Zero-lift drag coefficient
In aerodynamics, the zero-lift drag coefficient  is a dimensionless parameter which relates an aircraft's zero-lift drag force to its size, speed, and flying altitude.
 is a dimensionless parameter which relates an aircraft's zero-lift drag force to its size, speed, and flying altitude.
Mathematically, zero-lift drag coefficient is defined as  , where
, where  is the total drag coefficient for a given power, speed, and altitude, and
 is the total drag coefficient for a given power, speed, and altitude, and  is the lift-induced drag coefficient at the same conditions. Thus, zero-lift drag coefficient is reflective of parasitic drag which makes it very useful in understanding how "clean" or streamlined an aircraft's aerodynamics are. For example, a Sopwith Camel biplane of World War I which had many wires and bracing struts as well as fixed landing gear, had a zero-lift drag coefficient of approximately 0.0378.  Compare a
 is the lift-induced drag coefficient at the same conditions. Thus, zero-lift drag coefficient is reflective of parasitic drag which makes it very useful in understanding how "clean" or streamlined an aircraft's aerodynamics are. For example, a Sopwith Camel biplane of World War I which had many wires and bracing struts as well as fixed landing gear, had a zero-lift drag coefficient of approximately 0.0378.  Compare a  value of 0.0161 for the streamlined P-51 Mustang of World War II[1] which compares very favorably even with the best modern aircraft.
 value of 0.0161 for the streamlined P-51 Mustang of World War II[1] which compares very favorably even with the best modern aircraft. 
The drag at zero-lift can be more easily conceptualized as the drag area ( ) which is simply the product of zero-lift drag coefficient and aircraft's wing area (
) which is simply the product of zero-lift drag coefficient and aircraft's wing area ( where
 where  is the wing area). Parasitic drag experienced by an aircraft with a given drag area is approximately equal to the drag of a flat square disk with the same area which is held perpendicular to the direction of flight. The Sopwith Camel has a drag area of 8.73 sq ft (0.811 m2), compared to 3.80 sq ft (0.353 m2) for the P-51. Both aircraft have a similar wing area, again reflecting the Mustang's superior aerodynamics in spite of much larger size.[1] In another comparison with the Camel, a very large but streamlined aircraft such as the Lockheed Constellation has a considerably smaller zero-lift drag coefficient (0.0211 vs. 0.0378) in spite of having a much larger drag area (34.82 ft² vs. 8.73 ft²).
 is the wing area). Parasitic drag experienced by an aircraft with a given drag area is approximately equal to the drag of a flat square disk with the same area which is held perpendicular to the direction of flight. The Sopwith Camel has a drag area of 8.73 sq ft (0.811 m2), compared to 3.80 sq ft (0.353 m2) for the P-51. Both aircraft have a similar wing area, again reflecting the Mustang's superior aerodynamics in spite of much larger size.[1] In another comparison with the Camel, a very large but streamlined aircraft such as the Lockheed Constellation has a considerably smaller zero-lift drag coefficient (0.0211 vs. 0.0378) in spite of having a much larger drag area (34.82 ft² vs. 8.73 ft²).
Furthermore, an aircraft's maximum speed is proportional to the cube root of the ratio of power to drag area, that is:
![V_{max}\ \propto\ \sqrt[3]{power/f}](../I/m/6b7dd0e96a5584fbad2ff47ef78564a2.png) .[1] .[1]
Estimating zero-lift drag[1]
As noted earlier,  .
.
The total drag coefficient can be estimated as:
![C_D = \frac{550 \eta P}{\frac{1}{2} \rho_0 [\sigma S (1.47V)^3]}](../I/m/caa20e39ccc15712e7d7d55b4c1834de.png) , ,
where  is the propulsive efficiency, P is engine power in horsepower,
 is the propulsive efficiency, P is engine power in horsepower,  sea-level air density in slugs/cubic foot,
 sea-level air density in slugs/cubic foot,  is the atmospheric density ratio for an altitude other than sea level, S is the aircraft's wing area in square feet, and V is the aircraft's speed in miles per hour. Substituting 0.002378 for
 is the atmospheric density ratio for an altitude other than sea level, S is the aircraft's wing area in square feet, and V is the aircraft's speed in miles per hour. Substituting 0.002378 for  , the equation is simplified to:
, the equation is simplified to:
 . .
The induced drag coefficient can be estimated as:
 , ,
where  is the lift coefficient, A is the aspect ratio, and
 is the lift coefficient, A is the aspect ratio, and  is the aircraft's efficiency factor.
 is the aircraft's efficiency factor.
Substituting for  gives:
 gives:
 , ,
where W/S is the wing loading in lb/ft².
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Loftin, LK, Jr. "Quest for performance: The evolution of modern aircraft. NASA SP-468". Retrieved 2006-04-22.