Wiener–Hopf method
The Wiener–Hopf method is a mathematical technique widely used in applied mathematics. It was initially developed by Norbert Wiener and Eberhard Hopf as a method to solve systems of integral equations, but has found wider use in solving two-dimensional partial differential equations with mixed boundary conditions on the same boundary. In general, the method works by exploiting the complex-analytical properties of transformed functions. Typically, the standard Fourier transform is used, but examples exist using other transforms, such as the Mellin transform.
In general, the governing equations and boundary conditions are transformed and these transforms are used to define a pair of complex functions (typically denoted with '+' and '−' subscripts) which are respectively analytic in the upper and lower halves of the complex plane, and have growth no faster than polynomials in these regions. These two functions will also coincide on some region of the complex plane, typically, a thin strip containing the real line. Analytic continuation guarantees that these two functions define a single function analytic in the entire complex plane, and Liouville's theorem implies that this function is an unknown polynomial, which is often zero or constant. Analysis of the conditions at the edges and corners of the boundary allows one to determine the degree of this polynomial.
Wiener–Hopf decomposition
The key step in many Wiener–Hopf problems is to decompose an arbitrary function  into two functions
 into two functions  with the desired properties outlined above.  In general, this can be done by writing
 with the desired properties outlined above.  In general, this can be done by writing
and
where the contours  and
 and  are parallel to the real line, but pass above and below the point
 are parallel to the real line, but pass above and below the point  , respectively.
, respectively.
Similarly, arbitrary scalar functions may be decomposed into a product of +/− functions, i.e.  , by first taking the logarithm, and then performing a sum decomposition.  Product decompositions of matrix functions (which occur in coupled multi-modal systems such as elastic waves) are considerably more problematic since the logarithm is not well defined, and any decomposition might be expected to be non-commutative.  A small subclass of commutative decompositions were obtained by Khrapkov, and various approximate methods have also been developed.
, by first taking the logarithm, and then performing a sum decomposition.  Product decompositions of matrix functions (which occur in coupled multi-modal systems such as elastic waves) are considerably more problematic since the logarithm is not well defined, and any decomposition might be expected to be non-commutative.  A small subclass of commutative decompositions were obtained by Khrapkov, and various approximate methods have also been developed.
Example
Let us consider the linear partial differential equation
where  is a linear operator which contains 
derivatives with respect to x and y, 
subject to the mixed conditions on y=0, for some prescribed 
function g(x),
 is a linear operator which contains 
derivatives with respect to x and y, 
subject to the mixed conditions on y=0, for some prescribed 
function g(x),
and decay at infinity i.e. f→0 as  .
. 
Taking a Fourier transform with respect to x results in the following ordinary differential equation
where  is a linear operator containing y derivatives only, P(k,y)  is a known function of y and k and
 is a linear operator containing y derivatives only, P(k,y)  is a known function of y and k and 
If a particular solution of this ordinary differential equation which satisfies the necessary decay at infinity is denoted  F(k,y), a general solution can be written as 
where C(k) is an unknown function to be determined by the boundary conditions on y=0.
The key idea is to split  into two separate functions,
 into two separate functions,  and
 and  which are analytic in the lower- and upper-halves of the complex plane, respectively,
 which are analytic in the lower- and upper-halves of the complex plane, respectively,
The boundary conditions then give
and, on taking derivatives with respect to  ,
,
Eliminating  yields
 yields
where
Now  can be decomposed into the product of functions
 can be decomposed into the product of functions  and
 and  which are analytic in the upper and lower half-planes respectively.
 which are analytic in the upper and lower half-planes respectively.  
To be precise,  where
 where
(Note that this sometimes involves scaling  so that it tends to
 so that it tends to  as
 as  .) We also decompose
.) We also decompose  into the sum of two functions
 into the sum of two functions  and
 and  which are analytic in the lower and upper half-planes respectively, i.e.,
 which are analytic in the lower and upper half-planes respectively, i.e.,
This can be done in the same way that we factorised  Consequently,
Consequently,
Now, as the left-hand side of the above equation is analytic in the lower half-plane, whilst the right-hand side is analytic in the upper half-plane, analytic continuation guarantees existence of an entire function which coincides with the left- or right-hand sides in their respective half-planes. Furthermore, since it can be shown that the functions on either side of the above equation decay at large k, an application of Liouville's theorem shows that this entire function is identically zero, therefore
and so
See also
External links
- Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001), "W/w097910", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4
- Wiener–Hopf method at Wikiwaves


















