| 1896 Premiership season |
|---|
| Teams |
13 |
|---|
| Premiers |
Collingwood
(1st premiership) |
|---|
| Matches played |
118 |
|---|
|
|
The 1896 Victorian Football Association season was the 20th season of the Australian rules football competition. It was the final season in which the Association was the highest level of senior football competition in Victoria, with eight of its strongest members leaving the league and establishing the rival Victorian Football League from 1897.
The season was opened on 2 May, and concluded on 3 October with a playoff match for the premiership between the top two teams, in which Collingwood defeated South Melbourne by one goal. It was Collingwood's first VFA premiership.
Premiership season
In 1896, the VFA competition consisted of thirteen teams of 20 on-the-field players each. Because there was an odd number of teams, at least one team had a bye each week; the idle club often travelled to Ballarat to play one of the local senior clubs in a non-premiership match.
When reporting match scores in 1896, the number of goals and behinds scored by each team is given; however, only the number of goals scored is considered when determining the result of a match. This was the final VFA season before the introduction of the modern system of scoring, in which six points is awarded for a goal and one point is awarded for a behind.
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Round 4
Round 5
Round 6
Round 7
Round 8
Round 9
Round 10
Round 11
Round 12
Round 13
Round 14
Round 15
Round 16
Round 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Round 17[35] |
|
|
| Saturday, 5 September |
Fitzroy 5.6 |
def. |
Melbourne 3.6 |
Fitzroy Cricket Ground |
[36]
|
| Saturday, 5 September |
St Kilda 6.7 |
def. |
Footscray 5.1 |
St Kilda Cricket Ground |
[36]
|
| Saturday, 5 September |
Collingwood 6.8 |
def. |
Essendon 3.4 |
Victoria Park |
[36]
|
| Saturday, 5 September |
Geelong 5.6 |
def. by |
South Melbourne 6.9 |
Corio Oval |
[36]
|
| Saturday, 5 September |
Richmond 2.1 |
def. by |
Williamstown 4.13 |
Richmond Cricket Ground |
[36]
|
| Saturday, 5 September |
North Melbourne 6.6 |
def. |
Carlton 1.9 |
North Melbourne Recreation Reserve |
[36]
|
|
Bye: Port Melbourne |
|
|
- These matches were originally to be played on Saturday, 29 August, but inclement weather during the week had rendered the grounds unplayable. As such, this round, and all those which followed it, were postponed by one week.[37]
|
Round 18
Round 19
Round 20
Ladder
The Association had no formal tie-breakers in cases where clubs were equal on premiership points.
Playoff match
After the rostered premiership matches were complete, Collingwood and South Melbourne finished level on 58 premiership points, requiring the clubs to meet in a playoff match to determine the premiership. It was the second time in VFA history that a playoff match had been staged for the premiership – the first having occurred in 1878 – but it was the first time that the playoff was necessitated by a tie between two clubs for first place.[43]
It is often said that this playoff match was required only because, in addition to having equal win-loss records, Collingwood and South Melbourne finished with an equal record of goals scored and goals conceded; this version of events is given in several modern references.[44][45] However, contemporary sources reveal this to be a myth; Association Rule 19, which specifically covered the event of a playoff, did not consider goals scored or conceded as a means of tie-breaker for the premiership,[46] and newspaper match previews leading into Round 19 made clear that win-loss record was the only consideration for determining whether or not there would be a playoff.[47] Additionally, the clubs' for-and-against records were not quite identical, as Collingwood had scored one goal more than South Melbourne for the season;[43] but that the tallies were so close helped to perpetuate the myth.
- Scheduling controversy
The fact that a playoff would be required between Collingwood and South Melbourne was known after Round 19; both Collingwood and South Melbourne were scheduled with a bye in Round 20, and third-placed Essendon was six premiership points adrift with no chance of finishing first.[43] As a result, the two clubs organised to stage their playoff match on Saturday 26 September, the same day as the other Round 20 matches, at the neutral East Melbourne Cricket Ground; arrangements were made and advertisements were published. However, on the Tuesday, delegates from all Association clubs voted 11–8 in favour of postponing the playoff match to Saturday 3 October, the following weekend.[48] Arguments in favour of postponing the match centred mostly around the fact that a playoff match would detract from interest, attendances and gate takings at the rostered Round 20 matches. Arguments in favour of staging the playoff during Round 20 were to remove the need for the clubs to train for an extra week, and that public desire for the match to be held on 26 September was strong. A second meeting was held on the Wednesday night after Collingwood and South Melbourne objected to the postponement, but the Association delegates again voted in favour of postponing the match, albeit by a reduced majority of 10–9.[46]
Collingwood and South Melbourne initially discussed playing the match on 26 September anyway, in spite of the Association's decision, but this proved to be unworkable as the Association would not provide an umpire.[46] Collingwood, at short notice, arranged to play Bendigo Football League premiers Eaglehawk at Victoria Park during Round 20, winning 6.7 – 3.6; South Melbourne used the week as a bye.[43]
- Match summary
The playoff itself was played at a high standard in front of 12,000 spectators at the East Melbourne Cricket Ground. Two late goals in the first quarter allowed Collingwood to open up a 4–2 lead at quarter time, but Collingwood went goalless through the second and third quarters as South Melbourne dominated the game and regained the lead at 5–4. Collingwood tied the game early in the final quarter, then kicked the winning goal inside the final ten minutes to win 6–5.[49][50]
Notable events
- Following Collingwood's 4–3 win against Carlton in Round 5, it was revealed that, due to a timekeepers' error, the final quarter had lasted 30 minutes instead of the regulation 25 minutes. Because Collingwood had scored the winning goal inside those extra five minutes – and, in fact, on the final bell – Carlton formally challenged to have the result amended to a 3–3 draw.[52] The challenge was dismissed at the Association's next meeting, held three weeks later.[53] The ultimate importance of this decision on the final placings should not be overlooked, considering that Collingwood tied for first place and Carlton tied for last place on the ladder.
- In its Round 9 match against Essendon, Richmond was penalised for having too many men on the field. Last-placed Richmond was leading first-placed Essendon at half time by the score 3.3 – 2.4, but Essendon called for a head count after half time, and Richmond was found to have had 21 men on the field. Richmond's score was reset to zero, and Essendon went on to win 9.9 – 1.4.[19] Four weeks later against Port Melbourne, Richmond was subjected to another head count at half-time, and the umpire again found Richmond to have had 21 men on the field; but he counted again after the players had gone to the dressing rooms and found only twenty, so Richmond was not penalized.[54]
- Local fans at the North Melbourne Recreation Reserve rioted following North Melbourne's 4–5 loss to Collingwood in Round 12, mostly venting their anger against umpire Roberts' interpretation of the little mark. They invaded the field, some with weapons, and players from both teams were forced to protect Roberts from the mob. McDougall of North Melbourne was the most badly injured player in the riot, concussed after a blow to the head. The incident added to the already bad reputation of the North Melbourne ground and the "ruffianly element" of its patrons.[55]
- On 2 October, the day before the playoff match for the premiership, six of the league's strongest clubs – Collingwood, Essendon, Fitzroy, Geelong, Melbourne and South Melbourne – opted to split from the Victorian Football Association, and established the Victorian Football League as a distinct rival competition from 1897; Carlton and St Kilda were also invited to defect, bringing the size of the new league to eight clubs. The split was the culmination of several years of concerns from the strongest clubs about the standard and competitiveness of the Association. As such, the VFA ceased to serve as the top senior level of football in Victoria after twenty seasons; it has continued operating as a second-tier senior competition since.[56]
Charity Cup
On the Saturday between Rounds 5 and 6, a Charity Cup event was held, the gate takings from which were donated to charity. The event consisted of four clubs – Collingwood, Essendon, Port Melbourne and South Melbourne – contesting a knock-out tournament of shortened matches at the Melbourne Cricket Ground on a single afternoon, a format which has since become known as a lightning premiership. Each match was played over two periods of twenty minutes each.[52] The competition was won by Essendon.
The Charity Cup was used to trial two new rules in the VFA:[52]
- The use of boundary umpires, one on each sideline, to conduct boundary throw-ins; at the time, this responsibility fell to the field umpire in the VFA
- The removal of the "little mark", which meant the ball had to be kicked at least ten yards for the umpire to call a mark.
Both of these rule changes were soon adopted into all levels of the game.
References
- ↑ "Opening of the football season". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 2 May 1896. p. 4.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (4 May 1896). "Football – Opening of the season". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). pp. 5–6.
- ↑ "Football". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 6 May 1896. p. 6.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (11 May 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). pp. 5–6.
- ↑ "Football – Today's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 16 May 1896. p. 4.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (18 May 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). pp. 5–6.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 19 May 1896. p. 7.
- 1 2 3 Observer (25 May 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- 1 2 3 Observer (26 May 1896). "Football – the birthday matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 27 May 1896. p. 7.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (1 June 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 9 June 1896. p. 7.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (15 June 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 7.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 17 June 1896. p. 7.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (22 June 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 23 June 1896. p. 3.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (29 June 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 30 June 1896. p. 3.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Observer (6 July 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 7 July 1896. p. 3.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (13 July 1896). "Football – Essendon beaten by Geelong". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 14 Jul 1896. p. 7.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (20 July 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 22 July 1896. p. 6.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (27 July 1896). "Football – some exciting games and a riot". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- ↑ "Football". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 28 July 1896. p. 3.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (3 August 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 4 August 1896. p. 3.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (10 August 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 11 August 1896. p. 3.
- 1 2 3 4 5 Observer (17 August 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). pp. 5–6.
- ↑ The Argus misprinted the final score of this game as 4.2–4.2, although the same article's prose made clear that Footscray won. The Age confirms the final score. Follower (17 August 1896). "The Football Season - public interest revived". The Age (Melbourne, VIC). p. 3.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 18 August 1896. p. 3.
- 1 2 3 4 5 Observer (24 August 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). pp. 5–6.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 25 August 1896. p. 7.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (7 September 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- ↑ "Football – Senior matches postponed". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 31 August 1896. p. 7.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 9 September 1896. p. 6.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 14 September 1896. p. 6.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 15 September 1896. p. 3.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Observer (21 September 1896). "Football – Notes on Saturday's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). pp. 5–6.
- ↑ "Football – Victorian Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 25 September 1896. p. 7.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Observer (28 September 1896). "Football Notes". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- ↑ "1897 The Split". Oz Sports History. Retrieved 12 January 2013.
- ↑ "1896 The First Grand Final". Victoria Park. 2009. Retrieved 12 January 2013.
- 1 2 3 "The Football Quarrel". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 24 September 1896. p. 5.
- ↑ "Football – Today's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 19 September 1896. p. 9.
- ↑ "Football Complication – clubs in conflict". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 23 September 1896. p. 6.
- 1 2 Follower (5 October 1896). "Football Premiership". The Age (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
- 1 2 Observer (5 October 1896). "The Football Premiership". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 5.
- 1 2 The Argus misprinted the three quarter time score of this game as Collingwood 5.9 vs South Melbourne 4.6, cf. Collingwood 4.6 vs South Melbourne 5.9; the same article's prose made clear that South Melbourne led by one goal at three quarter time, and The Age confirms the three quarter time score as being the same as shown here.
- 1 2 3 "Football". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 2 June 1896. p. 3.
- ↑ "Football – Today's matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 20 June 1896. p. 4.
- ↑ "A comfortable win". The Australasian (Melbourne, VIC). 8 August 1896. p. 259.
- ↑ "A football row". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 27 July 1896. p. 5.
- ↑ "New Football Association". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). 3 October 1896. p. 10.
- 1 2 3 Observer (8 June 1896). "Football – The charity matches". The Argus (Melbourne, VIC). p. 6.
|
|---|
| | Current clubs | |
|---|
| | Former clubs | |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| | Representative side | |
|---|
| | Governing bodies | |
|---|
| | Professional clubs | |
|---|
| | Statewide leagues | |
|---|
| | Metropolitan leagues | |
|---|
| | Regional leagues (major) | |
|---|
| | Regional leagues (district) | |
|---|
| | Women's leagues | |
|---|
| | Defunct leagues | |
|---|
| | Principal venues | |
|---|
|