, manifold vacuum or any other parameter for the purpose of activating, modulating, delaying or deactivating the operation of any part of the emission control system, that reduces the effectiveness of the emission control system under conditions which may reasonably be expected to be encountered in normal vehicle operation and use.
  59. 1 2 Eric Jaffe. "The West Virginia Study That Started the Volkswagen Scandal - CityLab". CityLab. Retrieved 27 October 2015.
  60. Schiermeier, Quirin (24 September 2015). "The science behind the Volkswagen emissions scandal". Nature. (updated 25 September 2015)
  61. 1 2 Mathiesen, Karl (11 March 2015), "Have diesel cars been unfairly demonised for air pollution?", The Guardian, retrieved 30 September 2015
  62. "EPA, California Notify Volkswagen of Clean Air Act Violations". US Environmental Protection Agency. 18 September 2015. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  63. "Enforcement Basic Information". EPA. Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  64. "What is a Notice of Violation (NOV)". EPA. Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  65. 1 2 Grimmelmann, James (24 September 2015). "The VW Scandal Is Just the Beginning". Mother Jones (magazine). Retrieved 27 September 2015.
  66. Hruska, Joel (23 September 2015). "How independent researchers tracked down VW's diesel software hacks". Retrieved 27 September 2015.
  67. 1 2 Davenport, Coral; Ewing, Jack (20 September 2015). "Volkswagen to Stop Sales of Diesel Cars Involved in Recall". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 September 2015.
  68. "Volkswagen Drops 23% After Admitting Diesel Emissions Cheat". Bloomberg. 21 September 2015.
  69. "VW's Emissions Cheating Found by Curious Clean-Air Group". Bloomberg. 20 September 2015.
  70. "Volkswagen under investigation over illegal software that masks emissions", The Guardian
  71. 1 2 Ewing, Jack; Mouawad, Jad (23 October 2015). "Directors Say Volkswagen Delayed Informing Them of Trickery". The New York Times (The New York Times Company). Retrieved 25 December 2015.
  72. Volkswagen Group. "Volkswagen Group Statement by Prof. Dr. Winterkorn". volkswagenag.com.
  73. Landler, Mark (8 November 2006). "After Power Struggle, Volkswagen Ousts Its Chief".
  74. 1 2 "Volkswagen admits it 'totally screwed up' as emissions rigging scandal spreads". euronews.com. 22 September 2015. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  75. 1 2 "Volkswagen diesel scandal threatens to ruin its credibility and value". Los Angeles Times. 22 September 2015. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  76. Farrell, Sean (23 September 2015). "Volkswagen CEO Martin Winterkorn quits over diesel emissions scandal". The Guardian. Retrieved 23 September 2015.
  77. Moore, Thad (23 September 2015). "Volkswagen CEO quits amid emissions cheating scandal". The Washington Post. Retrieved 23 September 2015.
  78. Woodyard, Chris (23 September 2015). "VW CEO resigns in cheating scandal". The Detroit Free Press. p. 1B.
  79. "Volkswagen staff acted criminally, says board member". BBC News. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
  80. "Hinweise gab es seit 2007: Wieso überhörte VW so viele Warnungen?" [There were hints since 2007: Why Did VW Ignore So Many Warnings?] (in German). Germany: Bild. 27 September 2015. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  81. "Olaf Lies wirft Volkswagen-Managern kriminelles Verhalten vor" [Olaf Lies Accuses Volkswagen Managers of Criminal Behaviour]. SPIEGEL ONLINE (in German). 30 September 2015. Retrieved 1 October 2015.
  82. "VW-Skandal: Topmanager schwer belastet" [VW Scandal: Top Managers Under Intense Pressure]. Süddeutsche Zeitung (in German). Retrieved 1 October 2015.
  83. Cremer, Andreas (28 September 2015). "Germany investigates VW's ex-boss over fraud allegations". Reuters. Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  84. Doll, Nikolaus (28 September 2015). "Abgas Skandal: Für die Trickser wird es eng" [Exhaust Fume Scandal: It Will Be Tight For The Tricksters]. Die Welt (in German). Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  85. Lucas Mearian (23 September 2015). "A diesel whodunit: How software let VW cheat on emissions". Computerworld.
  86. "VW’s Crisis Strategy: Forward, Reverse, U-Turn - The New York Times", Nytimes.com, retrieved 27 February 2016
  87. "Volkswagen hires compliance manager Christine Hohmann-Dennhardt from rival Daimler to help clean up emissions scandal", Cityam.com, retrieved 27 February 2016
  88. 1 2 "Volkswagen says false Carbon dioxider emissions affect only 36,000 cars", Cnbc.com, retrieved 9 December 2015
  89. "EPA: Volkswagen cheated emissions standards on 2009 to 2016 diesel vehicles", Usatoday.com, retrieved 21 November 2015
  90. 1 2 3 "United States Files Complaint Against Volkswagen, Audi and Porsche for Alleged Clean Air Act Violations". US Dept of Justice. 4 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  91. "Volkswagen admits rigging of 8 mln cars in EU -Handelsblatt". Reuters.
  92. "1.2m UK vehicles affected in VW scandal", BBC News, 30 September 2015, retrieved 1 October 2015
  93. Kröger, Michael (30 September 2015), "Volkswagen: Aufsichtsrat sucht die Schuldigen", Der Spiegel, retrieved 1 October 2015
  94. 1 2 3 Geuss, Megan (17 December 2015). "Germany approves 30-minute software update fix for cheating Volkswagen diesels". Ars Technica. Retrieved 17 December 2015.
  95. "What happens if my VW car has emissions cheating software?". The Daily Telegraph. 30 September 2015.
  96. Davies, Alex (22 September 2015), "VW Owners Aren't Going to Like the Fixes for Their Diesels", Wired (website), retrieved 1 October 2015
  97. "New Volkswagen chairman Poetsch pleads for time", BBC News, 7 October 2015, retrieved 7 October 2015
  98. "Volkswagen U.S. CEO: It may take years to fix cars", USA Today, retrieved 8 October 2015
  99. "VW's U.S. Chief Tells Congress of a Wait to Fix Diesel Cars". The New York Times. 8 October 2015.
  100. 1 2 3 Fisher, Jake (9 October 2015), "Consumer Reports Tests VW Diesel Fuel Economy, Performance in 'Cheat' Mode; Tests reveal different results when the 'cheat' settings are used in the real world", Consumer Reports
  101. "VW emissions scandal: everything you need to know". Auto Express. Retrieved 27 October 2015.
  102. Bryant, Chris; Wright, Robert; Sharman, Andy (13 October 2015), "Volkswagen changes diesel technology plan after emissions scandal", Financial Times, retrieved 13 October 2015
  103. Alistair Charlton. "VW emissions scandal: Volkswagen Group begins sending recall letters to UK drivers". International Business Times UK. Retrieved 27 October 2015.
  104. Jason Collie (13 October 2015). "First UK drivers get letters their Volkswagen is affected by emissions scandal". Evening Standard. Retrieved 27 October 2015.
  105. "VW emissions scandal: recalls, compensation & is your car affected?", Autoexpress.co.uk, retrieved 19 November 2015
  106. 1 2 Graham Ruddick. "VW to recall 8.5m diesel cars across Europe". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 16 October 2015. VW had proposed a voluntary recall of the cars, which would have meant that motorists only took their car in for repairs if they wanted to remove the defeat device. VW has told motorists their cars remain legal to drive on the basis that they passed emissions tests, even if this was only due to the defeat device.
    Alexander Dobrindt, the German transport minister, confirmed there would be a compulsory recall. He said: "VW is ordered to remove the software from all vehicles and to take appropriate measures to ensure that the emissions rules are fulfilled."
  107. 1 2 "Volkswagen recalls 8.5M European diesels amid global probes". CNET. CBS Interactive. 16 October 2015. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 16 October 2015. Originally, the brand wanted to issue a voluntary recall, which would have placed the onus on individual drivers to come in for any remedy. However, Germany's Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) ordered a compulsory recall of every single affected vehicle.
    Volkswagen chose to expand the recall beyond German borders in order to treat the issue as a European one
  108. "VW says can bounce back as recalls 8.5 million EU cars". reuters.com.
  109. dpa/shz.de (15 October 2015). "VW-Abgas-Skandal: Dieselgate: KBA spricht von "illegal" - und kämpft gegen Kritik - shz.de". shz. Retrieved 18 October 2015. Das KBA hält die Software in den betroffenen Diesel-Fahrzeugen des VW-Konzerns für illegal
  110. 1 2 "VW ruft im Abgas-Skandal viel mehr betroffene Autos zurück". www.t-online.de. 16 October 2015. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 16 October 2015. KBA ist der Meinung, dass die von Volkswagen eingesetzte Software rechtswidrig sei
  111. 1 2 "VW Will Recall 8.5 Million Rigged Diesels After German Hard Line". Bloomberg.com. 15 October 2015. The mandatory recall is the basis for callbacks throughout Europe
  112. "Germany orders mandatory recall of VW's scandal-hit cars". Financial Times. The KBA's decision is expected to set a precedent for how other regulators with similar responsibilities across the EU deal with the scandal
  113. 1 2 Ramsey, Jonathon (18 November 2015). "VW demonstrates a fix for the 1.6-liter TDI engine". Autoblog. Retrieved 19 November 2015.
  114. Hetzner, Christiaan (26 November 2015). "VW's surreal fix turns diesel scandal into a comedy". Automotive News. Retrieved 29 November 2015.
  115. Boston, William; Dauer, Ulrike (16 December 2015). "Auto-Parts Supplier Robert Bosch Probed Amid Emissions Scandal". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 16 December 2015.
  116. Volkswagengroup">, "Technical measures for the EA 189 diesel engines affected", YouTube, retrieved 29 November 2015
  117. "8,2 Millionen VW-Autos können umgerüstet werden" [8.2 million VW cars can be retrofitted]. Norddeutscher Rundfunk (in German). 25 November 2015. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
  118. Reiter, Chris (19 February 2016). "Your Rigged VW Will Get Fixed Sometime Between Now and 2048". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 19 February 2016.
  119. Gulde, Dirk. "VW-Diesel-Update: Leistung gleich gut - Verbrauch leicht erhöht" [VW diesel Update: performance equally well - consumption increased slightly]. Auto Motor und Sport (in German) (05/2016). Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  120. Cremer, Andreas; Orr, Bernard (16 March 2016). "VW diesel recalls in Germany delayed by weeks". Reuters. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  121. "Volkswagen delays recall of 160,000 cars due to software glitch". Reuters. 11 April 2016. Retrieved 11 April 2016.
  122. "Le chantage de Volkswagen pour faire taire la presse francaise", Le Canard Enchaine, 30 September 2015
  123. Meier, Christian (4 October 2015), VW entschuldigt sich mit riesiger Werbekampagne, retrieved 4 October 2015
  124. 1 2 'Volkswagen plans to refit diesel cars affected by emissions scandal VW's Spanish unit'. Autonews (Europe). Retrieved 29 September from http://europe.autonews.com/article/20150929/ANE/150929810/volkswagen-plans-to-refit-diesel-cars-affected-by-emissions-scandal.
  125. 'Volkswagen to refit cars affected by emissions scandal'. Reuters. Retrieved 29 September 2015 from http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/29/us-volkswagen-emissions-plan-idUSKCN0RT0OL20150929
  126. 1 2 Moylan, John (2 October 2015), "VW takes 4,000 cars off the UK market - BBC News", Bbc.com, retrieved 2 October 2015
  127. Associated Press (8 October 2015), "VW dealers in US running out of cars to sell as emissions scandal deepens", The Guardian, retrieved 8 October 2015
  128. "More VW trouble: 2016 diesels have new suspect software". The Big Story.
  129. 1 2 "VW diesel owners to get $1,000 in gift cards and vouchers". Yahoo Finance. Retrieved 9 November 2015.
  130. "Volkswagen faces major spending cuts and regulatory deadlines", Cnbc.com, retrieved 19 November 2015
  131. "VW repair bill rises as Germany says 540,000 recalled cars need hardware changes", Theguardian.com, retrieved 10 November 2015
  132. 1 2 "Volkswagen emissions scandal: Class action lawsuit filed on behalf of Australian owners - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)", Abc.net, retrieved 19 November 2015
  133. "Volkswagen to offer generous compensation for U.S. customers: fund head", Reuters.com, retrieved 9 February 2016
  134. "VW emissions scandal: all owners to receive compensation", Autoexpress.co.uk, retrieved 15 December 2015
  135. Christiaan Hetzner (21 November 2015), "VW refuses compensation for European owners of rigged diesels", Autonews.com, retrieved 22 November 2015
  136. 1 2 Saarinen, Martin (13 January 2016). "VW emissions scandal: no compensation for UK car owners". Auto Express. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
  137. 1 2 "European Commission to pursue VW over EU consumer compensation - FT.com", Ft.com, retrieved 9 February 2016
  138. Ewing, Jack (21 April 2016). "Volkswagen Reaches Deal in U.S. Over Emissions Scandal". The New York Times (The New York Times Company). Retrieved 25 April 2016.
  139. "VW reaches US deal in emissions scandal". BBC (UK). 21 April 2016. Retrieved 22 April 2016.
  140. Geuss, Megan (22 April 2016). "Volkswagen makes it official—it’s buying back 500,000 2.0L diesels". Ars Technica (US). Retrieved 22 April 2016.
  141. Adam Vaughan (29 October 2015). "VW emissions cheat estimated to cause 59 premature US deaths". The Guardian. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  142. Barrett, Steven R H (2015). "Impact of the Volkswagen emissions control defeat device on US public health". Environmental Research Letters 10: 114005. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114005. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  143. Jenna R Krall; Roger D Peng (9 December 2015). "The difficulty of calculating deaths caused by the Volkswagen scandal". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
  144. Davenport, Coral; Ewing, Jack (18 September 2015), "VW Is Said to Cheat on Diesel Emissions; U.S. Orders Big Recall", The New York Times, retrieved 18 September 2015
  145. Stickoxide (NOx), Stickoxide, Federal Agency for Envoriment / Bundesamt für Umwelt, Switzerland, 16 January 2015.
  146. Federal Office for Environment, Germany, 27 July 2015.
  147. Seth Borenstein (3 October 2015). "AP analysis: Dozens of deaths likely from VW pollution dodge". Associated Press.
  148. Oldenkamp, Rik (2016). "Valuing the human health damage caused by the fraud of Volkswagen". Environmental Pollution 212: 121–127. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.053.
  149. "Nitrous Oxide Emissions | Climate Change | US EPA". www3.epa.gov. Retrieved 2 October 2015.
  150. "ACCC update on VW enforcement investigation", accc.gov.au, 1 October 2015, retrieved 26 October 2015
  151. "Kamer richt bijzondere commissie op rond ‘dieselgate’" [Chamber sets up special committee on 'dieselgate'] (in Dutch). Belgium: Het Nieuwsblad. 14 October 2015. Retrieved 22 April 2016.
  152. Nollet, Jean-Marc; Dierick, Leen; Janssens, Dirk; Wollants, Bert (18 March 2016). "Parlementair Document 54K1720 — Dieselgate" (in Dutch). Belgium: Chamber of Representatives. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  153. Baert, Denny (26 February 2016). "Peeters schakelt versnelling hoger in Zafira-onderzoek" [Peeters switches gear in Zafira investigation]. De Redactie (in Dutch) (Belgium). Retrieved 22 April 2016.
  154. "Dieselgate – Volkswagen pode ser multada em até R$ 50 milhões no Brasil".
  155. "Environment Canada opens investigation into VW scandal". The Globe and Mail. 22 September 2015.
  156. "VW Recalls Diesel Vehicles in China to Correct Emissions". The New York Times. 11 October 2015.
  157. "质检总局关于进口大众汽车的风险警示通告 (AQSIQ Risk warning notice for imported Volkswagen vehicles)". General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine. 10 October 2015.
  158. "Volkswagen: The scandal explained". BBC. 23 September 2015.
  159. "Volkswagen Cars in Europe Affected by Tainted Software". The Wall Street Journal. 24 September 2015.
  160. "RAR cere reprezentanței Volkswagen din România lista cu mărcile care au dispozitive de manipulare a emisiilor – AGERPRES", Agerpres.ro, retrieved 25 September 2015
  161. "EU bank chief 'could recall VW loans'", BBC, 12 October 2015, retrieved 12 October 2015
  162. 1 2 Oliver, Christian; Brunsden, Jim (27 October 2015), "EU calls for investigation into Brussels' Volkswagen blunders", FT.com, retrieved 29 October 2015
  163. 1 2 3 4 "EU caves in to auto industry pressure for weak emissions limits", Theguardian.com, retrieved 7 December 2015
  164. "EU to investigate Volkswagen emissions scandal", BBC, retrieved 17 December 2015
  165. Toor, Amar (19 January 2016). "Renault to recall 15,000 vehicles for emissions tests in wake of VW scandal". The Verge. Retrieved 20 January 2016.
  166. "Renault to modify 15,000 new cars in emission scare". BBC News. Retrieved 2016-01-21.
  167. "Renault to modify 15,000 new cars in emission scare". BBC (UK). 19 January 2016. Retrieved 22 April 2016.
  168. VW: Prosecutors launch probe into former boss Winterkorn BBC News. Retrieved 28 September 2015
  169. Cremer, Andreas; Lewis, Barbara (1 October 2015), "VW says emission scandal investigations to take months", Reuters, retrieved 1 October 2015
  170. http://www.staatsanwaltschaften.niedersachsen.de/portal/live.php?navigation_id=22875&article_id=137584&_psmand=165
  171. "VW crisis: 'Fewer than 10' targeted in emissions probe". BBC News. Retrieved 17 October 2015.
  172. "Pressemitteilung Nr. 29/2015 Nachprüfungen des Kraftfahrt-Bundesamtes (KBA) Ermittlung des Stickoxidausstoßes bei mehr als 50 Fahrzeugen" [Press release no. 29/2015 inspections of the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) determination of the nitrogen oxide emissions by more than 50 vehicles] (PDF) (Press release) (in German). Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt. 11 November 2015. Retrieved 23 December 2015.
  173. "India orders probe into Volkswagen cars". Reuters. 25 September 2015.
  174. "Volkswagen scandal: Govt asks ARAI to inspect India-spec models". NYSE Post. 27 September 2015.
  175. "Volkswagen scandal: India likely to go for a probe". The Economic Times. 22 September 2015.
  176. "Probe into VW India emission standards extended till October end". The Hindu. 1 October 2015.
  177. Kollewe, Julia; Ruddick, Graham (6 October 2015), "VW scandal widens as France and Italy launch deception inquiries", The Guardian, retrieved 6 October 2015
  178. Police raid VW and Lamborghini offices in Italy. 'The Local'. Retrieved 16 October 2015 from http://www.thelocal.it/20151015/police-raid-vw-and-lamborghini-offices-in-italy
  179. "GroenLinks: Miljarden terugvorderen van autofabrikanten". RTL Nieuws (in Dutch).
  180. 1 2 "Volkswagen crisis: how many investigations is the carmaker facing? - Telegraph", Telegraph.co.uk, retrieved 29 October 2015
  181. Neagu, Alina (1 October 2015), "Registrul Auto Roman nu mai elibereaza carti de identitate pentru masinile noi diesel Volkswagen euro 5 - Auto", HotNews.ro, retrieved 1 October 2015
  182. 1 2 Jung-a, Song (2016-01-19). "South Korea plans criminal case against VW executive". Financial Times. ISSN 0307-1766. Retrieved 2016-01-21.
  183. "Pressure builds on Volkswagen CEO as emissions-cheating probe spreads". Reuters. 22 September 2015.
  184. Lee, Hyun-jeong (26 November 2015). "Korea confirms VW emissions rigging, suspends sales". The Korea Herald. Retrieved 26 November 2015.
  185. "VW Hires Former FBI Director To Deal With U.S. Regulators: News Updates". Green Car Reports. Retrieved 2016-01-21.
  186. "Korea Times". 23 March 2016. Retrieved 24 March 2016.
  187. Roman, David (28 October 2015), "Spanish Court Opens Criminal Probe of Volkswagen", Wall Street Journal, retrieved 29 October 2015
  188. Volkswagen to refit cars affected by emissions scandal Reuters. Retrieved 29 September 2015.
  189. "Volkswagen emissions scandal: Switzerland bans sale of some models", The Guardian, retrieved 27 September 2015
  190. "VW scandal: Porsche boss 'named new Volkswagen chief executive' – as it happened". The Daily Telegraph. 24 September 2015. Retrieved 25 September 2015.
  191. UK Transport Select Committee publishes response from Volkswagen UK MD (PDF), 21 December 2015
  192. "Diesel cars' emissions far higher on road than in lab, tests show". The Guardian. 21 April 2016.
  193. Ewing, Jack (21 September 2015). "Volkswagen Stock Falls as Automaker Tries to Contain Fallout". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 September 2015.
  194. Viswanatha, Aruna (21 September 2015). "U.S. Conducts Criminal Probe of Volkswagen, Sources Say". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  195. Gibson, Kate (22 September 2015). "Volkswagen's stock is a car wreck". CBS. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  196. "VW chief Martin Winterkorn defiant over emissions cheating scandal". The Guardian. 22 September 2015.
  197. "EPA extends VW diesel emissions probe to other brands in US", FT.com, retrieved 6 October 2015
  198. Steffen McGhie. "FBI bekræfter: Efterforskning af Volkswagen i gang" FBI confirms: Investigation of Volkswagen started Ingeniøren, 12 November 2015.
  199. Christie Smythe,Patricia Hurtado (22 September 2015). "Volkswagen Probed by States Over Pollution Cheating". Bloomberg.com.
  200. http://www3.epa.gov/otaq/cert/documents/vw-nov-caa-09-18-15.pdf
  201. 1 2 3 "VW blasted for shielding emissions documents from U.S. probe", Reuters.com, retrieved 9 January 2016
  202. "VW sued by US justice department". BBC. 4 January 2016. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  203. 1 2 "Volkswagen recall plans rejected by US regulators". BBC News. 12 January 2016. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
  204. "Air Resources Board rejects VW 2-liter diesel recall plan and issues Notice of Violation" (Press release). California Air Resources Board. 12 January 2016. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
  205. "New Jersey sues Volkswagen over excess diesel emissions", Reuters.com, retrieved 10 February 2016
  206. Pettersson, Edvard (6 October 2015). "Volkswagen Sued by West Virginia Over Clean Diesel Claims". Bloomberg. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
  207. Randazzo, Sara; Spector, Mike (29 March 2016). "FTC Sues Volkswagen Over Advertising of Diesel Vehicles". Wall Street Journal (US). Retrieved 30 March 2016.
  208. "34 And Maybe More: Class Action Lawsuits Pile Up Against VW : NPR", Npr.org, retrieved 1 October 2015
  209. "Volkswagen faces lawsuits over emissions deception". USA Today. 22 September 2015.
  210. "Angry diesel owners joining lawsuits against Volkswagen (w/video)", Autoblog.com, retrieved 10 February 2016
  211. "Windsor law firm launches $1B class-action suit against Volkswagen". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. 22 September 2015.
  212. "Volkswagen owners join class-action lawsuit after emissions scandal". City News Canada. 22 September 2015.
  213. Yerak, Becky; Karp, Gregory (21 September 2015). "Volkswagen owners should be nervous about emissions scandal, experts say". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  214. Frankel, Alison (1 October 2015), "How U.S. lawyers were so quick off the mark to sue Volkswagen", Reuters.com, retrieved 1 October 2015
  215. Chew, Jonathan (30 September 2015). "Investors are suing Volkswagen over its stock drop". Fortune. Retrieved 5 October 2015.
  216. Los Angeles Times (7 October 2015). "Apologizing for emissions scandal, VW exec promises to 'make things right'". The Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 11 October 2015.
  217. Bronstad, Amanda (8 December 2015). "VW Cases Head to San Francisco". Law.com (ALM Media Properties). Retrieved 25 April 2016.
  218. 1 2 3 Todd, Ross (21 January 2016). "VW Judge Names 22 Lawyers to Class Action 'Dream Team'". The Recorder (ALM Media Properties). Retrieved 25 April 2016.
  219. Hancock, Ben (21 April 2016). "VW Judge Asks for Secrecy in Settlement Talks". The Recorder (ALM Media Properties). Retrieved 25 April 2016.
  220. Matussek, Karin (14 March 2016). "VW Sued for $3.7 Billion in Germany Over Diesel Scandal". Bloomberg. Retrieved 30 March 2016.
  221. Moody's downgrades Volkswagen's ratings to A3/P-2; negative outlook Moody's Investors Service, 04 Nov 2015
  222. "Fitch Downgrades Volkswagen to 'BBB+'; Outlook Negative" (Press release). London. Fitch Ratings. 9 November 2015. Retrieved 9 November 2015.
  223. "TCI launches campaign against executive pay at Volkswagen - FT.com", Ft.com, retrieved 7 May 2016
  224. Dreyfuss, Emily (22 September 2015). "Volkswagen Says Emissions Deception Actually Affects 11 Million Cars". Wired. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  225. "VW TDI "Dieselgate" Scandal Affects 11 Million Cars, VW CEO Rumored to Step Down". TFL Car. 22 September 2015.
  226. "Skoda: 1,2 millioner biler er udstyret med snydeprogram". politiken.dk.
  227. PETER SIMONSEN. "To millioner Audi-biler udstyret med snydesoftware". finans.dk.
  228. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung GmbH (6 October 2015). "Neuer Volkswagen-Chef: VW will Mängel an Fahrzeugen bis 2016 beheben". FAZ.NET. Retrieved 11 October 2015.
  229. Plungis, Jeff; Hall, Dana (20 September 2015). "VW's Emissions Cheating Found by Curious Clean-Air Group". The Washington Post. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  230. "Volkswagen apologizes, stops diesel sales in wake of US emissions scandal". CNET. 22 September 2015.
  231. "The dirty drive behind diesel". The Globe and Mail. 22 September 2015.
  232. "Volkswagen's appalling clean diesel scandal, explained". Vox. 22 September 2015.
  233. "Volkswagen scandal: the cost of a car crash like no other". The Daily Telegraph. 26 September 2015.
  234. "Notices of Violations". EPA date=25 September 2015. Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  235. Steve Goldstein. "EPA tells VW it's found more diesels with defeat devices". MarketWatch.
  236. "EPA Finds 10,000 Additional Audi, Porsche And VW Diesels Faked Emissions". www.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2 November 2015.
  237. Beene, Ryan (26 October 2015). "Used VW diesel prices nosedive as fix remains unclear". Autoweek (US). Retrieved 26 October 2015.
  238. Taylor, Edward (15 March 2016). "VW Financial Services takes writedown for emissions scandal". Frankfurt. Reuters. Retrieved 15 March 2016.
  239. 1 2 Volkswagen AG (VOW.DE) Historical Prices, Yahoo! Finance, retrieved 5 October 2015
  240. Cremer, Andreas; Reuters (21 September 2015). "Volkswagen AG shares plummet after admitting it cheated on emission tests". Financial Post. Retrieved 21 September 2015.
  241. "Volkswagen shares slump for third consecutive day as emissions scandal escalates". The Daily Telegraph. 23 September 2015.
  242. "Volkswagen shares swing amid pressure on chief executive". Financial Times. 23 September 2015.
  243. "Volkswagen CEO's future is in doubt after $7.3 billion hit". Fortune (magazine). Retrieved 23 September 2015.
  244. Kottasova, Ivana. "Volkswagen emission cheating costs Qatar $5 billion". CNNMoney. Retrieved 28 September 2015.
  245. Korosec, Kirsten (1 December 2015). "Volkswagen's U.S. Auto Sales Got Crushed in November". Fortune.
  246. Welch, David; Hull, Dana (2 December 2015). "Volkswagen of America November Vehicle Sales Down 24.7%". Bloomberg.
  247. "Volkswagen Sales in South Korea Make Sharp Upturn". The Wall Street Journal. 2 December 2015.
  248. "The whiff of scandal is no brake for Volkswagen", Thetimes.co.uk, retrieved 7 May 2016
  249. "Volkswagen could pose bigger threat to German economy than Greek crisis". Reuters. 23 September 2015.
  250. "Lawsuit tsunami headed for Volkswagen". Deutsche Welle. 24 September 2015.
  251. Dyer, Ezra (21 September 2015). "This VW Diesel Scandal Is Much Worse Than a Recall". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  252. 'VW urged to come clean over which UK diesel vehicles are affected'. The Guardian. Para 11. Retrieved 29 September 2015 from http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/sep/27/vw-uk-diesel-vehicles-affected-lawyers.
  253. Julia Loehr, "Two-thirds of Germans still trust Volkswagen after emissions scandal", Theguardian.com, retrieved 21 October 2015
  254. Hennessy, Julie (9 October 2015), "VW Messed Up, But the Emissions Scandal won't Turn off Customers", Fortune (magazine), retrieved 11 October 2015
  255. Isidore, Chris. "Volkswagen sold 3,060 diesels in US last month before scandal". CNNMoney. Retrieved 3 October 2015.
  256. "AutoPacific - Volkswagen's Reputation Takes Big Hit with Vehicle Owners; AutoPacific Predicts Tough Road Ahead". www.autopacific.com. Retrieved 3 October 2015.
  257. "Merkel calls for 'full transparency' in Volkswagen emissions scandal". France 24. Reuters. 22 September 2015. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  258. Massey, Ray (24 September 2015). "Did Angela Merkel cover up Volkswagen emissions scandal?". Daily Mail Online. Retrieved 11 December 2015.
  259. Kalamur, Krishnadev (22 September 2015). "Clean Diesel No More: Volkswagen Scandal Grows". The Atlantic. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  260. "Calls to ban diesel cars from London over VW emissions scandal - BBC News", Bbc.com, retrieved 1 November 2015
  261. "VW Emissions Scandal: Motor Industry Reaction", News.sky.com, retrieved 1 October 2015
  262. "Nissan CEO says it would be hard to hide any effort to falsify emissions data". Reuters.
  263. "Volkswagen board gathers for crisis meeting". BBC. 23 September 2015.
  264. "VW Scandal Shows German Companies Are No Longer Big League – SPIEGEL ONLINE", Spiegel.de/international/business/vw-scandal-shows-german-companies-are-no-longer-big-league-a-1055098.html, retrieved 1 October 2015
  265. "The Other Victims of the Volkswagen Scandal: Dealers – The New York Times", Nytimes.com, retrieved 1 October 2015
  266. 1 2 Meiners, Jens (30 September 2015), "Shame and Degradation in Wolfsburg: The Fallout from the VW Diesel Scandal", Car and Driver, retrieved 1 October 2015
  267. Maddie Stone. "Elon Musk: Dieselgate Proves It's Time to Go Electric". Gizmodo. Gawker Media.
  268. "VW's stock to be removed from Dow Jones indexes". Detroit News. 29 September 2015.
  269. Green Car Journal (30 September 2015). "VW and Audi Returning Green Car Of The Year® Awards,... -- SAN LUIS OBISPO, Calif., Sept. 30, 2015 /PRNewswire/ --". prnewswire.com.
  270. "Volkswagen's emissions cheating scandal has a long, complicated history", Ars Technica, 8 October 2015, retrieved 10 October 2015
  271. "An Open Letter to California Air Resources Board Chairman Mary Nichols", Takepart.com, retrieved 20 December 2015
  272. "Elon Musk Has Some Thoughts On VW's Punishment", The Huffington Post, retrieved 20 December 2015
  273. Plungis, Jeff (22 February 2016). "VW May Be Forced to Clean the Air Its Diesel Cars Polluted". Bloomberg. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
  274. 1 2 3 Plungis, Jeff; Bloomberg News (27 September 2015), "Carmakers cheating on emissions almost as old as pollution tests", Daily Herald
  275. "Auto makers and EPA split victories on '73 vehicles", Chronicle-Telegram (  via Newspaperarchive (subscription required) ), 22 January 1973
  276. 1 2 United Press International (23 January 1973), "Defeat Devices Must Go", The News Herald (Panama City) (  via Newspaperarchive (subscription required) )
  277. 1 2 "VW emissions 'defeat device' isn't the first", AutoWeek, 24 September 2015, retrieved 26 September 2015
  278. 1 2 Myers, Laura; Associated Press (1 December 1995), "Cadillacs Recalled To Remove Illegal Device", The Buffalo News (Buffalo, New York:   via HighBeam (subscription required) )
  279. Alexander, David E. (August 1998), Clean Air Act Prohibits "Defeat Devices" in Vehicles, Engines; Honda to Spend $267 Mil, Ford $7.8 Mil. to Settle Charges (Adobe PDF), United States Environmental Protection Agency
  280. 1 2 3 United States Environmental Protection Agency (22 October 1998), Mack Trucks Diesel Engine Settlement

Further reading

External links

Wikinews has news on this topic:
External images
EA 189 engine, starboard side
EA 189 engine, port side
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, May 07, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.