Web-based experiments

A Web-based experiment or "Internet-based experiment" is an experiment that is conducted over the Internet. Psychology and linguistics are probably the disciplines that have used these experiments most widely, although a range of other disciplines use web-based experiments. Within Psychology most web-based experiments are conducted in the areas of Cognitive and Social Psychology.[1][2] This form of experimental setup has become increasingly popular because researchers can cheaply collect large amounts of data from a wide range of locations and people. A web-based experiment is a type of online research method.

Introduction

Experiments are an integral part of research, however, their integration with the Internet has been gradual. There are three main categories of experiments:

While natural and field experiments adapt well online, controlled (also known as laboratory) experiments have had some hurdles.

Affordances

In web-based experiments, there is less reliance on data gathered from populations of Western undergraduate students who often are often used as default research subjects in social science disciplines:[3]

Limitations

Web-based experiments can make it difficult to come-up with procedures that ensure internal validity:[6]

Methodologies

In responding to the call for an "online laboratory",[7] Hergueux and Jacquemet created a platform which:[8]

Examples

Use in psychology

Web experiments have been used to validate results from laboratory research and field research and to conduct new experiments that are only feasible if done online.[9] Further, the materials created for web experiments can be used in a traditional laboratory setting if later desired.

Interdisciplinary research using web experiments is rising. For example, a number of psychology and law researchers have used the web to collect data. Lora Levett and Margaret Bull Kovera examined whether opposing expert witnesses are effective in educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.[10] Rather than sensitizing jurors to flaws in the other expert's testimony, the researchers found that jurors became more skeptical of all expert testimony. In her experiment, this led to more guilty verdicts.

Levett and Kovera's research used a written transcript (law) of a trial, which participants then read before making their decision. This type of stimulus has been criticized by some researchers as lacking ecological validity—that is, it does not closely approximate a real-life trial. Many recommend the use of video where possible.

Researchers at New York University are currently conducting a psychology and law study that uses video of a criminal trial.[11] Participants who go to the website can watch the trial (less than one hour long) and act as jurors.

Researchers at University of Salford are currently conducting a number of studies to explore sound perception.[12] Sound experiments over the web are particularly difficult due to lack of control over sound reproduction equipment (see criticisms below).

A wide range of psychology experiments are conducted on the web. The Web Experiment List provides a way to recruit participants and archives past experiments (over 700 and growing).[13] A good resource for designing a web experiment is the free Wextor tool, which "dynamically creates the customized Web pages needed for the experimental procedure" and is remarkably easy to use.[14]

Use in economics

Jerome Hergueux and Nicolas Jacquemet developed an "online laboratory" to compare social preferences and risk aversion online and in person. They administred a Public good game, a Trust game, a Dictator game, and an Ultimatum game.[15]

Salganik, Dodds, and Watts conducted an experiment to measure social influence, specifically in the popularity rating of songs. Their use of the Internet allowed them to collect over 14,000 participants and examine the relationship between individual and collective behavior.[16]

As more experiments have been conducted in economics, the issue of an appropriate methodology and organization has been raised.[17]

Criticisms

Some researchers have expressed concern that Web-based experiments have weaker experimental controls compared to laboratory-based ones. For instance, it may be difficult to be confident that the subjects characteristics are what they claim (e.g., age, race, gender, etc.) and that they are taking the experiment seriously. Others have argued[18][19][20] that brick-and-mortar experiments are just as affected by these problems, if not more so. Schoeffler et al. (2013) compared laboratory- and web-based results (62 and 1,168 subjects) of an auditory experiment and found no significant differences.[21]

References

  1. ↑ Reips, U.-D. (2007). The methodology of Internet-based experiments. In A. Joinson, K. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U.-D. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology (pp. 373-390). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. ↑ Reips, U.-D. & Krantz, J. H. (2010). Conducting true experiments on the Web. In S. Gosling & J. Johnson, Advanced Internet Methods in the Behavioral Sciences (pp. 193-216). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  3. ↑ Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.
  4. ↑ Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788–8790.
  5. ↑ Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295–298.
  6. ↑ Hoffman, M., & Morgan, J. (2011). Who’s Naughty? Who’s Nice? Social Preferences in Online Industries. UC Berkeley Working Paper.
  7. ↑ Bainbridge, W. S. (2007). The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science, 317(5837), 472–476.
  8. ↑ Hergueux, J., & Jacquemet, N. (2014). Social preferences in the online laboratory: a randomized experiment. Experimental Economics, 18(2), 251–283.
  9. ↑ Ulf-Dietrich Reips, "Standards for Internet-Based Experimenting", 49 Experim. Psych. 243 (2002)
  10. ↑ Levett & Kovera, "The Effectiveness of Opposing Expert Witnesses for Educating Jurors about Unreliable Expert Evidence", 32 L. & Hum. Behav. 363 (2008)
  11. ↑ Virginia vs. McNamara
  12. ↑ http://www.sound101.org/
  13. ↑ http://wexlist.net
  14. ↑ http://wextor.org
  15. ↑ Hergueux, J., & Jacquemet, N. (2014). Social preferences in the online laboratory: a randomized experiment. Experimental Economics, 18(2), 251–283.
  16. ↑ Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006). "Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market". Science, 311(5762), 854–856.
  17. ↑ Ben Greiner, "An Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments"
  18. ↑ Reips,U.-D. (1996, October). Experimenting on the World WideWeb. Paper presented at the 1996 Society for Computers in Psychology conference, Chicago.
  19. ↑ "Virtual labs: Is there wisdom in the crowd?". New Scientist. 16 March 2007.
  20. ↑ http://www.apa.org/monitor/apr00/research.html
  21. ↑ Schoeffler et al. (2013). "An Experiment About Estimating the Number of Instruments in Polyphonic Music: A Comparison Between Internet and Laboratory Results"

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, May 03, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.